Le blog de Frédéric Delorca

Au milieu des années 2000, quelques années après mes premiers pas sur Internet avec le site Résistancenet.org en 1999, je me suis proposé de poursuivre l’expérience du commentaire occasionnel de l’actualité mondiale à travers ce petit blog, et je continue aujourd’hui, dans le respect du IXe commandement du Décalogue qui interdit le faux témoignage (un commandement que tant de publicistes négligent). Ce blog vous donnera peut-être envie aussi de lire mes livres sur la Serbie, le Béarn, la Transnistrie, l’Abkhazie, les régimes populistes… (et pour une présentation plus vivante des contenus de ce blog n’hésitez pas à vous abonner gratuitement à TV Delorca sur You Tube !)

• Accueil
• Contact

La fin de l’Etat de droit

31 Juillet 2021 , Rédigé par Frédéric Delorca Publié dans #Grundlegung zur Metaphysik, #Le monde autour de nous, #coronavirus-vaccination-big pharma, #Christianisme, #Débats chez les « résistants », #Peuples d’Europe et UE

Après avoir vu l’an dernier les dernières protection du soi-disant « Etat de droit » sauter les une après les autres autour des questions du confinement et du port du masque, je crois que plus personne ne s’attendait plus à les voir fonctionner sur le sujet du « passe sanitaire ». Et effectivement cet été aucune digue n’a tenu : le Conseil d’Etat a rendu un avis favorable en choisissant pour rapporteur un ancien candidat aux régionales du parti présidentiel, le Conseil constitutionnel présidé par une ancien premier ministre au passé trouble, dont le fils travaille pour MsKinsey & Co, le cabinet américain (« global ») chargé de définir la stratégie de la vaccination en France, s’est aligné…  Le passage par le Parlement en un temps record a eu pour seule utilité permettre à une sénatrice franc-maçonne pro-avortement d’ajouter un amendement autorisant la vaccination des 16-17 ans sans accord parental (toujours le thème du « vos enfants sont à nous », cher à Céline Dion et à toutes les sociétés secrètes qui nous gouvernent) Seule la défenseure des droits a joué encore un peu son rôle, et encore, juste pour la forme. Débauche de mensonges, de manipulation, de mauvaise foi, de mépris. Des candides osent encore s’étonner : « Comment se fait-il que les laboratoires ne se satisfassent pas déjà des milliards de bénéfices engrangés sur notre dos ? Pourquoi n’arrêtent-ils pas cette folie ? » Ceux qui croient que l’économie gouverne la monde se bercent d’illusions : « On va boycotter les cinémas qui imposent le passe, et, vous allez voir, ils vont renoncer à nous l’imposer ». Quelle blague ! Ne voient-ils pas  que nos gouvernants sont prêts comme l’an dernier à continuer de subventionner en monnaie de singe tous les commerces jusqu’à ce que l’argent n’ait plus aucune valeur et que la misère s’impose à tous ? Tout l’engrenage de la pénurie les arrange. Car le moteur n’est pas économique. Il est spirituel. La destruction de l’humanité (sa réduction à 500 millions d’esclaves) est l’objectif des forces qui utilisent nos zombies de gouvernants façon Philippe et Castex comme des marionnettes. Les libéraux et les marxistes ne s’en rendront compte que trop tard, et comprendront alors que leur vieux catéchisme économiciste, sous des apparences rationnelles, n’était en fait qu’un instrument au service de cette finalité apocalyptique.

Les plus pathétiques sont ceux qui osent dire encore : « A l’automne il y aura 80 % de vaccinés à deux doses. Et là, le gouvernement abrogera le passe sanitaire ». Il faut vivre dans un syndrome de Stockholm complet pour croire ce genre de fadaise. Le gouvernement a rejeté l’amendement d’Emmanuelle Ménard, députée non inscrite, demandant que le Passe sanitaire cesse d’exister dès lors que le virus ne représentera plus une menace suffisante pour le justifier. Le passe est destiné à durer. Les médias monteront toujours en épingle des variants soi-disant sournois dont le vaccin n’immunisera pas. Il faudra de nouvelles doses, celui qui n’aura pas ses 6 ou 7 doses vaccinales sera menacé d’enfermement, fiché par son passe, lequel comportera aussi toutes sortes d’autres informations sur son état de santé, sur son compte bancaire, sur ses orientations politiques, et l’on imposera toujours plus de restrictions de services à ceux qui seront à la traîne pour le nombre de doses règlementaires. Tandis que les autres, ceux qui auront dit « oui » au 666, avec leur graphène dans les tissus cellulaires et leurs nanoparticules manipulables par la 5G,  seront à chaque instant, dans leur chair même, dans leur cerveau, à la merci du système auquel ils auront fait confiance.

Sans doute il faut encore manifester, et peut-être lancer des opérations de boycott, des actions en justice etc. Mais la solution n’est ni dans l’économie ni dans le droit. Il faut avant tout un recentrage spirituel d’un assez grand nombre de gens pour que ceux qui s’en remettent à la transcendance et reçoivent d’elle non seulement les moyens de « passer entre les gouttes » mais aussi des pistes d’action pour créer des poches de résistance collective vraiment efficaces.

Mais pour être « recentré », il faut principalement ne plus se sentir débiteur à l’égard du système. Ne pas attendre de lui un « assouplissement » (j’avais déjà indiqué en juin que le soi-disant assouplissement estival était fictif), ni aucune forme d’humanité, ni aucune vérité car le mensonge est désormais sa loi. Et ne perdez même pas d’énergie à argumenter avec les gens obtus ou à souffrir des malheurs que le système inflige aux plus faibles, de sa grossière bêtise (celle par exemple de l’atroce Mme Bachelot), de toute cette horreur qu’on peut agiter comme un chiffon rouge pour susciter votre colère ou votre dépression : ces sentiments faibles leur rendent service. L’urgence est de calmement et fermement, avec la force de la prière, soustraire notre âme à tout compromis et toute compromission avec cette iniquité. « Ne prenez point part aux oeuvres infructueuses des ténèbres, mais plutôt condamnez-les. » (Ephes 5:11) Coupez tous vos ponts affectifs avec la folie ambiante – ne gardez pour elle que le sentiment de la charité envers ses victimes.

Ex-cardinal McCarrick’s looming legal reckoning

Abuse victim James Grein is determined to go to trial to pry loose secrets the McCarrick Report keeps buried — even if we never learn why Ted really got tossed out of Xavier High. Fri Jul 30, 2021 – 3:08 pm EST

By William Underwood

---

• Share on Gab
• Share on Telegram
• 1
• Print this Page

July 30, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — This is the second in a two-part series. You may read the first part here.

It was the unplanned move to Fordham Prep that set McCarrick on his path to the cardinalate — because Fordham is where he became best friends with Werner Edelmann at the start of their junior year.

Werner was the son of Otto Edelmann, a wealthy businessman in Teaneck, N.J., who patented a method to manufacture bras and girdles in the 1930s. The scrawny but charming “Ted” McCarrick, an only child whose father died when he was three, was welcomed into the family like a surrogate son by the deeply Catholic, well-connected Otto Edelmann.

Otto took Werner and Ted to St. Gallen, Switzerland, the Edelmann family’s ancestral home, for the first time in 1947. He introduced the teenagers to his Swiss friends and business partners, as well as influential clerics connected with the historic Abbey of Saint Gall. As a present to Werner and Ted upon their graduation from Fordham Prep in 1949, Otto Edelmann paid all expenses for the pair to return to St. Gallen for a year of study at the prestigious Rosenberg Language Institute.

Those trips marked the beginning of McCarrick’s lifelong ties to St. Gallen, which would later come to be associated with a network of high-ranking Catholic clergy, the “St. Gallen Mafia,” that pushed a liberal, pro-homosexual agenda and reportedly helped elect Pope Francis.

When Ted returned home from St. Gallen in 1950 and announced he wanted to become a Catholic priest, Otto was ecstatic. He footed the bill for Ted’s full tuition at Fordham University, and even bought him a new car when he was ordained in 1958 by Cardinal Francis Spellman, a friend of Otto’s. Fr. McCarrick then essentially became the house chaplain to the Edelmanns and a second family: the Greins.

Ruth Edelmann, Otto’s daughter, became Ruth Grein upon her marriage to Fred Grein, who later managed the women’s undergarment factory owned by Otto. James Grein was born three days before Ted’s ordination and became his first baptism two weeks later. McCarrick eventually celebrated the wedding Masses for five of the seven Grein children, and continued to be treated as a member of both families for many years.

The New York Times in its front-page story in July 2018 identified James Grein by his first name only, but included a color photo of a grinning McCarrick with his arm around James’ waist, as they stood wearing swimsuits beside the pool in the Grein backyard. James had just turned 13 when the photo was taken in 1971, and “Uncle Ted” had already been sexually abusing him for two years.

McCarrick molested Grein, then 11, in the Edelmann home during Thanksgiving and Christmas celebrations in 1969. On both occasions the abuse occurred within the sacrament of confession, performed upstairs in Werner’s former bedroom, located farthest away from the holiday festivities on the first floor. Altogether, McCarrick sexually abused Grein in five American states over a period of 18 years, often plying him with alcohol and date rape drugs.

Investigative reporter Randy Engel connected many of these dots in “The McCarrick Report — After the Dust Has Settled,” an article published earlier this year. “Clearly, the Edelmann-Grein story should have been put front and center in the McCarrick Report,” Engel wrote, dismissing the Vatican document as a “dead letter” partly because James Grein’s name is nowhere to be found. — Article continues below Petition — SIGN: Show Pope Francis the Latin Mass will survive any suppression

25,988 have signed the petition.Let’s get to 30,000! Add your signature:   Show Petition Text Keep me updated via email on this
petition and related issues.

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, the Vatican’s former apostolic nuncio to the United States, called on Pope Francis to resign in August 2018, stating that he had personally informed Jorge Bergoglio of McCarrick’s abuse soon after he assumed the papacy in 2013.

The nearly 500-page McCarrick Report, formally the “Report on the Holy See’s Institutional Knowledge and Decision-Making Related to Former Cardinal Theodore Edgar McCarrick,” basically calls the former Vatican ambassador a liar, then turns the tables by blaming Viganò for failing to investigate allegations of McCarrick’s misconduct as instructed. Neither Viganò nor Grein were among the roughly 100 witnesses in the U.S., Italy, and elsewhere interviewed for the report.

Viganò referenced Grein when he appeared on EWTN to defend himself on the day the report was released last November. He told the interviewer it was significant “that James Grein, the only victim of McCarrick’s sexual molestations who had the courage to denounce him publicly, does not appear in the Report, and that there is no trace of his testimony.”

The omission of Grein’s victimization was no accident. The McCarrick Report’s lead author, California-based lawyer Jeffrey Lena, is essentially the Vatican’s defense attorney. Lena interviewed Grein over two days in connection with his ongoing lawsuits against the Archdiocese of New York, the Archdiocese of Newark, and the Diocese of Metuchen in New Jersey. Grein is also suing McCarrick personally.

Grein’s attorney, Mitchell Garabedian, was featured in Spotlight, the 2015 movie about the clerical sexual abuse crisis in Boston that won the Academy Award for Best Picture. They rejected the New York archdiocese’s settlement offer of $500,000 in 2019, viewing the sum as insufficient compensation for the lifelong impact of McCarrick’s years of abuse.

More importantly, Grein is determined to go to trial to pry loose secrets the McCarrick Report keeps buried — even if we never learn why Ted really got tossed out of Xavier High.

William Underwood, Ph.D., is currently writing a book with James Grein, the most prominent victim of sexual abuse by former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick.

Immune professor sues George Mason University for mandating COVID-19 vaccine

‘George Mason is forcing me to choose between serving my students on one hand and undergoing an unnecessary and potentially risky medical procedure on the other,’ Todd Zywicki said. Fri Jul 30, 2021 – 5:11 pm EST

By Calvin Freiburger

---

• Share on Gab
• Share on Telegram
• 3
• Print this Page

July 30, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — A George Mason University (GMU) law professor who has recovered from COVID-19 is threatening to sue the institution for requiring him to take a COVID-19 vaccine despite his natural immunity.

GMU is requiring all students to be fully vaccinated by August 1 before returning to campus, and all faculty to have received at least one dose by August 15 and be fully vaccinated by October 1, except for individuals with an “approved medical or religious exemption.”

The Epoch Times reports that the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) is representing Todd Zywicki, a professor at GMU’s Scalia Law School who has already contracted and recovered from COVID-19, against what it calls a “flawed reopening policy” that “tramples on the civil liberties of students, faculty, and employees alike.”

“For Professor Zywicki, who has recovered from COVID-19 and acquired robust natural immunity, it is not only medically unnecessary to undergo a vaccination procedure at the current time, but doing so also would create a risk of harm to him,” the NCLA explained in a July 21 letter warning of potential litigation. “Although the Policy may be well-intentioned, GMU has breached its constitutional and ethical obligations by interfering with health decisions that should reside with individuals and their medical providers.”

“George Mason is forcing me to choose between serving my students on one hand and undergoing an unnecessary and potentially risky medical procedure on the other,” Zywicki himself said. “Multiple clinical studies have shown that natural immunity provides at least as much protection against reinfection as the most effective vaccines.”

While it is not yet known whether natural immunity lasts an entire lifetime, multiple studies have found the presence of antibodies in patients’ systems up to a year after infection, as well as indications that natural immunity may be more effective than vaccinated immunity.

“There is more data on natural immunity than there is on vaccinated immunity, because natural immunity has been around longer,” says Dr. Marty Makary, professor of surgery at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, who believes natural COVID immunity will “probably” be life-long. “We are not seeing reinfections, and when they do happen, they’re rare. Their symptoms are mild or are asymptomatic.”  — Article continues below Petition — PETITION: Fire Fauci and investigate him now!

60,813 have signed the petition.Let’s get to 70,000! Add your signature:   Show Petition Text Keep me updated via email on this
petition and related issues.

The belief that vaccination would be unnecessary-at-best for the previously-infected is just one of several drivers of vaccine disinterest and hesitancy. Others include COVID-19’s high survivability among most groups, low risk of asymptomatic spread, and the issue of “breakthrough” infections among the vaccinated, which the Biden administration and Democrat officials across the country are treating as significant enough to necessitate a return to masking recommendations and mandates even for the vaccinated.

The chief reason for hesitancy, however, remains concern that the COVID-19 vaccines were developed and released so fast that potential side effects are not fully understood.

Vaccine defenders note that the one-year development period was not starting from scratch, but rather relied on years of prior research into mRNA technology; and that one of the innovations of the Trump administration’s “Operation Warp Speed” was conducting various aspects of the development process concurrently rather than sequentially, eliminating delays unrelated to safety. But those factors do not fully account for the condensing of clinical trial phases — each of which can take anywhere from 1–3 years on their own — to just three months apiece.

In a pro-vaccine article published May 25, Dr. Moon Nahm of the University of Alabama at Birmingham acknowledged that “trial volunteers continue to be monitored for any long-term issues,” implicitly conceding the limits of medical authorities’ current knowledge and the lingering possibility of long-term effects.

GMU is far from the only academic institution to mandate COVID vaccines for faculty and students. California State University, the largest four-year public university system in the United States, announced this week that it will require all of its estimated 486,000 students and 56,000 staff members to certify vaccination by September 30 in order to return to any of its 23 campuses.

Outer space to be solely the dominion of gays and trans

The big story is not the manufactured controversy over the naming of a single telescope: It’s the way that LGBT forces are successfully corrupting hard sciences.  Fri Jul 30, 2021 – 6:27 pm EST

• Share on Gab
• Share on Telegram
• 8
• Print this Page

LifeSiteNews has been permanently banned on YouTube. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 30, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — According to a growing number of astronomers, physicists, and major scientific journals, anyone who is not sufficiently pro-LGBTQ+ should be denied a presence in the cosmos.  

There is a movement afoot within NASA to rename the much anticipated, $8.8 billion yet-to-be-launched James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). Why? As a State Department official in the 1950s, James Webb opposed employing gays and lesbians, viewing them as security risks susceptible to blackmail.      

Webb went on to become in 1961 the head of NASA, where he oversaw the Apollo program.    

Because the race to beat the USSR to the moon was viewed as integral to winning the Cold War, the Apollo program had to be protected against vulnerabilities to Soviet interference.  Webb was responsible for implementing federal policy that included purging gays and lesbians from the NASA workforce.     

LGBT corruption: Making the hard sciences soft, squishy 

SUBSCRIBE to LifeSite’s daily headlines U.S. Canada World Catholic

The big story, however, is not the manufactured controversy over the naming of a single telescope: It’s the way that LGBT forces are successfully corrupting hard sciences.   

Scientific American magazine has now published two opinion pieces advocating for changing the name of the decades-long JWST project. The most recent article was published jointly with Nature magazine. It’s both ironic and tragic that once venerable mainstream journals devoted to science and nature now overtly reject science and nature in favor of faddish, “woke,” peripheral social justice issues.   

“We felt that we should take a public stand on naming such an important facility after someone whose values were so questionable,” explained the four astronomers behind the renaming move in an email to Nature. “It’s time for NASA to stand up and be on the right side of history.” 

However, it’s hard to imagine how scientists can be on the right side of history while on the wrong side of the laws of both science and nature.  

‘Incredibly creepy’ 

Scientific American regularly publishes articles that are political, not scientific, where LGBT ideology trumps intellectual curiosity, intellectual honesty, and solid research. Recent editorial headlines include Why Anti-Trans Laws Are Anti-Science, A Nationwide Ban Is Needed for “Anti-Gay Therapy,” and Gender-Affirming Health Care Should Be a Right, Not a Crime — all of which belong in the opinion sections of The Advocate or LGBTQ Nation, not a science journal.  

Nature has appended notices to articles and social media postings, declaring, “Nature recognizes that sex and gender are neither binary nor fixed,” or some variation on that theme.   

“What’s going on at Nature is worrisome. It is INCREDIBLY creepy that whenever sex comes up, the publication feels the need to print that parenthetical, like some sort of mantra to ward off wrongthink,” tweeted journalist and science writer Jesse Singal.  “This is not normal.”  https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=eyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2hvcml6b25fdHdlZXRfZW1iZWRfOTU1NSI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJodGUiLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X3NwYWNlX2NhcmQiOnsiYnVja2V0Ijoib2ZmIiwidmVyc2lvbiI6bnVsbH19&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1301632086231707648&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lifesitenews.com%2Fblogs%2Fouter-space-to-be-solely-the-dominion-of-gays-and-trans&sessionId=aad73cee9a04ca9cfcefb8d4bc800e1d9cfcf8e5&siteScreenName=LifeSite&theme=light&widgetsVersion=e9dfb5f%3A1627539779275&width=550px

“The only explanation for these strange and incorrect statements is ideological capture. These sentences are mantras of gender ideology – an ideology that claims that sex is not a reliable classification for humans. It is too vague, mutable and subjective to talk about reliably. The only reliable classification is ‘gender identity’ – whatever that is,” wrote blogger Andy Lewis.   

“This fashionable nonsense arose out of postmodernist-inspired philosophies in ‘gender studies’ and sociology. As with much of these philosophies, it seeks to undermine meaning in words, to break apart and deny objective knowledge and classifications in an attempt to undermine ‘oppressive power structures,’” explained Lewis. “It is a strictly political philosophy with activist aims that denies science can obtain reliable and objective knowledge and any such claim to knowledge is merely the speech of a dominant and oppressive class – usually white, heterosexual men.” 

Transtronomers 

The name-change petition was launched by the four astronomers, including one who identifies as ‘non-binary,’ an astrophysicist who uses the pronouns ‘she/they,’ and a professor of physics and astronomy who is also a core faculty member in women’s and gender studies who identifies as “queer and agender.”  The petition now has amassed 1,250 signatories, according to Nature.   

The authors wrote: 

Many astronomers feel a debt of gratitude for Webb’s work as NASA administrator and are appreciative of and nostalgic for the time during the Apollo program when the space agency thrived. But while appreciation and nostalgia are important, they are not sufficient.  

Webb might have played a positive role at NASA, but his greater legacy beyond the agency is also relevant. Now that we know of Webb’s silence at State and his actions at NASA, we think it is time to rename JWST. The name of such an important mission, which promises to live in the popular and scientific psyche for decades, should be a reflection of our highest values. 

“[T]he night sky is a shared heritage that belongs to all of us, including LGBTQIA+ people. The time for lionizing leaders who acquiesced in a history of harm is over. We should name telescopes out of love for those who came before us and led the way to freedom,” they concluded.   

The American Astronomical Society’s Committee for Sexual-Orientation and Gender Minorities in Astronomy (SGMA) has published a 69-page guide to “LGBT+ Inclusivity in Physics and Astronomy” that it asserts is “fundamentally a question of cultural transformation,” echoing the language employed by Barack Obama, who promised in 2008 to “fundamentally transform the United States of America.” Their passion is not science; they aim to remake the world according to rainbow Marxist ideals.  

Woke science is an experiment certain to fail 

“The federal science agencies have absorbed the vocabulary of academic victimology — from ‘intersectionality’ to ‘heteronormativity’ and ‘stereotype threat,’” wrote Heather Mac Donald in a Wall Street Journal commentary titled Woke Science Is an Experiment Certain to Fail. 

“The National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have all embraced the idea that science is pervaded by systemic bias that handicaps minorities and women,” continued Mac Donald, author and contributing editor at City Journal. “Those agencies have taken on the job of extirpating such inequity on the theory that scientific advancement depends on a ‘diverse’ scientific workforce.” 

‘Wokeness’ is making war on science and math, an attack on scientific principles 

“When it comes to wokeness, we are way past logic or consistency. We are in a world where everything is racist and oppressive and patriarchal — not just the theories developed by white men, but in scientific principles themselves,” observed Dan Hannan in a Washington Examiner opinion titled “Wokeness is making war on science — and even math.” 

Hannan explained that even Oxford University’s hard science departments have become “woke,” hiring a team of students “to diversify and ‘decolonize’ its STEM subjects: science, technology, engineering, and math.” 

He called the move an “attack on scientific principles.”  

“The essence of identity politics is that feelings trump facts, that ‘lived experience’ matters more than empirical data,” said Hannan.

mRNA vaccine inventor: COVID-19 vaccines may make virus more dangerous

Dr. Robert Malone warns that the development of antibody dependent enhancement among those vaccinated with COVID vaccines ‘is the vaccinologist’s worst nightmare.’ The scientist has recently been calling for a halt to vaccinations. Fri Jul 30, 2021 – 5:36 pm EST

By Raymond Wolfe
Follow

---

• Share on Gab
• Share on Telegram
• 11
• Print this Page

LifeSiteNews has been permanently banned on YouTube. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.

July 30, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – Top vaccine scientist Dr. Robert Malone warned that vaccines could be making COVID-19 more dangerous and said the vaccination push may need to be halted altogether in an interview Wednesday on Steve Bannon’s War Room.  

Dr. Malone notably claims to have been the chief inventor of mRNA technology and mRNA and DNA innovations while working with the Salk Institute in the 1980s. Both the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines rely on mRNA technology. Malone is also a licensed physician who received his medical training at Northwestern University, Harvard University medical school, and UC Davis.  https://cdn.vmrcommunications.com/stencil-files/2377ed9c-352e-4593-83f4-67e8b265a0df/index.html

In his interview with Bannon, Malone responded to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) recent reversal on face masks, noting what he called “increasingly desperate and abrupt rollouts of information.” 

Earlier this week, the CDC updated guidance to state that Americans should once again mask up indoors if they are in areas of “high” or “substantial” virus transmission, even after receiving COVID-19 vaccines. “Emerging evidence suggests that fully vaccinated persons who do become infected with the Delta variant are at risk for transmitting it to others,” the agency’s guidelines now say, citing “unpublished data,” some of which was released Friday.  

“We’ve seen a progression of increasingly desperate and abrupt rollouts of information, beginning with Pfizer’s alert a couple of weeks ago that they think we were going to need to have a booster after six months, and Fauci reprimanding them, and then the government flip-flopping and saying that we were going to have to have boosters for Pfizer recipients after six months in elderly and immunocompromised, and then the bomb dropped last night,” Malone said. “And I’m afraid that it’s precisely what I have been concerned about.”    SUBSCRIBE to LifeSite’s daily headlines U.S. Canada World Catholic

He noted a report by NBC News on Tuesday that claimed that the CDC’s backtrack on masks reflected data showing that vaccinated people “could be carrying higher levels of virus than previously understood” and possibly infecting others, according to “multiple sources” close to the Biden administration. The NBC article has been heavily edited since publication.  

Based on statements in the report, Malone inferred that viral levels were higher in vaccinated people than in unvaccinated people. As he later explained on Twitter, this has not been resolved. 

A CDC report published today said that viral loads between the vaccinated and unvaccinated are likely “similar,” though “microbiological studies are required to confirm these findings.”  

“This is precisely what one would see if antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) was happening,” Malone said regarding higher virus levels among the vaccinated. “What is antibody dependent enhancement? Briefly, it’s that the vaccine causes the virus to become more infectious than would happen in the absence of vaccination, would cause the virus to replicate at higher levels than in the absence of infection.” (See further ADE explanation here)

“This is the vaccinologist’s worst nightmare. It happened with the respiratory syncytial virus and in the ‘60s and caused more child deaths in vaccine recipients than unvaccinated. It happened with Dengvaxia, the dengue vaccine,” Malone continued. 

“And it’s happened with virtually every other coronavirus vaccine development program, certainly in humans, known in history, and it’s what the vaccinologists like myself have been warning about since the outset, is the risk of antibody dependent enhancement.” 

Malone said that antibody dependent enhancement seems most apparent in people injected with Pfizer’s vaccine. “So, we now know that the Pfizer protection is waning at six months,” he said. “And what the data seem to suggest is those who have received Pfizer, which is probably the least immunogenic of the three in terms of durability, length of protection, people that are now in the waning phase of the immune response to the Pfizer vaccine seem to be getting infected.” 

“Notice they keep talking about Pfizer and not about the other two. So, this suggests this is exactly what you would anticipate, is the window of greatest susceptibility to antibody dependent enhancement is in this long tapering phase as the vaccine response declines.” 

The top mRNA vaccine expert also criticized Dr. Anthony Fauci, who stated in an appearance on MSNBC this week that levels of virus in the noses of vaccinated people who contract COVID-19 are “exactly the same as the level of virus in an unvaccinated person who’s infected.” 

“And I think Dr. Fauci is being very disingenuous,” Malone said. “I’m accused of being now an anti-vaxxer and promoting disinformation. But to my eyes, the government is obfuscating what’s happening here.”  

“And I don’t mean to sound alarmist, but what seems to be rolling out is the worst-case scenario, where the vaccine in the waning phase is causing the virus to replicate more efficiently than it would otherwise, which is what is we call antibody dependent enhancement is what the word is. And people have been warning about this since the outset of this rushed vaccine campaign.” 

Dr. Malone also criticized Fauci, who recently blamed unvaccinated people for variants, for a “misleading set of statements” about the mutations. Malone said “the escape mutants that are escaping vaccine selective pressure are most likely developing in the people that have been vaccinated, not in the unvaccinated.” “So that’s just another convenient lie,” he said, adding that “antibody dependent enhancement can be influenced by escaped mutants.” 

“If the data are consistent with [antibody dependent enhancement], we have to stop the vaccine campaign,” Malone stressed. “We have to pivot to expediting as much as possible drug treatments, which have been largely blocked and suppressed at the FDA level, particularly for repurposed drugs.” 

Vaccine ‘groupthink’ 

Commenting on the Biden administration’s move to impose new COVID-19 vaccines requirements for all federal employees, Malone said he is witnessing “the most florid example, to my eye, of groupthink that I’ve ever seen in my life.” 

“I think that they are all in on the logic that we need universal vaccination to open up the economy. We don’t,” he said. “They think that vaccines are the pathway to getting to herd immunity. They’re not.” 

“And they think the vaccines are perfectly safe. And not only they’re not perfectly safe, if this is true, that NBC reports, and the titers are higher in vaccinated than unvaccinated, that means we got the worst case type of adverse event that scares vaccinologists, all vaccinologists, which is antibody dependent enhancement.” 

“They’re all in, and they seem to be unable to process this new information, and it seems to be causing cognitive dissonance and causing these people to be increasingly frantic and transparent in their chaotic messaging,” Dr. Malone continued.  

In an previous episode of Bannon’s War Room last week, Dr. Malone emphasized the risk of complications from COVID-19 vaccines, pointing to “pretty clear evidence that the spike protein expressed from vaccines is caused from toxicity in a small subset of patients.” 

“The question is, how big is that subset and how bad and broad are those toxicities? The honest truth is we don’t know, and furthermore there [are] a lot of signs that that information is being withheld from us.” 

Multiple sources told him, he said, that the CDC has been “grossly underreporting” adverse events like cardio toxicity. “My senior colleagues at the FDA have known that this was the case for months and are very frustrated,” Malone said. “We have multiple examples where the CDC appears to be editing data in the support of the ‘noble lie.’” 

Hundreds of thousands of complications after coronavirus vaccination have been reported by federal authorities, including more than 6,300 deaths, though research has shown that the vaccine injury tracking system led by the CDC and FDA significantly undercounts adverse events.  

Experts, like Dr. Peter McCullough, a renowned cardiologist and editor of two medical journals, have estimated that the total deaths attributable to the vaccines could be higher than 50,000. 

La grande étude de suivi Pfizer est enfin publiée : Le vaccin n’a pas d’effet sur la mortalité et il cacherait la contagiosité d’asymptomatiques avec de très fortes charges virales par Patrice Gibertie. Si les études publiées, sont fiables le pass sanitaire constituerait un terrible piège en laissant croire aux vaccinés qu’ils ne contaminent pas. Certains sont non symptomatiques mais avec des charges virales conséquentes

Wikistrike

La grande étude de suivi Pfizer est enfin publiée : Le vaccin n’a pas d’effet sur la mortalité et il cacherait la contagiosité d’asymptomatiques avec de très fortes charges virales par Patrice Gibertie. Si les études publiées, sont fiables le pass sanitaire constituerait un terrible piège en laissant croire aux vaccinés qu’ils ne contaminent pas. Certains sont non symptomatiques mais avec des charges virales conséquentes

medias-presse.info

Islande – Retour du Covid parmi les… vaccinés par Pierre-Alain Depauw

Le Point, organe de presse peu  suspect d’appartenir à la sphère complotiste, souligne que l’Islande figure parmi les pays en pointe de la vaccination contre le Covid-19 avec près des trois quarts de sa population entièrement vaccinée au 14 juillet dernier. Et pourtant,  Le Point ajoute que l’Islande voit les cas d’infection au Covid remonter, principalement chez des vaccinés.

Au cours de ces sept derniers jours, l’Islande recense 213 nouvelles infections, avec des pics quotidiens qui n’ont plus été observés depuis neuf mois. Et sur ces 213 nouveaux cas, 148 personnes avaient reçu leurs deux injections de vaccin expérimental, soit la majorité.

Qu’en pensent Macron et Véran qui nous affirment que « le vaccin c’est la liberté »

Font size

• Contact
• Store Account
• Store
• 0 items$0.00

Pelosi Orders Her Police to Arrest People Without Masks

Blog/Politics

Posted Jul 29, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Spread the love

Despite all the evidence and studies, including the first statement of Fauci, masks do not work and have been “useless”  even back in 1918, Pelosi has ordered what has become her private police force nationwide, to arrest anyone without a mask entering the Capitol. Reasoning and science NEVER matter anymore. It is the narrative that matters – in other words – tyranny. This is proving that there really is no point to getting vaccinated. It has not produced immunity except for politicians, Gates, and Big Pharm.

This entire  Covidscam is indeed collapsing in front of the world to see, but the press is still arguing the glass is half-full. These mask mandates and lockdowns are coming back because yet health authorities are not explaining it truthfully. The Covid vaccines do not offer effective protection certainly against the “new variants.”  What is the point of a Covid Passport when the vaccine does not protect and the vaccinated have to wear masks?  Instead, they are blaming the UNVACCINATED for giving the VACCINATED Coivid? They are getting lost in their own fatal logic.

In England, the government has conceded that “Fully vaccinated people are 65% more likely to be hospitalised & 1540% more likely to die due to Covid-19 than people who are unvaccinated according to latest Public Health England data”

L’illusion du choix et de la liberté — L’opposition contrôlée est un mouvement de protestation dirigé par des agents du gouvernement

Par The Wolf le 29/07/2021 • ( 2 Commentaires )

L’illusion du choix et de la liberté — L’opposition contrôlée est un mouvement de protestation dirigé par des agents du gouvernement

VIDEO

 Une opposition contrôlée est un mouvement de protestation qui est en fait dirigé par des agents du gouvernement. Presque tous les gouvernements de l’histoire ont utilisé cette technique pour tromper et maîtriser leurs adversaires. Notamment Vladimir Lénine qui a déclaré : « La meilleure façon de contrôler l’opposition est de la diriger nous-mêmes ». Le comte Mirabeau faisait partie de l’opposition contrôlée, car si tout le monde pensait qu’il soutenait la révolution, en réalité il soutenait la monarchie et était un ami personnel du roi. C’était un agent du gouvernement.

[Par Roderick Campbell, 29 août 2019] — Si vous allez en ligne et recherchez « opposition contrôlée », vous trouverez plus de 2 millions de résultats, et essentiellement tous sont des ordures. C’est une tactique qui a été utilisée tout au long de l’histoire humaine connue, et pourtant vous constaterez qu’Internet a été nettoyé de presque toutes les références significatives. Ma première introduction à l’opposition contrôlée a été le livre 1984 de George Orwell, un roman dystopique qui dresse un tableau éclatant d’un avenir sombre : l’humanité est devenue l’esclave d’une guerre perpétuelle, d’une surveillance gouvernementale inéluctable, d’une propagande insidieuse et d’un déni irrationnel. Cela vous rappelle-t-il le projet pour le nouveau siècle américain ? Cela devrait.

Dans le roman d’Orwell, les gens se concentrent sur les super-États, la police de la pensée et Big Brother. Mais, en fait, le plus grand personnage est une personne oubliable nommée Goldstein; il est le leader de « The Brotherhood » et il est basé sur Léon Trotsky. Dans le récit du roman, Goldstein est censé être le héros dont l’écriture révolutionnaire inspire ces esprits « éveillés » du système à se lever et à démanteler le système corrompu dans lequel ils sont asservis. Pourtant, au fur et à mesure que le roman progresse, Orwell nous révèle bientôt que l’héroïque « Goldstein » n’est rien d’autre que de la fiction, un personnage créé par la culture dominante pour attirer les dissidents au grand jour afin qu’ils puissent être identifiés et neutralisés. Orwell utilise « Goldstein » pour peindre une image vivante de l’opposition contrôlée.

Orwell utilise le personnage de Goldstein pour démontrer une tactique insidieuse, utilisée par la culture dominante, pour contrôler les limites de la dissidence. Ce personnage est effectivement un « piège à rats » pour captiver ces quelques individus qui osent regarder au-delà du voile de notre réalité fabriquée, afin qu’ils puissent être traités et neutralisés avant de fomenter une réelle résistance contre l’hégémonie de l’État.

[Par Aliana, édité par Eric Cram, 4 juin 2020]

L’opposition contrôlée est la technique consistant à jouer deux camps apparemment opposés l’un contre l’autre pour obtenir le résultat souhaité. Ceci est également connu comme la dialectique hégélienne ou la résolution artificielle des conflits. Si un manipulateur peut contrôler le conflit, il peut également contrôler le résultat.

Une dialectique est un débat destiné à résoudre les différences entre deux points de vue plutôt qu’à établir l’un d’entre eux comme vrai. L’opposition qui est créée à travers cela donne le pouvoir à une troisième force qui siège au-dessus et contrôle les deux côtés.

L’opposition contrôlée est une technique de contrôle de l’esprit et fonctionne de pair avec la stratégie de division et de conquête. Pour créer la division, le manipulateur présentera aux victimes l’illusion du choix. S’il n’y a qu’un seul chemin disponible, une personne sentira le contrôle derrière lui et résistera. Mais lorsqu’on lui permet de choisir, même entre deux options pratiquement identiques, on lui donne l’impression d’avoir choisi le résultat et il est beaucoup plus susceptible de l’accepter, de s’y identifier et de le défendre.

À mesure que les gens s’identifient à leur choix, ils considèrent quiconque s’y oppose comme un ennemi. En réalité, les deux camps ont été mis en place et contrôlés par le même maître de marionnettes, et le conflit qui en résulte est toujours à l’avantage du manipulateur.

La politique est une dialectique très évidente. Les gens sont amenés à s’identifier fortement à l’une ou l’autre des positions opposées; conservateur ou libéral. Ces deux parties sont en conflit constant l’une avec l’autre car leurs partisans sont amenés à croire que le changement et les solutions qu’ils souhaitent, incombent au parti pour lequel ils votent.

En vérité, aucune des deux parties ne détient de pouvoir réel autre que celui de rendre les gens conformes à la volonté d’une force supérieure tout en pensant que c’était leur propre décision.

La guerre est un autre excellent exemple de cette technique. Aucune personne saine d’esprit et en bonne santé ne choisirait volontiers la guerre. Pourtant, la guerre est continue et se poursuit dans notre monde. Les seuls qui en bénéficient sont ceux qui contrôlent les mécanismes par lesquels ces guerres sont menées; les armes qui sont fabriquées, les banques centrales et les dettes qui découlent de ces conflits, le carburant nécessaire pour alimenter ces guerres… Ces mécanismes sont tous contrôlés par le même groupe de personnes, et souvent ce même groupe de personnes finance les deux côtés de la guerre.

«… Le cadre pour guider les pensées et les actions dans les conflits menant à une solution prédéterminée. Ceci est accompli en manipulant la conscience dans un modèle circulaire de pensée et d’action. La solution synthétique de ces conflits ne peut être introduite que si ceux qui sont manipulés prennent un parti qui fera avancer l’ordre du jour prédéterminé. » — George Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel

L’Opposition Contrôlée a été utilisée pour nous contrôler, non seulement au niveau physique et mental, mais aussi et à un niveau encore plus grand au niveau spirituel. L’évolution consciente a été ralentie par l’utilisation de cette technique à travers des idéologies telles que la spiritualité New Age et les religions culturelles.

Les contrôleurs savent que les humains recherchent inconsciemment une évolution spirituelle et reconnaîtraient quelque chose qui ne va pas avec le système déséquilibré du cerveau gauche dans lequel nous vivons. La solution était de nous présenter leurs propres fausses versions de spiritualité et d’illumination, tout en gardant la vraie connaissance spirituelle occultée. En tant que dernier cul-de-sac avant la mine d’or, cela nous a égarés; loin du vrai chemin et vers la passivité et l’inaction.

Il y a beaucoup de vérités cachées dans le nouvel âge et les enseignements religieux, mais cela nécessite du discernement. L’une des techniques de manipulation consiste à infuser la vérité avec la tromperie. Le manipulateur sait qu’on ne prendra pas de poison évident, alors il le cache dans quelque chose de bon et de vrai pour le rendre agréable au goût.

Le courant sous-jacent imbriqué dans beaucoup de ces enseignements est celui de l’inaction. L’accent est mis sur la croyance et la pensée, plutôt que sur la connaissance et l’action. La sagesse s’acquiert en prenant la connaissance de la vérité, puis en agissant sur cette connaissance. Une action juste est ce qui entraînera en fin de compte le changement dont nous avons besoin dans ce monde. Le nouvel âge et les enseignements religieux ont été conçus pour nous passiver, de sorte que nous ne ferons rien contre l’usurpation de nos droits naturels.

« La sagesse est le pouvoir et le pouvoir est la sagesse, l’un avec l’autre, perfectionnant le tout. Ne sois pas fier, ô homme, de ta sagesse. Discours avec les ignorants aussi bien qu’avec les sages. Si quelqu’un vient à vous plein de connaissances, écoutez et faites attention, car la sagesse est tout. Ne restez pas silencieux quand le mal est dit pour la vérité. Car comme la lumière du soleil, la vérité brille avant tout. Celui qui outrepasse la loi sera tenu responsable. Car c’est seulement à travers la Loi que vient la vraie liberté. Ne faites pas peur aux autres, car la peur est la servitude; un lien qui lie les ténèbres à l’homme » — Philosophie hermétique

De plus, ces idéologies enseignent à ne pas regarder le négatif, l’erreur étant que c’est ainsi que fonctionne la loi de l’attraction; Si vous pensez au négatif, vous l’attirez dans votre vie. C’est une notion attrayante. Les gens évitent naturellement le côté obscur. Mais le contraire est vrai. La connaissance et la compréhension du côté obscur et de la manière dont il est utilisé contre nous, nous permettront de le reconnaître et d’y résister. Si nous ne reconnaissons pas et ne reconnaissons pas les choses les plus sombres, à la fois en nous et autour de nous, nous serons impuissants à nous élever et à les conquérir.

« On ne s’illumine pas en imaginant des figures de lumière, mais en rendant les ténèbres conscientes. Cette dernière procédure, cependant, est désagréable et, par conséquent, peu populaire. » — Carl Jung

Les contrôleurs nous ont donné l’illusion du choix et l’illusion de la liberté. En échange, nous leur avons donné notre conformité à leur système. C’est la sombre vérité. Nous devons l’examiner, le discerner et le reconnaître. Nous devons récupérer notre pouvoir de pensée, agir et commencer à créer des changements. Ignorer cette vérité est le moyen le plus sûr de détruire la vraie liberté.

medias-presse.info

Selon Pfizer, le vaccin anti-Covid a une durée d’efficacité limitée à huit mois par Pierre-Alain Depauw

Pfizer annonce un effondrement des anticorps 8 mois après la vaccination.
👉 7 à 13 fois moins pour les 65-85 ans
👉 4 à 6 fois moins pour les 15-55 ans
Les premières personnes à s’être fait vacciner par Pfizer fin 2020 sont donc aujourd’hui à peine encore immunisées.

Cliquer pour accéder à Q2-2021-Earnings-Conference-Call-Prepared-Remarks-FINAL.pdf

Une très mauvaise nouvelle pour ceux qui se font vacciner en croyant retrouver ainsi leur liberté.

Une très bonne nouvelle pour les actionnaires de Pfizer car cela signifie de nouvelles ventes de leur « vaccin » expérimental.

Pierre-Alain Depauw