Interviewing the dead Albert Einstein about free will

by Jon Rappoport

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Note: I’m publishing this piece as an introduction to the scientific tyranny which has overtaken us: the premise that we are machines, and we can be decoded and transformed by genetics. This is a lie on every possible level. For many people, their first taste of this insanity is the COVID vaccine—a genetic treatment. However, that treatment comes out of the conviction that life is “mechanism.”  For 35 years, I’ve been waging war against this conviction. I continue to do so—not because I have some quirky mystical alternative, but because FREEDOM VERSUS THE MACHINE is the Big One, the big battlefield under the surface of our civilization. I’m talking about today, tomorrow, the next hundred, the next five hundred years. OK, here we go—a piece of fiction to make the truth known:   ~~~ It was a strange journey into the astral realm to find Albert Einstein.  I slipped through gated communities heavily guarded by troops protecting dead Presidents. I skirted alleys where wannabe demons claiming they were Satan’s reps were selling potions made from powdered skulls of English kings. I ran through mannequin mansions where trainings for future shoppers were in progress. Apparently, some souls come to Earth to be born as aggressive entitled consumers. Who knew? Finally, in a little valley, I spotted a cabin, and there on the porch, sitting in a rocker, smoking a pipe and reading The Bourne Ultimatum, was Dr. Einstein. He was wearing an old sports jacket with leather patches on the elbows, jeans, and furry slippers.     I wanted to talk with the great man because I’d read a 1929 Saturday Evening Post interview with him. He’d said: “I am a determinist. As such, I do not believe in free will…Practically, I am, nevertheless, compelled to act as if freedom of the will existed. If I wish to live in a civilized community, I must act as if man is a responsible being.” Dr, Einstein went inside and brought out two bottles of cold beer and we began our conversation: Q: Sir, would you say that the underlying nature of physical reality is atomic? A: If you’re asking me whether atoms and smaller particles exist everywhere in the universe, then of course, yes. Q: And are you satisfied that, wherever they are found, they are the same? They exhibit a uniformity? A: Surely, yes. Q: Regardless of location. A: Correct. Q: So, for example, if we consider the make-up of the brain, those atoms are no different in kind from atoms wherever in the universe they are found. A: That’s true. The brain is composed entirely of these tiny particles. And the particles, everywhere in the universe, without exception, flow and interact and collide without any exertion of free will. It’s an unending stream of cause and effect. Q: And when you think to yourself, “I’ll get breakfast now,” what is that? A: The thought? Q: Yes. A: Ultimately, it is the outcome of particles in motion. Q: You were compelled to have that thought. A: As odd as that may seem, yes. Of course, we tell ourselves stories to present ourselves with a different version of reality, but those stories are social or cultural constructs. Q: And those “stories” we tell ourselves—they aren’t freely chosen rationalizations, either. We have no choice about that. A: Well, yes. That’s right. Q: So there is nothing in the human brain that allows us the possibility of free will. A: Nothing at all. Q: And as we are sitting here right now, sir, looking at each other, sitting and talking, this whole conversation is spooling out in the way that it must. Every word. Neither you nor I is really choosing what we say. A: I may not like it, but yes, it’s deterministic destiny. The particles flow. Q: When you pause to consider a question I ask you…even that act of considering is mandated by the motion of atomic and sub-atomic particles. What appears to be you deciding how to give me an answer…that is a delusion. A: The act of considering? Why, yes, that, too, would have to be determined. It’s not free. There really is no choice involved.  Q: And the outcome of this conversation, whatever points we may or may not agree upon, and the issues we may settle here, about this subject of free will versus determinism…they don’t matter at all, because, when you boil it down, the entire conversation was determined by our thoughts, which are nothing more than atomic and sub-atomic particles in motion—and that motion flows according to laws, none of which have anything to do with human choice. A: The entire flow of reality, so to speak, proceeds according to determined sets of laws. Yes. Q: And we are in that flow. A: Most certainly we are. Q: The earnestness with which we might try to settle this issue, our feelings, our thoughts, our striving—that is irrelevant. It’s window dressing. This conversation actually cannot go in different possible directions. It can only go in one direction. A: That would ultimately have to be so. Q: Now, are atoms and their components, and any other tiny particles in the universe…are any of them conscious? A: Of course not. The particles themselves are not conscious. Q: Some scientists speculate they are. A: Some people speculate that the moon can be sliced and served on a plate with fruit. Q: What do you think “conscious” means? A: It means we participate in life. We take action. We converse. We gain knowledge. Q: Any of the so-called faculties we possess—are they ultimately anything more than particles in motion? A: Well, no, they aren’t. Because everything is particles in motion. What else could be happening in this universe? Nothing. Q: All right. I’d like to consider the word “understanding.” A: It’s a given. It’s real. Q: How so? A: The proof that it’s real, if you will, is that we are having this conversation. It makes sense to us. Q: Yes, but how can there be understanding if everything is particles in motion? Do the particles possess understanding? A: No they don’t. Q: To change the focus just a bit, how can what you and I are saying have any meaning? A: Words mean things. Q: Again, I have to point out that, in a universe with no free will, we only have particles in motion. That’s all. That’s all we are. So where does “meaning” come from? A: “We understand language” is a true proposition. Q: You’re sure. A: Of course. Q: Then I suggest you’ve tangled yourself in a contradiction. In the universe you depict, there would be no room for understanding. Or meaning.  There would be nowhere for it to come from. Unless particles understand. Do they? A: No. Q: Then where do “understanding” and “meaning” come from? A: [Silence.] Q: Furthermore, sir, if we accept your depiction of a universe of particles, then there is no basis for this conversation at all. We don’t understand each other. How could we? A: But we do understand each other. Q: And therefore, your philosophic materialism (no free will, only particles in motion) must have a flaw. A: What flaw? Q: Our existence contains more than particles in motion. A: More? What would that be? Q: Would you grant that whatever it is, it is non-material? A: It would have to be, but… Q: Then, driving further along this line, there is something non-material which is present, which allows us to understand each other, which allows us to comprehend meaning. We are conscious. Puppets are not conscious. As we sit here talking, I understand you. Do you understand me? A: Of course. Q: Then that understanding is coming from something other than particles in motion. Without this non-material quality, you and I would be gibbering in the dark. A: You’re saying that, if all the particles in the universe, including those that make up the brain, possess no consciousness, no understanding, no comprehension of meaning, no freedom, then how can they give birth to understanding and freedom. There must be another factor, and it would have to be non-material. Q: Yes. That’s what I’m saying. And I think you have to admit your view of determinism and particles in motion—that picture of the universe—leads to several absurdities. A: Well…perhaps I’m forced to consider it. Otherwise, we can’t sit here and understand each other. Q: You and I do understand each other.  A: I hadn’t thought it through this way before, but if there is nothing inherent in particles that gives rise to understanding and meaning, then everything is gibberish. Except it isn’t gibberish. Yes, I seem to see a contradiction. Interesting. Q: And if these non-material factors—understanding and meaning—exist, then other non-material factors can exist. A: For example, freedom. I suppose so. Q: And the drive to eliminate freedom in the world…is more than just the attempt to substitute one automatic reflex for another. A: That would be…yes, that would be so. Q: Scientists would be absolutely furious about the idea that, despite all their maneuvering, the most essential aspects of human life are beyond the scope of what they, the scientists, are “in charge of.” A: It would be a naked challenge to the power of science. Einstein puffed on his pipe and looked out over the valley. He took a sip of his beer. After a minute, he said, “Let me see if I can summarize this, because it’s really rather startling. The universe is nothing but particles. All those particles follow laws of motion. They aren’t free. The brain is made up entirely of those same particles. Therefore, there is nothing in the brain that would give us freedom. These particles also don’t understand anything, they don’t make sense of anything, they don’t grasp the meaning of anything. Since the brain, again, is made up of those particles, it has no power to allow us to grasp meaning or understand anything. But we do understand. We do grasp meaning. Therefore, we are talking about qualities we possess which are not made out of energy. These qualities are entirely non-material.” He nodded.    “In that case,” he said, “there is…oddly enough, a completely different sphere or territory. It’s non-material. Therefore, it can’t be measured. Therefore, it has no beginning or end. If it did, it would be a material continuum and we could measure it.” He pointed to the valley. “That has energy. But what does it give me? Does it allow me to be conscious? Does it allow me to be free, to understand meaning? No.”   Then he laughed. He looked at me. “I’m dead,” he said, “aren’t I? I didn’t realize it until this very moment.” I shook my head. “No. I would say you WERE dead until this moment.” He grinned. “Yes!” he said. “That’s a good one. I WAS dead.” He stood up. “Enough of this beer,” he said. “I have some schnapps inside. Let me get it. Let’s drink the good stuff! After all, I’m apparently Forever. And so are you. And so are we all.”

7

Vaccins et consentement « éclairé » Blog du docteur Gérard Maudrux

Posted on 22 juin 2021 by Gérard Maudrux

En droit de la santé le consentement libre et éclairé impose au médecin de présenter clairement au patient tous les risques d’une conduite thérapeutique. Le consentement doit être libre, c’est-à-dire en l’absence de contrainte, et éclairé, c’est-à-dire précédé par une information.

Nous venons de voir que pour la vaccination des enfants pour le Sars-Cov-2, il faut 3 consentements : les deux parents, et l’enfant, qui doit s’exprimer librement. Que cache cette insistance ? C’est très simple, mais bien peu de gens sont capables de le comprendre vu le peu de culture juridique, de jugement, de bon sens et d’anticipation de l’avenir enseignés à nos concitoyens.

Le message est très clair : « si demain il y a problème, c’est vous le responsable. Vous avez été informés, vous avez signé, nous n’y sommes pour rien. Vous avez pris vos responsabilités ». Si le consentement éclairé ne peut exister quand c’est obligatoire, est-ce qu’on demande un consentement éclairé pour vous vacciner contre le Tétanos ? Tout autre traitement ? Est-ce qu’on exige de signer un consentement éclairé pour toute prescription hors AMM (20% des prescriptions) ? Non.

Le consentement éclairé, s’est développé surtout dans deux domaines : les expérimentations, et la chirurgie, c’est à dire les domaines à risques avérés, non prévisibles, et pouvant être graves, mortels. En chirurgie c’est devenu une obligation depuis 20 ans, suite à de nombreuses condamnations de praticiens, le patient (ou la famille) disant « je n’avais pas été prévenu du risque, si j’aurais su j’aurais pas venu », le praticien devant apporter la preuve du contraire. 

Notre Ministre décharge les médecins de bien informer les patients des risques de la vaccination. Je le cite : « La responsabilité des médecins ne pourra être engagée au motif qu’ils auraient délivré une information insuffisante aux patients sur les effets indésirables méconnus à la date de vaccination ».Que penser de la connaissance des médecins sur le sujet, quand ils n’ont droit qu’à une seule source d’information, l’officielle, toute autre étant méchamment vilipendée ou censurée. L’information officielle ? Celle des seuls laboratoires déjà multi condamnés pour avoir caché leurs effets secondaires. De plus, information édulcorée par les autorités. Un exemple : l’ARN messager reste dans le muscle deltoïde, dixit l’Inserm et les autorités. Qu’ont écrit Pfizer et Moderna dans leur études et occulté par les autorités ? « Nous avons retrouvé nos billes dans tous les organes, y compris reproducteurs ». Alors, bien « éclairé » le consentement ? Quand un vaccinateur dit aux patients que les vaccins sont sans risques, fabriqués comme les autres à partir de virus atténués, bien éclairé le responsable qui doit éclairer les autres ?

Notre Ministre, le même, vient de menacer les soignants dans les Ehpads de rendre leur vaccination obligatoire s’ils ne se vaccinaient pas plus. Dans le « consentement éclairé », il y a le mot « consentement ». Qu’est-ce qu’un consentement sous la menace, sous un chantage ? Est-ce un consentement ? De plus quelle justification scientifique et médicale à ce chantage quand 90% des pensionnaires sont vaccinés, donc protégés ? (Rappelons que le vaccin est efficace à 98%…  )

Sommes-nous dans l’esprit du code de Nuremberg qui veut dans son premier article que : « Le consentement volontaire du sujet humain est absolument essentiel. Cela veut dire que la personne concernée doit avoir la capacité légale de consentir ; qu’elle doit être placée en situation d’exercer un libre choix, sans intervention de quelque élément de force, de fraude, de contrainte, de supercherie, de duperie ou d’autres formes sournoises de contrainte ou de coercition « ?

Toujours dans sa lettre évoquée plus haut, le Ministre parle de l’indemnisation des victimes du vaccin. Habituellement, c’est le laboratoire qui est responsable des conséquences de ce qu’il commercialise, il fait donc attention avant de lancer sur le marché. Ici, l’Etat a passé contrat avec les laboratoires, « prenant en charge » la responsabilité et l’indemnisation des éventuelles conséquences. Les laboratoires ont donc moins de précautions à respecter, leur portefeuille n’en souffrira pas en cas d’insuffisance. Ils ont déjà été condamnés à des milliards d’euros d’amendes ces dernières années, pour avoir caché des informations et des défauts, ce qui n’empêche pas nos autorités, non seulement de leur faire confiance les yeux fermés, mais en plus de les décharger de leurs responsabilités.

On se décharge donc du pénal avec le consentement éclairé, mais pour l’indemnisation, qui prend en charge et comment, si ce n’est pas les laboratoires ? Est-ce l’Etat ? Comme l’écrit le Ministre, c’est l’ONIAM. L’ONIAM, Office National d’Indemnisation des Accidents Médicaux, des Affections Iatrogènes et des Infections Nosocomiales. C’est un établissement public créé par la loi du 4 mars 2002 relative aux droits des malades et à la qualité du système de santé, qui a pour mission d’organiser le dispositif d’indemnisation « amiable, rapide et gratuit » (selon le site) des victimes d’accidents médicaux.

Les victimes de la campagne de vaccination du H1N1, ont pu toucher du doigt les qualités de cet organisme. En effet, ce vaccin a été à l’origine de plus de 2 000 catalepsies en Europe. 12 ans après, une bonne partie des victimes, porteur d’une maladie invalidante et incurable, sont toujours au tribunal pour obtenir gain de cause, et ceux qui ont été indemnisés l’ont été à des tarifs dérisoires comparés aux indemnités habituellement attribués par les tribunaux.

Cerise sur le gâteau, savez-vous qui finance cet ONIAM ? Le financement de l’organiste est assuré par les cotisations sociales, c’est à dire par les victimes. C’est beau non ? L’Etat s’arrange avec les labos pour faire supporter leur responsabilité par les victimes potentielles. Dans cette affaire, ni les labos, ni l’Etat ne prennent aucune responsabilité. Coupables, mais pas responsables.

medias-presse.info

Covid en Israël : 40 % des nouveaux cas sont des vaccinés ! par Pierre-Alain Depauw

Israël – Lundi soir, le professeur Gabi Barbash, ancien directeur général du ministère de la Santé, était l’invité de la radio israélienne 103FM pour évoquer la reprise du coronavirus en Israël, l’un des pays à la population la plus vaccinée contre le Covid.

Selon le compte-rendu de l’émission fait par la télévision israélienne i24news, l’ancien directeur général du ministère israélien de la Santé a souligné que près de la moitié des nouvelles personnes contaminées par le coronavirus sont des personnes vaccinées : « 40 % des nouveaux cas sont des personnes vaccinées », a-t-il averti. Il a souligné que la question se pose de savoir s’il y aura une troisième injection du vaccin ou si un vaccin spécifique est en cours de développement pour traiter le nouveau variant.

Autrement dit, les vaccins anti-Covid, aux effets indésirables multiples, ne sont pas efficaces contre le Covid et ses multiples variants.

The Economic Collapse

   

On The Mean Streets Of America, The Gun Battles Never Seem To End…

---

On The Mean Streets Of America, The Gun Battles Never Seem To End… Posted: 21 Jun 2021 06:31 PM PDT Did you know that 296 mass shootings have happened in the United States this year?  Needless to say, the vast majority of the mass shootings are taking place in our core urban areas, and at this point many of our largest cities are becoming open war zones.  We desperately need more law enforcement officers on the streets, and as I wrote about yesterday, even some of our most liberal cities are now racing to “re-fund” the police.  Crime rates spiked dramatically all over the nation in 2020, and they are skyrocketing even higher in 2021.  But if you think that things have been bad so far, just wait, because we are being warned that “a bloody summer” is on the way… “The spike in homicides and nonfatal shootings is extremely alarming,” said Miami Police Chief Art Acevedo, who recently left the Houston Police Department and leads the Major Cities Chiefs Association, an organization of law enforcement executives. “One of the reasons we talk about a bloody summer ahead for our country is because it’s already been a very bloody year, a very deadly year for Americans.” There is usually more violent crime when the weather is warmer, and we have definitely seen that so far here in the month of June. Mass shootings are considered to be incidents in which at least four people are wounded, and during this past weekend we witnessed mass shootings in New Jersey, Colorado, Indiana, Virginia, Alaska, Louisiana, Minnesota, Texas and California. They are happening with such frequency now that each one barely makes a blip in the news before the next one happens. To me, the most disturbing incident during the weekend took place in Chicago… And in another deadly shooting in the city on Saturday night, two individuals were attacked by a group of men after a crash took place at Humboldt Park, prompting a large crowd to surround Gyovanny Arzuaga’s vehicle.He and his girlfriend, Yasmin Perez, were attending a Puerto Rican People’s Day parade in the park, Newsweek reported, when a group of two or three gunmen ambushed them and opened fire.A video of the incident, posted to Twitter, purportedly shows Arzuaga surrounded by a group of men, who leave him lying unresponsive on the ground. Words cannot really convey the true horror of that attack.  If you have not seen the video footage yet, you can watch it right here. When I first watched it, I could hardly believe what I was seeing. There has always been violence in our streets, but nothing like this. What in the world is happening to our country? Overall, the number of shootings in the city of Chicago is up 18 percent so far this year. I know that sounds bad, but other major cities are seeing much larger spikes. In Philadelphia, the number of shootings is up 27 percent so far this year. It is supposed to be “the city of brotherly love”, but it is rapidly becoming one of the most dangerous places in America. In Atlanta, the number of shootings is up 40 percent so far this year. But at least the Hawks are doing well, right? In Los Angeles, the number of shootings is up 51 percent so far this year. Crime is now the number one political issue in the L.A. area, and even tourist areas such as Venice Beach are being totally trashed. In New York City, the number of shootings is up 64 percent so far this year. As I discussed yesterday, in the Big Apple running gun battles even happen during broad daylight these days. In Minneapolis, the number of shootings is up 90 percent so far this year. I spent a lot of time in Minneapolis growing up, because I have a lot of relatives in the area.  I can’t believe how far that once beautiful city has now fallen. But there is one major city that even has Minneapolis beat. In Portland, the number of shootings is up 126 percent so far this year. Everywhere you look, there is chaos and violence, and what we have been through so far is just the beginning. It is almost as if a significant percentage of the population has gone completely and totally nuts over the past couple of years.  In this sort of an environment, you never know what some crazy person might do.  Here is just one example… A Bel Air homeowner is in shock after coming face to face with a violent naked man who broke into his house and killed the family pets.Mat Sabz was home alone Thursday afternoon when his wife called to tell him that security cameras showed a naked man breaking into their home. You have got to be really sick to want to kill somebody’s pets. Sadly, right now there are vast numbers of really sick people running around out there, and many of them would kill you and your family without even thinking twice about it. Up to this point in 2021, a total of 20,729 Americans have died as a result of gun violence, and by the time most of you read this article that number will inevitably be even higher. Ironically, many of the cities that have the strictest gun laws also have some of the highest murder rates. In Chicago, the number of gang members is more than ten times greater than the number of law enforcement officers, and that is causing enormous problems.  The politicians can pass as many laws as they want, but violent criminals are going to remain heavily armed and they are going to retain the upper hand for the foreseeable future. Of course Chicago is far from alone.  Violent criminals are gaining the upper hand in communities all over the country, and meanwhile police officers are resigning in record numbers from coast to coast after being relentlessly demonized by the mainstream media for months on end. Our society really is coming apart at the seams all around us. Unfortunately, most Americans still do not understand what is happening.  Most Americans still assume that things will eventually “return to normal”, but a “return to normal” is simply not in the cards.

Wikistrike

La fête de la musique enflamme l’Elysée tandis que la police gaze le Tout-Paris Des affrontements ont eu lieu entre les forces de l’ordre et des participants de la Fête de la musique le 21 juin au soir, alors que les restrictions sanitaires empêchent toujours les rassemblements de plus de dix personnes sur la voie publique

Pour une école libre au Québec

---

États-Unis — Juge suspend le programme de secours Covid de 4 milliards de dollars de Biden Posted: 21 Jun 2021 06:17 PM PDT Un juge fédéral américain a suspendu le programme de remise de prêt du président Joe Biden qui visait à aider les éleveurs et les agriculteurs de couleur défavorisés. L’ordonnance en référé intervient à la suite d’un procès intenté par un groupe de plaignants qui allèguent que le programme est « raciste », car il octroie une aide aux seuls agriculteurs non blancs. Le programme de secours Covid de Biden offre 4 milliards de dollars de remise de prêt aux agriculteurs noirs, amérindiens, hispaniques ou asiatiques. En avril, le programme est devenu la cible d’une poursuite en justice pour discrimination. En réponse au procès, le juge de district américain William Griesbach à Milwaukee a émis le 10 juin une ordonnance d’interdiction temporaire qui suspend le programme. Griesbach a déclaré que le programme permet au ministère de l’Agriculture des États-Unis d’accorder un allégement de la dette aux agriculteurs « sans réellement tenir compte de la situation financière du demandeur ». Le juge a également déclaré qu’il n’y avait aucune preuve de « discrimination intentionnelle » de la part de l’USDA. Le conservateur Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty a déposé une plainte en avril affirmant que les droits constitutionnels des agriculteurs blancs étaient violés puisque inéligibles au programme. « Parce que les plaignants ne peuvent même pas postuler au programme en raison de leur seule race, ils se sont vus refuser l’égale protection de la loi et ont donc subi un préjudice », indique le procès. Adam Faust, un agriculteur invalide du Wisconsin atteint de spina bifida et aux deux jambes prothétiques, a déclaré que le programme était discriminatoire à l’égard des Blancs. « C’était purement raciste, et je ne pense vraiment pas qu’il devrait y avoir du racisme autorisé au sein du gouvernement fédéral à quelque niveau que ce soit », a-t-il déclaré à WLUK-TV. Faust a été rejoint dans le procès par 11 autres agriculteurs blancs du Wisconsin, du Minnesota, du Dakota du Sud, du Missouri, de l’Iowa, de l’Arkansas, de l’Oregon, du Kentucky et de l’Ohio. L’avocat de Faust, Rick Esenberg, va encore plus loin dans ces allégations. Les données montrent que seul 1,3 % des agriculteurs du pays sont noirs Esenberg pense que toutes les questions raciales en Amérique ont été abordées pendant la guerre civile et le mouvement des droits civiques — et Biden ne fait que réécrire l’histoire et revisiter le passé. « Nous avons mené une guerre civile. Nous avons eu un long mouvement pour les droits civiques pour reconnaître le principe qui figurait dans nos documents fondateurs, que nous devons tous être traités comme des individus », a-t-il déclaré. Seul 1,3 % des agriculteurs du pays sont noirs, selon les données de l’USDA

Clusterfuck Nation

---

Thinking Out Loud Posted: 21 Jun 2021 06:28 AM PDT Clusterfuck Nation For your reading pleasure Mondays and Fridays Support this blog by visiting Jim’s Patreon Page And thanks to all my Patrons for your support! Events are tending toward an unfortunate convergence that may leave the USA in a very reduced condition before the end of this year, while the “Joe Biden” government cripples all our institutions, especially the military, with race-and-gender mind-fuckery as a distraction from its own coming and untoward collapse. The “president” is back from his toilsome travels through Europe, which included a summit meeting to butter-up Vladimir Putin, hoping to possibly use Russia as a buffer against an increasingly hostile China. In a kind of comic reversal of George W. Bush’s first meeting with Vlad Putin — “I was able to get a sense of the man’s soul,” W said — this time, Vlad looked into “Ol’ Joe’s” eyes and probably saw the ghost of Konstantin Chernenko. You may recall Ol’ Konstantin led the foundering Soviet Union for about a year, his final months from Moscow’s Central Clinical Hospital, where emphysema, congestive heart failure, and cirrhosis of the liver laid him low. “Joe Biden” did not start smoking cigarettes at age nine, as Chernenko had, but when Vlad P looked into his eyes, he probably saw a 15-watt bulb flickering within, and played him accordingly. After the summit, Vlad sized-up the “POTUS” as “professional” for the press — a witty snark, if ever there was one. You can see a procession of events now marshaling up toward an epic storm of bad karma for this exceptional nation of ours turning the corner into summer and then the fall. Of course, the friendly news media is not fully reporting the latest institutional failure, that is, the perfidious behavior of US chief health official, Dr. Tony Fauci, who, with either stupefying naïveté or by some other motive, assisted China in the development of a bio-weapon, which China then loosed upon the USA (and everybody else). Net result: millions dead around the world, and an awful lot of people here now extremely suspicious of the vaccines being aggressively touted by the government. Meanwhile, the roughly half of the US population who took the vaxes now have to worry about what the active ingredient, a toxic spike protein, is doing to their hearts, blood vessels, brains, and other organs, and whether something worse awaits down-the-road. Has a trap been set? (We’ll get to that below.) Just now, we have news of the strange case, revealed last week, of a “top Chinese counter-intel official,” a vice-minister of State Security, name of Dong Jingwei, defecting to the USA back in February. The strange part is that he came in from the cold to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) because he did not trust the CIA or the FBI to be outside China’s influence, and Dong sought protection from them. More American institutional failure? This raises a whole bale of questions, including whether Dong is a double-reverse disinfo agent, or what? It is rumored that he is proffering even more sordid dirt on “Joe Biden’s” son, Hunter, than is already known from the memo-and-email cache lodged on his infamous laptop-from-hell — not just sexual escapades while in China, but details of big money deals made for the Biden family business. And not just that, but heaps more dirt on other prominent political figures paid off by China. As if the US government is not already in a bad odor with at least half the country’s citizens. This Chinese spy tale is ripening at exactly the same time that the Maricopa County, AZ, election audit concludes phase one of its operations — scaring the panties off of the DNC and its PR staff at MSNBC, CNN, and the WashPo — with a lot of noises coming in from Georgia and Pennsylvania about likewise conducting vote audits. All that, plus Dong’s garbage barge of toxic political dirt, suggests that “Joe Biden” will have an even shorter run than Konstantin Chernenko did. We may find ourselves in an intense constitutional crisis by mid-summer. Hold that thought…. While all that is cooking on one front burner, we also have the case of the US equity markets burbling away at bubblicious highs on another burner, and therefore primed for a nauseating boil-over. Would a new and lethal government scandal supply the few extra therms for that? And by scandal, I mean something more like a broad loss of legitimacy and paralysis of the “Joe Biden” government. Also, how would a market train-wreck affect the credit markets? The US dollar? Whatever is left of the on-the-ground economy? Let’s just say it sure won’t act as a tonic for any of that; more like a slug of ethylene glycol. So now we’re talking about a simultaneous government crisis and financial crisis. Now, consider what might happen in the fall if a potent new strain, or “third wave,” of Covid-19 virus wafts across America. We’ve already seen speculation in the medical media that the residual action of mRNA “vaccines,” if exposed to yet another novel coronavirus, might tend to whack-out the immune response of those who got vaxed, killing them, as well as killing a new cohort of victims among the unvaxed, adding up to many millions of dead Americans. How would the country manage any of this along with a twin crisis of economy and government? We couldn’t even manage the pandemic when our institutions were supposedly still functioning. And now, consider what might happen if China decides this is a good time to gain control of Taiwan (and the world’s leading chip manufacturers). A savvy friend of the blog writes: They’ll hit Taiwan, Guam, Vietnam, South Korea, Philippines, Australia. Iran would move to secure the overland route from China to Africa. The Israeli/Saudi coalition could stop Iran but only if China didn’t help Iran. (Iran/China are far ahead of us in drone swarm warfare.)China could overrun all of it in a matter of weeks and establish a deep defensive perimeter before we could effectively respond.  More importantly they’ll hit our infrastructure so hard we’ll have a hard time hitting back effectively for years.Last year pretty much exposed our weakness; now they’ll move to exploit it. They’ll not wait till 2030, as our fearless leaders are touting, otherwise we might have time to mend our ways. Sun Tzu dictates they act now. My bet is they follow his guidance. It is the one area they are most predictable. Xi is following The Art of War to the letter so far.” Kind of makes you take a deep breath and say, Whoaaaa…? Those are known unknowns, as Mr. Rumsfeld liked to say. Add to that the known known of the mega-drought that has already developed in the American West and its implications for the food supply (not to mention the electric supply from the great western dams and the water supply to the western mega-cities). And add to that the extremely bad mood the various ethnic and racial groups remain in, due to the years-long DNC-Marxist fermentation of hatred among us. It all boils down to something that looks like an American collapse. Just sayin’. Also sayin’ it might be a really good time to lay in a few extra bags of rice, dried beans, and chili powder to make it edible.

Wikistrike

Biden-Poutine, un Yalta II plutôt qu’un nouveau Berlin Les États-Unis, vaincus à plate couture en Syrie, se sont rendus à Genève accepter les conditions du vainqueur, la Russie. Le sommet du 16 juin 2021 devrait mettre un terme aux hostilités à la condition que l’Administration Biden tienne ses troupes.

Nouvel article sur le blog : Le blog de Frédéric Delorca

Des Géants à 20 millions d’euros J’ai souvent attiré votre attention sur le fait que les performances artistiques comme celles de Marina Abramovic étaient en fait des rituels, et il y a toujours matière à s’interroger sur les « happenings » globaux qui mobilisent les consciences

Death rate from variant COVID virus six times higher for vaccinated than unvaccinated, UK health data show

Hospitalizations are also higher among thousands of fully vaccinated individuals who test positive for the Delta COVID ‘variant of concern.’ Fri Jun 18, 2021 – 6:59 pm EST

By Celeste McGovern
Follow Celeste

---

• Share on Gab
• Share on Telegram
• 95
• Print this Page

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here. 

LONDON, England, June 18, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – The death rate from the Delta COVID variant is six times higher among those who were fully vaccinated for two weeks or longer than among those who never received a shot, according to data published by Public Health England on Friday. 

Twenty-six people died among 4,087 who were fully vaccinated 14 days or more before testing positive for the Delta COVID variant. This equates to a death rate of 0.00636 percent, which is 6.6 times higher than the rate of 0.000957 deaths – or 34 deaths among 35,521 positive Delta cases among the unvaccinated, according to data published in a June 18 report titled “SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England, Technical briefing 16.” 

Both death rates among the unvaccinated and vaccinated are exceedingly low (less than one percent of all positive tests) for a variant that Public Health England describes as the “dominant variant” in the UK, comprising “91 percent of sequenced cases.” 

A risk assessment of the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus published Friday describes it as being more readily spread between people, but it is also described as a variant with “low infection severity.”   

Mainstream media have latched onto the possibility that the Delta variant is producing higher hospitalization rates in parts of Scotland and England than the “first wave” of the Alpha variant, but according to the UK public health report, these data are based on “early evidence” and “limited understanding of the clinical course of the disease.”  SUBSCRIBE to LifeSite’s daily headlines U.S. Canada World Catholic

Higher hospitalization among vaccinated 

Since hospitalizations are of concern, fully vaccinated people are being hospitalized in the UK at a higher rate than unvaccinated people. According to most recent technical briefing report, public health data show that 2.0 percent of vaccinated individuals (84 of 4,087) who tested positive for the Delta variant were admitted to hospital (including those tested upon entering the hospital for any other reason) compared with 1.48 percent of unvaccinated individuals (527 of 35,521). 

The current data is in keeping with data published last week by England’s public health agency that also showed a six-times greater death rate among the fully vaccinated than the unvaccinated and a hospital admission rate of 2.3 percent among those fully vaccinated at least two weeks earlier compared with just 1.2 percent among the unvaccinated. 

Antibody-dependent enhancement? 

This is reminiscent of the ADE (antibody dependent enhancement) phenomenon that has been seen for other vaccine and that has been expressed as a point of concern among many scientists for the COVID vaccines,” Stephanie Seneff, a senior researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory told LifeSiteNews. 

ADE blighted previous attempts at coronavirus vaccines and frequently resulted in enhanced lung disease among vaccinated lab animals. It led researchers in 2012 to advise scientists to proceed with “caution” for any human coronavirus vaccines which could lead to enhanced lung disease. 

Seneff said research has shown that coronavirus vaccines alter the ways immune systems respond to infection and can activate other sleeping infections in the vaccinated person such as herpes virus, creating symptoms of Bell’s palsy or shingles.  

“It is conceivable to me that the laser-beam specificity of the induced antibodies is offset by a general weakening of innate immunity,” Seneff said.  

“I also suspect that massive vaccination campaigns may accelerate the rate at which the vaccine-resistant mutant strains become dominant among all the SARS-Co-V2 [coronavirus] strains