You Can’t Have a Red Wave with a Blue Dam

American Thinker




American Thinker on MeWe

| Print |


November 11, 2022

You Can’t Have a Red Wave with a Blue Dam

By Matthew G. Andersson

Since 1979 I’ve been a registered Republican.  I was optimistic like so many other conservatives that a “Red Wave” would reflect a learning behavior from the larger public in the current voting cycle, a change in perception given the overwhelming flood of not only bad policy from the Left, such as mass illegal immigration, but outright incompetence in fiscal and monetary policy.

While I was skeptical of an actual surge among America’s largest political party — the non-voters — I didn’t want to be creating defeatism in my local community by pointing out some unpleasant facts: the GOP at least, is not playing the same game as the DNC, and as the rules have been changed, so will the results. 

These structural modifications to voting — created under the pretext of biosecurity in 2020 and largely organized tactically at a state level by the political law practice of Perkins Coie — cannot be overcome by wishful thinking about an effective “populist” uprising.  Modern Americans simply don’t do organized revolt any longer, and certainly are not up for any sort of “revolution,” or even mass protest (which is why the J6 Committee exists as an intimidation tactic) at least as long as they adhere to a representative republic rather than direct democracy.

What the DNC has accomplished is to install an effective political software, or malware, that structurally alters the entire voting process, by undermining the traditional format we have used for generations, with a software “patch” that rests on secondary methods of unaccountable vote sources such as various early voting, mail ballots, run-offs, delays, concealed ballot harvesting, and opportunistic pauses and interruptions to the more regular voting process that all of us are used to. The DNC has organized a specific tactical interruption of the entire voting infrastructure.

And if you think it’s bad now, wait until 2024: all the millions of illegal “immigrants” that are flooding the U.S. by the thousands every day, and being strategically transported illegally into key suburbs and cities, will come crashing down into the 2024 election with a flood of DNC votes, procured by granting them voting rights — with no documentation.  The fraud has just begun. Wishful thinking should be replaced with pragmatic Realpolitik. 

The Courts have been able to hold back the fraud and overreach here and there, as they were in the 1930s against FDR’s New Deal excess (including court packing).  But today’s Supreme Court has insufficient resolve to take on the DNC’s extralegal activities, even in a spirit of inquiry, let alone even carry out its function of overseeing the integrity of the larger judicial system (the nine Justices are each assigned an “allotment” of circuit court responsibility).

Part of the problem is that the DNC controls the House, and the purse, and as NYU Law’s Anna Harvey points out in “A Mere Machine: The supreme court, congress, and American democracy,” the Court will largely follow the direction of what party controls the House — the concept of separation is very tenuous, as the Court demonstrated in its refusal to even hear numerous appeals to the 2020 election.  Part of the problem also is that the Chief Justice struggles to resist political intimidation. He won’t hear any challenges to the prior and current election, and he won’t either in 2024 — he’s been tied, bound, intimidated and literally threatened by the DNC and its backers.

Red waves and other optimistic emotional constructs are healthy, but the reality is that the Left has installed a massive electoral blockage that rivals the famed Hoover Dam: no matter how much volume and pressure build up behind it from the voting public, it can control how much gets filtered and released downstream.  It can create and hold a massive buildup behind it, or it can dump all of it suddenly and leave the reservoir depleted.  That’s why the DNC and its backers seek to reformulate the actual content of the voting pool, so that by mass illegal immigration, more “voting water” can be regularly released to create the impression of voting normalcy, except the water has been reformulated and diluted so that it poses no threat of crashing through the dam. 

The American political system was never intended by design to become vulnerable to being dammed up into isolated pools and reservoirs by special interests: classical liberal constitutionalism rests on free-flowing liberties including association, speech, and voting itself.

Until the 2020 election “steal” and its causes are adjudicated and resolved, the radical Left dam that was explicitly constructed to control the voting process will continue, and grow.  There are other ways of breaking a dam: some by sheer force of the pressure behind it; some by changing the nature of the force (a new party?).  That is why the “Red Wave” shouldn’t be abandoned as an aspiration: it just needs to be tied to more organization, more legal challenge, and better messaging, communication, and especially, candidate quality. 

When that happens, and more voters come into a renewed political franchise, red may change color to a more powerful maroon of conservatives and moderates from both parties who are alienated by or indifferent to the current poor quality of the American political economy.

Image: Public Domain Pictures

Halloween ou l’américanisation des peuples

Halloween ou l’américanisation des peuples

dans exportmci / Société— par Jules Putois— 23 octobre 2022

Cette image a un attribut alt vide ; le nom du fichier est non_halloween1-MPI.png

La prétendue fête d’Halloween fait désormais partie du paysage. Elle revient chaque automne, pour nous rappeler dans quel triste état nous sommes. Voilà une fête instituée par on ne sait qui. Elle se répand par imitation, comme la mode vestimentaire ; pour ne pas dire par contagion, comme la maladie. « Les voisins fêtent Halloween. On a parlé d’Halloween à la télévision. Que faites-vous pour Halloween ? »

Le simple fait que cette fête soit nouvelle devrait suffire à la faire rejeter, par principe, par instinct. Tout le monde devrait se dire : « Mais enfin, qu’est-ce que c’est que cette histoire d’Halloween ? Cette fête n’est pas de chez nous , nous ne la connaissons pas. »

Mais les Français n’ont plus cette saine méfiance devant la nouveauté. On peut leur changer leur religion tous les jours, ça ne leur fait plus rien. Et puis même la maîtresse en a parlé, donc, allons-y quoi !

Et puis c’est américain, donc c’est forcément bien ! Nous mangeons américain, nous nous habillons américain, nous parlons américain, nous donnons à nos enfants des prénoms américains (quel crève-cœur !) ; nous faisons même la guerre pour l’Amérique. Au point où nous en sommes, pourquoi ne pas aussi adopter leurs fêtes ?

Bravo aux militants de la section Mexique de Civitas pour leur action contre Halloween ! C’est un exemple à imiter. Français, refusons l’américanisation, redevenons ce que nous sommes !

Le Lion des Flandres


Le Lion des Flandres


Taxes incluses


Seulement 10 restants!

Le Lion des Flandres

La description

Abbé Benoît Knittel

«Le Lion des Flandres» : pourquoi ce titre ? Est-ce qu’il y aurait dans les Flandres, région du nord de la France, de nombreux lions ? Non, évidemment : il n’est pas question dans ce livre du roi des animaux.

Cependant, sur le blason de la Flandre un lion est dessiné, et ce que ces pages racontent, c’est précisément l’histoire d’un homme, originaire des Flandres, qui eut une force comparable à celle du lion. Il s’appelait Marcel Lefebvre. Il fut prêtre, missionnaire, archevêque. Le pape lui confia des missions très importantes.

Ce livre fait découvrir sa vie vraiment passionnante. Elle fut une véritable aventure qui le mena de Tourcoing au Gabon, de la Normandie au Sénégal, de Madagascar à la Corrèze, de Rome à la Suisse.

Il n’eut pas seulement la puissance du lion lorsqu’il fallut batailler contre l’erreur dans l’Eglise, mais la douceur et la sérénité du félin. Il fut un ami de Dieu. Ceux qui l’ont connu l’ont beaucoup aimé. Pour la première fois, sa vie est racontée aux enfants.

Avec un cahier photos couleur.

11 x 16 cm – 176 pages (éditions Clovis)

A partir de 10 ans

Democracy Dies – Liz Truss Forced to Resign

Store Account
0 items$0.00


Democracy Dies – Liz Truss Forced to Resign
Posted Oct 20, 2022 by Martin Armstrong
Spread the love

Liz Truss has resigned. However, I was just doing a report on the new surge in the Globalists who used to stand quietly behind the curtain but are now forcefully no longer hinting and advising on the political direction of nations but are taking a much more authoritarian role. While I disagreed with Truss’ remarks on Russia and that it must be forcefully removed from all of Ukraine without the slightest reflection on what that meant, she was trying to revitalize the economy of Britain. Some say she was trying to follow Thatcher as a role model.

I put together the whole battle over the Chancellor of the Exchequer and how she was being dictated to behind the curtain. I will put this report up for sale ASAP. What we must understand is that the game is shifting. The Globalists pushing this agenda for their dream of a one-world government headed by the United Nations are hurling us ever closer to World War III and presume that they can defeat Russia, and bring it to its knees, all on a conventional basis. They then intend to use war as the excuse for the sovereign debt defaults and then usher in a new Bretton Woods with a digital currency administered by the International Monetary Fund.

While the press will never report the truth, Truss’ resignation comes as she now realizes being PM is not one of power, but just another hand-puppet in this worldwide agenda.


Dutch MEP to Tucker Carlson: Pfizer’s admission on COVID jab testing ‘one of the biggest scandals of our time’

Dutch MEP to Tucker Carlson: Pfizer’s admission on COVID jab testing ‘one of the biggest scandals of our time’

Shortly before Rob Roos went on Carlson’s show, he questioned Pfizer executive Janine Small in a hearing in the European Parliament.

Featured ImageTucker Carlson (L) and Dutch MEP Rob Roos (R)Screenshot/Rumble


  • 3

Wed Oct 12, 2022 – 12:30 pm EDT

Listen to this article

0:00 / 3:41BeyondWords

(LifeSiteNews) — Rob Roos, a Dutch Member of the European Parliament (MEP), told Tucker Carlson that Pfizer never tested COVID vaccines for the ability to stop transmissions and that this is “one of the biggest scandals of our time.”

Shortly before Roos went on Carlson’s show, he questioned Pfizer executive Janine Small in a hearing in the European Parliament. The Dutch MEP asked Small if the Pfizer COVID shots were “tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market.” 

In her response, Small appears to admit that the injections were not thoroughly tested before entering the market  

“Regarding the question around whether we knew about stopping immunization before it entered the market, no,” Small responded, laughing. 

“These, you know, we had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market,” she said, adding that the company was “doing everything at risk.” 

It remains unclear whether Small might have meant something else, for instance the jabs’ waning effectiveness, given that she swapped out the word “transmission” for “immunization” in her response. 

RELATED: Pfizer exec appears to say the company didn’t know whether COVID jabs would stop transmission 

— Article continues below Petition —

PETITION: Demand the Conservative Party apologize for not resisting Trudeau’s COVID regime

2872 have signed the petition.

Let’s get to 4000!

Add your signature:

  Show Petition Text

Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

“It really was a special moment. For the first time, Pfizer admitted that the vaccine was not tested on stopping the transmission of the virus when it entered the market,” Roos said in his interview with Carlson. 

“This has massive implications,” Roos continued. “Governments pushed millions of people worldwide to get vaccinated by telling you to do it for your grandmother, and they tricked perfectly healthy young people into taking this jab using false arguments.” 

subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada Catholic

The Dutch MEP lamented that governments had sowed “immense hatred” towards people who refused to take the jab. He pointed out that many governments introduced COVID passports which made “access to parts of society,” like going to a restaurant or the gym, “conditional.” 

“Our governments love to talk about institutional discrimination, but this was real institutional discrimination,” Roos declared, adding that “in many countries, like the U.S. and Italy, vaccine mandates were introduced for certain professions. Many people lost their job, their livelihoods, their business because they stood by their principles.” 

The Dutch politician observed that Austria “even had a lockdown for the unvaccinated” and “literally imprisoned people in their own homes.” 

“All of this was based on the idea that vaccinations help prevent the spread of the virus,” Roos continued. “But this has now [been] proven to be a big lie,” since the Pfizer executive has admitted that there is “no scientific basis to say that vaccination would stop the transmission of the virus.” 

“And I find this one of the biggest scandals of our time,” Roos added. He promised that he “won’t forget what they did to millions of people.” 

“If we are a democracy then we should have accountability. And that’s what I’m calling for,” the Dutch MEP said. 

Carlson agreed with Roos and remarked that “Pfizer knew this. None of its executives have bothered to correct these politicians, and yet no Pfizer executives have been charged with the crime they committed, which is pretty unbelievable.”