NON LA VACCINATION NE DIVISE PAS PAR DOUZE LA CONTAMINATION ! Les anticorps limitant la contagiosité chutent de 80% dans le mois qui suit la deuxième dose …. par pgibertie Ils sont prets à tous les mensonges pour justifier un pass sanitaire accordé à des vaccinés potentiellement contaminants et à des détenteurs d’un test négatif . Si le ridicule tuait les médecins de plateau télé seraient tous morts, à les écouter les 20 000 cas quotidiens sont tous des non vaccinés et le vaccin diviserait par douze les risques de contamination Réfléchissez un peu , compte tenu du nombre actuel de vaccinés , sans les produits miracles nous aurions plus de 200 000 cas par jour ! Pire scientifiquement la protection forte contre la contamination par ces vaccins est impossible… IL FAUDRAIT UN RAPPEL TOUS LES MOIS…. Les anticorps protecteurs de la contamination chutent de 80% dans le mois qui suit la deuxième dose …. Les vaccinés contaminés contaminent autant que les non vaccinés par la charge virale très forte des voies nasales et les vaccins actuels ne peuvent pas agir durablement sur cette charge virale tant qu’elle demeure dans les voies nasales… Le corps humain peut être représenté par 2 régions importantes que nous appellerons : – le compartiment stérile dit « systémique » comprenant le sang, le cœur, rate, poumon, foie, cerveau etc. – -le compartiment en contact avec l’extérieur dit « muqueuses » comprenant l’appareil respiratoire, digestif et génital. Le système immunitaire protège ces deux compartiments de manières différentes car le compartiment « muqueuses » est constitué de flores microbiennes vitales pour nous alors que le compartiment « systémique » est stérile. La seule manière de bloquer la transmission du Sars-Cov-2 qui se fait par le compartiment en contact est d’induire une immunité dans les voies respiratoires soit un vaccin par administration nasale soit par une infection naturelle ! A minima un spray. Les vaccins actuels sont injectés par voie intra musculaire, pour être plus précis le gène de la protéine spike est injecté dans un muscle et votre organisme fabriquera la dite protéine qui devrait provoquer l’apparition d’anticorps. C’est le compartiment stérile dit systémique qui est visé pour induire une forte production d’anticorps IgG qui vont neutraliser le virus et empêcher le développement de formes graves de la maladie. C’est ce qui est espéré avec les vaccins actuels de la Covid. Les IgG sont les immunoglobulines les plus abondantes (75 à 80 % des anticorps circulants). Elles sont fabriquées lors d’un contact avec un antigène (corps étranger pour l’organisme). Elles protègent l’organisme contre les bactéries, les virus, et les toxines qui circulent dans le sang. Elles participent également à la réponse mémoire, base de l’immunité sur laquelle repose le mécanisme de la vaccination. Mais pour éviter la contamination , c’est une autre affaire il faut absolument agir sur les muqueuses pour une production d’anticorps IgA . Par exemple le vaccin de la polio se présente sous deux formes : – la forme atténuée administrée par voie orale bloque parfaitement la transmission car il empêche la réplication du virus dans les muqueuses dont fait partie le système digestif et donc les contaminations par les selles. -La forme inactivée, administrée par injection protège de la maladie mais n’empêche pas les contaminations par les selles! Nous savons maintenant que l’on retrouve des anticorps contre la protéine S un peu partout y compris dans les muqueuses , ce qui peut poser problèmes , mais aboutir à la production d’anticorps IgAOn retrouve un maximum d’IgA après la deuxième dose . PROBLEME LES IGA PRODUITS PAR LA VACCINATION S’EFFONDRENT RAPIDEMENT DANS LES DEUX MOIS A titre de comparaison les IgG qui protègent des formes graves résistent plus longtemps : AGIR DIRECTEMENT SUR LES MUQUEUSES Les incultes se sont moqués de Raoult quand celui-ci parlait d’utiliser des molécules pour détruire le virus tant qu’il se trouvait dans les voies nasales. Il prononça le mot Vicks et les imbéciles see gargarisèrent d’une pommade. La marque en question propose pourtant des produits à inhaler. Bien des médecins qui soignent ajoutent depuis longtemps des inhalations de glucocorticoïdes inhalés (budesonide) avec succès . La piste de l’administration par voie intranasale soit de médicaments soit d’un vaccin pour lutter contre le SARS-CoV-2 est très intéressante. Pharma and Beauty a proposé en vain un spray, les résultats ont été approuvés par le professeur Bernard La Scola, chef de service de recherche à l’Institut Méditerranée Infection, où exerce le professeur Didier Raoult. En France, un candidat vaccin utilisant un vecteur lentiviral est en cours d’étude, tandis qu’en Israël et Nouvelle-Zélande un spray nasal utilisant du monoxyde d’azote – aux propriétés virucides – est déjà autorisé, bien qu’en attente des résultats définitifs d’efficacité. Croire qu’un vacciné est douze fois moins contaminant qu’un non vacciné relève ou de l’escroquerie ou de la connerie Une exception cependant, la France et les chiffres biaisés de Véran qui ne prennent pas en compte le fait que les vaccinés se font bien moins tester que les autres et qu’ils sont souvent asymptomatiques et contagieux mais non pris en compte En Israel les taux de vaccinés contaminés sont identiques à leur part de la population par classe d’âge Aux USA / Fauci: « Maintenant que nous avons le variant Delta, cela change tout » « le niveau de virus est le même dans le pharynx nasal des vaccinés et des non-vaccinés » Human IgG and IgA responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccineshttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249499https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210330/28410/French.aspx Longtemps les médecins de plateau téléé ont expliqué que la protection vaccinale étauit supérieure à la protection naturelle suivant une contamination à partir d’une étude parue dans Nature le 26 août et portant uniquement sur les variants Alpha et Bêta qui stipule que les sérums de personnes convalescentes offrent une protection « significativement plus faible » que ceux des personnes vaccinées (de mesures en laboratoire). Nous savons aujourd’hui que l’immunité impliquait bien autre chose que les IgA etIgG et que la véritable immunité n’était pas vaccinale. L’étude, menée sur 779.000 personnes en Israël, est la plus vaste à ce jour comparant l’immunité naturelle et l’immunité vaccinale. Elle montre que les patients vaccinés avec deux doses de vaccin Pfizer (le seul utilisé en Israël) ont 13 fois plus de risque d’être infectés par le variant Delta, comparativement aux personnes atteintes par le virus lors des vagues de janvier ou février 2021. Le risque est encore 5,96 fois plus élevé comparé aux individus touchés lors des vagues de 2020, où d’autres variants étaient en circulation, et 7,13 fois plus élevé concernant les formes symptomatiques. « Ce résultat peut s’expliquer par une réponse immunitaire plus complète conférée par l’infection naturelle», suggèrent les auteurs Rappelons qu’au 19eme siecle la Covid de 1890 a disparu rapidement, sans vaccin mais après avoir contaminé 40% de la population Mais il faudrait soigner précocément et ils ne veulent pas en entendre parler
En juillet, une vidéo blasphématoire avait déjà provoqué une onde de choc. Il récidive en estimant que les actes homosexuels ne sont pas condamnés par l’Eglise !
« Il n’est marqué nulle part, ni dans la Bible ni dans le catéchisme de l’Eglise catholique c’est-à-dire l’ensemble de la tradition, que d’être homosexuel ou de pratiquer l’homosexualité c’est un péché. »
Suite à la nouvelle vidéo scandaleuse du père Matthieu Jasseron sur le réseau Tiktok, le diocèse a publié cette mise au point :
Ainsi que le relevait déjà le pape Benoît XVI, dès 2010, “il est demandé aux prêtres la capacité d’être présents dans le monde numérique dans la fidélité constante au message évangélique, pour exercer leur rôle d’animateurs de communautés s’exprimant désormais, toujours plus souvent, au milieu des “voix” provenant du monde numérique, et d’annoncer l’évangile en se servant, à coté des moyens traditionnels, de l’apport de la nouvelle génération des moyens audiovisuels (photos, vidéo, animations, blog, sites web) qui représentent des occasions inédites de dialogue et même des outils indispensables pour l’évangélisation et la catéchèse.”1 Répondant à cet appel, de nombreux prêtres sont effectivement présents sur le “continent numérique”.
Parmi eux, l’Abbé Matthieu Jasseron, prêtre du diocèse de Sens & Auxerre développe depuis plusieurs mois une présence sur le réseau social TikTok. Or, comme nombre de prêtres, l’Abbé Jasseron s’y exprime à titre personnel, sans en avoir reçu la mission particulière. Mais l’audience qu’il a pu rencontrer donnant un retentissement particulier à ses interventions, il importe que ces dernières puissent bénéficier d’un concours de compétences plus large pour pouvoir engager l’Église. Cette préoccupation rejoint notamment l’initiative du Service national Jeunes et Vocations qui a réuni, il y a peu, quelques prêtres développant une présence pastorale sur internet et cherchant à ce qu’elle soit la mieux ajustée. Un processus sera donc mis en place afin de poursuivre cette œuvre pastorale de façon à ce qu’elle “montre Dieu vivant et agissant dans la réalité quotidienne et présente la sagesse religieuse du passé comme une richesse à laquelle puiser pour vivre dignement l’aujourd’hui et construire l’avenir avec justesse.”
Il n’a pas du lire le catéchisme et notamment les articles 2351 et 2357 (qui parlent « d’actes intrinsèquement désordonnés »). Et il faut être activement de mauvaise foi pour énoncer le sophisme « l’homosexualité n’est pas concernée par le CEC » en arguant du fait que l’Eglise parle essentiellement de l’union d’un homme et d’une femme. Quant à la Bible, il faut ne pas l’avoir lue, ou d’une manière orientée, pour ignorer par exemple la fin de Rm 1.
Ce prêtre a visiblement des difficultés avec sa propre sexualité. La publication de propos gravement contraires à l’enseignement de l’Eglise le rend coupable d’une « coopération formelle » au mal, en induisant en erreur des âmes fragiles.
To paraphrase a famous quip from then Presidential candidate Bill Clinton in a debate with his Republican opponent in 1992, “It’s the vaccine, stupid!” The daily mainstream media and government narrative we are being inundated all over the world with is confusing to most, to put it mildly. So-called Delta or “Indian” variant is spreading like chicken pox we are told, but not what that “spreading” means. Unvaccinated are accused of spreading COVID-19 to those supposedly vaccinated. The USA, UK and EU are leading this confusing and deadly narrative.
Children are told by political appointees to get the jab despite official recommendation from WHO and national medical authorities such as STIKO in Germany to wait. PCR tests that define policy, but which do not tell anything about a person’s having a specific virus, are treated as a “Gold Standard” of infection. Yet as of this writing not one lab has successfully isolated purified samples of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus said to cause the COVID-19 disease. How can PCR tests be calibrated if the claimed pathogen is not clear? If we take a step back it becomes clear that we are being subjected to a deliberate worldwide operation in cognitive dissonance whose intended consequences for the future of our civilization are not being told to us.
Resolving dissonance
Cognitive dissonance is a term in psychology for a person’s experience of two contradictory or inconsistent experiences whose inconsistency causes them great stress. The stress is resolved in the brain by the person playing unconscious tricks to resolve the contradiction. The Stockholm Syndrome comes to mind. In this case it is the traditional trust in Authority—governments, WHO, CDC, RKI, Bill Gates and other self-appointed epidemiological experts, in many cases with no medical degree. These authorities are imposing draconian lockdowns, masking and travel restraints and what is rapidly becoming de facto forced vaccination with untested jabs whose adverse effects now number in the millions in the EU and USA.
The ordinary brain says, “Why would the authorities want to harm us? Don’t they want the best for us and the country or the world?” The real experiences of the past 18 months since the World Health Organization declared a pandemic over an alleged virus first proclaimed in Wuhan China suggest that either politicians and health officials across the world have lost their minds, are deliberately evil, or willfully destructive or simply corrupt. To resolve that frightening contradiction, millions of us take an experimental concoction known as mRNA genetically-edited substance assuming then they are protected against infection or severe illness from an alleged deadly pathogen called COVID-19. Some even attack those around them who view the dissonance differently and who refuse a vaccine out of distrust and caution. Yet even the ever-present Dr. Fauci in Washington admits the novel mRNA vaccines do not prevent getting the alleged disease or being infectious, only maybe helps lessen its impact. That is not a vaccine, but rather something else.
Delta Variant?
At this point it is useful to look at several demonstrated facts around this coronavirus and its apparently unlimited “variants.” The current scare in the UK and EU as well as the USA is a so-called Delta variant of the coronavirus. The only problem is that we are not being told by the relevant authorities anything useful about that variant.
Since the alleged Delta variant of an alleged but nowhere scientifically proven Wuhan novel coronavirus is being used to justify a new round of draconian lockdowns and pressure to vaccinate, it is worth looking into the test to determine if a Delta variant is present in a tested person tested with the standard WHO-recommended PCR test.
The Delta Variant back in May was originally called the Indian variant. It was soon blamed for up to 90% of new COVID-19 positive tests in the UK, which also has a significant Indian population. What is not being told is that in just two months the alleged Delta positives in India dropped dramatically from 400,000 daily in May to 40,000 in July. Symptoms were said to be suspiciously like that for ordinary hay fever, so the WHO quickly renamed it the Delta variant according to the Greek alphabet just to muddy the waters more. Similar Delta declines came in the UK. “Experts” claimed it was because terrified Indians stayed at home as only a tiny 1-3% of the population had been vaccinated. In UK experts there claimed it was because so many had been vaccinated that Delta cases plunged. If you get the impression they are just inventing explanations to feed the vaccine narrative, you are not alone.
It gets worse. Virtually no one in the UK, India the EU or the USA who is claimed to have been tested positive for Delta has had a specific Delta variant test as such a direct variant test does not exist. Complex and very costly tests are claimed to exist, but no proof is offered that they are being used to claim such things as “90% of UK cases are Delta…” Labs around the world simply do the standard, highly inaccurate PCR tests and health authorities declare it is “Delta.” There is no simple test for Delta or any other variant. If that were not true, the CDC or WHO or other health institutes should explain in detail those tests. They haven’t. Ask relevant health “experts” how they prove presence of a Delta variant virus. They cannot. Testing labs in the USA admit that they do not test for any variants.
Worthless PCR Tests
Even the PCR test itself is not a test for any virus or disease. The scientist who won a Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR test, Dr. Kary Mullis, went on TV to attack by name NIAID head Tony Fauci as incompetent for claiming the PCR tests could detect any pathogen or disease. It was not designed for that, but rather as a laboratory analytical tool for research. PCR tests cannot determine an acute infection, ongoing infectiousness, nor actual disease. The PCR test is not actually designed to identify active infectious disease, instead, it identifies genetic material, be it partial, alive, or even dead.
A January 21, 2020 published paper by two Germans, Corman and Drosten, was used to create the PCR test immediately adopted by the WHO to be the world standard to detect cases of the novel coronavirus from Wuhan. At that point a mere six persons had been identified having the novel coronavirus. In November 2020 a group of scientific external peers reviewed the Drosten paper and found an incredible number of major scientific flaws as well as brazen conflict of interest by Drosten and colleagues. The scientists noted the Drosten PCR design and paper suffered from, “numerous technical and scientific errors, including insufficient primer design, a problematic and insufficient RT-qPCR protocol, and the absence of an accurate test validation. Neither the presented test nor the manuscript itself fulfils the requirements for an acceptable scientific publication. Further, serious conflicts of interest of the authors are not mentioned. Finally… a systematic peer review process was either not performed here, or of problematic poor quality.” Yet the Drosten PCR design was immediately recommended by the WHO as the world corona test.
The PCR amplifies genetic material by using cycles of amplification until it reaches what is called Cycle threshold (Ct), the number of amplifications to detect genetic material before the sample becomes worthless. Mullis once said if you amplify by enough cycles you can pretty much find anything in anybody as our bodies carry huge numbers of different viruses and bacteria, most harmless. Even Dr. Fauci in a 2020 interviews stated that a CT at 35 or above is worthless. Yet the CDC is believed to recommend testing labs to use a CT of 37 to 40! At that level perhaps 97% of COVID positives are likely false.
Neither the CDC nor the WHO makes public their Ct recommendations, but reports are that the CDC now recommends a lower Ct threshold for testing vaccinated so as to minimize COVID positives in the vaccinated, while recommending a Ct above 35 for the unvaccinated, a criminal manipulation if it is true.
For those interested in the evolution of perverting the PCR tests to supposedly diagnose specific presence of a disease, look into the sordid history beginning in the 1980s of Fauci and his underling then, Dr Robert Gallo, at NIAID, using Mullis’ PCR technology to wrongly claim a person is HIV-positive, a criminal enterprise that resulted in unnecessary deaths of tens or hundreds of thousands of people.
Notably nearly every prominent COVID vaccine advocate from Fauci to WHO head Tedros have come out of the HIV/AIDS swamp and its fake PCR testing. The entire panic measures imposed since 2020 around the world are based on the false premise that “Positive” RT-PCR test means being sick or infected with COVID. The COVID-19 scare that emanated from Wuhan, China in December of 2019 is a pandemic of testing as many doctors have pointed out. There is no proof that a pathogenic virus is being detected by the test. Nor is there a proven reference value, or “gold standard” to determine positive. It is purely arbitrary. Do the research and you will find it.
Pushing Experimental Vaccines
If it is the case that we have destroyed trillions of dollars in the world economy since early 2020 and ruined countless lives based on worthless PCR tests and now the same fraud extends the insanity for an alleged Delta variant, the clear conclusion is that some very influential actors are using that fear to drive experimental genetic vaccines never before tested on humans nor extensively on animals.
Yet the vaccine-related official death toll in the EU and USA continue to break records. As of this writing, according to the official EU database for recording vaccine injuries, EduraVigilance, by August 2 a total of 20,595 deaths had been reported of people who previously received the experimental genetic mRNA jabs! Such numbers have never before been seen. In addition there have been reported 1,960,607 injuries and 50% of them serious including blood clots, heart attacks, menstrual irregularities, paralysis, all following COVID-19 mRNA injections. The USA data at the CDC VAERS database is being manipulated openly, but even they show more than 11,000 post-mRNA vaccine deaths. The major news media never mention this.
Authorities and politicians reply that there is no evidence the deaths or injuries were vaccine related. But they cannot prove that they were not because they prohibit doctors from doing any autopsy. If we are told to follow science, why are doctors being told by health officials to not do autopsies on patients who died AFTER receiving two mRNA vaccines? After thousands of vaccine-related deaths only one autopsy has been reported, that in Germany, and the findings were horrific. The mRNA spike protein had spread through the entire body. The CDC stopped monitoring non-severe COVID-19 cases among vaccinated people in May. That hides the alarming number of vaccinated who get seriously ill.
Something is terribly wrong when respected experienced medical experts are being banned for suggesting alternative hypotheses to the entire COVID drama. When other scientists adhering to the official line call for any criticism of Tony Fauci or other mainstream COVID doctors, they are to be labelled as doing a “Hate Crime.” Or when cheap and proven remedials are prohibited in favor of the costly deadly mRNA vaccines in which Fauci’s NIAID holds a financial interest.
Already vaccine advocates such as Fauci are speaking of the need for booster mRNA shots and warning of yet a new “Lambda variant” looming. How will they test for that? Or are we to take it on faith because he or she is said by CNN or BBC to be a “respected authority”? How far will sane citizens allow this cognitive dissonance to destroy our lives?
F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.
Pour paraphraser une célèbre boutade lancée par Bill Clinton, alors candidat à la présidence, lors d’un débat avec son adversaire républicain en 1992, « C’est le vaccin, idiot ! ». Le récit quotidien des médias grand public et du gouvernement dont le monde entier est inondé est déroutant pour la plupart, et c’est un euphémisme. Le variant dit Delta ou « indien » se propage comme la varicelle, nous dit-on, mais sans préciser ce que signifie cette « propagation ». Les personnes non vaccinées sont accusées de transmettre la COVID-19 à celles qui sont censées être vaccinées. Les États-Unis, le Royaume-Uni et l’Union européenne mènent la danse avec ce confus et mortel récit.
Des responsables politiques poussent les enfants à se faire vacciner malgré les recommandations officielles de l’OMS et des autorités médicales nationales, comme le STIKO en Allemagne, qui préconisent d’attendre. Les tests PCR, qui définissent la politique mais qui ne disent rien sur la présence d’un virus spécifique chez une personne, sont traités comme le « Gold Standard » de l’infection. Pourtant, à ce jour, aucun laboratoire n’a réussi à isoler des échantillons purs du prétendu virus SRAS-CoV-2 qui serait à l’origine de la maladie COVID-19. Comment les tests PCR peuvent-ils être calibrés si l’agent pathogène revendiqué n’est pas clairement identifié ? Avec un peu de recul, il apparaît clairement que nous sommes soumis à une opération mondiale délibérée de dissonance cognitive dont les conséquences prévues pour l’avenir de notre civilisation nous sont cachées.
Résoudre la dissonance cognitive
Dissonance cognitive est un terme utilisé en psychologie pour désigner ce que ressent une personne vivant deux expériences contradictoires ou une expérience défiant sa logique ; cette incohérence vécue lui causant un grand stress. Ce stress est résolu par le cerveau qui utilise inconsciemment n’importe quel tour de passe-passe pour résoudre cette incohérence. Le syndrome de Stockholm en est un exemple. Dans le cas présent, le conflit est résolu en donnant toute sa confiance aux autorités – gouvernements, OMS, CDC, RKI, Bill Gates ou tout autre expert épidémiologique autoproclamé, souvent sans diplôme médical. Ces autorités imposent pourtant des mesures draconiennes de confinement, de port de masque et de restriction des déplacements qui ont rapidement tourné à une vaccination forcée de facto avec des vaccins non testés dont les effets indésirables se comptent désormais par millions dans l’UE et aux États-Unis.
Le cerveau ordinaire se dit : « Pourquoi les autorités voudraient-elles nous faire du mal ? Ne veulent-elles pas le meilleur pour nous et pour le pays ou le monde ? » Les expériences réelles des 18 derniers mois, depuis que l’Organisation mondiale de la santé a déclaré une pandémie à propos d’un prétendu virus identifié pour la première fois à Wuhan en Chine, suggèrent que soit les politiciens et les responsables de la santé du monde entier ont perdu la tête, soit ils sont délibérément mauvais, soit ils sont volontairement destructeurs, soit ils sont tout simplement corrompus. Pour résoudre cette effrayante contradiction, des millions d’entre nous acceptent de recevoir une concoction expérimentale faite à base d’ARNm génétiquement modifié et pensent qu’ils sont alors protégés contre l’infection et la grave maladie qu’entraine un prétendu virus pathogène et mortel appelé COVID-19. Certains attaquent même ceux qui, autour d’eux, résolvent différemment cette dissonance en refusant ce vaccin, par simple méfiance et prudence. Pourtant, même le Dr Fauci, l’omniprésent expert médical de Washington, admet que les nouveaux vaccins à ARNm n’empêchent pas de contracter la prétendue maladie ou d’être contaminant, mais qu’ils contribuent peut-être à en atténuer l’impact. Il ne s’agit donc pas d’un vaccin, mais de quelque chose d’autre.
Un variant Delta ?
À ce stade, il est utile d’examiner plusieurs faits avérés concernant ce coronavirus et son nombre apparemment infini de « variants ». La peur actuelle au Royaume-Uni, dans l’Union européenne et aux États-Unis est déclenchée par un variant, appelé Delta, du coronavirus. Le seul problème est que les autorités compétentes ne nous apprennent rien d’utile sur ce variant.
Étant donné que le prétendu variant Delta d’un nouveau coronavirus, prétendument identifié à Wuhan mais jamais scientifiquement prouvé, est utilisée pour justifier une nouvelle série de mesures draconiennes de confinement et de pressions en faveur de la vaccination, il est utile d’examiner le test permettant de déterminer si ce variant Delta est bien présent chez une personne testée à l’aide du test PCR standard recommandé par l’OMS.
En mai dernier, le variant Delta fut d’abord appelé variant indien. Il a rapidement été identifié dans 90 % des nouveaux tests positifs au COVID-19 au Royaume-Uni, qui compte également une importante population indienne. Ce que l’on ne dit pas, c’est qu’en deux mois seulement, les prétendus positifs au variant Delta en Inde ont chuté de façon spectaculaire, passant de 400 000 par jour en mai à 40 000 en juillet. Les symptômes ressemblant étrangement à ceux du rhume des foins ordinaire, l’OMS s’est empressée de le rebaptiser Delta, en se basant sur l’alphabet grec, afin de brouiller davantage les pistes. Des baisses similaires du variant Delta ont été observées au Royaume-Uni. Les « experts » ont prétendu que c’était parce que les Indiens terrifiés étaient restés chez eux, car seul un petit 1-3% de la population avait été vacciné. Au Royaume-Uni, les experts ont prétendu que c’est parce que beaucoup de gens étaient vaccinés que les cas de delta avaient tellement chuté. Si cela vous donne l’impression qu’ils inventent n’importe quelle explication pour alimenter le discours sur les vaccins, vous n’êtes pas le seul.
Et ce n’est pas tout. Pratiquement personne au Royaume-Uni, en Inde, dans l’Union européenne ou aux États-Unis n’a pu être testée positif au variant Delta avec un test spécifique au variant Delta, car un tel test n’existe pas. Des tests complexes et très coûteux sont censés exister, mais aucune preuve n’est apportée qu’ils sont utilisés pour affirmer des choses telles que « 90% des cas britanniques sont dus au Delta… ». Les laboratoires du monde entier se contentent d’effectuer des tests PCR standard, très imprécis, et les autorités sanitaires déclarent qu’il s’agit du « Delta ». Il n’existe pas de test simple pour le Delta ou tout autre variant. Si ce que je dis n’est pas vrai, le CDC ou l’OMS ou d’autres instituts de santé devraient expliquer en détail ces tests. Ils ne le font pas. Demandez aux « experts » de la santé concernés comment ils peuvent prouver la présence d’un variant Delta du virus. Ils ne le peuvent pas. Les laboratoires d’analyse aux États-Unis admettent qu’ils ne peuvent tester aucun variant.
Des tests PCR inutiles
Le test PCR ne permet pas de détecter un virus ou une maladie. Le scientifique qui a obtenu un prix Nobel pour avoir inventé le test PCR, le Dr Kary Mullis, est passé à la télévision pour attaquer nommément le chef du NIAID, Tony Fauci, en le qualifiant d’incompétent pour avoir prétendu que les tests PCR pouvaient détecter n’importe quel agent pathogène ou maladie. Il n’a pas été conçu pour cela, mais plutôt comme un outil d’analyse de recherche en laboratoire. Les tests PCR ne peuvent pas déterminer une infection aiguë, une infectiosité continue, ni une maladie réelle. Le test PCR n’a pas été conçu pour identifier une maladie infectieuse active, il identifie plutôt du matériel génétique, qu’il soit partiel, vivant ou même mort.
Un article publié le 21 janvier 2020 par deux Allemands, Corman et Drosten, a été utilisé pour créer le test PCR et immédiatement adopté par l’OMS pour devenir la norme mondiale de détection du nouveau coronavirus. À ce moment-là, six personnes seulement avaient été identifiées comme porteuses du nouveau coronavirus. En novembre 2020, un groupe de pairs scientifiques a examiné l’article de Drosten et a découvert un nombre incroyable de failles scientifiques majeures ainsi qu’un conflit d’intérêts flagrant de la part de Drosten et de ses collègues. Les scientifiques ont noté que la conception du PCR et l’article de Drosten souffraient de « nombreuses erreurs techniques et scientifiques, notamment une conception insuffisante des amorces, un protocole RT-qPCR problématique et insuffisant, et l’absence d’une validation précise du test. Ni le test présenté ni le manuscrit lui-même ne remplissent les conditions d’une publication scientifique acceptable. En outre, les graves conflits d’intérêts des auteurs ne sont pas mentionnés. Enfin… un processus systématique d’examen par les pairs n’a, jusqu’à maintenant, pas été effectué, ou alors il était de mauvaise qualité. » Pourtant, le modèle de PCR de Drosten a été immédiatement recommandé par l’OMS comme test pour le coronavirus.
Le test PCR amplifie le matériel génétique en utilisant des rotations jusqu’à ce qu’elles atteignent ce que l’on appelle le seuil de cycle (Ct), un nombre d’amplifications permettant de détecter le matériel génétique avant que l’échantillon ne devienne sans valeur. Mullis a dit un jour que si l’on amplifie par un grand nombre suffisant de rotation, on peut trouver n’importe quoi chez n’importe qui, car notre corps est porteur d’un grand nombre de virus et de bactéries différents, la plupart inoffensifs. Même le Dr Fauci, dans une interview de 2020, déclarait qu’un CT supérieur à 35 n’a aucune valeur. Pourtant, le CDC recommanderait aux laboratoires de tests d’utiliser un CT entre 37 et 40 ! A ce niveau-là, 97% des COVID positifs sont probablement faux.
Ni le CDC ni l’OMS n’ont rendu publiques leurs recommandations en matière de Ct, mais on rapporte que le CDC recommande désormais un seuil de Ct plus bas pour les tests des personnes ayant été vaccinées, de manière à minimiser les COVIDs positifs chez les personnes vaccinées, tout en recommandant un Ct supérieur à 35 pour les personnes non vaccinées, une manipulation criminelle si elle est avérée.
Pour ceux qui s’intéressent à l’évolution de la manipulation des tests PCR pour soi-disant diagnostiquer la présence spécifique d’une maladie, il faut se pencher sur l’histoire sordide qui a commencé dans les années 1980 lorsque Fauci et son subordonné de l’époque, le Dr Robert Gallo, au NIAID, ont utilisé la technologie PCR de Mullis pour affirmer, à tort, qu’une personne était séropositive, une entreprise criminelle qui a entraîné la mort inutile de dizaines, voire de centaines, de milliers de personnes.
Notamment, presque tous les éminents défenseurs du vaccin COVID, de Fauci à Tedros, le chef de l’OMS, viennent de cette glauque affaire VIH/SIDA et de ses faux tests PCR. L’ensemble des mesures de panique imposées depuis 2020 dans le monde entier sont basées sur la fausse prémisse qu’un test RT-PCR « positif » signifie que l’on est malade ou infecté par le COVID. La peur du COVID-19 qui a émané de Wuhan, en Chine, en décembre 2019, est une pandémie qui n’est due qu’aux tests, comme l’ont souligné de nombreux médecins. Il n’y a aucune preuve qu’un virus pathogène soit détecté par le test. Il n’y a pas non plus de valeur de référence prouvée, ou « étalon-or » pour déterminer la positivité. C’est purement arbitraire. Faites la recherche et vous verrez.
La promotion de vaccins expérimentaux
Si l’économie mondiale a perdu des milliers de milliards de dollars depuis le début de l’année 2020 et ruiné d’innombrables vies sur la base de tests PCR sans valeur et que maintenant la même fraude continue avec un prétendu variant Delta, la conclusion évidente est que certains acteurs très influents utilisent cette peur pour promouvoir des vaccins génétiques expérimentaux qui n’ont jamais été testés à grande échelle sur des humains ni sur des animaux.
Pourtant, le nombre officiel de décès liés aux vaccins dans l’UE et aux États-Unis continue de battre des records. À l’heure où nous écrivons ces lignes, selon la base de données officielle de l’UE pour l’enregistrement des conséquences liées aux vaccins, EduraVigilance, à la date du 2 août, 20 595 décès ont été signalés chez des personnes venant d’être inoculées avec ces vaccins à ARNm expérimentaux ! De tels chiffres n’avaient jamais été observés auparavant. En outre, 1 960 607 conséquences médicales ont été signalées, dont 50 % graves, notamment des caillots sanguins, des crises cardiaques, des irrégularités menstruelles, des paralysies, toutes consécutives à une injection d’ARNm COVID-19. Les données américaines de la base de données VAERS établie par le CDC sont ouvertement manipulées, mais elles montrent quand même plus de 11 000 décès post-vaccins ARNm. Les grands médias n’en parlent jamais.
Les autorités et les politiciens prétendent qu’il n’y a aucune preuve que les décès ou les conséquences médicales soient liés aux vaccins. Mais ils ne peuvent pas prouver ce qu’ils prétendent parce qu’ils interdisent aux médecins de pratiquer toute autopsie. Si l’on nous dit de faire confiance à la science, pourquoi les autorités sanitaires ordonnent-elles aux médecins de ne pas faire d’autopsie sur les patients qui sont morts APRÈS avoir reçu deux doses de vaccins ARNm ? Malgré ces milliers de décès liés à ces vaccins, une seule autopsie a été pratiquée, en Allemagne, et les conclusions furent terribles. La protéine de pointe ARNm s’était répandue dans tout le corps. Depuis le mois de mai, le CDC a cessé de répertorier les cas non graves de COVID-19 chez les personnes vaccinées. Pour cacher le nombre alarmant de vaccinés qui tombent malades.
Quelque chose ne va pas du tout lorsque des experts médicaux expérimentés et respectés sont bannis pour avoir suggéré des hypothèses alternatives pour expliquer ce drame COVID. Lorsque d’autres scientifiques, qui adhérent à la ligne officielle mais critiquent Tony Fauci ou d’autres médecins traditionnels du COVID, sont accusés de « crime de haine ». Ou lorsque des remèdes bon marché et éprouvés sont interdits en faveur des coûteux vaccins ARNm mortels dans lesquels le NIAID de Fauci détient un intérêt financier.
Les défenseurs des vaccins tels que Fauci parlent déjà de la nécessité d’injections de rappel et mettent en garde contre l’apparition d’un nouveau « variant Lambda ». Comment vont-ils l’identifier celui-là ? Ou devons-nous le croire sur parole parce qu’il ou elle est considéré(e) par CNN ou la BBC comme une « autorité respectée » ? Jusqu’à quand les citoyens sains d’esprit vont-ils permettre à cette dissonance cognitive de détruire nos vies ?
En Ukraine, découverte du plus grand charnier des purges staliniennes
30 Août, 2021 Provenance: fsspx.news
Joseph Staline
La récente mise à jour de charniers contenant les restes de plusieurs milliers de victimes du communisme en Ukraine a permis de remettre au premier plan de l’actualité les persécutions subies par de nombreux chrétiens, victimes du totalitarisme communiste.
Les Grandes purges – ou la Grande Terreur – communistes menées par Staline ont consisté en une campagne d’arrestations, de répression politique et de nettoyage ethnique au cours desquelles plus de 20 millions de personnes sont mortes, victimes d’exécutions pour des délits criminels et politiques, assassinées dans des camps de travail forcé et d’autres manières horribles.
Récemment, des fosses contenant les restes de 5 000 à 8 000 personnes ont été localisées sur un terrain de presque cinq hectares situé près de l’aéroport d’Odessa ont été récemment découvertes, grâce à l’Institut de la mémoire nationale d’Ukraine (IMNU), sur les rives de la mer Noire.
Le 25 août 2021, les autorités annonçait que vingt-neuf fosses communes avaient été découvertes, contenant les restes mortels de victimes du Commissariat du peuple aux affaires intérieures (NKVD) sur un terrain de près de cinq hectares.
Cette découverte a été rendue possible par le travail de l’historien Odesius Oleksandr Babich, qui a trouvé les documents relatant les exécutions de masse à Odessa.
Le responsable de l’antenne régionale de l’Institut de la mémoire nationale, Sergui Goutsaliouk, en est certain : la plupart des victimes ont été tuées d’une balle dans la tête par le NKVD, la police secrète soviétique et ancêtre du KGB. Des exécutions qui remontent aux années 1937-1939, sous la Grande terreur stalinienne.
Toujours d’après M. Goutsaliouk, il ne sera pas possible d’identifier les victimes, les documents concernant ces purges étant classés secrets et conservés à Moscou, « qui ne les donnera pas » à l’Ukraine en raison des relations tendues entre les deux pays.
Mais le charnier d’Odessa n’est que peu de choses par rapport aux plusieurs centaines de milliers d’Ukrainiens qui, selon les historiens de ce pays, ont fait les frais du totalitarisme communiste : l’un des sites de mise à mort les plus connus se trouve dans la forêt proche du village de Bykivnia, en périphérie de Kiev, où des dizaines de milliers de victimes ont été enterrées.
L’IMNU a précisé : « Nous ne pouvons que spéculer sur la quantité de sang que le pouvoir soviétique a fait couler pour s’imposer à Odessa », car, selon la documentation, les tombes pourraient s’étendre du site prouvé jusqu’à une ancienne caserne militaire, ce qui en ferait le plus grand site funéraire communal de toute l’Ukraine.
Retour sur une persécution sanglante
Il n’est pas inutile de restituer le contexte de ces massacres de masse : à la fin des années 1920, Joseph Staline met un terme à la Nouvelle politique économique (NEP) de Lénine, afin de rétablir le pur communisme.
Après 1929 et pendant les années 30, les fermetures d’églises, les arrestations massives de membres du clergé et de laïcs religieux actifs, ainsi que la persécution des personnes qui fréquentent l’Eglise ont atteint des proportions sans précédent.
Le fer de lance de cette politique était la Ligue des militants athées (LMG) ou Société des Sans-Dieu ou encore L’Union des Sans-Dieu, une organisation antireligieuse formée de travailleurs et citoyens soviétiques durant la période 1925–1947.
Guidée par les principes bolcheviques et la propagande antireligieuse du parti communiste, la Ligue combat la religion sous toutes ses formes, et inculque l’idéal de la pensée scientifique parmi les travailleurs. La Ligue a fait fermer la plupart des lieux de culte de l’Union soviétique.
La LMG a utilisé des tactiques de terreur contre les croyants pour faire avancer sa campagne, tout en dissimulant ses actions sous le couvert de la protection de l’État et de la poursuite des contrevenants à la loi.
Des procès ont été organisés contre des évêques qui, avec leur clergé et leurs paroissiens laïcs, ont été dénoncés comme constituant des « bandes terroristes subversives » qui avaient été démasquées.
La propagande officielle de l’époque exigeait le bannissement de l’Union soviétique du concept même de Dieu. Ces persécutions devaient contribuer à l’objectif socialiste ultime d’éliminer la religion.
Plan quinquennal meurtrier
A l’image des plans quinquennaux économiques, stratégies de planification économique gouvernementales fixant des objectifs de production pour une période de 5 ans, établis en Union soviétique de 1929 à 1991, d’autres projets de même nom avaient des faces beaucoup plus sombres.
De 1932 à 1937, Joseph Staline décréta les « plans quinquennaux de l’athéisme » et la LMG fut chargée de l’élimination complète de toute expression religieuse dans le pays. Nombre de ces mêmes méthodes et tactiques de terreur ont également été imposées à d’autres personnes que le régime considérait comme ses ennemis idéologiques.
C’est ainsi qu’en 1932, le pouvoir soviétique resserre la pression sur les paysans d’Ukraine – les koulaks – coupables de n’en faire qu’à leur tête et suspects de nationalisme. Les représentants du Parti multiplient les réquisitions forcées, y compris dans les fermes collectives.
En 1932, les premiers effets de cette politique désastreuse se font sentir, avec une famine qui fera plusieurs millions de victimes – environ sept millions selon une estimation basse, famine orchestrée par Staline pour réprimer toute volonté indépendantiste.
Les historiens ukrainiens n’hésitent pas à donner le nom de génocide à cette famine meurtrière, planifiée par le « petit père des peuples ».
Tandis que la Lumière de la Vérité continue de s’affaiblir dans le monde, cette Lumière continuera de s’intensifier en clarté et en puissance au plus intime du cœur de ceux qui Lui sont consacrés. Le fruit en sera la joie ! Oui, vous deviendrez des signes de contradiction pour le monde. Car, tandis que les nations trembleront de terreur, une sérénité, une paix et une joie émaneront, tels les rayons du Soleil, du cœur de ceux qui auront résisté aux tentations du siècle présent et délaissé les plaisirs de ce monde, pour ouvrir leur cœur à Jésus !
Première publication sur ce blog le 8 février 2018. Traduction relue et améliorée le 31 août 2021.
Une puissante image m’est venue à l’esprit… une image ayant à la fois un sens d’encouragement et d’avertissement.
Ceux qui me lisent régulièrement savent que le but de mes articles a été précisément de nous préparer pour les temps difficiles qui attendent l’Église et le monde. […] Leur objectif était essentiellement de nous appeler à nous réfugier en Lieu sûr.
Le Seigneur dit à Noé : « Entre dans l’arche, toi et toute ta famille, car j’ai vu qu’au sein de cette génération, devant moi, tu es juste. » (…) Noé entra dans l’arche avec ses fils, sa femme et les femmes de ses fils. (…) Alors le Seigneur ferma la porte sur Noé. Et ce fut le déluge sur la terre pendant quarante jours.
Gn 7: 1-17 (ajout)
La bougie qui se consume
Cette image représentait l’humanité rassemblée dans une sorte de salle obscure. Au centre se trouvait une bougie allumée. La cire avait presque entièrement fondu. La Flamme représente la lumière du Christ : la Vérité. La cire représente le temps de grâce dans lequel nous vivons.
Le monde, dans sa majeure partie, ignore cette Flamme. Mais pour ceux qui la perçoivent, ceux qui ne quittent pas des yeux sa Lumière et qui la laissent les guider, quelque chose de merveilleux et d’imperceptible se produit : leur être intérieur, secrètement, s’enflamme.
Le moment arrivera bientôt où cette période de grâce ne parviendra plus à soutenir la mèche (notre civilisation) en raison des péchés croissants de l’humanité. Les événements qui arrivent vont souffler complètement la flamme de cette bougie, et sa Lumière s’éteindra. Un chaos soudain embrasera cette « salle obscure ».
Il ôte l’intelligence aux chefs de la nation, les égare dans un chaos sans chemin ; là ils tâtonnent dans les ténèbres, sans lumière, égarés comme des ivrognes.
Job 12: 24,25
La privation de Lumière entraînera confusion et peur panique. Mais ceux qui auront emmagasiné cette Lumière, en ces temps de préparation, auront une Lumière intérieure pour les guider (car cette Lumière ne pourra jamais être éteinte). Même s’ils expérimenteront les ténèbres autour d’eux, la Lumière intérieure de Jésus brillera intensément en eux, les guidant de façon surnaturelle depuis le lieu le plus intime de leur cœur.
Ne cherchez pas Jésus très loin, Il n’est pas là-bas, Il est en vous. Entretenez la lampe et vous le verrez.
— Mère Térèsa (ajout)
Pensons seulement aux nombreuses fois où la nuit obscurcit notre vie. Eh bien, même dans ces moments-là, Dieu ne nous laisse pas seuls, mais il se rend présent… Sa proximité apporte la lumière là où il y a les ténèbres et illumine ceux qui traversent l’obscurité profonde de la souffrance. (cf. Lc 1: 79)
— Pape François, lettre apostolique « Admirabile signum », 1er décembre 2019, n° 4 ; catholique.fr (ajout)
Ensuite dans cette vision se présenta une scène inquiétante. Une lumière apparut au loin… une très faible lumière. Elle n’était pas naturelle, c’était comme une petite lumière fluorescente. Tout à coup, la plupart des personnes présentes dans la salle se précipitèrent vers cette lumière, la seule lumière qu’ils percevaient. Pour eux, c’était une lueur d’espoir… mais en réalité elle était trompeuse et traître. Elle n’offrait ni Chaleur ni Salut — à l’inverse de cette Flamme qu’ils avaient rejetée.
… dans de vastes régions de la terre la foi risque de s’éteindre comme une flamme qui ne trouve plus à s’alimenter
— Lettre de Sa Sainteté le Pape Benoît XVI à tous les évêques du monde, 10 mars 2009 ; Vatican.va
Des nuages extrêmement menaçants s’accumulent à l’horizon de l’humanité entière et les ténèbres tombent sur les âmes humaines.
— PAPE SAINT JEAN-PAUL II, Extrait de la prière du 8 décembre 1983, place d’Espagne, Rome ; mariedenazareth.com
C’est l’heure
La Parabole des dix vierges m’est venue à l’esprit immédiatement après avoir reçu cette vision intérieure. Seules cinq de ces dix vierges avaient assez d’huile dans leurs lampes pour sortir à la rencontre de l’Époux qui devait venir à elles dans les ténèbres de cette nuit noire (Mt 25: 1-13). C’est-à-dire que seules cinq vierges avaient rempli leur cœur des grâces nécessaires pour éclairer leurs pas. Les cinq autres vierges n’étaient pas préparées et se plaignaient, « … nos lampes s’éteignent ! » ; elle durent aller chercher de l’huile chez les marchands. Leur cœur n’était pas préparé, et elles partirent donc se procurer la « grâce » dont elles avaient besoin… non pas auprès d’une Source Vive, mais chez des marchands malhonnêtes et trompeurs [ndtr, ex. New Age, fausses doctrines, sectes, etc.].
Une fois de plus, j’écris ceci dans un seul but : vous aider à acquérir cette huile divine, afin que vous puissiez être marqué par les anges de Dieu, et que vous parveniez à avancer à la lumière de la flamme divine, en cette période où le Fils de l’homme sera momentanément éclipsé, plongeant l’humanité dans une sombre et douloureuse nuit.
À notre époque où dans de vastes régions de la terre la foi risque de s’éteindre comme une flamme qui ne trouve plus à s’alimenter, la priorité qui prédomine est de rendre Dieu présent dans ce monde et d’ouvrir aux hommes l’accès à Dieu. Non pas à un dieu quelconque, mais à ce Dieu qui a parlé sur le Sinaï ; à ce Dieu dont nous reconnaissons le visage dans l’amour poussé jusqu’au bout (cf. Jn 13: 1) – en Jésus Christ crucifié et ressuscité. En ce moment de notre histoire, le vrai problème est que Dieu disparaît de l’horizon des hommes et que tandis que s’éteint la lumière provenant de Dieu, l’humanité manque d’orientation, et les effets destructeurs s’en manifestent toujours plus en son sein.
— Lettre de Sa Sainteté le Pape Benoît XVI à tous les évêques du monde, 10 mars 2009 ; Vatican.va
Les familles
Nous savons de la bouche de notre Seigneur que ces temps qui arrivent en surprendront beaucoup, comme un voleur dans la nuit :
Comme cela s’est passé dans les jours de Noé, ainsi en sera-t-il dans les jours du Fils de l’homme. On mangeait, on buvait, on prenait femme, on prenait mari, jusqu’au jour où Noé entra dans l’arche et où survint le déluge qui les fit tous périr.
Il en était de même dans les jours de Loth : on mangeait, on buvait, on achetait, on vendait, on plantait, on bâtissait ; mais le jour où Loth sortit de Sodome, du ciel tomba une pluie de feu et de soufre qui les fit tous périr ; cela se passera de la même manière le jour où le Fils de l’homme se révélera… Rappelez-vous la femme de Loth… Qui cherchera à conserver sa vie la perdra. Et qui la perdra la sauvegardera.
Luc 17: 26-33
Plusieurs de mes lecteurs m’ont écrit pour m’exprimer leur inquiétude par rapport aux membres de leur famille qui s’éloignent et deviennent de plus en plus hostiles à la foi chrétienne.
En effet, un criblage et une purification s’oppèrent en ce moment dans le monde. Cependant, grâce à vos prières et votre fidélité à Jésus, je suis convaincu que vos proches recevront de grandes grâces lorsque l’Esprit de Dieu ouvrira tous les cœurs pour leur dévoiler l’état de leur âme comme le Père la voit — ce don incommensurable de Sa Miséricorde, qui est aujourd’hui tout proche. L’antidote à cette apostasie au sein de vos familles est le Rosaire. (Lire : La prochaine restauration de la Famille)
Vous avez été choisi par Dieu, non pour vous sauver vous-même, mais pour être un instrument de salut pour les autres. (Lire Vous serez Noé) Votre modèle est Marie qui s’est abandonnée complètement entre les mains de Dieu, devenant par là une coopératrice de la Rédemption — la Co-Rédemptrice de nombreuses âmes. Elle est un symbole de l’Église. Ce qui s’applique à Marie s’applique à vous. Vous aussi êtes appelé à devenir, avec le Christ, un co-rédempteur ou une co-rédemptrice par vos prières, votre témoignage et vos souffrances.
Mais quand les épreuves de cette période de purification auront été surmontées, cette Église simplifiée et plus riche spirituellement en ressortira grandie et affermie. Les hommes évoluant dans un monde complètement planifié vont se retrouver extrêmement seuls. S’ils perdent totalement de vue Dieu, ils vont réellement ressentir l’horreur de leur pauvreté. Alors, ils verront le petit troupeau des croyants avec un regard nouveau. Ils le verront comme un espoir de quelque chose qui leur est aussi destiné, une réponse qu’ils avaient toujours secrètement cherchée.
Pour moi, il est certain que l’Église va devoir affronter des périodes très difficiles. La véritable crise vient à peine de commencer. Il faudra s’attendre à de grands bouleversements. Mais je suis tout aussi certain de ce qu’il va rester à la fin : une Église, non du culte politique car celle-ci est déjà morte, mais une Église de la foi. Il est fort possible qu’elle n’ait plus le pouvoir dominant qu’elle avait jusqu’à maintenant, mais elle va vivre un renouveau et redevenir la maison des hommes, où ils trouveront la vie et l’espérance en la vie éternelle.
Le Seigneur est ma lumière et mon salut ; de qui aurais-je crainte ? Le Seigneur est le rempart de ma vie ; devant qui tremblerais-je ?
Qu’une armée se déploie devant moi, mon coeur est sans crainte ; que la bataille s’engage contre moi, je garde confiance.
Car Il me réserve un lieu sûr au jour du malheur ; Il me cache au plus secret de Sa Tente, Il m’élève sur le Roc.
Psaume 26 (27)
Quand je me tiens sous l’abri du Très-Haut et repose à l’ombre du Puissant, je dis au Seigneur : « Mon refuge, mon rempart, mon Dieu, dont je suis sûr ! » C’est lui qui te sauve des filets du chasseur et de la peste maléfique ; il te couvre et te protège. Tu trouves sous son aile un refuge : sa fidélité est une armure, un bouclier. Tu ne craindras ni les terreurs de la nuit, ni la flèche qui vole au grand jour, ni la peste qui rôde dans le noir, ni le fléau qui frappe à midi. Qu’il en tombe mille à tes côtés, qu’il en tombe dix mille à ta droite, toi, tu restes hors d’atteinte… Oui, le Seigneur est ton refuge ; tu as fait du Très-Haut ta forteresse. Le malheur ne pourra te toucher, ni le danger, approcher de ta demeure : il donne mission à ses anges de te garder sur tous tes chemins… « Puisqu’il s’attache à moi, je le délivre ; je le défends, car il connaît mon nom. Il m’appelle, et moi, je lui réponds ; je suis avec lui dans son épreuve… »
Psaume 90 (91) (ajout)
Je laisse la parole de conclusion à saint Pierre :
Et nous tenons pour d’autant plus certaine la parole prophétique [que nous avons reçue], à laquelle vous faites bien de prêter attention, comme à une lampe qui brille dans un lieu obscur, jusqu’à ce que le jour vienne à paraître et que l’étoile du matin se lève dans vos coeurs.
L’Effondrement de Biden réhabilite Trump et accuse l’oligarchie médiatique !
Certes, on ne doit pas tirer sur une ambulance, mais doit-on la laisser fuir quel que soit le malade qu’elle transporte ? Celle sur laquelle il faut tirer sans retenue contient beaucoup de monde. Son passager le plus visible est le personnage dont on dit qu’il est le plus puissant du monde, Joseph Robinette Biden Jr., dit Joe Biden, 46e Président des Etats-Unis. Les mots manquent pour qualifier ce personnage qui se liquéfie à vue d’oeil sur la scène internationale : lamentable, quand il prétendait accomplir la politique de son prédécesseur, et en achever le processus le 31 Août, alors que les événements, la victoire-éclair des Talibans et le retrait de la présence occidentale dans les limites de l’aéroport de Kaboul le dépassaient totalement ; pitoyable, lorsqu’il doit annoncer la mort de 13 “marines” victimes d’un attentat, et qu’il pense partager la douleur des parents en évoquant la mort de son fils à la suite d’un cancer au cerveau, comme s’il n’était pas avant tout le responsable du chaos qui a coûté la vie de ces soldats ; grotesque, quand il brandit la menace d’une punition à l’encontre des auteurs de la tuerie aux abords de l’aéroport, sans prendre conscience que tous les terroristes du monde doivent rire de cet homme ridicule qui a laissé la première puissance mondiale se faire humilier par une de leurs sectes sans même réagir ; minable et détestable à la fois lorsqu’il affirme que les Talibans et les Etats-Unis ont le même ennemi, l’Etat islamique, comme si ce n’était pas le même totalitarisme qui les guidait, avec lequel une démocratie digne de ce nom n’a rien à partager.
Le laïus de Biden est un festival : impuissant, ignorant, indécent, cet homme évoque la décision de son prédécesseur comme cause du désastre, se réfère à la communauté du renseignement américain qui a été cependant totalement défaillante, glorifie les “héros” américains qu’il a exposés à la mort par sa stupidité. On ne peut que songer au procès constant qu’a subi Donald Trump pendant les quatre ans de son mandat, la démolition systématique entreprise contre lui par les grands médias de la bienpensance internationale, les tentatives “d’impeachment” d’une opposition démocrate vindicative et qui se sont toutes dégonflées parce qu’elle étaient dénuées de fondement. Donald Trump voulait que les Etats-Unis cessent leur politique de croisade démocratique et de construction de nations, mais il n’a jamais cessé de brandir une menace réelle contre les ennemis de l’Amérique. Ceux-ci savaient qu’il n’hésiterait pas à la mettre en oeuvre comme il l’avait fait en Syrie, ou en Irak, en faisant exécuter le chef de l’Etat islamique, Abou Bakr al-Baghdadi ou celui d’Al Qods, le général Qassem Soleimani. Les Américains avaient évidemment les moyens d’enrayer l’avancée des Talibans, et de leur imposer un partage du pouvoir avec le gouvernement en place, en s’appuyant sur les ethnies non-pashtouns, les Hazaras et les Tadjiks que le fils du commandant Massoud appelle à la résistance. Il y avait des éléments dans l’armée afghane qui voulaient résister, comme le général Sami Sadat.
La vérité est cruelle : le président des Etats-Unis, en politicard sénile et paresseux s’est dit que le retrait américain était porteur dans les sondages, qu’il fallait en tirer la couverture en soi en faisant la chose le plus vite possible pour se tourner vers la politique intérieure avant les élections de mi-mandat, et que l’on pouvait s’entendre avec les Talibans suivant la logique démocrate qui considère qu’il y a de bons islamistes fréquentables, même s’ils sont un peu maffieux comme au Kosovo, ou terroristes comme Al-Nosra (Al-Qaïda !) en Syrie. Ce vieillard dégoulinant de moraline est un vieux roublard de la politique américaine, et désormais c’est de sang dont il dégouline ! Quant à l’effacement des progrès réalisés en matière d’éducation, de santé, de droits de la femme, notre progressiste s’en moque, comme il se moque des dizaines de milliers d’Afghans désormais en danger qui voudront fuir, et qui sont pris au piège parce que les événements on bousculé la Maison Blanche. Il se contente de glorifier le gigantesque pont aérien, prouesse américaine qui transforme la débandade en exploit logistique. Beaucoup d’Afghans quitteront néanmoins le pays… vers l’Eldorado européen, ce qui n’est pas son affaire. Parmi eux, il y aura des terroristes, ce qui ne l’est pas davantage.
Mais le pauvre Biden n’est pas seul dans son ambulance, fragilisé comme dit “Le Monde”. Ce “grand” quotidien du soir, l’”Im-Monde” comme disait de Gaulle, est à ses côtés, avec la grande majorité de ses confrères des deux rives de l’Atlantique, le NYT, le Washington Post, CNN et nos canards gauchistes de luxe financés par les milliardaires propriétaires… et nos impôts. Pendant quatre ans, ils ont fusillé Trump jour après jour, parce qu’il était “populiste”, parce que son style était vulgaire, qu’il n’était pas digne de l’oligarchie mondialiste et progressiste qui doit diriger la planète. L’appartenance se reconnaît au style, et Trump ne l’avait pas : préjugé de classe cocasse chez des révolutionnaires assagis parce qu’enrichis ! Ils ont voulu la défaite de Trump, la victoire de Biden, en dépit de ses conditions. En France, les “nôtres” avaient assassiné Fillon de la même manière mais pour d’autres raisons. En permettant l’élection de Biden accompagnée d’une majorité démocrate au Congrès, ils ont tué deux fois la démocratie, par leur désinformation, d’abord, par le triomphe assuré des islamistes, ensuite. Ce sont eux les vrais coupables !
AFLDS: Media, Big Pharma attacking doctors who promote effective COVID-19 drugs
Globally, it is well known that early treatment works, but this truth continues to be frantically suppressed by the dishonest American media. Shutterstock.com
LOS ANGELES (America’s Frontline Doctors) – America’s Frontline Doctors released the following statement in response to inaccurate and slanderous reporting by both Time Magazine and NBC News.
When Covid-19 hit in March 2020, the formal recommendation from the United States government was to lock down and only come to the hospital if you could not breathe.
Never before in the history of our nation has this been medical advice. Over the past 18 months, the government has contended that there is nothing that can be done other than masking to protect individuals from Covid-19. The human cost of that reckless and unscientific prescription has been massive. This has been attested to by thousands of doctorsworldwide including several testifying before Congress.
A small number of courageous physicians in the U.S. and around the world put their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor on the line, and started treating Covid patients early to prevent hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, and death. These intrepid doctors, including Dr. Vladimir Zelenko in upstate New York, Dr. Brian Tyson in California, and Dr. Didier Raoult in Marseilles, France, achieved extremely impressive clinical results, using various combinations of hydroxycholoroquine, ivermectin, zinc, vitamins and antibiotics.
AFLDS was formed in response to the unprecedented media censorship of early outpatient treatment of Covid-19 with cheap, easily available drugs. We responded to the enormous humanitarian need by aggressively working to make hydroxychloroquine over the counter, just as it is in many other countries. A Citizen’s Petition was filed with the FDA on October 12, 2020 and was ignored, and thus AFLDS worked to establish relationships with telemedicine companies to enable physicians to see patients virtually. Several other organizations stepped into this void as well and, together with qualified physicians appropriately prescribing these proven, safe, and effective medications, have saved millions of lives.
Globally, it is well known that early treatment works, but this truth continues to be frantically suppressed by the dishonest American media. In India, the scientist who withheld this cheap, safe medicine from her people is now facing the death penalty. In Japan, the Tokyo Medical Association urged all doctors to prescribe ivermectin. In China, Chloroquine has been recommended since March 2020. In America, the mainstream media failed to report >300 studies showing early treatment works, including in the American Journal of Medicine and the American Journal of Therapeutics, and the treatment algorithm posted by Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. The Wall Street Journal did attempt to shame the FDA for trying to block people’s access to the Nobel Prize- winning drug.
subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada Catholic — Article continues below Petition — PETITION: Ban COVID vaccine mandates for schools and universities! 15683 have signed the petition.Let’s get to 17500! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
AFLDS has been maliciously attacked as part of an ongoing, orchestrated effort by media outlets who are making billions from Big Pharma and pandemic-related government advertising. The CDC’s own data debunks the government and pharmaceutical industry’s narrative that only vaccines can save us from from Covid-19. In fact, the CDC’s own numbers reveal the truth, which is that your own immune system can virtually always manage this virus. According to the CDC, even without treatment, the survival rate is 99.98% under age 50 and almost 95% over age 70. Both numbers approach 100% with early treatment.
The vaccines will not protect you from delta and future variants and have serious side effects, including death (>13,000 in the CDC database VAERS). Doctors have always known that natural immunity is far superior (more robust, longer lasting) to vaccine immunity, and the data is now accumulating that the vaccines are failing, with vaccinated people being 13x more likely than unvaccinated to be diagnosed and 27x more likely to become sick.
The latest research portends great harm from the vaccines. A recent study of healthcare workers in Vietnam showed that the vaccinated group had 251x the viral load of the unvaccinated group. This is consistent with ADE (antibody dependent enhancement), about which AFLDS warned the world in November 2020.
AFLDS continues to encourage the public to remain calm. The delta variant is very contagious but clinically milder than the original Wuhan variant. Covid-19 has a very high survivability rate and, with an increased effort to protect physician independence and patient choice, we will save even more lives.
(LifeSiteNews) — A deadly virus has decimated much of the human population, every baby born is now part animal, and surviving humans live in such fear of contagion that they will strap to a chair and burn alive anyone who shows symptoms of the deadly virus.
This is the backdrop for the Netflix series Sweet Tooth. The title seems a deliberate misnomer to highlight, by contrast, the darkness of the story it names. And indeed, the original 2009 DC comic book series Sweet Tooth, upon which it is based, is depressingly bleak.
While the Netflix series keeps the dark undertones of a post-apocalyptic world, it has enormously brightened the story, in part cosmetically, with beautiful settings of forests and sunlit fields. But the show’s real sweetness comes from the charm of the main character, Gus, a human-deer hybrid boy only identifiable as such by his ears and antlers. He embodies innocent boyhood so endearingly that you want to adopt him as your own.
Watching the show, it is easy to see why it became the most popular series on Netflix upon its release in June. It isn’t just that our post-COVID-19 world can eerily relate to the face masking and the fear of contagion among the show’s human characters. It’s also because the show pulls at your heartstrings with lovable characters and relationships that feel real and relatable.
But the innocence and lovability of Gus, the viewer quickly finds, is exploited to convey the show’s sinister underlying message.
The viewer is primed for this message at the very beginning of the show, as the pandemic outbreak unfolds. As the show’s narrator puts it: “As the world slipped into chaos, something else was happening. Something extraordinary.”
The word “extraordinary” attempts to put a positive spin on something most people would consider deeply disturbing: the birth of human-animal hybrids to human couples, mysteriously coinciding with the virus outbreak.
“No one knew which came first. The virus, or the hybrids. But that question would become the biggest mystery of our lifetime,” says the narrator.
After glimpses of the fiery chaos of the virus outbreak, the show cuts to where little Gus lives with his father in the woods, tucked away from civilization. While Gus has little deer ears and antler buds, he looks and behaves like a little human boy in every other way, and on top of that, he is exceptionally cute.
It doesn’t take long for the show to flash its dark underbelly, just after you, the viewer, have had your heart warmed with scenes showcasing little Gus’s charm.
Not long into the first episode, Gus’s father — who is by all appearances a respectable man who loves Gus dearly — explains to Gus how and why the world changed during the pandemic.
subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada Catholic
He presents Gus with an apple in a jar. When Gus looks closely at it, he can see ants crawling about in the jar, to devour the apple.
“Once upon a time, bad people ruled the earth,” Gus’s father tells him, with contempt in his voice. “Doing what they wanted, taking from the planet. Just like those ants. They were greedy things. Self-destructive. Only out for themselves. So nature made everyone sick. And wiped away as many as she could.”
Then, his tone brightens: “And then a miracle happened. Your kind. They called them hybrids. No one knows where you came from or how. But the people who were left feared you. They were meaner now, angrier. They didn’t like you because you were different.”
Here is a double whammy of a message, with implications that are so sinister because they have real-world counterparts.
The first message — one that has been oft-repeated in Hollywood — is that because humans are bad and destroy the planet, they are deservedly dead. The second is that these human animal hybrids are their rightful replacement, and that they are not merely as good as humans, but better than humans, as the show will later explain.
“Engineering Consent” to Depopulation?
In the amazing maneuver that is television’s specialty, the viewer is led to accept unthinkingly this genocidal, anti-human worldview by hypnosis, experimental medicine made to go down smoother with administration by sympathetic characters. The propaganda is all the more insidious because the characters are so likable.
For those skeptical that a show like Sweet Tooth is propaganda, it should be noted that the co-founder and first CEO of Netflix, Marc Randolph Bernays, is a great-nephew of Edward Bernays, a pioneering and hugely influential propagandist (literally) for the U.S. government and corporations. Edward Bernays wrote the book Propaganda, arguably the definitive work on the subject.
Edward Bernays, himself the nephew of Sigmund Freud, exercised massive influence over people’s beliefs and even behaviors, particularly in the U.S. He won the support of John D. Rockefeller, Jr., the Roosevelts, and Anne Harriman Vanderbilt, wife of William Kissam Vanderbilt, early in his career in fundraising for what he called a “propaganda play that fought for sex education.”
Bernays went on to help sell the First World War to Americans living at home and abroad as the war that would “Make the World Safe for Democracy,” while working for the U.S. Committee on Public Information. He called this work “psychological warfare.”
Afterwards, he applied his techniques in helping to market cigarettes to women — even as he threw his own wife’s cigarettes in the trash — and in helping convince Americans that water fluoridation was safe and beneficial. He described the goal of his methods as the “engineering of consent.”
These techniques were reportedly admired and emulated by Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels.
There is little doubt that Netflix co-founder Marc Randolph Bernays is continuing the legacy of his great uncle, embodied in this quote by Bernays senior:
The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, and our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of…. It is they who pull the wires that control the public mind.
Is Sweet Tooth a way to “engineer consent,” as the senior Bernays would have put it, to global depopulation goals?
It is not the only recent T.V. show in which mass death by virus is a running theme. The 2020 series Utopia, which finished filming in October 2019 and was canceled after only one season, reveals in its final episode (spoiler alert) that a mad genius has “created a flu that sparked the demand for a vaccine that doesn’t work,” in the words of one character who has wised up to his plan. The villain, played by John Cusack, has embedded a virus, in turn, in the vaccine, in order to sterilize people and “stop human reproduction for three generations.”
So-called overpopulation has long been a concern of the world’s wealthiest people. A 2009 article by the Sunday Times of London shared that the world’s most powerful billionaires, including Bill Gates, David Rockefeller Jr., George Soros, Oprah Winfrey met to address “overpopulation,” which one meeting attendee described as resulting in “something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers.”
A year later, Bill Gates declared in a Ted Talk that vaccines would help slow population growth, along with health care and reproductive health services, without explaining how.
As far back as 1988, the late Prince Philip, husband of Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain, commented to German news agency Deutsche Presse-Agentur, “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation.”
Human-Animal Hybrids: Superior Beings?
As Sweet Tooth drives deeper the message that humans are a plague, it shores up the value of the human-animal hybrids. The reasoning behind this is a bit obscure, but the show’s pointed messaging, real-world developments, and a public experiment by Netflix lead one to wonder: why?
The show connects the value of the human-animal hybrids to their supposed non-consuming, non-destructive qualities. One extremely likable character of the show, a kind of warrior-princess archetype, explains to Gus about mid-series: “Before the virus, earth was dying. Humans, grown ups, had ruined it. All for their own selfish needs, leaving us with nothing.”
“My Pubba said the bad people took everything they wanted,” Gus responds.
“Yeah. They did. They still do,” she responded. “Did you know that before the virus came, the water wasn’t blue? That’s because they filled it with trash. The sky too. But once kids like you were born, the earth could start to heal. You can live without taking. You can keep the earth alive. And that’s why we vowed to always protect hybrids, no matter what the cost.”
Later in the show, another female protagonist says to the master villain regarding the human-animal hybrids: “They’re better than us. Better than you or me. They’re the good part of us. Without the complications. Nature doesn’t want us back. We never gave her a good reason to keep us around in the first place.”
In fact, the evil of the show’s villains hinges in part upon their hatred of the hybrids. The chief villain believes the hybrids need to be exterminated, that they are “a mutation, a pest.”
Netflix went so far as to float a “bird-human baby” in Los Angeles, using a lifelike robot nestled in a stroller as if it were a real baby. The video segment opened with the question: “Is the world ready to welcome hybrids?”
The Netflix representative babytalked with the “waking” hybrid as bystanders caught off-guard gaped in amazement. While the children appeared generally more open-minded, and a few giggled, the contorted expressions of many adults suggested they were aghast.
Then, USA Today, the highest-circulation paper in the U.S., published in its June weekend edition, as an “advertisement” for Sweet Tooth, a fake front cover which read, “Hybrid babies born across the US,” with the subheading, “World reacts to new generation of half-human, half animal children with both awe and concern.”
It ran completely with the hoax, publishing two fake articles that were written to sound authentic. One read, “When photos of half-human, half-animal babies surfaced on the internet yesterday, most assumed it was an elaborate hoax. But within a few hours, video evidence from various maternity wards around the country became irrefutable. We can now confirm that ‘hybrids’ are in fact real.”
Why would such a popular and respected newspaper run the risk of being lambasted for deceiving the masses by publishing fake articles, with only small “advertising” lettering at the top to clue-in readers?
It’s as if some forces are indeed at work trying to prime the masses for the public introduction of human-animal hybrids, by framing the discussion in their terms, to train you to think of such hybrids not as something monstrous, but as something cute and sweet. — Article continues below Petition — Thank Cardinal Burke for defending Life, Family, Freedom and Tradition 18054 have signed the petition.Let’s get to 20000! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
These efforts, to say the least, are falling short. Unfiltered reactions to Netflix’s promo tweet for Sweet Tooth (in contrast to the more mixed reactions shown in their LA experiment) were overwhelmingly negative.
“Can we talk about how cute the hybrid babies on Sweet Tooth are for a second??” Netflix tweeted with pictures of several baby “hybrids” depicted in the show, including a beak-nosed “bird baby” baby and a pig-nosed baby.
Responses called it “terrifying” and “nightmarish,” and included depictions of wide-eyed horror. As one Twitter user accurately pointed out, the “hybrids” are terrifying “because they are actual monsters.” This is the instinctual human response to a such a creature. Many of the monsters of ancient mythology were portrayed as such hybrids.
“Is the world ready to welcome hybrids?” The question is unsettling because you can bet the Bernays-founded propaganda machine that is Netflix would not ask this question if there wasn’t an intention to introduce such hybrids.
Indeed, human-animal chimeric research (referring to organisms which contain at least two different kinds of genetically distinct cells) has long been carried out privately worldwide and in the U.S. A little over a month before Sweet Tooth debuted, it was announced that researchers with the Salk Institute in California injected 25 induced pluripotent stem cells (IPS cells) from humans into macaque monkey embryos in a grotesque Frankenstein-like experiment.
Just days before the Sweet Tooth premiere, the International Society for Stem Cell Research released much-anticipated guidelines backing the use of “chimeric embryo and in utero research.” Then, just five days after the show began, the U.S. Senate passed a bill allocating billions of dollars to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), while nixing an amendment that would have criminalized certain human-animal hybrids.
While evolutionary “science” attempts to classify humans a “primate” that is not “outside the animal kingdom,” but “alongside all animalkind,” as the Jane Goodall Institute claims, common sense knows otherwise. Our creative imagination and abilities, capacity for abstract thought, subordination of impulses to free will, and inclination toward the transcendent and its accompanying religious behavior, are nowhere matched in animals.
Animals are ontologically vastly inferior to humans. We live out this belief as a society when we kill animals for eating. An attempt to merge human and animal through the mixture of our DNA is an abomination. Like any other violation of the natural order, which is God’s order, it leads to disastrous results.
If such hybridized embryos were somehow able to develop, disturbing and dangerous confusion would ensue. One can imagine the possibility of unduly elevating the rights of “humanized” animals, perhaps at the cost of humans with immortal souls; or of degrading and exploiting beings of mostly human DNA, who were conceived in vitro with the slightest bit of animal DNA, whose possession of human souls would be called into question.
Such confusion, disruption of the natural order, and degradation of human beings are hallmarks of a satanic anti-human and anti-God agenda, one that sadly lurks beneath the “sweet” veneer of this Netflix series.
Mon Aug 30, 2021 – 2:20 pm EDT ONTARIO, Canada (Catholicuprising.org) — The following is a 2-part, 19-point essay about the experimental COVID-19 inoculations, offering legal and medical arguments against mandating their use in Canada.
PART 1 – LAW
1.Nuremberg Code – Coercing Canadian citizens into accepting an injection contradicts the Nuremberg Code which requires voluntary and informed consent to any medical treatment:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. (Nuremberg Code, 1)
In addition to the Nuremberg Code, there are other international agreements which coerced vaccination programs contravene including the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005) and the Helsinki Declaration (1964).
2.Charter of Rights and Freedoms – Coercing persons into accepting an injection contradicts the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantees all Canadians the freedom of conscience and religion (Article 2) and the right to right to life, liberty, and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice (Article 7). Therefore, the practice of mandated vaccines is in contravention to the Charter. In particular, it is contrary to the “security of the person”. Security of the person includes a person’s right to control his or her own bodily integrity. It will be engaged where the state interferes with personal autonomy and a person’s ability to control his or her own physical or psychological integrity, for example by… imposing unwanted medical treatment (R. v. Morgentaler, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 30 at 56; Carter, supra; Rodriguez, supra; Blencoe, supra at paragraph 55; A.C., supra, at paragraphs 100-102). (33)
One of the basic fundamental proofs of freedom is the idea that we, as individual persons, and not some other actor, have control over our own bodies within prescribed moral limits. If one does not have bodily autonomy, one does not have freedom. If coercion is used to force a vaccine into our bodies, we don’t have principal stewardship of our own bodies any longer. Someone else does; namely, the State. If we lose this basic principle, we lose our individual liberties in their most basic and rudimentary form. To relinquish this basic, necessary, and fundamental right, is to open Canadian society to the real risk of losing other fundamental and inalienable rights to totalitarian movements under the guise of health care or another “emergency”.
3.Canadian Case Law – In Canada, informed consent to medical interventions – including vaccines – is the law. (See Cuthbertson vs Rasouli 2013-10-18; 2013 SCC 53). The Court ruled: “The patient’s consent must be given voluntarily and must be informed.” (42)
4.Non-Genetic Discrimination Act (2017) – This federal legislation explicitly prohibits any person from undergoing any genetic test as a condition of employment and other contracts. The legislation states quite clearly: “It is prohibited for any person to require an individual to undergo a genetic test as a condition of (a) providing goods or services to that individual; (b) entering into or continuing a contract or agreement with that individual; or (c) offering or continuing specific terms or conditions in a contract or agreement with that individual.” The PCR test would be considered a genetic test as defined by the Act in relation to Bill S-201, Statues of Canada 2017: “An Act to prohibit and prevent genetic discrimination” which defines a “genetic test” to mean any test that analyzes DNA, RNA, or chromosomes for purposes assessing risks of transmission of diseases, or for monitoring, diagnosis, or prognosis. So, in other words, requiring COVID tests as a condition of employment is illegal. Penalties for breaching this law are particularly punitive, reaching as high as one million dollars and imprisonment up to five years. (47)
5.The Ontario Health Care Consent Act, 1996 – This legislation also prohibits any treatment which does not involve consent (Cf. Article 10). (43)
6.Ontario Human Rights Code – Article 1 of the OHRC protects employees on the basis of Creed. According to the Ontario Human Rights Commission: “The right to be free from discrimination based on creed reflects core Canadian constitutional values and commitments to a secular, multicultural and democratic society. People who follow a creed, and people who do not, have the right to live in a society that respects pluralism and human rights and the right to follow different creeds.” (52)
a.Moral (Religious) – These vaccines have used aborted fetal cell lines in their development and testing. Therefore, they represent a direct attack on the dignity of the human person. Many religious traditions, undergirded by basic science, believe that life starts at the moment of conception, and therefore to these groups, the development of these particular vaccines represents an anthropological regression of humanity. For those persons, therefore, who oppose this immoral practice and are being coerced into being its beneficiary, it is a direct violation of their consciences and, as such, can never be tolerated by a free and just society which must uphold the genuine conscientious rights of its citizens.
b.Ethical (Religious) – In the Catholic Tradition, it is the moral imperative of all governments […] to uphold the rights of the conscience of their citizens. Vaccines can never be imposed on anyone because, without full consent, such an imposition is an overt attack on the dignity of the human person:
It is in accordance with their dignity as persons-that is, beings endowed with reason and free will and therefore privileged to bear personal responsibility-that all men should be at once impelled by nature and also bound by a moral obligation to seek the truth, especially religious truth. They are also bound to adhere to the truth, once it is known, and to order their whole lives in accord with the demands of truth. However, men cannot discharge these obligations in a manner in keeping with their own nature unless they enjoy immunity from external coercion as well as psychological freedom. (Dignitatis Humanae, 2)
Conscience is a judgment of reason whereby the human person recognizes the moral quality of a concrete act that he is going to perform, is in the process of performing, or has already completed. In all he says and does, man is obliged to follow faithfully what he knows to be just and right. It is by the judgment of his conscience that man perceives and recognizes the prescriptions of the divine law… Man has the right to act in conscience and in freedom so as personally to make moral decisions: “He must not be forced to act contrary to his conscience. Nor must he be prevented from acting according to his conscience, especially in religious matters.” (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1778, 1782)
Rev. Tad Pacholczyk, Director of Education at the National Catholic Bioethics Centre, confirmed that Catholic teaching is clear when it comes to the topic of mandatory vaccination. “The Church has been clear that vaccination, as the rule, is not a moral obligation. It is something that needs to be voluntary,” Pacholczyk said. “Every individual needs to be, according to conscience, determining which medical interventions are, or are not, appropriate for their particular state in life. So, when you have these blanket mandates, there is a lot of risk; there’s kind of a tendency to paint with too broad of a brush. And, you know, the effect here can be that individual liberty and individual assessment of circumstances are not respected,” he added. (53) Moreover, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Catholic Church’s top doctrinal body, also recently re-affirmed that vaccination is not a moral obligation and must be voluntary. (54)
Ø In summary, any government which coerces its citizens into mandated vaccinations implicitly arrogates themselves to the position of a medical professional who is giving medical counsel. The claim that no one is actually forced to take a vaccination is a vacuous statement when the alternative for those who object to these injections is essentially to live in effective isolation for the foreseeable future, if not for the rest of their lives. If that is not the very definition of coercion, then nothing is. Furthermore, it treats everyone as being sick until proven healthy which is tantamount to reversing another fundamental principle in law and justice which is that citizens of a free State are innocent until proven guilty. The precedent established is also very concerning because if informed consent is no longer protected from reprisal in Canadian law, and the violation of a citizen’s conscience is established in practice as well as law, unforeseen future encroachments on Canadian civil liberties and sacrosanct values beyond this crisis are very possible and even likely. — Article continues below Petition — PETITION: Ban COVID vaccine mandates for schools and universities! 17512 have signed the petition.Let’s get to 20000! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
PART 2 – HEALTH
7.Emergency Use, Liability, and Shielding Big Pharma – All the treatments being marketed as COVID-19 “vaccines”, are still in Phase III clinical trials until 2023 (1) and, hence, qualify as a medical experiment. People accepting these treatments are essentially test-subjects, and are generally unaware that the injections are not conventional vaccines as they do not contain a virus but instead an experimental gene therapy.
The recent “approval” for Pfizer’s vaccine by the FDA on August 23, 2021 only applies to their now licensed version called “COMIRNATY” which is yet to be produced for mass distribution; the original Pfizer vaccine which is currently used received an extension of emergency use authorization from the FDA (34). The question is why this distinction? If the products are identical in substance, then why has the FDA not simply licensed the currently available unbranded “Pfizer/Biontech” vaccine which has been produced in high volume, and allowed American citizens the protection of civil liability?
According to US biosafety expert Dr. Meryl Nass, the FDA simply split the Pfizer vaccine into two products: a branded product (“Comirnaty”), which received a full market license but is currently unavailable in the US (due to “insufficient stocks”); and an unbranded product (“Pfizer/Biontech vaccine”), which is widely available in the US but remains under the existing Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). As the FDA approval letter admitted: “There is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the emergency use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to prevent COVID-19.” (58). In other words, governments are using the unavailable branded product to justify politically motivated vaccination mandates, but they may then deliver the unbranded product to avoid any liability for vaccine injuries (there is no liability under EUA, but there is full liability under a market license). (57)
8.No Mid or Long-term Data on Health Effects – There are no mid or long-term data available on these novel vaccines. Therefore, we do not know what health consequences await Canadians, including cancer, neurological disorders, infertility, and a host of other possible and permanent health consequences. We do know, even now, from the warning labels and admissions of the pharmaceutical companies and Health Canada that vaccine risks include Myocarditis, Pericarditis, and Bell’s Palsy. Other studies have linked the vaccines to neurological diseases like Guillain-Barré syndrome. Therefore, Canadians are being coerced into participating in a novel technology and medical experiment whose full health risks have not been properly assessed, understood, or revealed. Normal vaccine testing takes 5-10 years or longer to assess the long-term impact. No other coronavirus vaccine (e.g., MERS, SARS-1) has been approved for the market, due to antibody-dependent enhancement, resulting in severe illness and deaths in animal models (10). Past history in vaccine development has not been without risks. (49)
9. Vaccine Death Count:
a. Serious Adverse Reactions & Deaths – In the US alone, as of August 13, 2021, there have been 13,627 deaths attributed to the Covid vaccines, more than all previously reported vaccine deaths combined (see chart below), as well as over 623,341 adverse reactions (2). Of these reactions, 84,466 have been serious (3).
Moreover, even these numbers, as troubling as they may be, are likely underreported by at least several orders of magnitude. According to a Harvard Study from 2010 entitled “Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS)”, it concludes the following on page 6: “Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1–13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.”(4)
More than 2 million adverse events and 21,000 deaths have been reported to a European Union (EU) drug reaction database following the use of currently available COVID jabs. The EnduraVigilance system is the EU-wide database for recording vaccine injury reports, as well as other medicine-induced injuries, corresponding to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), jointly run by both the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The system has collated 2,074,410 reports of injuries related to the jabs, including 21,766 fatalities across the 27 member states (not including the United Kingdom). The source related that just under half of all reports (1,021,867) were of serious injuries, classified by the EU agency as corresponding to “a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”
The highest rate of problematic developments among the four emergency-authorized jabs occurred following the AstraZeneca shot, designed and manufactured in conjunction with Oxford University, which is reportedly linked to 947,675 injuries within the EU. There were 4,740 reports of deaths, a large proportion of which followed the development of nervous system and vascular disorders. A total of 12,080 reports were listed as “reproductive system and breast disorders.”
Overall, the recently FDA-approved Pfizer jab, now marketed under the name Comirnaty, was correlated with 833,498 injuries and 10,616 deaths. The system showed that Pfizer’s jab preceded 22,844 blood disorders, 148,477 nervous system disorders, and 910 adverse events related to “pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions,” resulting in 29 deaths. It is unknown if the pregnancy-related deaths were miscarriages. An additional 10,909 reports were for reproductive system disorders.
Moderna’s jab, granted “conditional marketing authorization” for use within the EU on January 6, has been flagged for 229,430 injuries and 5,600 deaths on the drug reaction database. Johnson & Johnson, marketed in Europe under the name Janssen, has had 63,807 injuries reported against its jab, with 810 deaths occurring after using the single-dose shot. (35)
b. Adverse Events Officially Recognized – Health Canada officially recognizes vaccine risks including Myocarditis and Pericarditis (5) and Bell’s Palsy (6). Other studies have linked the vaccines to neurological diseases like Guillain-Barré syndrome (7). Recent concerns have now been raised about Moderna and heart inflammation (27), in addition to the Pfizer vaccine having this problem. Numerous virologists, doctors, scientists, and medical experts are issuing dire warnings about the short and long-term effects of COVID-19 injections, including, but not limited to death, blood clots, infertility, miscarriages, Bell’s Palsy, cancer, inflammatory conditions, autoimmune disease, early-onset dementia, convulsions, anaphylaxis, inflammation of the heart (8), and antibody dependent enhancement leading to death; this includes children ages 12-17 years old.(9)
Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA vaccines, recently remarked that “if you are vaccinated and then become infected, your risk of developing serve disease or dying is better than if you were not vaccinated and then become infected with the Delta….if you are vaccinated and then become infected, you MAY have a higher risk of becoming a “superspreader” because you are less likely to show the disease. This has not been measured but it should be.” (30) And while these and many other side-effects are reportedly rare in the short term, the long-term effects of these novel mRna vaccines are still unknown.
c. Vaccine Death and Historical Context – In 1976, the U.S. government vaccinated 45 million people against pandemic swine flu. The entire program was canceled after reports of just 53 deaths and 450 people who developed Guillain-Barré syndrome, a prevalence of 1 in 100,000 (11). Why are 53 deaths worthy of pulling dangerous vaccines in 1976, but tens of thousands of deaths for these vaccines do not rise to the same level of concern? Our society has lost all sense of historical and scientific context in assessing the safety of these mRNA vaccines.
10. Natural Immunity & Other Treatments – People who have been already infected with Covid have been found to have a significantly reduced risk, not only of contracting COVID again, but also against hospitalization – for both the original strain of the virus and also the Delta strain. (36) There was some data from Israel that came out recently showing that if a person has had a vaccine, he is 6.7 times more likely to be reinfected than if he has had the COVID disease itself. (37)
Moreover, there are promising new alternative treatments to Covid-19 (in addition to the ones already being utilized). The chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association recently announced that the anti-parasite medicine Ivermectin seems to be effective at stopping COVID-19 and publicly recommended that all doctors in Japan immediately begin using Ivermectin to treat COVID (44). Fourteen out of fifteen severely ill COVID-19 patients who were treated in an investigator-initiated, interventional, open-label clinical study of the drug TriCor (fenofibrate) didn’t require oxygen support within a week of treatment and were released from the hospital, according to the results of a new Hebrew University of Jerusalem study (45). In addition, early treatment with a medication commonly used to treat asthma appears to reduce significantly the need for urgent care and hospitalisation in people with COVID-19, researchers at the University of Oxford have found (46). Natural treatment from severe cases of COVID-19 includes a regiment of Vitamin D, Vitamin C, Zinc, and Quercetin, among other treatment protocols, have been very effective in reducing symptoms of the virus.
11. No Uniform Opinion – Opinion is divided in the medical field on many questions surrounding the vaccines beyond their efficacy or safety. The FDA itself was recently heavily criticized for giving “rushed” approval for Pfizer’s newly licensed product by a major British medical journal. (38). The decision made by national medical associations to administer “Boosters” because of waning immunity has also been criticized by the WHO on efficacy and safety concerns. (39)
Science has never been a monolithic endeavour. The great value of science is that there are always improvements and new discoveries. To say the science is “settled” brings to mind the old saying, “Science advances funeral by funeral.” That is to say, it is never settled. And yet, the State and Medical authorities are acting in a way that imposes only one way of dealing with Covid (vaccination), even when there are a myriad of successful, alternative treatments available and being proposed by leading medical doctors in the field and approved by the FDA – as a prophylactic (28) and post-exposure (29). It is more than disturbing that only one method of addressing COVID is imposed, and without properly informed patient consent.
12. Masks & Plastic Barriers – Both masks and plastic barriers are also of limited value or negative value. The commonly worn cloth and surgical masks are roughly 10 percent efficient at blocking exhaled aerosols, a University of Waterloo study found. Regarding plastic face shields, though scientists and researchers could not conclusively state whether or not plastic barriers had any impact on the coronavirus, the evidence currently shows that plastic barriers are disrupters of airflow and ventilation to the point that the virus becomes more transmissible. The barriers were also shown to give people a false sense of security. (40)
Dr. Margarite Griesz-Brisson MD, PhD is a Consultant Neurologist and Neurophysiologist with a PhD in Pharmacology, with special interest in neurotoxicology, environmental medicine, neuroregeneration, and neuroplasticity. She is the Founder and Medical Director of The London Neurology & Pain Clinic Ltd, Specialized Clinic exclusively on Physiology, Neurotoxicology and Primary Prevention Medicolegal Expert in the USA, UK, Germany, Switzerland, Norway. She explains that “the rebreathing of our exhaled air will without a doubt create oxygen deficiency and a flooding of carbon dioxide. We know that the human brain is very sensitive to oxygen depravation. There are nerve cells for example in the hippocampus, that can’t be longer than 3 minutes without oxygen – they cannot survive. The acute warning symptoms are headaches, drowsiness, dizziness, issues in concentration, slowing down of the reaction time – reactions of the cognitive system. (50)
13. Transmission – Public Health England released their latest technical briefing on the variants of concern, “Number 20” (August 6, 2021). This data reinforces the picture that had been emerging in recent months of vaccines which do little to prevent infection or transmission (and thus to prevent or stop outbreaks) but which do reduce severe disease and death in the vaccinated, albeit not by as much as was originally claimed. This confirms that vaccination may be a good way for a person at high risk from the disease to reduce their personal risk, but it has almost no value as a way of protecting others. Thus, there is no benefit in vaccinating children, introducing vaccine passports domestically or internationally, or coercing young people to get a vaccine which to them is almost all risk and no benefit. (41)
Vaccinated individuals transmit the virus at the same rate as unvaccinated individuals (14). Therefore, restricting unvaccinated people’s freedom is unscientific discrimination. If one can contract COVID from a vaccinated person at the same rate as the unvaccinated, how exactly does stripping the rights away from a large portion of the population help the vaccinated population?
Furthermore, vaccines are intended to protect its recipients. If they do not protect the recipients from the virus, then they do not work, and therefore the problem is with the efficacy of the vaccines themselves, and not with those who choose not to be vaccinated. Restricting the freedom of healthy Canadian citizens does not make the vaccines work.
14. Vaccination effectiveness – Double-dosed Covid vaccines do not prevent infection. Their only benefit is that they reduce serious symptoms for an undefined period (13) – perhaps as short a time frame as five months (55). Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis, Israel’s director of public health services, explained that Israel’s recent decision to make available a booster shot is based on evidence of the difference between infection rates in those who were vaccinated early on and those vaccinated later, but also on the evidence of increased hospitalizations of severe and critical cases among the 60-and-above population who are fully immunized. Severe cases slightly rise as new restrictions are imposed.
“That, together with the fact that we’re seeing lack of response to the vaccine over time, has led us to suggest and allow people to be vaccinated for a third time. It’s not just that we’re seeing more disease, but that they’re getting into severe and critical conditions,” Alroy-Preis said. (48).
Furthermore, the requirement to be vaccinated with the current COVID-19 vaccines is essentially nonsensical as their effectiveness continues to seriously wane over time, with estimates of 42% to as low as 17% efficacy, and a vaccine for the new strain (the Delta) has not been yet developed. (51)
15. Totalitarian Measures & Logan’s Run – Since the Covid outbreak, Canadians have had to endure lockdowns, the banning on social media of vaccine victim accounts, fines, jail, enforceable confinement, religious and civil rights persecution, restriction on travel, psychological aggression, and soon the loss of employment, loss of health care, and even access to food (25). These are all the actions of a totalitarian state which has been permitted to run roughshod over the constitutional and human rights of Canadians without weighing the steep costs of these draconian measures and lockdowns both in terms of physical and mental health (61). There has been virtually no consideration to these particular consequences.
But the most insidious part of these government abuses is the psychological warfare the State has been waging against its own population through a propaganda of fear. This “wedge warfare” has effectively split our country, communities, and families and created a “hermeneutic of suspicion” such that the majority who get vaccinated trade their health for their freedom, while the minority who decline the vaccination are forced to relinquish their freedom to defend their health. And yet, the great irony is that the freedom that each group thinks they have gained or lost is actually in the opposite direction. When the VaxPass on our phones turns from that green “checkmark” which granted us the privileges we once called rights into an “expiry notice,” we must surely realize that our “red pill” moment has arrived. That “expiry notice” means that we must scurry along to get our required “booster shots” so that we will be in compliance with the State’s health diktats. This “red pill” moment might cause many to wonder just who has the real freedom – those who live on the steroids of state privileges or those who are truly free and who courageously deprive themselves of these “privileges” so that they can recover them again as “rights” in due time. Historically, no one who gave up their human rights and dignity at the behest of the State was ever considered a hero.
Yesterday’s fiction is becoming today’s reality….
Most western countries are now recognizing that in light of the waning effects of double-dosed vaccines that booster shots will be necessary (32). The logical questions about the third dose of these vaccines are these: How many of these boosters will I need in the future? Will I be on boosters for the foreseeable future? For the rest of my life? What will these boosters do to my short, mid, and long-term health, and will these boosters weaken my natural immunity to other viruses? If there is a chance of the latter situation developing, is there a risk I will be dependent on the government and its medical agencies to survive this Covid regime? If the government does not approve of my opinions or actions in the future for any issue, will they use such power over me to demand compliance? Do I have any evidence now of the State depriving citizens of their livelihood and rights unless they comply with government directives? What is the probability of the State availing themselves of this option for other “extreme situations”?
16. Proportionality of Threat– The authorities who have made these draconian decisions seemed to have lost all sense of proportion when the “survival” rate defined as the number of deaths over the total population of the U.S. is considered. (Note: the denominator should be the total population, and not just those who are infected) (26):
The fatal numbers above could be even further reduced considering:
an early and aggressive education campaign by government and medical professionals of preventative natural and conventional medicines could have significant results in reducing serious illness and death (see paragraph 10 above);
there are other promising alternative treatments available after contracting the virus (see paragraph 10 above);
the deployment of a risk-based strategy which target high-risk groups i.e. older-age groups and groups subject to pre-existing conditions;
the transparent and honest reporting of true Covid deaths, instead of unethical, sloppy, or paranoid protocols which inflate the number of deaths (i.e. patients dying “with” COVID vs. “of” COVID) (59) for disingenuous and financial reasons (60).
a. French virologist and Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier – Montagnier called mass vaccination against the coronavirus during the pandemic “unthinkable” and a historical blunder that is “creating the variants” and leading to deaths from the disease. Many epidemiologists know it and are “silent” about the problem known as “antibody-dependent enhancement,” Montagnier said. “It is the antibodies produced by the virus that enable an infection to become stronger,” he said in an interview with Pierre Barnérias of Hold-Up Media earlier this month. Vaccination leading to variants? While variants of viruses can occur naturally, Montagnier said that vaccination is driving the process. “What does the virus do? Does it die or find another solution?” he asked. “It is clear that the new variants are created by antibody-mediated selection due to the vaccination.” (56)
b. Peter McCullough, internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, Professor of Medicine at Texas A & M College of Medicine, the President at the Cardiorenal Society of America, Editor-in-Chief of Cardiorenal Medicine and of Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, and a Senior Associate Editor at American Journal of Cardiology – McCullough maintains that, first, the virus doesn’t spread among asymptomatic people. Second, asymptomatic people should not get tested, as it is “generating false positives, creating extra cases.” Third, natural immunity gained after having the virus is “robust, complete, and durable.” Fourth, COVID-19 and even the variants are easily treatable at home with early intervention. Fifth, the coronavirus jabs by Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and AstraZeneca “right now are obsolete.” In fact, McCullough pointed out that the experimental “vaccines” must “be considered unsafe and unfit for human use.” He mentioned some of the dangerous side effects brought on by the injections. Meanwhile, he also said that safe and effective medicines and treatments have not been promoted, even though they have saved lives — and could save more. (56)
c. Dr. Robert Malone is the discoverer of in-vitro and in-vivo RNA transfection and was the inventor of mRNA vaccines while he was at the Salk Institute in 1988.
“This is precisely what one would see if antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) was happening,” Malone said regarding higher virus levels among the vaccinated. “What is antibody dependent enhancement? Briefly, it’s that the vaccine causes the virus to become more infectious than would happen in the absence of vaccination, would cause the virus to replicate at higher levels than in the absence of infection.”
“This is the vaccinologist’s worst nightmare. It happened with the respiratory syncytial virus and in the ‘60s and caused more child deaths in vaccine recipients than unvaccinated. It happened with Dengvaxia, the dengue vaccine,” Malone continued.
“And it’s happened with virtually every other coronavirus vaccine development program, certainly in humans, known in history, and it’s what the vaccinologists like myself have been warning about since the outset … the risk of antibody dependent enhancement.”
Malone said that antibody dependent enhancement seems most apparent in people injected with Pfizer’s vaccine.
“So, we now know that the Pfizer protection is waning at six months,” he said. “And what the data seem to suggest is those who have received Pfizer, which is probably the least immunogenic of the three in terms of durability, length of protection, people that are now in the waning phase of the immune response to the Pfizer vaccine seem to be getting infected.”
“Notice they keep talking about Pfizer and not about the other two. So, this suggests this is exactly what you would anticipate, is the window of greatest susceptibility to antibody dependent enhancement is in this long tapering phase as the vaccine response declines.” (56)
d. Dr. Byram Bridle is a viral immunologist from the University of Guelph –Bridle stressed that there is no evidence that the unvaccinated are causing a rise in cases — especially those associated with new variants — as this goes against the established orthodoxy on how viruses and vaccines work. In Bridle’s expert opinion, the inability of coronavirus vaccines to kill the virus and its narrow focus on the “single protein” are a recipe for the mutations that could be leading to the proliferation of the novel variants being bandied about by politicians and the media.
“The principles are this: if you have a biological entity that’s prone to mutation, and the SARS Coronavirus-2, like all coronaviruses, is prone to mutation… and you apply a narrowly focused selective pressure that is non-lethal, and you do this over a long period of time, this is the recipe for driving the emergence of novel variants, and that’s exactly what we are doing,” Bridle explained.
e. Christina Parksholds a Ph.D. in Cellular and Molecular Biology –Dr. Parks testified on August 19 in favor of Michigan legislation which would “prohibit discrimination against an employee or volunteer who declines or has not received certain vaccinations, including for COVID-19.” Besides addressing the particular scientific issues concerning the more problematic elements of the vaccines, she broached the taboo subject of the mistrust of the government when it comes to issues of medicine and health. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/8DOOZpGA_VI?start=3&feature=oembed&iv_load_policy=3&modestbranding=1&rel=0&autohide=1&playsinline=0&autoplay=1
f. Ryan Cole is the CEO and Medical Director of Cole Diagnostics, one of the largest independent labs in the State of Idaho. Dr. Cole is a Mayo Clinic trained Board Certified Pathologist. He is Board Certified in anatomic and clinical pathology. He has expertise in immunology and virology and also has subspecialty expertise in skin pathology.
“I am concerned about the lack of long term safety data, because this vaccine is simply too new,” Cole has said.
“We have never tried an mRNA vaccine in humans before. I am concerned about the implications of injection of foreign, synthetic mRNA and the antibody reaction which cannot be reversed,” he continued.
“It concerns me that large numbers of individuals are being essentially enrolled in a long term phase III clinical trial for the vaccine without being fully informed of this, with no ability for recompense if injured or in case of death. I am concerned by the number of adverse event and deaths that have been reported in correlation with this vaccine administration.”
g. Dr. Martin Kulldorff is a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a biostatistician and epidemiologist at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital. He helped develop the CDC’s current system for monitoring potential vaccine risks, and he is also one of the co-authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, which argued for “focused protection” of the most vulnerable, instead of lockdowns. Dr. Kulldorff stated in an interview:
There’s a push both for vaccine passports and vaccine mandates. If people want to have a job and stay at the job, they are required to take the vaccine or they’ll be fired. If they want to study at the university, many universities are requiring vaccines for all the students. So there are these vaccine mandates and vaccine passports. In New York City, for example, now they’re requiring restaurants to require vaccinations for people who go to the restaurants. That is a very coercive way to get people to vaccinate. And that’s very bad for public health. One question is, “Why do you coerce people who are immune or people who are young, who have very small risk, when the vaccines are much more needed in for older people in other places?” So that’s an ethical aspect of it. I think it is very unethical to do so. The other aspect is that if you force something on people, if you coerce somebody to do something, that can backfire. Public health has to be based on trust. If public health officials want the public to trust them, public health officials also have to trust the public. I’ve been working on vaccines for almost two decades now. One thing that we’ve always tried to do is to maintain good confidence in the vaccines.
h. Professsor Sucharit Bhakdi MD, Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Former Chair, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz (Medical Doctor and Scientist) (Germany and Thailand) – “This is a disastrous situation,” Bhakdi says, “because the spike protein itself is now sitting on the surface of the cells, facing the bloodstream. It is known that these spike proteins, the moment they touch platelets, they active them [the platelets], and that sets the whole clotting system going. The second thing that should happen, according to theory, is that the waste products of this protein that are produced in the cell, are put in front of the ‘door’ of the cell … and is presented to the immune system. The immune system, especially the lymphocytes, recognize these and will attack the cells, because they don’t want them to make viruses or viral parts. And the viral parts are now being made in locations where viral parts would never, ever reach [naturally], like the vessel wall in your brain …If that ‘tapestry’ of the wall [i.e., the lining of the blood vessel] is then destroyed, then that is the signal for the clotting system to [activate], and create a blood clot. And this happens with all of these vaccines because the gene [the instruction to make spike protein] is being introduced to the vessel wall.” https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/pyPjAfNNA-U?start=58&feature=oembed&iv_load_policy=3&modestbranding=1&rel=0&autohide=1&playsinline=0&autoplay=1
i. Doctors for Covid Ethics Signatories – This group, comprising over 160 doctors, has written three open letters to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 vaccine dangers. In those letters they have insisted upon evidence that risks of clotting, bleeding, and platelet abnormalities were inappropriately ruled out in legitimate empirical trials prior to human use. They foresaw deaths and harm from clotting, warning of these dangers before blood clots led to vaccine suspensions around the world.
18. Improper Use of the PCR Tests – The purported increase in “cases” is a direct consequence of increased testing through the inappropriate use of the PCR instrument to diagnose so-called COVID-19.
It has been well established that the PCR test was never designed or intended as a diagnostic tool and is not an acceptable instrument to measure this so-called pandemic. Its inventor, Kary Mullis, has clearly indicated that the PCR testing device was never created to test for coronaviruses (15). Mullis warns that “the PCR Test can be used to find almost anything, in anybody. If you can amplify one single molecule, then you can find it because that molecule is nearly in every single person.” In light of this warning, the current PCR test utilization, set at higher amplifications, is producing up to 97% false positives (16). Therefore, any imposed emergency measures that are based on PCR testing are unwarranted, unscientific, and quite possibly fraudulent.
An international consortium of life-science scientists has also detected 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level in a 3-peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 (17). In November 2020, a Portuguese court ruled that PCR tests are unreliable (18). On December 14, 2020, the WHO admitted the PCR Test has a ‘problem’ at high amplifications as it detects dead cells from old viruses, giving a false positive (19). On Feb 16, 2021, BC Health Officer Bonnie Henry, admitted PCR tests are unreliable (20) . On April 8, 2021, the Austrian court ruled the PCR was unsuited for COVID testing (21) . On April 8, 2021, a German Court ruled against PCR testing stating, “the test cannot provide any information on whether a person is infected with an active pathogen or not, because the test cannot distinguish between “dead” matter and living matter (22) ”. On May 8, 2021, the Swedish Public Health Agency stopped PCR Testing for the same reason (23). On May 10th, 2021, Manitoba’s Chief Microbiologist and Laboratory Specialist, Dr. Jared Bullard testified under cross-examination in a trial before the court of the Queen’s Bench in Manitoba, that PCR test results do not verify infectiousness and were never intended to be used to diagnose respiratory illnesses (24).
19. Profits and Criminality – American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc. (hereinafter together “Pfizer”) were fined $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice, to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products. (31) And that was only one settlement. Does it not strike us as troubling that one of the leading suppliers of the COVID vaccines was involved in such activity? The popular quip “What could go wrong?” comes to mind when considering the ramifications of the zealous promotion of these vaccines. Furthermore, there have been stark admissions from the medical bureaucracy who admitted that there exists a “perverse incentive” for hospitals to classify deaths as being coronavirus related when the virus didn’t cause them. Lawmakers voiced concern about the financial incentives to report the deaths as COVID when there was uncertainty as to the definitive cause, similar to what occurred during the HIV epidemic. (60)
John Pacheco
CatholicUprising.org
Note: Much of the text provided in this report is a compilation of texts from the sources noted in the footnoted references.
The information in this paper does not purport to offer legal or medical advice, and should not be relied on for such. Readers are cautioned to seek out their own legal and medical advice with qualified professionals.
Shutterstock.com
naufrage/sauvetage 