“Macron n’a pas d’enfants, il veut piquer les nôtres”: l’afficheur Michel-Ange Flori crée à nouveau la polémique
août 27, 2021
Michel-Ange Flori crée à nouveau la polémique avec une affiche visant le président de la République, Emmanuel Macron.
Propriétaires de plusieurs centaines de panneaux publicitaires dans le Var, Michel-Ange Flori a publié la photo d’une de ses affiches de sa campagne sur Facebook. On y aperçoit deux enfants se tenir la main, avec un cartable sur le dos et la phrase suivante. “Macron n’a pas d’enfants, il veut piquer les nôtres”. Ce panneau fait référence à la vaccination des 12-18 ans contre le coronavirus, qui est en route depuis juin 2021.
Ce n’est pas la première fois que l’afficheur, qui se décrit comme un défenseur de la liberté d’expression, cible le président de la République. En juillet dernier, des affiches comparant Emmanuel Macron à Hitler avaient été placardées dans le sud de la France. “Obéis, fais-toi vacciner”, pouvait-on lire en légende.
Une enquête pour “injure publique sur la personne de la République” avait été ouverte par le parquet de Toulon, après une plainte déposée par le président français. Une procédure qui n’a visiblement pas refroidi l’afficheur controversé.
On trouve des pépites, quand on cherche bien, ou que le hasard (appelé Dieu par les croyants) les met sous nos pas, sur Twitter. La censure massive qui s’est abattue depuis l’opération mondialiste baptisée covid n’a pas pu tout nettoyer, pour reprendre le mot de Bruno Patino, l’apparatchik rebelle placé par les forces occultes à la tête d’Arte.
Nous savons aussi que la « pandémie de covid » n’est qu’un masque augmenté médiatiquement ( et aussi en laboratoire) sur les grippes saisonnières, qu’elles soient de métropole ou d’Outre-mer, pour ce qui nous concerne, nous Français.
Nous savons aussi que beaucoup de personnes mortes estampillées du virus ont été ajoutées à la colonne covid pour les besoins de la cause oligarchique, afin de mettre la pression sur les vivants et amener le troupeau dans l’enclos prévu – depuis longtemps – à cet effet.
Maintenant, découvrons ensemble cette nouvelle pépite, qui donne un écho certain à la situation actuelle. En matière de journalisme, la vérité se situe souvent dans le passé. Voici le thread (la déclinaison de messages courts) en question.
« Est-ce que vous connaissez le scandale traversé par Sanofi Pasteur avec son vaccin contre la dengue appelé Dengvaxia ? Franchement, ça mérite qu’on y jette un œil. Très riche en enseignements…
Après 20 ans de recherche et beaucoup de millions investis, Sanofi publie en 2015 un article dans le prestigieux New England Journal of Medicine : une étude sur 30 000 enfant démontre l’efficacité d’un nouveau vaccin contre la dengue.
C’est une excellente nouvelle car la dengue est transmise par les moustiques, son taux de létalité est de 2,5 %, jusqu’à 20 % pour la dengue hémorragique. Une campagne de vax aux Philippines permettrait de sauver des milliers de vies et prévenir 10 000 hospitalisations sur 5 ans.
À l’époque, le Dr Scott Halstead de Washington, spécialiste de la dengue depuis des décennies, décortique l’étude de Sanofi… et manque de tomber de sa chaise. Il décèle une dangerosité du vaccin : « the plasma leakage syndrome » = des hémorragies internes.
Il alerte 6 journaux scientifiques, et adresse même une vidéo au gouvernement philippin. Il lance une alerte… qui ne sera pas entendue.
En juillet 2016, l’OMS donne son accord pour les enfants de 9 à 16 ans, la campagne qui avait déjà commencé, se poursuit.
Sauf que… en novembre 2017, soit 16 mois après l’avis favorable de l’OMS, Sanofi publie de nouveaux résultats : WARNING CATASTROPHE les doutes sont confirmés. Pas de risque pour ceux qui ont déjà eu la dengue, mais risque hémorragique pour ceux qui ne l’ont jamais eue. »
Naturellement, nous avons vérifié cette histoire, et parce que nous sommes bien lus dans les territoires hors métropole, nous avons retrouvé le Dengvaxia, toujours présent, sur mesvaccins.net. Dès l’intro, l’avertissement est clair :
Ce vaccin n’est pas recommandé pour les voyageurs d’une zone non endémique vers une zone endémique. Il n’est pas recommandé pour les résidents de La Réunion et de Mayotte. Pour les personnes qui vivent en Guadeloupe, en Martinique ou en Guyane, la vaccination n’est pas recommandée mais peut toutefois être proposée à celles apportant une preuve documentée d’une infection confirmée virologiquement.
Nous nous sommes arrêtés au chapitre des « contre-indications » :
Hypersensibilité à la substance active, à l’un des excipients mentionnés à la rubrique « Composition » ou survenue après une administration antérieure de Dengvaxia ou d’un vaccin contenant les mêmes composants.
Sujets présentant un déficit de l’immunité cellulaire congénital ou acquis, y compris les sujets ayant reçu des traitements immunosuppresseurs tels qu’une chimiothérapie ou une corticothérapie par voie générale à fortes doses (par exemple 20 mg ou 2 mg/kg de prednisone pendant au moins 2 semaines) au cours des 4 semaines précédant la vaccination.
Sujets présentant une infection par le VIH symptomatique, ou asymptomatique accompagnée de signes d’altération de la fonction immunitaire.
Femmes enceintes (voir rubrique « Grossesse »).
Femmes qui allaitent (voir rubrique « Allaitement »).
Mais après les contre-indications, il y a les « mises en garde et précautions d’emplois »…
Les sujets sans antécédent d’infection par le virus de la dengue ou pour lesquels cette information n’est pas connue ne doivent pas être vaccinés car un risque accru d’hospitalisation pour dengue et de dengue cliniquement sévère (principalement dengue hémorragique de grade 1 ou 2) a été observé chez ces sujets au cours du suivi à long terme des études cliniques (voir rubrique « Effets indésirables »).
En l’absence de documentation d’une infection antérieure par le virus de la dengue, un antécédent d’infection doit être confirmé par le bais d’analyses sérologiques avant la vaccination. Pour éviter la vaccination de sujets faux positifs, seules les méthodes d’analyses avec une performance adéquate en terme de spécificité et de réactivité croisée selon l’épidémiologie locale de la maladie doivent être utilisées.
La revue trimestrielle XXI a publié un gros sujet sur cette histoire, sujet repris par France Culture.
Ceci explique peut-être pourquoi Sanofi ne s’est pas vraiment lancé dans la course aux vaccins contre le « covid » (même s’il vient d’annoncer en préparer un pour la fin d’année)…
Comme prévu, sur E&R :
E&R | 20 août |63PolitiqueSantéComment l’oligarchie a utilisé la dengue en Outre-mer et la grippe en métropole pour tromper les Français « La situation sanitaire, je le dis et pèse mes mots, est sans commune mesure avec ce que j’ai pu voir jusqu’ici. La virulence des variants, la puissance de l’épidémie, les jeunes patients sont une réalité que chacun doit regarder en face. Avec courage, sang froid et détermination. Je le dis, sans provocation, mais avec ma conviction de médecin, et de ministre. Le retard pris par la vaccination ne peut (…)
E&R | 24 août |131Justice & DroitSantéLe ministre du Big Pharma Olivier Véran dénonce « une épidémie de non-vaccinés »Du Goebbels dans le texte « Il faut être extrêmement vigilant et je demande aux Français qui nous regardent de faire très gaffe dans les jours et semaines à venir, de respecter les gestes barrière, de porter le masque partout où c’est nécessaire, de se laver les mains, vous savez tout cela. » Olivier Véran (@olivierveran) sur la situation sanitaire aux Antilles : « C’est une épidémie de non-vaccinés » (…)
Coroner rules BBC Radio host died from COVID jab ‘complications’ after media downplayed link
In the UK alone, over 1,000 have died soon after receiving the AstraZenica jab; a total of 1,590 post-vaccination deaths have been recorded here. Lisa Shaw, a BBC radio presenter who died after being treated for blood clots following an Astrazeneca COVID-19 injection.Family handout
NEWCASTLE, England, (LifeSiteNews) – A British coroner has found that BBC Radio host Lisa Shaw died from “complications of an AstraZeneca Covid vaccine.”
Today, after a hearing that lasted less than an hour, Newcastle senior coroner Karen Dilks declared that “Lisa died due to complications of an AstraZeneca Covid vaccine.”
Previously, the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and other news media had downplayed the role the jab played in Shaw’s death. However, thousands of people worldwide have died or suffered other serious side effects after receiving the experimental COVID-19 inoculations. In the UK alone, over 1,000 have died soon after receiving the AstraZenica jab; a total of 1,590 post-vaccination deaths have been recorded here.
Shaw, 44, died on May 21, 2021, leaving a husband and child. The popular radio host had received her first dose of AstraZeneca’s COVID injection on April 29, 2021.
On May 13, Shaw was admitted to University Hospital of North Durham after complaining of “severe” headaches. When a scan revealed she had venous sinus thrombosis, Shaw was transferred to the Royal Victoria Infirmary in Newcastle. There the radio personality underwent a number of procedures as surgeons tried to relieve the pressure and bleeding on her brain.
Dr. Christopher Johnson, a consultant in anaesthetics and intensive care at the Royal Victoria, told the coroner that the surgery was unable to help with the cause of the clotting, and that it had been too risky to attempt removing the clots “manually.”
Pathologist Tuomo Polvikoski confirmed that Shaw had been active and healthy before taking the injection. The mother of one was not known to have any underlying health problems.
Regarding the “vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia,” Shaw had developed, Polvikoski stated that he “strongly supports the idea that it was, indeed, vaccine induced.”
“Based on available clinical information, it seems to be the most likely explanation,” he said.
Johnson downplayed any concerns about the injection, however, stating that this “was one of the first cases of this kind of vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis I had seen and had been seen nationally.”
Media reports at the time of her death in May stated merely that Shaw had been in hospital for a “short illness.” Fuller details only began to emerge after her family stepped in and revealed the link to one of the experimental COVID-19 injections.
Shaw’s relatives released a second statement following her death, revealing that Shaw had developed “severe” headaches only one week after having the Oxford/AstraZeneca injection and had fallen seriously ill a few days later. Describing some details of her hospital visits, Shaw’s family said she had been treated for blood clots.
subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada Catholic
Following this statement, media outlets subsequently reported that Shaw died shortly after having received the COVID-19 injection.
On her Youtube channel, British pundit Katie Hopkins shared allegations that the family had been told by the hospital that Shaw’s death would “definitely not be documented” as linked to the vaccine.
The BBC, Shaw’s former employer, reported that it had seen the interim fact-of-death certificate; apparently it listed “complication of AstraZeneca Covid-19 virus vaccination” only as a consideration, with the cause of death only to be determined following the investigation.
Official government advice in the U.K. in May was that those aged under 40 should be offered an alternative to the AstraZeneca injection, due to the risk of blood clots and thrombocytopenia. The injection has been subject to numerous headlines in recent months, as reports of blood clots following its administration have led a number of countries to suspend the injection for younger people.
However, current advice in the U.K. is that the injection can be given to adults over 18, and recipients are asked to seek “urgent medical attention if you get symptoms of a severe allergic reaction.” — Article continues below Petition — PETITION: Ban COVID vaccine mandates for schools and universities! 9277 have signed the petition.Let’s get to 10000! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Official data released by the British government around the time of Shaw’s death recorded a total of 5,820 blood disorders for the AstraZeneca injection from January 4 through May 19. There were 631 accounts of thrombocytopenia and 172 cases of immune thrombocytopenia in that same time period.
A May statement released by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) about Shaw’s death read: “As with any serious suspected adverse reaction, reports with a fatal outcome are fully evaluated by the MHRA, including an assessment of post-mortem details if available. Our detailed and rigorous review into reports of blood clots occurring together with thrombocytopenia is ongoing.”
Since then, the number of adverse reactions and deaths has grown. The most recent datadocuments 1,590 people who died following the injections, with 1,056 of those dying after the Astra/Zeneca injection. There are now 851 accounts of thrombocytopenia, 218 accounts of immune thrombocytopenia, and 7,354 blood disorders recorded following the Astra/Zeneca injection alone.
Many Christians, among others, are refusing to take the experimental inoculations, not only because of the harm they have done, but because cell-lines derived from aborted babies have been used in their development.
‘There is no product in human history that has ever created such a swathe of injuries to the public’: doctors speak out against COVID jab risks
Dr. Jane Orient suggested people should think carefully about taking ‘a one in a million chance of having their heart destroyed or damaged to receive a vaccine for a condition that they would almost certainly survive.’
TUCSON, Arizona (LifeSiteNews) – Following the recent decision of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to give its approval to the Pfizer-developed COVID-19 vaccine, doctors and medical experts from the Truth for Health Foundation convened to warn the public against the dangers of the shots that the FDA is not publishing.
The third meeting in the “Stop the Shot” series, broadcast on LifeSiteNews August 26, brought together experts from around the world to discuss the safety record of the newly approved Pfizer vaccine, as well as its market competitors, with the purpose of forming “a citizens’ safety review board on the COVID vaccine.”
“We are stepping up to serve the public,” Truth for Health president and CEO Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet, M.D., said, “because the CDC [U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] and FDA have failed to evaluate updated safety information that has been coming to light since these experimental shots were launched.”
Vliet added that these bodies “have failed to report to the public accurate information about medical risks and complications, and the rising deaths that have occurred since the experimental COVID shots were launched.”
Dr. Peter McCullough, M.D., is the chief medical adviser to the Truth for Health Foundation as well as a cardiologist, epidemiologist, and professor of medicine. Appearing at the conference, McCullough criticized the FDA and CDC for failing to produce an adequate safety review of the COVID jabs they have sponsored and that subsequently have been mandated by “40 percent of the top five hundred companies.”
“Americans have questions,” he said, which is why the Truth for Health Foundation is setting up its own “citizens’ safety review board.”
The renowned physician explained that he has chaired over 24 data safety monitoring boards for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), “big pharmaceutical and device committees, and multiple different divisions of federal agencies.” With his experience on these health product safety boards, coupled with the latest data showing Pfizer’s jab to have a 42 percent efficacy level, McCullough noted that “at this point in time, the lead vaccine that’s up for full approval has failed.”
Accordingly, “Americans have been asked on faith to sign up and take one of these vaccines with no information, with a minimal informed consent,” correlating with over 500,000 vaccine injuries, the doctor said.
“These injuries fall into very serious categories,” he continued. “Over 12,000 certified deaths by the CDC, over 200,000 composite deaths, hospitalizations, urgent care visits, and office visits. A staggering number of myocardial infarctions, strokes, and over 4,000 cases of myocarditis, a heart inflammation in young individuals. Permanent damage to the neurologic systems, hematologic systems, immunologic systems.”
“As we sit here today, there is no product in human history that has ever created such a swathe of injuries to the public that’s been asked to participate in taking one of these vaccines,” he said.
McCullough has also produced a study into the safety data of the mRNA jabs as used in pregnant women, concluding that the data was “inadequate.” As a result, McCullough determined that “they should not be used in pregnancy.”
subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada Catholic
During clinical trials “the FDA, Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, as well as AstraZeneca, all agreed that pregnant women and women of childbearing age … should under no circumstances receive the vaccine in the clinical trials program.”
“Nothing’s changed from the registrational trials to the public program,” McCullough explained.
“The minimum standard for safety is two years of observational data and then … only through years of history of acceptance do we allow the inactivated flu, diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis ever to be given to a pregnant woman. We only give the safest of all products tested over many, many years” to pregnant women.
Although two years is the minimum standard for vaccine safety to be observed, the mRNA jabs, classified as “gene transfer technologies” by McCullough, are required to undergo a five-year observational period, he stated. “Under no circumstances should we allow a genetic product that that has not even achieved two years of standard vaccine observation, let alone the five years required for gene transfer technologies” to be administered to pregnant women.
The reports that are currently available and demonstrate hundreds of thousands of injuries, including many thousands of deaths, are only the “tip of the iceberg,” McCullough added.
In fact, a U.K. “evidence-based consulting group,” McCullough noted, has evaluated the Yellow Card reporting system, wherein vaccine injuries are recorded in Britain, with their advisers putting in “a formal recommendation to the MHRA [Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency] to close the program, given that the risks far outweigh the benefits and the vaccines are not suitable for human use.”
Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., the inventor of the mRNA technology found in Pfizer’s jab, weighed in to explain his view that the FDA has been “failing to exercise its normal policies and procedures and [is] basically employing shortcuts to try … to specifically achieve a political objective” by approving the Pfizer shot.
“This is as much a political statement as it is a regulatory statement,” Malone continued, adding that the regulatory bodies are already acknowledging the safety risks involved with taking the shots and the myriad adverse effects associated with them. For instance, “the CDC itself is now acknowledging that … the incidence of the cardiac toxicities associated with this vaccine may be two and a half times, or more, greater than what they had previously assessed.”
Given the contradiction between acknowledged safety concerns and the FDA statement giving full approval to the Pfizer jab, Malone said that “the gentlest way I could express this is that it’s a misrepresentation. Some people might use stronger language, like it’s a lie, but it certainly appears to be as much a political statement as it is a regulatory statement.”
“My overall sense of the document, given the many studies that are being required concerning both safety and efficacy to be performed in the post marketing environment, clearly demonstrates that this is being rushed out and that they for some reason feel the need to bypass normal safety evaluation,” Malone continued.
“There’s no question in my mind that there are multiple controversies currently concerning the data itself, the nature of the adverse events and the various analyses that have been bypassed in bringing this product forward to this point for the US population,” he concluded.
The Executive Director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), Dr. Jane Orient, M.D., joined Malone in criticizing the FDA’s decision to grant its approval to Pfizer for the manufacture of its COVID-19 shot.
“I think this day may live in infamy,” Orient said, “if they’re saying that there are no concerns raised, either they are just plain lying or they are just not paying attention.”
“The FDA has approved this vaccine many months before even the scheduled trials were supposed to be finished,” the AAPS director explained, adding that the trials were “not supposed to be done before the end of 2022.”
“They had no hearings. They had no potential for public input. There have been no explanations given or any evidence that they have investigated at least 12,000 deaths that followed soon after the vaccine, or the many other consequences leading to disability, leading to myocarditis, into blood clots, or leading to paralysis,” Orient continued. “Even though there are FDA warnings about some of these conditions, it’s not in the package insert yet and I think very few patients have been lining up to get their emergency vaccinations have been told about this possibility.” — Article continues below Petition — PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus 1059854 have signed the petition.Let’s get to 1100000! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Vliet confirmed that most of her patients were also not told about the dangerous adverse effects associated with taking the jabs.
Orient further warned that myocarditis poses a particularly troubling case for young people who take the jabs, stating that “we do not know how many how many people, especially young men, have a subclinical case of it. They don’t have symptoms enough … So they’re not getting tests like cardiac enzymes or an ultrasound.”
“How many people have a condition that needs this kind of treatment?” Orient asked. “They don’t know about their heart muscle suddenly being damaged and replaced with fibrous tissue, maybe in two years they’re going to have heart failure.”
Orient voiced her concern that “our promising athletes, our firefighters, our soldiers, people who might have need for strenuous exercise, maybe just have the silent damage.”
Vliet added that myocarditis is not normally a problem seen in young people, but that it occurs more commonly “very late in life.”
“We need to understand, too, that the five-year survival rate for heart failure is 50 percent. That’s worse than a lot of cancers. And we’re not screening for this after we do the vaccines,” Orient lamented.
Despite being a rare condition among vaccinated individuals, “I think it’s just outrageous that, once having seen a case, you do not go back and look,” Orient said, again criticizing the FDA’s safety assessment of the drugs.
Regarding young people, who are the least likely to be damaged by the virus and who survive infection with COVID with over 99 percent success, Orient suggested that they should think carefully about taking “a one in a million chance of having their heart destroyed or damaged to receive a vaccine for a condition that they would almost certainly survive.”
Lockdowns are the ‘single biggest mistake in public health history’: Stanford medical professor
Asked directly if ‘lockdowns have killed more people than they have saved,’ Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Stanford University Medical School epidemiologist and public health expert, responded, ‘Yes, I think that is actually true.’ Dr. Jay BhattacharyaZDoggMD / YouTube
(LifeSiteNews) — A Stanford University Medical School epidemiologist and public health expert reiterated in a recent interview his conviction that Covid lockdowns have been horrendous for public health and affirmed that they have killed more people than they have saved.
“I say the lockdowns were the single biggest mistake in public health history. I still believe that. I don’t see how anyone can look at lockdown and say there was successful policy,” Dr. Jay Bhattacharya said.
“We have had lockdowns in country after country after country,” he continued. “I don’t think by any measure you can call them a success.”
From the beginning of the pandemic, Bhattacharya has advocated for a public health action plan of “focused protection,” a policy wherein creative measures are enacted by public servants to shield the most vulnerable from infection and the rest of society is allowed to carry on with regular life.
As previously covered by LifeSiteNews, Bhattacharya and numerous other medical professionals formally outlined this idea in the Great Barrington Declaration. In part, it reads:
The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.
Regarding this approach, Bhattacharya said, “The idea was to give people resources to protect themselves as they saw fit, that they could make trade-offs in their lives based on what they valued.” He added, “You have to think differently about what the goal is. If the goal is focused protection, then adopt a different set of policies than if the goal is testing, tracing, identifying, and quarantine.”
Bhattacharya said that many in the medical and public health community have come to think erroneously about herd immunity, which was once identified as the goal for resolving the Covid pandemic.
“Herd immunity is not a synonym for zero Covid. It does not mean the disease has gone away. What it means is that the disease has become endemic,” he said.
subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada Catholic
“What I do know is that if a government induces fear in a population, if a government formally locks down, that it will take much longer to get to that point where the disease is at a level where we can manage it without having to turn over all of society,” Bhattacharya asserted. “If people are scared to interact with everybody else, it will take longer, even if you don’t have a policy.”
Bhattacharya called the harms caused by lockdowns “extremely multi-dimensional” and traumatic, especially to the poor, children, and those on the margins of society. “It’s not possible to reduce to a single number,” he said. “A child who skips a year of school, the consequences will last a lifetime.”
According to Bhattacharya, dramatic increases of poverty, food insecurity, outright starvation, depression, anxiety, suicide, and death are some of the black fruits of the mitigation measures implemented in lockdowns. Asked directly if “lockdowns have killed more people than they have saved,” he responded, “Yes, I think that is actually true.”
The idea that there are alternatives to lockdowns has not been given minimal space for discussion in the public forum, particularly among the mainstream media, politicians, and public health and medical professionals. Conversely, Bhattacharya asserted that science is, in fact, a “free-wheeling discussion,” one that should be informed by data, not politics. To be against lockdown, Bhattacharya said, was considered “saying something dangerous” and “at the core of this sort of de-platforming effort” by Big Tech companies. Standing against this trend is “something we should resist with all our strength.”
“We have come to think about lockdown as if it were the only possible thing to do,” Bhattacharya said, “But that’s not true. You have to make decisions based on the margins of what is alternatively possible. That requires imagination and requires care about thinking of different people in different parts of society, and the risks they face combined with the values they have and the scientific parameters about disease spread and all of these other things.”
Bhattacharya noted that we have had “enormous Covid deaths despite the lockdowns.” While lockdown proponents may argue that this is because the lockdowns were not strong enough, Bhattacharya insists that reality is a constraint on their model and that in the real world “society could not meet their high standard of what a lockdown ought to look like.”
Bhattacharya concluded his interview with the idea that we have two futures before us: a dystopian one filled with lockdowns where humanity is much impoverished by such efforts, or another in which we recognize that the disease is something that is realistically here to stay and that we will learn to cope with. The bottom line, Bhattacharya hopes, is that “once people realize that we cannot achieve elimination of the disease, they can remember what is important.”
‘The Nuremberg Code has been violated’: Prominent medical expert blasts FDAs approval of Pfizer COVID jab
‘If in running the safety portion of the trial, we see that the risks are way greater than the benefits, then that’s a problem,’ Dr. Paul Alexander said. ‘And in that case, the trial has to be stopped.’ Paul AlexanderFox News / screenshot
(LifeSiteNews) – A former adviser to COVID Pandemic policy for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) criticized the U.S. government Thursday for circumventing due diligence in its approval of the vaccines against COVID-19, stating that “it is actually incomprehensible what has been done right now.”
Dr. Paul E. Alexander is a former faculty member at McMaster University in Canada and now serves as Director of Evidence-Based Medicine and Research Methodology for the Truth for Health Foundation. He also leads the newly formed “citizens’ data safety advisory committee” on the COVID jabs, launched by the Truth for Health Foundation during its most recent “Stop the Shot” conference, which aired Thursday at LifeSiteNews.
Speaking at the conference, Alexander criticized the method and timescale under which the COVID shots have been approved and rolled out to the general public. “Normally vaccines take anywhere from about 8 to 10 to 12 to as much as 15 years from conception” before being produced en masse, Alexander said. “But we have a situation right now where we have these vaccine developers in conjunction with the FDA and NIH and CDC, to an extent that they have brought vaccines to the public in three to four months.”
“This is a real problem,” Alexander noted, owing to the lack of time-tested information regarding the efficacy of the jabs. Moreover, the research scientist warned against simply counting on the efficacy of a drug to prove its usefulness and safety. In fact, he said that it is “maybe more important” to consider “evidence of harm, and if those harms, those risks supersede the benefits, then that medical device, that drug, that vaccine, cannot be brought to market […] That trial has to be stopped.”
When the FDA approves a drug or vaccine, they are confirming that the benefits of the medicine outweigh any risks involved in taking the drug, Alexander explained. He added that some risks are considered acceptable, as they are not life-altering, and that some should even be expected. Soreness at the site of injection and a slight fever are modest risks, he said. — Article continues below Petition — PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus 1059858 have signed the petition.Let’s get to 1100000! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
However, “if in running the safety portion of the trial, we see that the risks are way greater than the benefits, then that’s a problem. And in that case, the trial has to be stopped.”
“In this case, for these vaccine trials, the proper animal testing, the proper safety testing was not done. The duration of follow up clearly is not there.” In fact, Alexander lamented that “we cannot properly state what the safety signals are … because it was just not studied. The information is not available to anyone, to no one in the public, to scientists, to clinicians. We are just going based on what these vaccine developers and the FDA are saying.”
Deborah Conrad, a physician’s assistant based in New York, told the conference that the hospital in which she works has seen “unprecedented amounts of patients” come in with conditions that would not normally affect someone of their age or without a history of ill health, all of whom had taken a COVID shot. Accordingly, seeing the FDA approve the Pfizer jab is “terrifying to me,” she said.
Conrad explained that, from around March 2021, she began encountering among patients higher levels of “hypoglycaemia … kidney failure, we’re seeing a lot of sepsis … urinary tract infections, pulmonary embolisms … idiopathic strokes.” The patients often ask, Conrad stated, if the vaccine is to blame for their sudden condition.
“We’re seeing weird, weird things and there’s no there’s no rhyme or reason. It could be a couple of weeks after vaccination. It could be six weeks after vaccination. It could be months down the road. I don’t know if any of it is truly related,” she said.
Following reports of increasing injury after taking a COVID jab, Alexander said that the FDA “appears to be failing the American public because it’s not doing … due diligence … and protecting the American public.”
subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada Catholic
So egregious is this breach of safety protocols that the medical expert suggested the Nuremberg Code, the international code of ethics drafted in 1947 following the Nuremberg Trials, had been broken.
The trials saw several scientists and doctors being heavily punished for subjecting people to inhumane experiments. The Nuremberg Code “seeks to protect people who partake in medical research,” Alexander explained. “And the issue is to protect their safety, to make sure there is informed consent, to make sure that there’s no unnecessary procedures applied to them.”
The first principle listed in the code is that “[t]he voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential,” meaning that force, coercion, and duress are considered illegitimate means of making individuals partake in a medical experiment.
Additionally, the code affirms that experiments, such as developing a vaccine for public use, “should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.”
Alexander noted that the manufacturers of the currently available COVID jabs decided to “circumvent use of animal studies, proper toxicity studies, … pharmacodynamic studies, the reproductive toxicity studies were not done for these COVID vaccines.” Participants must be duly informed to be able to give their informed consent,” he added, “and that means explaining to the participant the benefits and the harms.”
“Right now, I would sit here and say we probably cannot point to one individual in this entire world, not just the United States, the entire world, who has been properly consented for informed consent,” said Alexander. “Taking a vaccine is not just ‘sit over there, roll up your sleeves, and let me give you this jab.’ Taking a vaccine involves you having been explained the benefits and the harms based on your own risk profile … it has to be somebody who knows you like your medical provider, your clinician, etc., not someone working in a CVS pharmacy or a Wal-Mart or drive-to car park. It is actually incomprehensible what has been done right now.”
Examining the Nuremberg Code alongside a group of scientists, Alexander concluded that “all 10 tenets of the code … include voluntary participation… we found that these vaccines violated all ten.”
Therefore, “the FDA right now is in a very questionable position, especially with this president who’s now pushing to give full FDA approval of the Pfizer,” a pursuit that came to fruition Monday when the FDA granted Pfizer’s mRNA shot its “full approval.”
This is problematic according to Alexander, who said that despite the FDA’s ruling, it is clear that “the vaccines have failed.” There are reports of “breakthrough infections with the Delta variant for those who have been vaccinated,” the doctor noted, “so much so that they are talking about a booster.”
“If the second vaccination failed, why would you give a booster?” he asked. “Wouldn’t the booster not also fail? All of this is nonsensical, very nonsensical.”
“Doctors were held criminally liable for what they did,” Alexander said of the scientists at the Nuremberg Trials. “The Nuremberg Code has been violated and we have a serious problem … vaccine developers and doctors … can be held liable in the highest courts of law, criminally liable, even, if they contravened the legality of the Nuremberg Code.”
Threat of Democrat malfeasance in California governor recall ballot: A test for democracy
‘Do elections still have meaning? Are voters allowed to choose their own leaders?’ wondered Fox News host Tucker Carlson. ‘Do we have any power at all as citizens? Or are they going to steal it from us?’
Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news. Subscribe now.
(LifeSiteNews) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom is the subject of a recall ballot as citizens seek to wrest the once-land of milk and honey, opportunity and prosperity from the control of a Democrat who has overseen his state’s demise since taking office.
The recall initiative that culminates September 14 has become a battleground as frightened progressive activists and establishment Democrats seek to halt the ongoing recall vote while conservative Republicans justifiably fear that the integrity of the balloting will be undermined by those seeking to keep Democrats in power at all costs.
Panic among progressive Democrats palpable
The magnitude of progressive Democrat fear is increasing daily and most visible in their attacks on Larry Elder, a black conservative and beloved radio show host who is the Republican’s leading contender to replace Newsom if the recall effort is successful.
The left-leaning Los Angeles Times recently ran a commentary claiming that Elder is the “Black face of White supremacy.”
“This is not the first time the L.A. Times has attacked me. There is another writer who all but called me a Black David Duke,” Elder told Fox News host Steve Hilton. “They are scared to death.”
David Duke, it should be noted, is a former grand wizard of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan.
subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada Catholic
MSNBC has likewise targeted Elder. Liberal Hollywood celebrity Rob Reiner called Elder a “maniac,” and verklempt Bette Midler told her liberal fans, “Larry Elder has a shot at winning,” so “you have to vote like hell!”
The stakes in the recall vote are high not only for California but for the entire nation
“The question is: Do elections still have meaning? Are voters allowed to choose their own leaders?” wondered Carlson. “Or does the L.A. Times get to do that? Does the party apparatus get to do that? Do we have any power at all as citizens? Or are they going to steal it from us?”
“If the answer is ‘they’re going to steal it from us,’ we’re in trouble,” he said. “Once citizens conclude their votes are meaningless, they quickly become radical. Democracy is the safety relief valve that keeps our society placid. But when people think it’s fake, they go bonkers. They have no option. They have no power. They have nothing to lose.”
“It’s in all of our interests that the state of California conducts a free and fair election next month. Yes, with outside election observers. U.N., you’re welcome, too. Why? Because there are indications it won’t be free and fair,” he concluded.
The threat of voter fraud in the Golden State recall is very real
Earlier this month, felony voter fraud charges were filed against six defendants, including Compton City Council member Isaac Galvan.
“Talk about a close election! Galvan won his City Council race in 2021 by only one vote, 855 to 854,” wrote Hans A. von Spakovsky, the Heritage Foundation’s election law reform initiative manager and senior legal fellow. “Not only have all of the defendants been charged with conspiracy to commit election fraud, but Galvan is also accused of attempting to bribe an election official with concert tickets to ‘influence’ the outcome of the election.”
Spakovsky said, “California made a huge mistake when it legalized voter trafficking, that is, allowing third-party strangers — candidates, campaign staffers, party activists, and political consultants — to pick up voters’ absentee ballots.”
“Giving those who have a stake in the outcome of an election the lawful ability to possess and handle ballots is simply asking for trouble and putting temptation in front of those who are willing to cheat to win an election,” he said.
Harmeet K. Dhillon, co-chair of the Republican National Lawyers Association and a California resident, filed a lawsuit yesterday hoping to head off Democrat efforts to halt the recall effort.
“I filed a lawsuit to intervene in a challenge to the constitutionality of the recall statute because frankly I don’t trust the secretary of state or the attorney general who are both appointed by the governor to defend him in this regard,” Dhillon explained in an interview with Carlson.
Democrats “are playing fast and loose,” said Dhillon. “We’ve seen some alarming scenes of 300 ballots bundled together in the car of a person with a gun and some drugs and so we are definitely looking into all of these issues.”
The lawsuit notes that the party seeking to halt the recall vote has a “distorted theory of democracy,” believing that “the Court should overturn a 110-year-old provision of the California Constitution to stop an election out of fear that the majority of California voters may decide that they want to recall their Governor.”
“Article II of the California Constitution, which allows California’s voters to recall state officials, was approved by California’s voters in 1911 and ‘[s]ince 1913, there have been 179 recall attempts of state elected officials in California,’ including 55 attempts to recall the governor,” notes the lawsuit.
Democrats believe conservative Blacks aren’t legitimately Black
“With Larry Elder closing in on the California governorship, shouldn’t we be seeing lots of CNN and MSNBC stories about how historic it would be for him to win?” asked Scott Adams, creator of the Dilbert comic strip, in a tweet.
During the 2020 presidential campaign, then-candidate Joe Biden famously scolded an African American video audience, “If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t Black.”
Biden and Harris slated to campaign against the recall: ‘No more democracy for you!’
“He is doing a terrible job, so you would think that even leaders of the Democratic Party, his party, would be very happy that he could be leaving, but they are not. They are doing everything they can to keep him in office,” said Carlson.
“They are going so far as to endorse the job he is doing if you can imagine. Imagine the bile they have to swallow to do that, because they are not blind, and they see what he has done. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are now set to campaign against the recall: ‘No more democracy for you!’”
“You have to wonder, will the state survive this? Will there be a free and fair election?” asked Carlson. “Everyone is watching.”
“I can tell you, even living in my latte-sipping, avocado toast-eating, Lululemon-wearing neighborhood in San Francisco, people are fed up with the crime, the drugs, the homelessness, the intermittent electricity and everything else that is wrong with California, so people want a change here,” Dhillon said.
Study: Fully vaccinated healthcare workers carry 251 times viral load, pose threat to unvaccinated patients, co-workers
A preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published Aug. 10 in The Lancet, found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated.
(Children’s Health Defense) – A groundbreaking preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published August 10 in The Lancet, includes alarming findings devastating to the COVID vaccine rollout.
While moderating the symptoms of infection, the jab allows vaccinated individuals to carry unusually high viral loads without becoming ill at first, potentially transforming them into presymptomatic superspreaders.
This phenomenon may be the source of the shocking post-vaccination surges in heavily vaccinated populations globally.
The paper’s authors, Chau et al, demonstrated widespread vaccine failure and transmission under tightly controlled circumstances in a hospital lockdown in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
The scientists studied healthcare workers who were unable to leave the hospital for two weeks. The data showed that fully vaccinated workers — about two months after injection with the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (AZD1222) — acquired, carried and presumably transmitted the Delta variant to their vaccinated colleagues.
They almost certainly also passed the Delta infection to susceptible unvaccinated people, including their patients. Sequencing of strains confirmed the workers transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to one another.
This is consistent with the observations in the U.S. from Farinholt and colleagues, and congruent with comments by the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conceding COVID-19 vaccines have failed to stop transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
On February 11, the World Health Organization indicated the AZD1222 vaccine efficacy of 63.09% against the development of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. The conclusions of the Chau paper support the warnings by leading medical experts that the partial, non-sterilizing immunity from the three notoriously “leaky” COVID-19 vaccines allow carriage of 251 times the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 as compared to samples from the pre-vaccination era in 2020.
Thus, we have a key piece to the puzzle explaining why the Delta outbreak is so formidable — fully vaccinated are participating as COVID-19 patients and acting as powerful Typhoid Mary-style super-spreaders of the infection.
Vaccinated individuals are blasting out concentrated viral explosions into their communities and fueling new COVID surges. Vaccinated healthcare workers are almost certainly infecting their coworkers and patients, causing horrendous collateral damage.
subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada Catholic — Article continues below Petition — PETITION: Ban COVID vaccine mandates for schools and universities! 9340 have signed the petition.Let’s get to 10000! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Continued vaccination will only make this problem worse, particularly among frontline doctors and nurses workers who are caring for vulnerable patients.
Health systems should drop vaccine mandates immediately, take stock of COVID-19 recovered workers who are robustly immune to Delta and consider the ramifications of their current vaccinated healthcare workers as potential threats to high risk patients and coworkers.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.
The EU, comprising around 450 million people – roughly 60 percent of Europe’s estimated 750 million inhabitants – has reported administering 522.4 million doses of the jabs, corresponding to 75.1 percent of the EU’s citizens receiving at least one dose of either Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, or AstraZeneca’s experimental COVID shots.
The EnduraVigilance system is the EU-wide database for recording vaccine injury reports, as well as other medicine-induced injuries, corresponding to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), jointly run by both the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
According to a report in Health Impact News, a service that has provided tabulated versions of data from EnduraVigilance, between rolling out the COVID shots last year through to August 14, 2021, the system has collated 2,074,410 reports of injuries related to the jabs, including 21,766 fatalities across the 27 member states.
The source related that just under half of all reports (1,021,867) were of serious injuries, classified by the EU agency as corresponding to “a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”
The highest rate of problematic developments among the four emergency-authorized jabs occurred following the AstraZeneca shot, designed and manufactured in conjunction with Oxford University, which is reportedly linked to 947,675 injuries within the EU.
There were 4,740 reports of deaths, a large proportion of which followed the development of nervous system and vascular disorders. A total of 12,080 reports were listed as “[r]eproductive system and breast disorders.”
Overall, the recently FDA-approved Pfizer jab, now marketed under the name Comirnaty, was correlated with 833,498 injuries and 10,616 deaths. The system showed that Pfizer’s jab preceded 22,844 blood disorders, 148,477 nervous system disorders, and 910 adverse events related to “pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions,” resulting in 29 deaths. It is unknown if the pregnancy-related deaths were miscarriages. An additional 10,909 reports were for reproductive system disorders.
Moderna’s jab, granted “conditional marketing authorization” for use within the EU on January 6, has been flagged for 229,430 injuries and 5,600 deaths on the drug reaction database. Johnson & Johnson, marketed in Europe under the name Janssen, has had 63,807 injuries reported against its jab, with 810 deaths occurring after using the single-dose shot.
The Yellow Card system used in the U.K. (which is now independent of the EU), the British equivalent of EnduraVigilance and VAERS, shows similar findings, with an overall vaccine injury tally of 1,165,636 after the three emergency authorized jabs between December 8, 2020, and August 18, 2021.
subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada Catholic
The vaccine rollout in the U.K. has reached some 70 percent of the population with at least the first dose. Just over 60 percent are considered “fully vaccinated” against the virus in the nation, given that they have received two doses of the shots.
Again, AstraZeneca’s formula was reported most frequently to the Yellow Card reporting system, drawing 816,393 adverse event injury reports, accounting for 70 percent of all U.K. injury reports. There were 1,056 deaths also recorded, six of which were miscarriages, and 810 reports of anaphylaxis, a dangerous allergic reaction, were made.
A total of 16,689 reproductive and fertility disorders were reported for the AstraZeneca jab, as well as 390 cases of Bell’s palsy, a muscular paralysis occurring in the face.
Despite the now millions of vaccine injury reports, many of which are life-threatening or damaging to fertility, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, which runs the Yellow Card system, determined that the “total number and the nature of Yellow Cards reported so far is not unusual for a new vaccine.”
injury reports related to the “vaccines” continue to pour in around the world, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) moved Monday to give its “full approval” to the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA jab, characterizing the experimental shot as “a key achievement for public health.”
Despite clinical trials for the experimental drug not being due for completion before May 2, 2023 at least, the American agency decided to award the jab a “milestone” biologics license, with FDA acting commissioner Janet Woodcock claiming that individuals “can be very confident that this vaccine meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality the FDA requires of an approved product.”
Rebutting Woodcock’s confidence in the shot, world-renowned medical expert Dr. Peter McCullough, M.D., of the Truth for Health Foundation noted that people “have been asked on faith to sign up and take one of these vaccines with no information, with a minimal informed consent” prompting him to declare that “there is no product in human history that has ever created such a swathe of injuries to the public that’s been asked to participate in taking one of these vaccines.”
‘God made from one every nation of men’: Exploding the evolutionary myth of creation-based racism, Pt 4
For the last fifty years since abortion on demand was legalized in the United States, the leaders of the evolution-based population control movement have applauded this cruel genocide. Image of a slave market, taken from 13th century Muslim manuscript, now in Paris.Marzolino/Shutterstock
Editors note: This is part 4 of a five part series of articles on the topic, by Hugh Owen. Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 can be found on LifeSiteNews.
Part IV
Islam and the African Slave Trade
(LifeSiteNews) – While the German military launched its evolutionarily-inspired Namibian genocide, the main East African base for Muslim commerce located in Zanzibar also served as the center of a flourishing slave trade. The prophet Mohammed was an enthusiastic champion of slavery, and the Koran explains in detail how Muslims can lawfully exploit and abuse the human beings they enslave. For example, when Mohammed had already assembled a large harem, he received this revelation:
Prophet! We [i.e. God] have made lawful for you the wives to whom you have granted dowries and the slave girls whom God has given you as booty . . . You may . . . take to your bed any of them as you please [Koran 33:50-51) . . . [After this] it shall be unlawful for you to take more wives or to change your present wives for other women . . . unless they are slave girls whom you own [Koran 33:52].
The founder of the Society of Missionaries of Africa, Cardinal Lavigerie, received regular reports from his missionaries of the enormous number of African slaves who were trafficked from Sub-Saharan Africa for sale to Muslims in the North. Speaking at an anti-slavery conference in 2013, the superior general of the White Fathers, recalled:
When our Founder, Cardinal Lavigerie, was bishop of Algiers in North Africa he got reports from his Missionaries working in the interior part of Africa. In them he discovered the atrocities of slavery and how the man-hunts were devastating whole villages and were going to depopulate Africa. He was already aware of the Trans-Saharan Slave-Trade in which black slaves were taken from Africa and sent to Arab countries, as domestic workers, etc. Without making a blanket condemnation of Islam, he decried the practice of discrimination that he saw among the Arabs and especially their conception of the black race. On the 1st July, 1888 Conference in St Sulpice (Paris), he gave the following impressive figures:
Five hundred thousand slaves sold each year in the markets of the interior of Africa, under conditions which I have just described.
I am only talking about slaves who have been sold; added to these, according to the explorers and our Fathers, for every slave put up for sale, must be added the victims who have been massacred during the man hunts, or who have died from their sufferings and from hunger in the caravans en route to the slave markets. Some people say that for every slave sold, must be added four, five or even ten dead before arriving at the markets.
Cameron, in confirming these estimates, reports that in order to procure fifty women to be sold, one of these “tigers” destroyed nearby, ten inoffensive villages, each with a population of as many as two hundred people, and massacred all their inhabitants. If, in the other regions where these man hunts are carried out, the proportions are the same, this makes two million blacks killed or sold, each year. This means that in fifty years the interior of Africa will be completely depopulated. I am not astonished by this consequence, especially as my missionaries write that every day a slave caravan arrives at Lake Tanganyika. When my missionaries arrived ten years ago in the heavily populated Manyema region, the area was totally covered with villages and cultivated fields; today, Tipo-Tip’s slave traders have made most of this region, as big as a third of France, a sterile desert where the only traces of the former inhabitants are the bones of the dead people.
Lavigerie visited the Pope with a delegation of former slaves from North Africa at the occasion of the 50th Anniversary of Priesthood of the Pope and urged the Pope on 21st May 1888 to say something also against the slavery in Africa and to do something about it.
Pope Leo XIII listened carefully and gave full mandate to Lavigerie to lead the campaign in a “brief” dated 17th October 1888. Thus began the Anti-Slavery campaign that took him to some major towns of Europe (Paris, London, Brussels, Geneva, Rome, Napoli, etc.). He gave conferences to different people in order to:
– present the facts as he had them from the Missionaries (Sisters, Brothers and Fathers) and the explorers;
– convince that something had to be done to stop it;
– raise funds;
– to get the public opinion to obtain a change of policy from their respective governments (emphasis in original)
Cardinal Lavigerie based his opposition to slavery upon the Catholic doctrine of creation and the God-given dignity of all human beings, but he urged the increasingly secular leaders of Europe to oppose the slave-trade by an appeal to the natural law.
Slavery, as it is practiced in Africa, is not only, in fact, opposed to the Gospel, it is contrary to the natural law…Now the laws of nature apply not just to Christians but to all men. That is why I appeal to all, without distinction of nationality, or party, or religious confession. (emphasis in original) (Chiesa del Gesù, 23rd December 1888).
While Lavigerie’s campaign against slavery met with considerable success in Europe, faith in the “principal doctrine of the modernists” continued to spread through the ranks of the intellectual elite of Europe and North America, fast becoming the new orthodoxy of the western world. As St. Pius X had foreseen in Pascendi, a world in which everything exists in a continuous state of evolution and in which the human body is the result of millions of years of development from an amoeba through a struggle for existence cannot logically co-exist with the notion of natural law which flows from the fact that God created man and woman “in the beginning” with a stable and unchanging human nature. Thus, the same “principal doctrine” that appeared to debunk the sacred history of Genesis simultaneously “debunked” the notion of an unchanging human nature and an immutable natural law. What was taken away from Satan’s war on humanity with one hand—the hand of the creation-based Gospel of Jesus Christ—was given back to him with the left hand of evolution-based modernism which, as we have seen, easily rationalizes every kind of moral abomination.
Black Lives Matter, Marxism and Stalin’s breeding experiments
Darwin’s contempt for black Africans is well known, but the evolution-based racism of his disciples is not as well-known as it should be. Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin all lost their faith in the Judaeo-Christian God under the influence of Darwin and his disciples and became confident atheist-materialists. It is a tragic irony that the leaders of the Black Lives Movement boldly identify themselves as Marxists in the tradition of Lenin and Stalin. Karl Marx wanted to dedicate Das Kapital to Darwin in recognition of the fact that Darwin’s imaginary “evolution through a struggle for existence” offered the perfect “scientific” basis for Marx’s imaginary progress to utopia through “class struggle.”
After losing his faith in Christianity as an Orthodox seminarian by reading the works of Lyell and Darwin, Josef Stalin became obsessed with the idea of breeding apes with humans so as to produce a race of ape-men who could be used as cannon fodder to advance the communist revolution. As the leader of the Soviet Union, Stalin allocated funds for his pet project to biologist Ivan Ivanov who was sent to Africa in the 1920’s to begin the experiment. In 1926, Ivanov obtained permission from French Guinea’s colonial governor to work at the botanical gardens in Conakry. Here Ivanov artificially inseminated three chimpanzees with human seed. When all three failed to become pregnant, he returned to the Soviet Union, where further planned experiments also failed. Meanwhile, fallen-away Catholic Margaret Sanger and other evolution-believing eugenicists in Europe and North American promoted the idea of “birth control” as a way of eliminating the “less fit” blacks and inferior human beings while allowing only the “superior” white Europeans to reproduce. According to one account:
Margaret Sanger opened her first birth control clinic in 1916 in the impoverished Brownsville section of Brooklyn to help control the problem of ‘over breeding’. The two-room storefront clinic was a great contrast to Margaret’s plush Greenwich Village home, but
‘ … since the clientele she wished to attract—“immigrant Southern Europeans, Slavs, Latins, and Jews”—could only be found “in the coarser neighborhoods and tenements,” she was forced to venture out of her comfortable confines.’ Sanger once addressed the women’s branch of the Ku Klux Klan in Silver Lake, New Jersey, and received a ‘dozen invitations to speak to similar groups’.
As her organization grew, Sanger set up more clinics in the communities of other ‘dysgenic races’—such as Blacks and Hispanics. Sanger turned her attention to ‘Negroes’ in 1929 and opened another clinic in Harlem in 1930. Sanger, ‘in alliance with eugenicists, and through initiatives such as the Negro Project … exploited black stereotypes in order to reduce the fertility of African Americans.’ The all-white staff and the sign identifying the clinic as a ‘research bureau’ raised the suspicions of the black community. They feared that the clinic’s actual goal was to ‘experiment on and sterilize black people’. Their fears were not unfounded: Sanger once addressed the women’s branch of the Klu Klux Klan in Silver Lake, New Jersey, and received a ‘dozen invitations to speak to similar groups’. Flynn claims that she was on good terms with other racist organizations.
Sanger believed the ‘Negro district’ was the ‘headquarters for the criminal element’ and concluded that, as the title of a book by a member of her board proclaimed, The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy, was a rise that had to be stemmed. To deal with the problem of resistance among the black population, Sanger recruited black doctors, nurses, ministers and social workers ‘in order to gain black patients’ trust’ in order ‘to limit or even erase the black presence in America’.
Her Birth Control League board was ‘made up almost exclusively of sociologists and eugenicists’, insuring that her eugenic goals were implemented. Margaret and the Malthusian Eugenicists she worked with did not discriminate narrowly, but targeted every ‘non-Aryan’ ethnic group, whether red, black, yellow or white. They placed clinics wherever they judged ‘feeble-minded, syphilitic, irresponsible, and defective’ persons ‘bred unhindered’. Since, by their estimation, as many as 70% of the population fell into this ‘undesirable’ category, Margaret and her cohorts had their work cut out for them. Much of the early grass-roots work in her movement was done by ‘radicals’, mostly socialists and communists.
— Article continues below Petition — PETITION: Tell University of Pittsburgh to stop barbaric experiments using human babies 5374 have signed the petition.Let’s get to 6000! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Evolution, abortion and black genocide
The success of Margaret Sanger and her disciples in promoting birth control paved the way for the legalization of abortion on demand in the second half of the twentieth century. As the evolutionarily-inspired “birth control movement” spearheaded the movement for “abortion rights,” Sanger’s dream of eliminating the “less fit” came closer to fruition. In the words of black American Pastor Walter Hoye II’s “Black Genocide” web page:
According to the National Vital Statistics Reports of 2009, in 2005 there were 587,000 Live Black Births, 452,000 Induced Black Abortions and 292,808 Black Deaths from all causes, excluding induced abortion. If we do the math we have 587,000 Live Black Births against 744,808 Black Deaths (i.e., 452,000 Induced Black Abortions + 292,808 Black Deaths from all other causes) which equates to a Black Life Deficit of a Negative 157,808. Abortion, which has taken the lives of more Black Americans than heart disease, cancer, strokes, accidents, diabetes, homicide, and chronic lower respiratory diseases combined, is the number one (1) cause of death in Black America. In the last forty (40) years Black Americans have suffered the loss of over twenty (20) million lives to abortion alone. Still further, these numbers do not include those of us aborted by abortifacients such as ellaOne or by ‘private physicians’ procedures.”
Pastor Hoye goes on to show that the disproportionate number of abortions performed on black women constitutes a genuine genocide, defined by Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on Genocide as:
…any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Pastor Hoye concludes his report on black genocide by pointing out that:
subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada Catholic
According to the latest report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and please keep in mind that the CDC’s report legally excludes the numbers from California (the state that performs the largest number of abortions in the country), Maryland, and New Hampshire, Black Women accounted for 35% of all abortions in the United States of America and have the highest abortion rates (31.8 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years) and ratios (483 abortions per 1,000 live births). According to the latest report from the Guttmacher Institute, Black Women accounted for 28% of all abortions in the United States of America.
For the last fifty years since abortion on demand was legalized in the United States, the leaders of the evolution-based population control movement have applauded this cruel genocide, while the Bishops of the Catholic Church have often stood alone among world leaders in raising their voices in defense of the sacred right to life of all human beings from conception to natural death.
Hugh Owen is the convert son of Sir David Owen, the first Secretary General of International Planned Parenthood Federation. He is also the founder and director of the Kolbe Center for the Study of Creation, the producer of the DVD series “Foundations Restored,” which provides a comprehensive defense of the traditional Catholic doctrine of creation from the perspective of theology, philosophy and natural science and which exposes the fatal flaws in the molecules-to-man evolution hypothesis in its theistic and atheistic forms. He can be reached through the Kolbe website www.kolbecenter.org or through the Foundations Restored website where the first two episodes of the DVD series can be viewed gratis: www.foundationsrestored.com
Lisa Shaw, a BBC radio presenter who died after being treated for blood clots following an Astrazeneca COVID-19 injection.Family handout
Dr. Jay BhattacharyaZDoggMD / YouTube
Paul AlexanderFox News / screenshot
A Pfizer BioNTech shot is administered in a Romanian hospital.Shutterstock
Image of a slave market, taken from 13th century Muslim manuscript, now in Paris.Marzolino/Shutterstock
naufrage/sauvetage 