« Il s’est fait vacciner, on ne l’a plus reconnu » – Le sprinter médaillé Christophe Lemaître n’est plus en mesure d’aller aux Jeux olympiques

Wikistrike

Un lien «probable» entre des problèmes cardiaques chez des jeunes et certains vaccins anti-Covid Au 11 juin, 323 cas de myocardites ou péricardites ont été confirmés chez des personnes de 29 ans ou moins vaccinées avec les produits de Pfizer ou Moderna, qui ont en commun de reposer sur la technologie de l’ARN messager.

medias-presse.info

« Il s’est fait vacciner, on ne l’a plus reconnu » – Le sprinter médaillé Christophe Lemaître n’est plus en mesure d’aller aux Jeux olympiques par Pierre-Alain Depauw

Les prochains Jeux olympiques devraient être marqués de façon inattendue par les effets indésirables de la vaccination anti-Covid. Exemple avec le sprinteur français Christophe Lemaitre qui ne s’alignera pas aux Championnats de France Elite, en fin de semaine à Angers et ne participera probablement pas aux Jeux Olympiques de Tokyo.

Le journal sportif L’Equipe signale que Christophe Lemaitre ne défendra donc pas ses chances ce week-end à Angers. Cette décision a été prise avec son staff technique, car l’athlète « n’est pas à 100 % de ses moyens physiques, suite notamment à de mauvaises réactions aux vaccins contre la COVID-19 », a-t-il fait savoir dans un communiqué.

« Il y a eu une période où ses tests étaient excellents, au même niveau qu’avant et puis il s’est fait vacciner, on ne l’a plus reconnu », explique Pierre Carraz, l’un de ses entraîneurs.

Christophe Lemaitre, médaillé de bronze du 200 m des Jeux de Rio, devait représenter la France aux Jeux de Tokyo (23 juillet-8 août) mais ses performances sont en chute libre.

« Ça ne sert à rien d’aller aux Jeux pour se faire éliminer en séries », ajoute Thierry Tribondeau, son autre coach.

Le phénomène s’observe auprès de sportifs de haut niveau de plusieurs pays.

British Airways : 4 pilotes MORTS après leur “vaccination” – L’Espagne et la Russie recommandent aux personnes “vaccinées” de ne pas prendre l’avion

Publié le 24 juin 2021 par Olivier Demeulenaere

Un homme prétendant être ami avec un pilote de British Airways a déclaré que 3 pilotes venaient de mourir au cours de la dernière semaine peu après avoir reçu des injections de COVID-19, et son enregistrement est devenu viral sur les médias sociaux.

HUGE …. 3 British Airways pilots have DIED of the COxxVID vaxxine in the past 7-days, and BA are now in crisis talks with the UK Government about whether or not their vaxxinated pilots should be allowed to fly.

85% of all British Airways pilots have already been vaxxinated. pic.twitter.com/MutkpRYT9T

— 404_Not_Found (@4_04_Not_Found) June 17, 2021

Dernières nouvelles …. 3 pilotes de British Airways sont MORTS suite au vaccin contre la COVID au cours des 7 derniers jours, et BA est maintenant en discussion sur une crise potentielle avec le gouvernement britannique pour savoir si oui ou non leurs pilotes vaccinés devraient être autorisés à voler. 85% de tous les pilotes de British Airways ont déjà été vaccinés.

*****

Cela a fait ressortir les « vérificateurs d’information » habituels des médias d’entreprise pour essayer de démystifier les affirmations de l’homme.

Reuters a répondu par une « vérification des faits », mais dans leur propre enquête et rapport, ils ont confirmé que non seulement ces trois personnes sont mortes, mais aussi une quatrième.

Ils ont donné la réponse habituelle des médias d’entreprise en citant certaines « autorités » de santé qui ont catégoriquement déclaré que leur mort n’avait « rien à voir » avec les injections, sans nier leur mort, et sans donner non plus aucune autre explication à leur mort.

Partagé sous la forme d’un enregistrement vocal sur Facebook, Instagram et Twitter, un homme non identifié dit avoir parlé à un « ami qui est pilote de BA » et explique « les choses deviennent folles » après le décès de trois collègues pilotes (ici, ici et ici).

« Le troisième pilote de BA est mort au cours des sept derniers jours, oui ? Troisième pilote mort la semaine dernière », explique l’homme entendu dans l’enregistrement. « Les deux premiers gars avaient la quarantaine et la cinquantaine ; ce type, au milieu de la trentaine, parfaitement en forme, sans conditions sous-jacentes. Il reçoit son deuxième jab et il est mort en quelques jours, exactement la même chose avec les deux premiers.

« Pour cette raison, BA est maintenant en crise avec le gouvernement sur l’opportunité d’autoriser les pilotes vaccinés à voler. Le problème avec cela, bien sûr, est qu’environ 80 %, selon mon ami de BA, 80 à 85 % ont été injectés. »

L’homme poursuit en disant que seulement « 10 % des pilotes seront en mesure de voler », qu’il s’agit d’un « problème grave ».

Reuters a présenté les revendications à British Airways, qui a déclaré qu’elles n’étaient pas fondées et qu’aucun travail de ce type n’était en cours avec le gouvernement.

Le porte-parole a toutefois confirmé l’authenticité des quatre livres de condoléances, car quatre pilotes de compagnie étaient récemment décédés.

« Nos pensées vont à leur famille et à leurs amis », ont-ils déclaré, ajoutant qu’aucun des décès n’était lié aux vaccins.

Dans une déclaration à Reuters, la Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) du Royaume-Uni a également nié de tels pourparlers de crise avec le transporteur aérien phare britannique.

« Nous n’avons pas été informés du décès de pilotes de BA après avoir reçu le vaccin Covid-19 et n’avons pas eu de discussions avec BA ou d’autres compagnies aériennes sur la façon d’empêcher les pilotes de voler après avoir reçu le vaccin COVID-19 », a déclaré le Dr. Sarah Branch, directrice de la vigilance et de la gestion des risques des médicaments pour la MHRA. « Il n’y a actuellement aucune restriction sur l’aviation ou d’autres industries et activités après la vaccination. » (Source – Ajout de ce qui est mis en anglais.)

Pendant ce temps, Sky News d’Australie rapporte que les compagnies aériennes en Espagne et en Russie avisent aux personnes « vaccinées » contre la COVID-19 de ne pas voyager en raison du risque de formation de caillots sanguins.

Brian Shilhavy, Mondialisation.ca, le 22 juin 2021

Article original en anglais : 4 British Airways Pilots DEAD Following COVID-19 Injections While Spain and Russia Prohibit “Vaccinated” From Air Travel, Health Impact News, le 18 juin 2021.

12 COVID deaths in Belgian nursing home following vaccination

52 of the 55 residents who tested positive for the coronavirus in May had been vaccinated in January. Wed Jun 23, 2021 – 10:45 am EST

• Share on Gab
• Share on Telegram
• 6
• Print this Page

June 23, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — A nursing home for the elderly in Nivelles, Belgium, has lost 12 of its 121 residents to COVID-19 in less than a month, and two are still in critical condition. While 98 percent of the elderly inhabitants had been fully inoculated with both doses of the Pfizer experimental vaccine in January, no less than 55 of them tested positive in May for the coronavirus, and 52 of those were vaccinated. The home, “Nos Tayons” in the French-speaking part of Belgium, had not experienced previous waves of COVID contaminations since the beginning of the public health crisis last year.

According to press reports, all those who died had been vaccinated.

The numerous “breakthrough” contaminations and deaths — over 20 percent of those who tested positive did not survive — did not shake the confidence of the health care workers and managers of “Nos Tayons” in the vaccine. Colette Delmotte, head of the social services of Nivelles, went on record on Belgian television on June 7, when nine deaths had been registered, saying that the jabs had certainly prevented an even deadlier outcome, since about four fifths of the residents who tested positive for COVID had no symptoms or mild ones.

She stressed that vaccination does not necessarily prevent catching or transmitting the illness.

But more and more reports in Belgium are suggesting a third dose of the “vaccine” might now be called for.

Jean-Michel Dogné, an “expert in vaccine security” and the director of the pharmacy department at the University of Namur, explained that residents who are old and very frail can in certain cases “develop mild forms of the disease, and unfortunately these mild forms can be enough to lead to more serious consequences.” SUBSCRIBE to LifeSite’s daily headlines U.S. Canada World Catholic

At this point, it might seem reasonable to question the efficiency of the “vaccine,” as it does not stop the virus from circulating, as elderly people have weaker immune responses in any case, as even very mild forms of COVID-19 can kill those who are most frail.

But this did not happen. Instead, the health care workers in the nursing home are now a target, because only 60 percent of those who are in contact with the residents have received the shot. It appears that while the elderly patients all had the “Indian” or “Delta” variant of COVID, health care workers had the “British” variant, and clearly the contagion circuits were different for the two groups. It was definitely not the health care workers who contaminated their patients.

This did not prevent epidemiologist Antoine Flahault, who commented on the case for French media Atlantico on June 16, from suggesting that the number of victims was due to the fact that the younger generation had not received the jab. He also suggested that there should be mandatory vaccination for health care workers caring for the elderly and vulnerable populations (despite the fact that the COVID shots do not give certain protection against viral transmission).

The French magazine Marianne quoted Flahault’s recommendations and added that in France, health minister Olivier Véran recently made a “solemn appeal to unvaccinated health care workers” to take the jab. “60 percent of French adults have already received one injection, but less than 60 percent of care workers in homes for the dependent elderly have done so, that’s not justifiable,” he said. He threatened that if “between now and the end of summer, things were not to get better, then yes, we would pose the question of compulsory vaccination for these particular groups.”

Going back to mid-May reports on the Nivelles nursing home where so many vaccinated residents have died is quite revealing. At the time, the local press noted that a resident of the home had tested positive when he was taken to the hospital for other issues. He had no visible symptoms of COVID, nor did the other residents of “Nos Tayons.” Confinement measures were put in place immediately but at the time, social services director Colette Delmotte explained that thanks to the vaccine, the residents would be protected from “serious forms of the coronavirus.”

By May 30, a statement by Colette Delmotte on the website of the municipality of Nivelles stated that 55 out of the 121 residents had been contaminated with the Indian variant while 16 out of the 107 staff members, of whom 76 percent were vaccinated, had tested positive, mostly to the British variant. “It would therefore appear that two distinct origins must be considered: one for the residents, another for the personnel,” she wrote.

She added:

The vaccination in January 2021 was extremely effective as all residents and staff members are currently doing well. The degree of contagion of the Indian variant is very high, but the vaccination has protected our residents and staff members perfectly.

Twelve deaths later, her remarks sound particularly misguided. At least, the situation has not been concealed from the public, and an epidemiological investigation is under way. The inquiry will look at the conditions in which the “vaccines” had been stored and administered, and check the “emergency response” of the nursing home. “Patient zero” is not yet known. — Article continues below Petition — PETITION: Fire Fauci and investigate him now!

59,631 have signed the petition.Let’s get to 60,000! Add your signature:   Show Petition Text Keep me updated via email on this
petition and related issues.

On a more practical note, the quality of the air in “Nos Tayons” is being assessed. Ten days ago, air purifiers have been installed. This might have been a good idea from the start, instead of relying on an experimental jab whose efficacy and safety raises so many questions.

The residents of “Nos Tayons” are also receiving psychological counseling.

On the other hand, no particular treatment is being recommended for people who test positive for COVID-19. The Belgian Anti Poison Unit’s website has a page full of frightening warnings about the dangers of hydroxychloroquine — an approach that Didier Raoult, professor of infectiology at the IHU university hospital of Marseille, has repeatedly called crazy, since hydroxychloroquine is one of the most-prescribed drugs in the world, with very few side effects. Ivermectin, vitamin D, and other possible drugs and prophylactic substances are routinely disparaged by the authorities.

Defending Viganò: Two of the archbishop’s editors respond to Professor de Mattei’s accusations

We thought that, by virtue of our work and close collaboration with His Grace, we might be competent to speak for and defend him. Wed Jun 23, 2021 – 8:57 pm EST

• Share on Gab
• Share on Telegram
• 2
• Print this Page

June 23, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – The following text is a composite response from Professor Brian McCall and Dr. Maike Hickson, both of whom are involved in book projects with collections of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò’s writings of the last years.

We thought that, by virtue of our work and close collaboration with His Grace, we might be competent to speak for and defend him. We do so in two consecutive texts, written individually. We are both honored to add our Apologiae pro Viganò to those already published by Dr. Taylor Marshall and Robert Moynihan.

The Real Archbishop Viganò

By Brian McCall

Sadly, Professor Roberto De Mattei decided to publish a calumnious attack on Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò[1]. Before addressing this surprising and disappointing attack, I wish to state that I have had great respect for Professor De Mattei. I have highly recommended his book: The Second Vatican Council: An Unwritten Story. I was very much taken by surprise when he came out so forcefully in favor of totalitarian government measures and mandatory vaccines this past year. Yet, I gave him the benefit of the doubt. Living in Europe, and especially Italy, this past year must have been devastating. Yet, when I saw this scandalous attack on Archbishop Viganò, I was left speechless. Finally, a bishop of the Church responds to the crisis in the Church the way Traditionalists have urged the hierarchy to respond. Finally, a bishop has his eyes opened to the revolution that De Mattei meticulously documents in his book. Yet, Professor De Mattei hurls insults rather than opening his arms in acceptance to someone who is clearly indebted to his very work.

De Mattei levels three main accusations at the Archbishop: (1) the Archbishop’s public statements from 2020-2021 exhibit “discrepancies” from his statements from 2018—2019 and are essentially not in continuity; (2) the Archbishop’s more recent statements are “pompous” and “sarcastic;” and (3) the Archbishop is not the real author of the statements attributed to him recently and there is some secret alter ego author publishing them under his signature. SUBSCRIBE to LifeSite’s daily headlines U.S. Canada World Catholic

As to the first criticism, from someone who has studied the Archbishop’s writings extensively (both for publication through Catholic Family News) and for editing and explanation in the book A Voice in the Wilderness, I find absolutely no discrepancies between the identified time periods. I see a perfectly logical and coherent development of understanding running through the four-year period. As I explain at length in A Voice in the Wilderness, that logical progress goes from seeing a serious problem with corruption (and in particular sodomy and its harboring) in the highest levels of the hierarchy to tracing the root causes of that moral corruption to Vatican II and the New Mass. This is frankly the consistent and logical course of development that Traditionalists have been urging and praying for the priests and bishops of the world to follow. Archbishop Viganò avoids falling into the pit we have been criticizing “conservatives” for landing in for years: seeing the moral corruption as an isolated problem not connected to liturgy or doctrine. Rather than denouncing the Archbishop for discrepancies or being inconsistent, we should be congratulating and encouraging him for following the evidence wherever it led, even when it led to denouncing the conservative position and the “hermeneutic of continuity’ he had accepted during his Vatican career. 

As to the second charge concerning the tone and manner of his more recent interventions, I am surprised to see them called “pompous.” As I explain in A Voice in the Wilderness, his message these past years has been incredibly humble. His Grace has done what so few clerics are willing to do and which takes humility: admit he was wrong. Even when his critics have blamed him for “criticizing” Pope Benedict XVI or claiming that Benedict “deceived” the whole Church, the Archbishop has been quick to respond and make clear that we were all deceived. He has disputed the ability of the “hermeneutic of continuity” to save us from the crisis, but he has made clear that he believes Pope Benedict offered it with good motives and with a love for the church. He has many times admitted his own fault in not seeing the problems with the Council earlier. Rather than pompously telling others “I told you so,” he has merely decried our mutual suffering at the hands of the great deception.

Yes, some of his expressions and criticisms have been strongly worded. Yes, he has called the Vatican of Pope Francis the New Sanhedrin. Yes, he alleged that there are those in the Vatican, including Francis, who are wittingly or unwittingly advancing the agenda of the “invisible enemy.” A grave crisis calls for strong words. The first step to healing is to admit one has a serious problem. Tiptoeing around a problem with euphemisms when the one suffering refuses to admit there is a crisis is not helpful. I remind readers that the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was often criticized for using strong language to denounce the infiltration and betrayal of the Church. In his famous November declaration he referred to Paul VI’s Vatican as “Neo-Protestant and Neo-Modernist Rome.” In his famous sermon at Lille, he referred to the new rites as “bastard sacraments.” When we are living in self-denial, we sometimes need to be shocked out of it. I admit that some of Archbishop Viganò interventions include some sarcasm. Rather than a fault, I see these instances as strengthening his texts. Some of the things we have witnessed, the veneration of the Pachamama for example, are so outrageous that they deserve sarcasm. Yes, his language has been sometimes powerful, graphic, and sarcastic (although justified) but never pompous.   

I also must note that in my regular personal, direct communication with Archbishop Viganò, I have found him to be kind, gentle, and very understanding. Much like Archbishop Lefebvre, I have noted his strong public statements when necessary are in tandem with his very gentle and supportive personal communication. I find this combination not disconcerting but saintly. I am also aware that Archbishop Viganò has provided caring and paternal spiritual guidance and assistance to many lost souls in this time of crisis. He has shown real compassion to help those who reach out for help. 

As to the final and in my opinion most outrageous accusation, I find it extremely disappointing that such an accomplished historian would level such an accusation with no evidence or proof. I have already noted that I believe his public interventions are perfectly consistent with a mind open to the truth and reality who sifts the mountains of evidence of the past five decades that lead one to the Council and its New Mass. Certainly, many of the Archbishop’s interventions have been composed in Italian and translated by different translators over the past few years. I do not dispute that one might be able to point to some minor semantic differences in the English translations but there is nothing of substance that I find inconsistent with a developing understanding of the reality of the past five decades. I find it most bizarre that Professor De Mattei specifically attacks in this criticism the “philosophy of history” in the Archbishop’s writings. In these texts, I discover a philosophy of history that is clearly indebted to Professor De Mattei. Rather than seeing the Second Vatican Council as a collection of abstract texts, His Grace has come to see the Council as an entire historical event, and one that is part of a larger revolution. This is the same philosophy that I read in The Second Vatican Council: An Unwritten Story. Is Professor De Mattei disturbed that Archbishop Viganò has become his pupil of history? 

As to this absurd and unfounded accusation that there is some secret behind the scenes author, how does Professor De Mattei explain the fact that many of the interventions of the past year are transcripts of conferences given by Archbishop Viganò personally and recorded in video or audio form (until YouTube deletes them). For example, his text from the Catholic Identity Conference was delivered via video. His speech at the Jericho March in Washington was also preserved in video as was his speech to the Venice Philosophy Festival. Does Professor De Mattei think that there is some Archbishop Viganò impersonator who gave these recorded lectures? The Archbishop himself publicly denied this scurrilous accusation (although I guess De Mattei might claim that was merely his double speaking). 

After his first article, Professor De Mattei issued a second missive that purported to present linguistic evidence that there is a double who wrote the recent texts. He argues that since the Archbishop’s texts use the following expressions, which are also used by a blogger writing for Opportune Importune under the pseudonym Baronio, this Baronio must have authored the texts attributed to Viganò: “counter-church,” “conciliar sect,” “innovators,” and “idol” in reference to the Council. De Mattei claims further proof exists in that both Baronio and Viganò claim an equivalence between Vatican II and the New Mass and both claim that the New Mass was composed by progressives and those suspected of Freemasonry. He also adds that both refer to the New Mass as the “reformed rite” or “Montinian Rite.” This flimsy evidence is unworthy of such an eminent historian. The listed phrases are found all throughout Traditionalist literature and conferences for decades. Does de Mattei claim this Baronio is the secret author behind Michael, Davies, Chris Ferrara, and even Archbishop Lefebvre, all of whom have used some or all of these expressions? I have repeatedly claimed a deep equivalence between the Council and the New Mass and have written and spoken on the Freemasonic and Progressives who forged the New Mass.  Am I next to be accused as a puppet of this Baronio? 

Further, de Mattei claims that this Baronio is an Italian named Pietro Siffi, someone whom I do not know but who apparently is a controversial figure in Italian traditional circles. His main fingering of Siffi as Baronio/ Viganò II is a defense of Siffi on Baronio’s blog. Then to add insult to injury after using the flimsy vocabulary claims to link Viganò to Baronio and then just asserting that Baronio is Siffi, he intimates that Siffi is a practicing homosexual or at least sympathetic towards such lifestyle. This last intimation defies reason. Archbishop Viganò has been one of the few prelates of our time to unambiguously condemn sodomy and the attempt to temper Catholic doctrine on the intrinsic evil. We are now to believe that the power behind the miter is a homosexual! We are to believe all this on the basis of an anonymous blogger also using terms like “counciliar sect.” 

Sadly, this attack on Archbishop Viganò is another example of a criticism often justly lobbed at Traditionalists. Too often some in the Traditionalist movement do not embrace with open arms those who find the truth late. They are often pushed away or mocked. We should rejoice for any Catholic, lay or clerical, who is willing to follow the evidence to its root. We should be tolerant of any rash or overly zealous language they may employ in discussing their newly found knowledge. (Not that I am claiming that the Archbishop has been overly rash or imprudently zealous). Too often we attack rather than welcome brave souls like Viganò.

I for one stand behind Archbishop Viganò. I welcome his contributions to the debate over the crisis in the Church. I read in all his texts, even his strongly worded ones, a true love for the Church and for lost souls. I admire his courage and his humility. To anyone scandalized by the recent attack, I would urge put these accusations aside and read the texts authored by Archbishop Viganò. Decide for yourself if he speaks consistent truth or not. I assure you that I find nothing in his public addresses or his personal correspondence with me that is inconsistent or contradictory. Finally, pray for Archbishop Viganò. His brave stand against the New Mass and the Council will bring persecution, even from unlikely corners. Pray that he receives the grace to persevere to the end.

In Defense of Archbishop Viganò

By Dr. Maike Hickson

It has been one of the greatest honors and joys of my work as a journalist and author to have gotten to know Archbishop Viganò personally and through his work. I am also currently working with him on a book dealing with his writings on the Second Vatican Council and the message of Fatima. It is a very rewarding work to collaborate with him in every aspect. Most of all, it is a spiritual endeavor that touches the heart of one’s Faith, because one sees a man of the Church who gives his all and his best to Christ’s Bride, willing to die for her. Day and night – I sometimes wonder when His Grace ever sleeps – Archbishop Viganò is at the service of mankind. People of all steps of life – from simple to high-ranking – have his attention and prompt assistance.

I can testify for this, since I am honored to have been the channel of many communications from priests and laymen who reach out to me, asking me to pass on a message to Archbishop Viganò. I have seen close up how quickly he responds, whenever he is able to. Promptus ad bonum, prompt unto the good, at every moment of his life. With fatherly kindness and gentleness, he responds to desperate souls, to priests who are under pressure from their superiors; to faithful who seek his advice.

I remember one case where I had asked Archbishop Viganò to pray for someone who was in a difficult situation, for weeks he kept him in his prayers. When finally he was able to reach out to that person, he wrote with such kindness, that the person was touched to tears.

Who is this archbishop who acts like a servant, a true shepherd, and a father?

It is Archbishop Viganò.

Also in our little family, we have been touched so many times by his kindness. When our daughter was sick for a longer time last summer, His Grace sent her sweet pictures and photos with angels and saints. He sometimes gets back to me, asking how someone in my family is now doing, and I had forgotten I had even mentioned it to him.

But also intellectually, Archbishop Viganò is such a blessing. He names things as they are. It seems that God used the McCarrick case to remove His Grace from the Church’s hierarchy and structure so that he would be fully free to speak in Catholic language. And He seems to bless him abundantly for his willingness to suffer for the Church and under her. So it makes sense that Viganò is growing deeper and deeper in his understanding of the crisis in the Church and in the world, as well.

My husband, who has followed the Church crisis for 40 years and with much agony, so often rejoices about Archbishop Viganò’s writings. “This is definitely his best text so far,” is what he has now said already several times, not knowing that something even better was to come! It is a great consolation to Robert to see that an archbishop of the Church finally speaks those criticisms that he has uttered for many years now and for which he himself had much to suffer. Viganò’s kindness toward him means so much.

In our many communications, I have seen how His Grace takes in new information, learns from others, and deepens his thought and takes counsel. I would say that it is his deep humility that makes this intellectual honesty possible.

At the same time – and here I respond directly to the claim of Professor de Mattei that there are two Viganòs – I can testify that what His Grace writes is authentically coming from him. There is no split between his own thoughts as he expresses them in private and his writings for the public. He might take counsel with others – as I have seen it myself –, but this is what every responsible churchman should do.

As to what His Grace is writing about, I can see much farsightedness. I still marvel at how clearly he saw the corona situation, more than a year ago, at a time where my family was still trying to figure out what was going on. Many of his statements have come to be proven right. Just the other day, a family member who works in the medical field told us how many patients she now has that have grave side effects from the corona vaccines. So much suffering, and we have a shepherd who tried to warn us, at a time where the Supreme temporal Shepherd appears to have largely abandoned us.

And truly, he leads us on the path of truth, repentance, reform, trust in God and love of Mary.

And this is why so many priests and faithful love Archbishop Viganò. Whether they agree with everything he says or with most of it, they know that he truly loves them and truly cares for them. He acts like a father to us. As one Catholic told me: “the sheep follow when they hear their shepherd’s voice.” Or as a priest told me who witnessed a telephone conversation between His Grace and a nun: “she took to him like a duck to water,” meaning they had an immediate, trustful rapport.

I have seen Archbishop Viganò calling in to give counsel, taking time to listen and to help.

This is the churchman my family and I so cherish.

---

[1] https://www.corrispondenzaromana.it/the-vigano-case-the-archbishop-and-his-double/. 

EU to take legal action against Hungary’s anti-pedophilia bill

European Commission Presiden von der Leyen called the bill ‘a shame,’ claiming it ‘goes against all the values, the fundamental values of the European Union.’ Wed Jun 23, 2021 – 1:32 pm EST

By Raymond Wolfe
Follow

---

• Share on Gab
• Share on Telegram
• 22
• Print this Page

BRUSSELS, June 23, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has announced that the European Union will take initial steps against a Hungarian anti-pedophilia bill that bans promotion of LGBT ideology to children.

Von der Leyen said in a press conference on Wednesday that she will use “all the powers of the Commission” against the legislation, which was passed by the Hungarian parliament last week.

“I’ve instructed my responsible commissioners to write a letter to the Hungarian authorities concerning or expressing our legal concerns before the bill enters into force,” she said, though she did not announce other specific measures. Justice commissioner Didier Reynders and market commissioner Thierry Breton will be preparing the letter to Hungary, according to POLITICO.

Hungary’s sweeping new anti-pedophilia law prohibits showing pornographic content or depictions of homosexuality or transgenderism to minors under 18. It includes other child protection provisions, like regulations on sexual education, tougher rules against child pornography, and the creation of a new sex offender registry. — Article continues below Petition — PETITION: Stand with Hungary for protecting children from LGBT propaganda

917 have signed the petition.Let’s get to 1,000! Add your signature:   Show Petition Text Keep me updated via email on this
petition and related issues.

Von der Leyen called the bill “a shame,” claiming it “goes against all the values, the fundamental values of the European Union.” “So, I will use all the powers of the Commission to ensure that the rights of all EU citizens are guaranteed,” she added. Her comments made no mention of the religious and political rights of majority-Christian Hungary, whose conservative supermajority in parliament passed the child protection bill with a wide majority last Tuesday.

The European Commission’s initial action comes as left-wing governments of several European states clamor for retaliation against Hungary. 17 countries have joined a letter initiated by Belgium calling on the Commission to take Hungary to the European Court of Justice, if necessary, to negate the anti-pedophilia bill, the Belgian government announced yesterday. Historically Catholic Ireland, Italy, and Spain have joined the statement, as have France and Germany.

If Budapest ignores the European Commission’s letter, the Commission can start an infringement procedure to try to stop the bill once it takes effect. If the Hungarian government then refuses to comply, Hungary could be tried in the Court of Justice and could face financial sanctions.

The European Union already has begun Article 7 proceedings against both Hungary and Poland, which have the potential to strip the countries of their EU voting rights. European ministers were slated to meet with officials from the two conservative Eastern European nations regarding the sanctions procedure on Tuesday, EUobserver reported.

Cruella (Ursula) Von der Leyen à Paris pour approuver le plan de relance de la France.

par Charles Sannat | 24 Juin 2021 | Affaires européennes, Grille article | 3 commentaires

Cruelle von der Leyen est à Paris, j’en suis fort aise, elle est là pour approuver le plan de relance français.

Je ne suis pas d’accord pour son approbation.

En effet son approbation s’accompagne de « contraintes » et de « contreparties ».

Mieux, notre plan d’aide nous le finançons nous-mêmes en versant à l’Union Européenne notre propre argent que la Commission nous reverse sous forme d’aides accompagnées de contraintes de réformes à faire.

Surréaliste.

C’est cela l’Union Européenne.

Et cela doit-être dit.

Encore et encore.

On nous prend dans la poche gauche pour nous le remettre à droite en nous imposant des réformes que nous ne voulons pas et pour lesquelles personne n’a voté !

Drôle de conception de la démocratie.

C’est vraiment Cruella !

Charles SANNAT

Font size

• Contact
• Store Account
• Store
• 0 items$0.00

NYC Mayor Race 69% for Non-Politician – Trump Style Populism Again?

Blog/Politics

Posted Jun 23, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Spread the love

The founder of Guardian Angels who stood against crime in NYC, Curtis Sliwa, took 69% of the Republican votes which looks like the populism of 2016 all over again. Sliwa scored a big victory as the Republican nominee for mayor. What this is showing is that crime is out of control in NYC. Police are abandoning the job taking retirement ASAP and recruits are hard to find because the Democrats have painted the police as all racist enemies. You could not ask for a more toxic atmosphere and this election provides a hint of what we are going to see in 2022 – a real revolution at the polls.

Society cannot function without the rule of law. The Democrats think that they can win by dividing the country and fueling the flames of race and class. This is not the unity which is the very purpose of civilization where everyone benefits by coming together. They are actually unwinding the very reason to form civilization and in the process create the very reason for the break up of the United States post-2032.

If they try to steal this election, those in power better stay in a safe room and never come out. People like this who have gone so far against the basic standard of civilization have NEVER survived history. Even the birth of the Roman Republic in 509BC followed by the birth of Democracy in Athens in 508BC was a political CONTAGION that swept the Western world because corruption reached this level of insanity.

It has been about 2530 years (nearly 3 x 8.6) since the sweeping global revolution against tyranny where Rome overthrew its Tarquin king in 509BC and within less than one year Athens also rose up and overthrew their tyrants in 508BC. The political contagion was GLOBAL in western society. In China, there was the unification about 221BC and then there was the revolution of Confucius also during the 6th century BC. Confucius was appointed governor of Chung-tu in 501BC. Despite the fact that these regions did not know of each other at that point in time, there were sweeping political revolutions that engulfed the world as a whole.

In Denmark, which normally sided with Britain in the EU Parliament, is moving toward DEXIT. Many are beginning to see the EU as the greatest danger – not Russia. The EU has turned so far left and these lockdowns will tear the EU apart. Instead of promoting a common market and expanding trade, they have raised trade barriers and are firmly in the hand of Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum.

Everything is starting to unwind. Indeed, 2022 will be the Panic Cycle in politics and we will focus on this fascinating forecast coming out of Socrates for 2022 at the World Economic Conference (WEC), the shift in assets from Public to Private, the rising inflation, and the prospect for gold and cryptocurrencies that Socrates has laid out.

The fact that Curtis took 69% of the vote shows that there is a political change in the wind that will result in the greatest surprises beyond what we mere humans can put together. This is what Socrates was born to do. There are people who hate me and usually try to kill the messenger. But I and here only to reveal the forecasts of Socrates – not my personal wishes or desires.

---

NOTE: Schwab’s first real WEF took place in 1987. To reach 50 years, he is counting his seminars before 1987. Our first WEC was in 1985, and before that, we too had seminars around the world. To go back to when you first began, 1971, is by no means justified to pretend you have been doing world events for 50 years which is an exaggeration. That is why Nigel Farage called the WEC the alternative to Davos.

Que nous a appris l’Inde sur le traitement du Covid ? (G. Delépine)

Publié le 22 juin 2021 par Olivier Demeulenaere

Depuis près de deux mois, les médias se moquent de la politique sanitaire de l’Inde, et décrivent cet immense pays comme celui où on entasse les morts dans les rues pour les brûler, et le creuset de naissance de variants qui vont nous anéantir lors de la quatrième vague. Cette présentation dramatique est contraire à la vérité.

Mais revenons aux faits, aux faits authentifiés et publiés par l’OMS et les agences sanitaires officielles.

L’Inde a affronté le covid avec au total six fois moins de victimes que nous

Au 16/6/21 la France recensait 1678 décès attribués au covid par million d’habitants contre 290 en Inde.

La comparaison de ces deux chiffres devrait interpeller des médias objectifs.

Compte tenu de l’insuffisance de l’appareil sanitaire indien, l’obtention de ce résultat étonnement favorable justifie l’analyse de la recette indienne du succès anti covid19 qui réside dans la jeunesse de sa population, mais surtout dans les traitements préventifs (avant toute contamination) et les traitements précoces (dès les premiers signes).

Le traitement préventif par hydroxychloroquine a contrôlé la première vague

Lors de la première vague le 22/3/2020, le conseil indien pour le covid a refusé de suivre l’avis de l’OMS déconseillant HCQ sur la foi de l’étude truquée publiée par le Lancet, et retirée depuis qu’a été dévoilé son caractère totalement fallacieux.

Rappelons que le ministre français s’est précipité pour interdire l’HCQ à la sortie de cet article mensonger et faire stopper les essais où l’HCQ était testée, mais n’a toujours pas pris le temps de rétablir la vérité et de libérer les médecins de l’angoisse de prescrire ce médicament pas cher et sûr, honni par le pouvoir, par crainte de poursuites par le conseil de l’ordre, comme d’autres collègues auxquels on reproche d’avoir guéri leurs patients avec des médicaments refusés par le ministre !

L’Indian covid19 Task force a, au contraire, recommandé le traitement préventif par l’hydroxychloroquine du personnel soignant^[1] et des membres des familles âgés de plus de 15 ans^[2] au contact de malades covid19.

Ce traitement a considérablement amoindri la diffusion de la maladie dans la population avec un pic de nouvelles contaminations quotidiennes qui n’a pas dépassé 75/Million, alors qu’en France il a atteint 1072 (quatorze fois plus).

Au total, au 30 janvier 2021 (avant le début de la vaccination) l’Inde ne comptabilisait que 8275 cas/Million d’habitants (10 757 710) alors qu’à cette date la France en recensait 47 715/M (3 114 542) soit six fois plus. Elle était un modèle !

Cette forte réduction du risque de contamination ne peut pas être attribuée à l’âge de la population, car l’infection atteint à peu près également toutes les tranches d’âge, même si son expression et sa gravité en dépendent fortement. Elle est d’autant plus remarquable que l’Inde se singularise par la grande promiscuité de sa population dans les nombreuses mégapoles, Bombay

(12 478 447 d’habitants), Delhi (11 007 835), Bangalore (8 425 970), Hyderabad (6 809 970), Ahmedabad (5 570 585), Madras (4 681 087) Calcutta (4 486 679).

Ce traitement préventif ciblé a aussi fortement réduit la mortalité puisqu’au 30 janvier 2021, l’Inde ne comptait que 118 morts/M (154 147 morts) contre 1156/M (75466 morts) en France, soit dix fois plus.

La catastrophe post vaccinale de la deuxième vague stoppée par l’Ivermectine

En février 2021, en Inde, l’épidémie paraissait contrôlée avec une moyenne quotidienne de 7,7 nouveaux cas/million (10000 nouveaux cas) et avec le début de la vaccination le 16 janvier 2021, les traitements préventifs ont été délaissés.

Pourquoi les Indiens ont-ils cédé à la propagande de la vaccination ?

Un mois et demi après le début de la campagne de vaccination, une deuxième vague a déferlé sur l’Inde avec une augmentation exponentielle des nouveaux cas pendant 6 semaines et un pic de contaminations journalières atteignant 418 cas/Million (cependant deux fois et demie moindre que le pic français de novembre 2020).

Cette augmentation post vaccinale brutale des cas, cohérente avec les prédictions du Dr Tenpenny et du Professeur Cahill, avait été déjà observée dans de nombreux pays.^[3][4]

Elle a été suivie d’une augmentation de la mortalité qui a été très médiatisée en Occident afin de relancer la panique du covid qui commençait à s’estomper.

LE BON SENS REVIENT AVEC LE TRAITEMENT PRÉCOCE

Les autorités ont réagi en rassurant la population. Le président de Medanta,^[5] le Dr Trehan, a déclaré

« 90 % des patients atteints de COVID peuvent récupérer à la maison s’ils reçoivent les médicaments appropriés à temps. Dès que votre test RT-PCR est positif, mon conseil serait de consulter votre médecin local avec qui vous êtes en contact. Tous les médecins connaissent le protocole et commenceront votre traitement en conséquence ».

Ce protocole a été publié le 22 avril 2021 en une série de recommandations officielles comportant, pour les formes modérées de covid, de l’hydroxychloroquine ou de l’Ivermectine per os sous la surveillance des médecins traitants, complétées, si besoin, par de la Budésonide inhalée.

Et dix jours plus tard, le nombre de nouvelles contaminations s’est effondré passant de 319 cas/Million (414 188 cas) le 7 mai à 47/Million (61 471 cas) le 14 juin. Si nos dirigeants souhaitaient vraiment éviter une éventuelle quatrième vague, il suffirait qu’ils suivent la méthode indienne, ou marseillaise préconisée dès mars 2020. Que cherchent-ils vraiment ?

La vague post vaccinale a été vaincue par les traitements précoces, mais au prix d’une augmentation de la mortalité globale passée à 295/Million le 20 juin 2021 (contre 1681/M en France avec 109743 morts depuis le début de l’épidémie). Que de vies perdues par ce fameux pseudovaccin !

Quelles leçons peut-on tirer de l’évolution de l’épidémie en Inde ?

1°) Un pays pauvre peut faire nettement mieux que les pays occidentaux

2°) Les traitements préventifs par hydroxychloroquine, ciblés sur les personnes à risque, ont fortement réduit les contaminations lors de la première vague

3°) La campagne de vaccination a été suivie d’une forte augmentation de la maladie et donc qu’il faut abandonner en urgence ces substances géniques en essai thérapeutique.

L’accumulation des effets secondaires graves et des décès post vaccinaux reconnue par les agences officielles tant aux USA^[6][7] qu’en UE^[8] et en Grande-Bretagne, combinée à l’absence d’efficacité démontrée par les vagues de contamination dans tous les pays vaccinés, devrait faire renoncer le monde à cette escroquerie contre une maladie peu mortelle et curable, si tant est qu’on accepte de la traiter.

4°) Les traitements précoces par HCQ et Ivermectine peuvent stopper l’épidémie, ce que confirment de nombreux articles accumulés en 18 mois dont une nouvelle méta-analyse sur l’ivermectine parue récemment et commentée ce jour dans France soir.^[9]

Conclusion

Espérons que les médias et nos gouvernants soient finalement capables de l’entendre et libèrent les prescriptions médicales, devant la révolte populaire encore silencieuse, mais dont l’attitude électorale rejetant tous ceux qui ont soutenu la dictature sanitaire imposée par le gouvernement est un signal fort de la conscience du peuple et de l’absence de résignation.

Il n’est jamais trop tard.

Gérard Delépine, Nouveau Monde, le 21 juin 2021

(via Jo Busta Lally)

Rappels :

« L’ivermectine sauce l’Inde »

En Inde, le Covid peut même tuer les morts une deuxième fois

Pro-abortion ‘revolutionary’ priest headed for seminary role steps down after media backlash

‘Fr. Philip Dyer-Perry has given further thought to his appointment as Pastoral Director at Allen Hall Seminary and his prayerful discernment has led him to ask the Cardinal for permission to withdraw.’ Tue Jun 22, 2021 – 12:17 pm EST

By Michael Haynes
Follow Michael

---

• Share on Gab
• Share on Telegram
• 9
• Print this Page

LifeSiteNews has been permanently banned on YouTube. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.

WESTMINSTER, U.K., June 22, (LifeSiteNews) – A pro-abortion and pro-LGBT priest appointed to a prominent position in a London seminary by Cardinal Vincent Nichols will not be taking up his role after numerous reports of complaints by concerned Catholics.

Father Philip Dyer-Perry of Our Lady of the Rosary Parish in the Diocese of Westminster had been appointed by Cardinal Nichols as the pastoral director of Allen Hall seminary, which is based in the diocese. He was due to take up his position later this fall, but will no longer do so.

In a statement emailed to LifeSiteNews, the Diocese of Westminster wrote: 

Fr. Philip Dyer-Perry has given further thought to his appointment as Pastoral Director at Allen Hall Seminary and his prayerful discernment has led him to ask the Cardinal for permission to withdraw. This request has been granted. The Cardinal thanks Fr. Philip for this searching discernment and for his continuing reflection. Fr. Philip will continue his ministry as Parish Priest at Staines.

His appointment was reported last week by Church Militant, which reported that sources in Westminster informed them that there has been “an unprecedented number of complaints” made about Dyer-Perry’s appointment due to his position on moral issues such as abortion and homosexuality.  SUBSCRIBE to LifeSite’s daily headlines U.S. Canada World Catholic

U.K. commentator and blogger Mark Lambert reported that his Westminster sources mentioned to him that the (then proposed) appointment was “wrong in every way.” 

“Fr. Dyer-Perry seems to be one of those priests who is trying to be ‘hip,’” wrote Lambert. “He is prepared to manipulate, ignore and twist doctrine in order to present it as what he considers to be more palatable to modern ears.”

Damian Thompson, associate editor of The Spectator, described the news of Fr. Dyer-Perry’s original appointment to Allen Hall as “scandalous.”

While the news of Fr. Dyer-Perry’s views on morality seems to have prevented him away taking up the role of pastoral director at Allen Hall, Cardinal Nichols appears to believe that Dyer-Perry has a sufficient grasp of the faith and issues of doctrine to continue in his role as parish priest.

Meanwhile, Dyer-Perry also continues to serve on the Board of Governors of Allen Hall seminary. A media spokesperson for the Diocese of Westminster commented that his position there would be “reviewed in due course.”

Pro-abortion, pro-LGBT priest refers to God as ‘she’

Fr. Dyer-Perry was previously described by John Smeaton, executive director of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC), as having a “revolutionary” position on abortion. Writing for Voice of the Family, Smeaton stated, “I cannot recall anyone purporting to speak on behalf of the Catholic Church in England and Wales expressing a position on abortion which so clearly opposes the Fifth commandment and which does so in the form of the most commonly used and discredited arguments of the pro-abortion lobby.”

Given Dyer-Perry’s support for abortion, Smeaton described his then-appointment to Allen Hall as “a grave threat to the future of the pro-life struggle in Britain, and its resistance to barbaric anti-life laws, since he will be forming the Catholic priests who form the Catholic people from whose ranks the vast majority of the pro-life movement is made up.”

Smeaton’s comments were made in reference to Dyer-Perry’s reaction to Poland’s 2020 ruling that widely banned abortion as being mostly illegal under the country’s constitution. According to a message to Polish parishioners in the parish newsletter reproduced on Independent Catholic News, Dyer-Perry called the ruling “a bad one.”

While proclaiming that he is pro-life himself, Dyer-Perry attacked the pro-life ruling since it “fails to respect the choice and autonomy of the mother,” and that it should be the mother’s decision whether “to continue with the pregnancy.”

“Political and religious leaders do not necessarily know best,” he wrote, before making a reference to the oft-used pro-abortion argument that men should not have a say in the debate. “Matters are not helped when those who seek to impose this new law are, predominately, male.”

The backlash after the ruling in Poland demonstrated the poor decision of the government, wrote Dyer-Perry. The ruling led to the formation of “two distinctive and opposing camps – pro- and anti-abortion,” he declared. “This is not the way to progress the protection of the unborn child.” — Article continues below Petition —