Troublantes révélations de François sur le pré-conclave de 2013
10 Septembre, 2021 Provenance: fsspx.news
Le pape François vient de préciser les contours du futur texte qui doit définir la place et le rôle de la Curie romaine, une des grandes réformes de l’actuel successeur de Pierre, qui revient également sur certaines circonstances ayant entouré le pré-conclave de 2013.
La constitution Praedicate Evangelium
C’est la première fois que le pape évoque, d’une façon aussi précise, la future constitution apostolique sur la réforme de l’Eglise qui devrait être promulguée à la fin de l’année 2021.
Trois passages de l’entretien accordé par le pontife romain à la radio espagnole Cope, le 1er septembre 2021, sont consacrés au futur document qui doit, à terme, remplacer la constitution Pastor Bonus, signée par le pape Jean-Paul II, le 28 juin 1988.
Le pape confirme le nom du futur document : « en ce qui concerne la constitution apostolique Praedicate Evangelium, qui est en cours d’élaboration, on en est à la dernière étape qui est pour moi celle de la relecture ; je dois la relire, mot pour mot, avant d’y imposer ma signature », révèle-t-il.
Au cours de l’entretien, le pontife argentin assure que le futur texte « ne présentera rien de nouveau par rapport à ce qu’on a pu voir jusqu’à présent ».
« Tout au plus quelques détails » ajoute le successeur de Pierre « quelques changements concernant la fusion de dicastères, ou la création de deux ou trois dicastères supplémentaires : par exemple, l’Education va rejoindre la Culture ; Propaganda fide rejoindra la Nouvelle évangélisation ».
Le pré-conclave révélé
Plus intéressante encore, la confirmation explicite que l’actuelle réforme de l’Eglise relève d’un agenda programmé et décidé en amont de l’élection de 2013, par un certain nombre de cardinaux : « la réforme, c’est ce que voulaient les cardinaux, dès le conclave de mars 2013 », insiste François.
« Je n’ai rien inventé, ajoute le Pape, mon action depuis le début du pontificat consiste à réaliser ce que nous, les cardinaux, avions demandé dans les réunions de pré-conclave pour le futur pape : “le prochain pape devra faire ceci, ceci et cela”.
« Et c’est ce que j’ai commencé à mettre en œuvre. Je pense qu’il y a encore diverses choses à faire, mais il n’y a aucune invention de ma part : j’obéis à ce qui avait été décidé à l’époque. »
Le pape avance que certains électeurs, qui s’étaient rangés au côté des réformateurs, n’auraient pas pris toute la mesure des conséquences de leur engagement : « peut-être que certains n’ont pas réalisé la portée de ce qu’ils disaient, ou n’ont pas imaginé les conséquences, tant il est vrai que certains thèmes sont dérangeants.
« Mais il n’y a aucune originalité de mon côté dans le plan mis en œuvre », souligne le pontife qui précise que le réformisme qui se concrétise « résume ce que nous, cardinaux, disions à l’époque ». S’il fallait définir la ligne qui a présidé à son élection, le souverain pontife, la résume par l’exhortation Evangelii Gaudium, qui « reprend ce qui avait été exprimé par les cardinaux ».
Ainsi donc, le fait de faire prévaloir la dimension pastorale sur le reste, et de renvoyer la doctrine aux oubliettes du magistère, semble bien au cœur du programme qui a scellé le résultat de l’élection de 2013, de l’aveu même de l’actuel pontife romain.
Une sorte de capitulation
Le mot « capitulation » peut désigner une « convention réglant certains privilèges et devoirs, négociée au terme d’une discussion ou d’un affrontement ». Il se dit particulièrement des conditions que les électeurs, durant la vacance de l’Empire, proposaient à celui qui doit être élu Empereur, et qu’il devait signer avant son élection.
Le terme a été repris pour l’élection des papes. En ce sens, la capitulation est un acte rédigé par le collège des cardinaux pendant un conclave. Généralement, le texte était préparé avant le premier tour de scrutin et tous les cardinaux devaient jurer de respecter le texte en cas d’élection.
Entre le XIVe et le XVIIe siècle, l’histoire de l’Eglise rapporte une quinzaine de capitulations qui eurent des issues diverses.
A la lumière de ce phénomène historique connu, il est tout de même étonnant de lire la conclusion du pape : « une chose demeure claire : la réforme ne mettra en œuvre rien d’autre que ce que les cardinaux avaient préalablement décidé, ce que nous avons demandé au pré-conclave, et qui désormais se réalise et se voit au grand jour ».
Que les cardinaux discutent sur le futur de l’Eglise avant un conclave est une chose. Mais que certains cardinaux prennent une décision qui engagera le futur pape qui ne fera rien d’autre que mettre en place le plan que ses électeurs ont décidé en est une tout autre.
De cette manière, nous entrons dans la logique du parti : un homme est élu sur le programme qui réunit le plus de voix, programme qu’il doit ensuite accomplir. Il ne s’agit plus de la Sainte Eglise, mais d’une organisation purement humaine, oublieuse de la mission divine qui devrait l’animer.
Terminons par une question : que comportait encore ce « programme » décidé au cours du pré-conclave ?
Les personnes despotiques ont tendance à télégraphier leurs actions futures tout comme les combattants inexpérimentés ont tendance à télégraphier leurs coups de poing ; ce n’est pas comme si les intentions des totalitaires étaient obscures ou difficiles à prévoir. Dans certains cas, ils peuvent même croire qu’ils peuvent être aussi transparents qu’ils le souhaitent, car ils supposent que personne ne tentera jamais de les arrêter. Ils détruisent des vies depuis si longtemps qu’ils adoptent un sentiment de supériorité, comme s’ils étaient intouchables.
Dans mon étude approfondie de la psychopathie, je constate que, malheureusement, le principal catalyseur de l’exploitation et de la victimisation de vastes populations est le fait que nombre d’entre elles ne parviennent pas à se faire à l’idée d’une conspiration organisée de monstres humains. Ils refusent de reconnaître l’existence du mal qui se trouve juste devant eux, ce qui permet au mal de rester sans opposition pendant de longues périodes. Il y a TOUJOURS un moment, cependant, où les psychopathes poussent les mauvaises personnes trop loin. Ils ne peuvent pas s’en empêcher, et c’est à ce moment-là qu’ils se retrouvent au bout d’un nœud coulant ou dans la ligne de mire du canon d’une arme.
Lorsqu’il s’agit d’organisations de psychopathes, le même moment finit par arriver, il faut simplement plus de temps pour que le public comprenne que c’est nécessaire.
En ce qui concerne l’agenda du « Grand Reset », la tyrannie médicale utilisant la Covid comme justification est clairement un ingrédient clé des objectifs futurs de l’élite du pouvoir. Au début des confinements pandémiques l’année dernière, j’ai fait plusieurs prédictions et émis des avertissements. J’ai dit que les obligations et les confinements pour la plupart des gens dans le monde ne disparaîtraient jamais, et j’ai appelé cela la « théorie des vagues » ; l’utilisation de moments intermittents de liberté limitée suivis de restrictions de plus en plus agressives.
Ce cycle est destiné à conditionner le public à l’idée que les gouvernements sont « autorisés » à microgérer notre vie quotidienne, que c’est « normal », que c’est pour notre bien et que nous devrions profiter des courts moments de liberté ou de normalité qu’ils nous laissent si gracieusement.
J’ai toujours prévenu que tous les gouvernements du monde finiraient par adopter des exigences en matière de preuve de vaccination pour que les gens puissent participer aux activités quotidiennes telles que se rendre dans des lieux publics, aller à l’école, faire des achats dans des magasins ou même trouver un emploi. L’année dernière, les médias grand public et les gouvernements n’ont cessé d’affirmer que les passeports vaccinaux « n’allaient pas exister » et que cette notion même était une théorie du complot. Aujourd’hui, les passeports vaccinaux sont mis en place dans de nombreux pays, y compris dans certaines régions des États-Unis, et toute personne qui s’y oppose est traitée de « théoricien de la conspiration ».
Vous voyez comment cela fonctionne ? Si vous exposez la vérité d’un complot autoritaire, l’establishment ment et vous traite de « théoricien du complot ». Une fois que l’establishment admet le complot et que vous refusez de vous y conformer, ces mêmes menteurs vous traitent de nouveau de théoricien du complot, ainsi que de « terroriste ».
Oui, cela a également été prédit par moi-même et d’autres au début de la pandémie. Nous avions dit que les personnes qui luttent contre la tyrannie du passeport vaccinal seraient rapidement qualifiées de traîtres et de terroristes « mettant les autres en danger » parce que nous sommes trop « égoïstes » pour nous incliner et prendre le vaccin expérimental ou nous soumettre aux confinements. C’est exactement ce qui s’est passé, le DHS ayant récemment annoncé que l’un des signes avant-coureurs d’un terroriste potentiel est l’opposition aux obligations Covid et aux vaccins.
J’ai également prédit que le but ultime de l’agenda Covid sera de créer des restrictions de voyage à l’intérieur du pays et des points de contrôle dans les États et les villes, sans parler des « camps » ou des prisons Covid pour les personnes non vaccinées. Aux États-Unis, le DHS admet qu’il envisage de limiter les déplacements entre les États et d’instaurer un système de « papiers s’il vous plaît » pour empêcher les Américains de se déplacer librement. L’État de New York a fait allusion à des camps Covid il y a plusieurs mois, mais le véritable plan est révélé à l’étranger, dans d’autres nations occidentales comme l’Australie et la Nouvelle-Zélande.
Et c’est ici que nous trouvons les coups de poing télégraphiés…
J’ai spécifiquement examiné les plans de tyrannie Covid accélérée de l’Australie et de la Nouvelle-Zélande il y a un an dans mon article « L’avenir totalitaire que les globalistes veulent pour le monde entier est en train d’être révélé« et j’ai noté que tout ce qui se passe dans ces pays ainsi que dans certains pays d’Europe va être essayé aux États-Unis à court terme. La principale différence est que ces mesures ne peuvent pas être mises en œuvre rapidement de la même manière aux États-Unis, car les Américains sont lourdement armés et ont la capacité d’enterrer l’establishment six pieds sous terre si nous nous organisons pour le faire.
C’est pourquoi les passeports vaccinaux ne sont encore qu’une mesure progressive aux États-Unis et ne sont pas mis en place dans la grande majorité du pays. C’est pourquoi, en dehors des grandes villes, la plupart des Américains ignorent complètement les obligations et ce, depuis de nombreux mois.
Dans ma région, je ne pense pas avoir vu plus de deux personnes par jour porter un masque, où que ce soit. La vue du masque est si bizarre qu’il se remarque presque immédiatement. Une fois, j’ai même vu une femme avec un masque (une touriste évidente) dans la file d’attente de l’épicerie regarder autour d’elle et réaliser que personne d’autre n’en portait. Elle a soudain commencé à trouver des excuses bizarres et très bruyantes pour son masque devant tous les gens dans la file, affirmant qu’elle « déteste l’odeur des détergents » et que c’était pour cela qu’elle le portait.
La différence entre les zones rurales libres et les villes dystopiques est frappante.
Franchement, je me fiche que quelqu’un porte un masque ou non. C’est un placebo qui ne fait rien pour arrêter la transmission du virus, mais si cela les fait se sentir mieux, alors tant mieux pour eux. Le problème est que ces personnes effrayées et pathétiques essaient de projeter leurs illusions sur tout le monde. Le taux de mortalité médian de 0,26% pour la Covid est si faible que je n’arrive pas à croire que tant de personnes dans les états et comtés bleus en soient terrifiées. Je ne pense pas qu’ils comprennent les statistiques de base de la situation – 99,7% de la population a peu à craindre de la Covid.
C’est ce que disent les CDC et des dizaines d’études médicales indépendantes, mais vous n’entendrez jamais ces chiffres dans les médias. Ils parleront du nombre d’infections et de décès, mais ils refusent de mettre les décès en perspective avec les statistiques. Pourquoi ? Parce qu’alors la peur du public disparaîtrait, et l’establishment a besoin d’augmenter la peur pour pouvoir continuer à nous priver de nos libertés au nom de la « sécurité ».
J’ai entendu récemment un argument plutôt naïf selon lequel des pays comme la France font honte aux Américains parce qu’ils sont dans les rues pour protester contre les confinements et les passeports. Ils disent que les Américains « ne se défendront jamais ». Ce que ces gens ne comprennent pas, c’est que dans la plupart des États-Unis, il n’y a PAS de confinements et il n’y a pas d’obligations. Le gouvernement les déclare, bien sûr, et nous les ignorons. Il n’y a que des poches de gauchistes dans certains états et comtés qui suivent et appliquent réellement ces règles. La population conservatrice est tout à fait prête à stopper net cet agenda lorsque le gouvernement essaiera de le faire respecter, et elle essaiera certainement.
C’est ici que nous devons comprendre les développements horribles en Australie et en Nouvelle-Zélande : Les confinements sont maintenant normalisés dans ces pays et les gouvernements n’ont pas besoin d’une réelle excuse pour les justifier. Ils annoncent simplement qu’il y a une poignée de cas de Covid et que les confinements doivent revenir. Les voyages sont étranglés et les droits et libertés fondamentaux sont inexistants. Le dernier discours du Premier ministre néo-zélandais sur les restrictions en dit long : https://www.youtube.com/embed/-jJUUp27Bbo?version=3&rel=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&fs=1&hl=fr&autohide=2&wmode=transparent
Le message principal étant que l’interaction sociale est interdite. Il suffit de rester dans sa bulle et de suivre les obligations sans poser de questions. Et, même si vous êtes vacciné, ces règles s’appliquent toujours à vous. La beauté des restrictions Covid est qu’elles sont une excuse parfaite pour un gouvernement tyrannique pour bloquer les rassemblements publics, ce qui permet d’empêcher l’organisation de la résistance.
Les globalistes ont besoin que les confinements durent éternellement. En Australie et en Nouvelle-Zélande, on affirme que toute personne qui enfreint ces restrictions sera la cible de sanctions pouvant aller jusqu’à l’enfermement dans un camp Covid géré par l’armée. Ce sont les mêmes mesures que Biden et les globalistes de l’establishment voudraient pour les États-Unis. Ce n’est pas une théorie du complot, c’est la réalité du complot.
Cela m’amène à la situation en Afghanistan, et certains pourraient suggérer qu’elle n’a rien à voir avec la tyrannie Covid, mais suivez-moi. Encore une fois, il s’agit de prédire les événements futurs en fonction de coups de poing télégraphiés ainsi que d’exemples historiques.
La question que j’entends le plus souvent lorsqu’il s’agit de l’Afghanistan est « comment est-il possible pour un groupe d’hommes des cavernes tribales de vaincre l’armée la plus avancée du monde ». Je pense que cette énigme doit être explorée lorsqu’il s’agit de la tyrannie Covid, car si la puissance épique de l’armée américaine n’a pas suffi à retenir les Talibans, comment les globalistes prévoient-ils de faire respecter les confinements Covid en Amérique ?
Soyons d’abord clairs : nombreux sont ceux qui affirment que l’armée américaine n’avait pas le droit de gagner en Afghanistan. Il s’agit d’une déformation de la réalité. Le fait est que gagner a TOUJOURS été IMPOSSIBLE en Afghanistan. L’establishment le savait il y a 20 ans lorsqu’il a envoyé les premières troupes américaines. Ils n’avaient pas besoin de saboter la mission américaine en Afghanistan, car perdre en Afghanistan était de toute façon inévitable.
L’occupation d’une nation entière afin de réduire une insurrection importante et d’imposer un changement culturel est un effort qui doit être accompli rapidement ou pas du tout. Le coût financier est écrasant, le coût humain est stupéfiant et la quantité de ressources nécessaires pour maintenir la subjugation est exponentielle. En vérité, plus une occupation se prolonge sans l’élimination totale de l’insurrection, moins elle a de chances de réussir. Le problème est que, pour éliminer complètement l’insurrection, il faudrait anéantir la majeure partie de la population en utilisant des tactiques grotesques, qui ne font qu’inspirer davantage d’insurrection.
Je vais répéter le message ici car je pense que certaines personnes ne le comprennent pas : La conspiration visant à piéger les États-Unis dans l’échec a été achevée il y a 20 ans, au moment où nous nous sommes engagés dans l’invasion de l’Afghanistan. À partir de là, tout s’est dégradé et il n’y avait aucun moyen de gagner.
J’ai également entendu dire qu’il n’est pas pratique de comparer une insurrection afghane à une rébellion américaine contre la tyrannie parce que les Talibans sont composés de combattants dont les capacités sont bien supérieures à celles des patriotes américains. En d’autres termes, certaines personnes pensent que les talibans sont des sortes de super soldats. C’est une vision idiote. Je pense que la vidéo suivante illustre bien mon propos : https://www.youtube.com/embed/bfMlP_YvLmY?version=3&rel=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&fs=1&hl=fr&autohide=2&wmode=transparent
Ces soldats ne sont pas les plus brillants de la bande et ne sont pas non plus des berserkers inarrêtables. Leur entraînement est médiocre et la majorité des incidents de combat avec les talibans font état de leur habitude de ne même pas regarder le viseur de leur fusil lorsqu’ils tirent. Cela nous amène à une question logique concernant le goulag Covid que les globalistes veulent transplanter aux États-Unis : si les combattants à bas prix des talibans peuvent repousser la puissance militaire moderne des États-Unis, comment diable les globalistes comptent-ils contrôler une insurrection américaine composée de vétérans entraînés au combat et de tireurs civils expérimentés utilisant des tactiques de guérilla ?
Qui vont-ils charger de cette tâche ? Qui est assez stupide pour exiger des papiers, faire respecter les points de contrôle et arrêter ceux qui ne s’y conforment pas dans des régions majoritairement conservatrices où il y a plus d’armes que de personnes et assez de munitions pour combattre au moins deux guerres mondiales ? Je soupçonne que des mercenaires coûteux payés par des entreprises privées seraient la seule réponse en dehors des forces étrangères, et même dans ce cas, je ne voudrais pas être à leur place lorsque le géant endormi de la rébellion américaine se réveillera.
Je suppose que la leçon que je tire de ces exemples est que les globalistes vont essayer d’appliquer l’agenda Covid et la tyrannie du passeport quoi qu’il arrive. Ils ne peuvent pas arrêter le processus qu’ils ont mis en marche. Les événements en Australie et en Nouvelle-Zélande montrent que leur addiction au totalitarisme est insatiable et qu’elle exige qu’ils poursuivent un contrôle croissant quel qu’en soit le coût. Ils nous disent exactement ce qu’ils sont sur le point de faire.
Les événements en Afghanistan montrent qu’un tel contrôle est presque impossible à maintenir sur une population armée et que, du moins aux États-Unis, ils finiront par perdre… gravement. Même s’ils utilisent des tactiques de terreur absolue, ils perdront toujours tant que les Américains continueront à se battre. Les lois de l’usure prévalent toujours, et la supériorité technologique ne signifie rien. Pour résumer, le combat est déjà gagné, mais la lutte ne fait que commencer.
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
Several military members told Health Impact News today that their commanders are coercing members of their unit to get the COVID-19 shot TODAY (September 7, 2021) or face the consequences of disobeying a direct order.
One member stated that when they went by the local pharmacy in a drug store, there were many military members lined up to get the shots today, fearful of the consequences if they don’t.
And this is in spite of the fact that military officials are saying publicly that service members still have 2 to 3 months to comply, according to Military.com.
Sailors and Marines Have 90 Days to Get Vaccinated or Face Punishment
Sailors and Marines now have 90 days to get vaccinated against COVID-19 or risk disobeying a lawful order, a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the maritime branches’ top leaders said in a series ofmessagesreleased Tuesday and Wednesday.
Airmen Have Less than Two Months to Get Fully Vaccinated
The Department of the Air Force has set a tight two-month deadline for active-duty troops to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19. Those who don’t get the shot in time could be punished under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Airmen and Space Force Guardians must be fully vaccinated – including a two-week period after a final shot – by Nov. 2, the Air Force said in a press release Friday. Air National Guardsmen and reservists have until Dec. 2.
Apparently the military commanders are following their own schedule, regardless of what is being stated publicly by the various branches.
Lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives have now proposed legislation that would prevent the military from issuing dishonorable discharges for service members who refuse the COVID-19 vaccine.
Lawmakers Try to Ban Dishonorable Discharges for Troops Who Refuse Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccines
Legislation sponsored by Rep. Mark Green, R-Tenn., an Army veteran, requires only honorable discharges for anyone who is separated from the military over refusing to be vaccinated. It was added to the fiscal 2022 defense authorization bill, passed by the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday.
“No American who raises their hand to serve our Nation should be punished for making a highly personal medical decision,” Green said in a statement after the committee vote.
However, service members are telling Health Impact News that this is what some of them are being threatened with, dishonorable discharge, while others have said they have been threatened with demotions and being barred from reenlisting.
Judicial System Again Fails to Protect Constitutional Rights of Citizens by Denying 200,000 Unvaccinated Military a Temporary Restraining Order
On August 17, 2021, two military members filed a lawsuit in federal court in the State of Colorado, claiming that they represented 200,000 service members who were not vaccinated for COVID-19, but that they had previously contracted COVID-19 and recovered, and that therefore there was no need to be vaccinated against COVID-19, as they had “natural immunity.”
On August 24, 2021, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin issued a Memorandum for “SENIOR PENTAGON LEADERSHIP COMMANDERS OF THE COMBATANT COMMANDS DEFENSE AGENCY AND DOD FIELD ACTIVITY DIRECTORS” which stated:
I therefore direct the Secretaries of the Military Departments to immediately begin full vaccination of all members of the armed Forces under DoD authority on active duty or in the Ready Reserve, including the National Guard, who are not fully vaccinated against COVID-19. (Source.)
So on August 31, 2021, Todd Callender, counsel for the military Plaintiffs, filed a motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to stop this directive from being enforced, which was heard by Judge Raymond P. Moore, who then denied the TRO on September 1, 2021.
The Plaintiffs had expert testimony from an affidavit by Dr. Peter McCullough, stating that “people who have the naturally created antibodies resulting from contracting and recovering from the Virus” should not be vaccinated because “it will do more harm than good.”
Judge Moore rejected his testimony and the evidence provided by the plaintiffs, because it was contrary to what the CDC states.
But Plaintiffs ignore all contrary opinion evidence, including obviously relevant guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) recommending vaccination regardless of whether a person has already had COVID-19 because research has not yet shown people are protected once they recover from the virus.
The Court is not compelled to view Plaintiffs’ evidence in a vacuum or an echo chamber. As a result, the evidence cited by Plaintiffs coupled with their unsubstantiated insistence on their own natural immunity is insufficient to establish a clear and unequivocal right to a TRO under the circumstances of this case. (Read full opinion here.)
Again, to expect relief from COVID-19 vaccine mandates from the judiciary is just not reasonable. The system is rigged. They will quote the CDC, Anthony Fauci, and a whole host of other corrupt government agencies and leaders to deny facts and keep the COVID-19 narrative going that benefits the Pharmaceutical industry and their Wall Street Billionaires and Bankers.
The judiciary works for these Wall Street Billionaires and Bankers, not for the public.
Mass non-compliance is what is needed now, and while there are signs that those in law enforcement and other government agencies are now forming groups to resist (See: Police, Firefighters In LA Form Group To Resist Vaccine Mandates, for example), where are the military commanders who take seriously the oath they took to protect this country and their citizens??
One of the military members that Health Impact News corresponded with today wrote:
As much as I value my uniform, my time in service and fighting back against such obvious abuses of power I’m coming more and more to the realization that this is the new world order, so to speak.
These vaccines aren’t going away no matter how long or how bitterly we fight this in the courts.
It’s time to tell the system to go **** itself and start figuring out how to best take care of ourselves and our families outside of the system.
Our military leadership has no concern for our wellbeing and they have made it clear that they will punish those who can’t see things from their perspective.
I signed up to defend the Constitution and freedom and now my military leadership is intent on violating both. I’m no longer interested in serving my country in this capacity. It’s time to leave while I can still walk to the door. https://rumble.com/embed/vj5nwr/?pub=4#?secret=QkgSgZWOem
*
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Featured image: Pfc. Shaniah Edwards, Medical Detachment, prepares to administer the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine to soldiers and airmen at the Joint Force Headquarters, February 12, 2021. (U.S. Army National Guard photo by Sgt. Leona C. Hendrickson – Source.)
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
Several military members told Health Impact News today that their commanders are coercing members of their unit to get the COVID-19 shot TODAY (September 7, 2021) or face the consequences of disobeying a direct order.
One member stated that when they went by the local pharmacy in a drug store, there were many military members lined up to get the shots today, fearful of the consequences if they don’t.
And this is in spite of the fact that military officials are saying publicly that service members still have 2 to 3 months to comply, according to Military.com.
Sailors and Marines Have 90 Days to Get Vaccinated or Face Punishment
Sailors and Marines now have 90 days to get vaccinated against COVID-19 or risk disobeying a lawful order, a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the maritime branches’ top leaders said in a series ofmessagesreleased Tuesday and Wednesday.
Airmen Have Less than Two Months to Get Fully Vaccinated
The Department of the Air Force has set a tight two-month deadline for active-duty troops to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19. Those who don’t get the shot in time could be punished under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Airmen and Space Force Guardians must be fully vaccinated – including a two-week period after a final shot – by Nov. 2, the Air Force said in a press release Friday. Air National Guardsmen and reservists have until Dec. 2.
Apparently the military commanders are following their own schedule, regardless of what is being stated publicly by the various branches.
Lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives have now proposed legislation that would prevent the military from issuing dishonorable discharges for service members who refuse the COVID-19 vaccine.
Lawmakers Try to Ban Dishonorable Discharges for Troops Who Refuse Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccines
Legislation sponsored by Rep. Mark Green, R-Tenn., an Army veteran, requires only honorable discharges for anyone who is separated from the military over refusing to be vaccinated. It was added to the fiscal 2022 defense authorization bill, passed by the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday.
“No American who raises their hand to serve our Nation should be punished for making a highly personal medical decision,” Green said in a statement after the committee vote.
However, service members are telling Health Impact News that this is what some of them are being threatened with, dishonorable discharge, while others have said they have been threatened with demotions and being barred from reenlisting.
Judicial System Again Fails to Protect Constitutional Rights of Citizens by Denying 200,000 Unvaccinated Military a Temporary Restraining Order
On August 17, 2021, two military members filed a lawsuit in federal court in the State of Colorado, claiming that they represented 200,000 service members who were not vaccinated for COVID-19, but that they had previously contracted COVID-19 and recovered, and that therefore there was no need to be vaccinated against COVID-19, as they had “natural immunity.”
On August 24, 2021, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin issued a Memorandum for “SENIOR PENTAGON LEADERSHIP COMMANDERS OF THE COMBATANT COMMANDS DEFENSE AGENCY AND DOD FIELD ACTIVITY DIRECTORS” which stated:
I therefore direct the Secretaries of the Military Departments to immediately begin full vaccination of all members of the armed Forces under DoD authority on active duty or in the Ready Reserve, including the National Guard, who are not fully vaccinated against COVID-19. (Source.)
So on August 31, 2021, Todd Callender, counsel for the military Plaintiffs, filed a motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to stop this directive from being enforced, which was heard by Judge Raymond P. Moore, who then denied the TRO on September 1, 2021.
The Plaintiffs had expert testimony from an affidavit by Dr. Peter McCullough, stating that “people who have the naturally created antibodies resulting from contracting and recovering from the Virus” should not be vaccinated because “it will do more harm than good.”
Judge Moore rejected his testimony and the evidence provided by the plaintiffs, because it was contrary to what the CDC states.
But Plaintiffs ignore all contrary opinion evidence, including obviously relevant guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) recommending vaccination regardless of whether a person has already had COVID-19 because research has not yet shown people are protected once they recover from the virus.
The Court is not compelled to view Plaintiffs’ evidence in a vacuum or an echo chamber. As a result, the evidence cited by Plaintiffs coupled with their unsubstantiated insistence on their own natural immunity is insufficient to establish a clear and unequivocal right to a TRO under the circumstances of this case. (Read full opinion here.)
Again, to expect relief from COVID-19 vaccine mandates from the judiciary is just not reasonable. The system is rigged. They will quote the CDC, Anthony Fauci, and a whole host of other corrupt government agencies and leaders to deny facts and keep the COVID-19 narrative going that benefits the Pharmaceutical industry and their Wall Street Billionaires and Bankers.
The judiciary works for these Wall Street Billionaires and Bankers, not for the public.
Mass non-compliance is what is needed now, and while there are signs that those in law enforcement and other government agencies are now forming groups to resist (See: Police, Firefighters In LA Form Group To Resist Vaccine Mandates, for example), where are the military commanders who take seriously the oath they took to protect this country and their citizens??
One of the military members that Health Impact News corresponded with today wrote:
As much as I value my uniform, my time in service and fighting back against such obvious abuses of power I’m coming more and more to the realization that this is the new world order, so to speak.
These vaccines aren’t going away no matter how long or how bitterly we fight this in the courts.
It’s time to tell the system to go **** itself and start figuring out how to best take care of ourselves and our families outside of the system.
Our military leadership has no concern for our wellbeing and they have made it clear that they will punish those who can’t see things from their perspective.
I signed up to defend the Constitution and freedom and now my military leadership is intent on violating both. I’m no longer interested in serving my country in this capacity. It’s time to leave while I can still walk to the door.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Featured image: Pfc. Shaniah Edwards, Medical Detachment, prepares to administer the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine to soldiers and airmen at the Joint Force Headquarters, February 12, 2021. (U.S. Army National Guard photo by Sgt. Leona C. Hendrickson – Source.)
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
This year marks a seminal turning point in human history. For the first time since human civilization began, our species is being genetically modified. Vaccine manufacturers have now made it possible for the human genome to be permanently altered—and humanity’s relationship with nature forever changed—by means of an experimental pharmaceutical injection that is being falsely referred to as a “vaccine.”
In light of this defining event, I believe we must take a sober look at the motives and acts that are revamping humanity as we know it. Simultaneously, we must examine our increasingly destructive treatment of the natural world.
In order to investigate the many variables that are hastening the demise of humanity and sabotaging our unique role as stewards of the earth and its billions of plant and animal species, I have divided this study into four main parts, which will appear as separate articles:
In Part I:The Microbiome and The Virome, we will discover that we are literally swimming in a vast sea of genomic information that was essential for life to begin and flourish on this precious earth and that is still trying to help all species survive. The matrix of organisms that make up the microbiome have built a viromic information stream that has allowed for adaptation and biodiversity to occur on the planet. And that very same viromic information stream is responsible for building the human species.
In Part lI: Our War Against Nature, we will explore how our own reckless behaviour is destroying the environment, thereby moving us toward the sixth mass extinction. By that I mean, I will be covering the real environmental catastrophe, not the billionaire-funded “global warming/climate change” hoax initiated by the Club of Rome and further promulgated by the World Economic Forum (WEF).
In Part III:What Happened in 2020, we will examine how this real environmental devastation has contributed to the “pandemic” that was rolled out in 2020, that led to the mass experimental injections of unknown substances into human “subjects” in 2021, and that has no foreseeable end. (I put “pandemic” in quotes because of its fraudulent character. Indeed, it is more accurately and aptly described as a plandemic, a scamdemic, a pseudo pandemic or any other term indicating fakery.)
In Part IV: Our Response, we will analyze the irresponsible and irrational response of most people on the planet to this so-called pandemic.
The Pandemic, “Our Species Is Being Genetically Modified’: Our Response
Instead of coming to terms with how we are destroying our habitat, instead of learning the lessons nature has been trying to teach us over the past 18 months, we have ignored the wreckage and have refused to be taught. If anything, humanity has only intensified its war against nature during the past year’s pseudo pandemic.
For example, since January of last year, 129 billion face masks (most of them made from polypropylene) and 65 billion latex gloves have been disposed of every month, according to a study published by the ACS Publications’ Environmental Science & Technology journal.
A significant portion of this waste will eventually end up in the world’s oceans, where it will take the form of polluting microplastics. Then there are the billions upon billions of plastic and paper food containers that have been used—and discarded—as a result of the pandemic-created surge in takeout food orders once restaurants were closed to dine-in customers.
And that’s only part of the environmental damage being wrought by this scam of all scams. Governments around the world—notably, in China and Italy—are spraying cancer-causing biocides into the atmosphere. That final act of madness, an effort to contain or destroy the unjustifiably feared virus, subjects pedestrians to still more harmful chemicals. These disinfectants will eventually end up in the tap water of millions of households. In short, we have no idea of the consequences that biocides may be having on the microbiome and on our long-term health.
Meanwhile, hundreds if not thousands of medical professionals and scientists around the world have dared to stand on their oath to do no harm and to follow their conscience by telling the truth about the devastating consequences of adhering to the fake pandemic’s mandates.
These brave men and women—all of them are either physicians or PhDs and thus use the title “Dr.”—include:
Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine technology;
pediatrician Lawrence Palevsky;
primary care physician Vladimir Zelenko; former NIAID scientist Judy Mikovits; attorney,
physician, and America’s Frontline Doctors founder Simone Gold; family physician Stephen Malthouse;
microbiologist Sucharit Bhakdi;
associate professor of viral immunology Byram Bridle; pediatrician Paul Thomas;
cardiologist Richard Fleming; emergency room and family physician Patrick Philips;
pathologist Roger Hodkinson;
and former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Mike Yeadon, to name but a few.
Each has raised serious concerns about the potential side effects these never-tested-or-approved-or-used “vaccines” may have on human health. And, for speaking out, each is being threatened and censored and worse.
Collectively, their apprehensions range from
(1) the possible effects that Lipid Nano Particles (LNPs) may be having on the human brain to
(3) how the artificially induced spike proteins that travel throughout the human body may be producing blood clotting disorders in different parts of the body to
(4) how these excess spike proteins, which are a neurovascular toxin to the body, may be causing myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) in children and young adults.
One way medical practitioners are being bullied is through the strong-arm tactics of the agencies that licence them to practice.
For instance, Canada’s College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) issued an ominous statement in late April 2020 threatening to remove the licence to practice medicine of any doctor who publicly spoke out against—or even raised questions about—the harmful side effects of lockdowns and/or the COVID vaccines that they witnessed while working on the frontlines in their local hospitals and communities. In the US, the process of removing a doctor’s license is slightly different, but the end result is the same.
Each state has its own Medical Board that can temporarily suspend a medical license without a hearing if “the Board finds that Licensee’s conduct has breached the standard of care and has placed the health and safety of many of his patients at risk of harm.”
Other attempts to prevent vital scientific information from reaching the public include the discrediting and stifling of medical practitioners, doctors, and scientists by Big Tech mainstream social media platforms like Google’s YouTube.
This should come as no surprise, since Google, which was created by the CIA, also has major ties to pharmaceutical companies like GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), registered in England. These individuals are also being deplatformed from Facebook—another DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency)/CIA–created private company—as well as by Instagram, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Linkedin, and Twitter.
Worse yet, doctors have faced extreme censorship for providing evidence that there are indeed viable, effective, and inexpensive treatments for COVID-19—treatments that obviate the need for a “vaccine.”
For instance, all of the physicians mentioned above, plus hundreds more from many countries, have not only praised but have repeatedly demonstrated the effectiveness of anti-malarial drugs chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and other remedies like Ivermectin, azithromycin, doxycycline, and zinc, in treating their COVID-19 patients. They have proven, for example, that CQ and HCQ, when administered in small prescribed doses, exert relatively few to no adverse effects. Numerous studies out of South Korea, China, and France bear further witness to that fact.
Nevertheless, government health agencies—the FDA, the NIH, and the CDC in the US, the MHRA in the UK, and Health Canada—as well as the WHO continually ban these inexpensive treatments, try to discourage people from using them, and, with the mainstream media’s complicity, make provably false claims about them.
To find out why this suppression of effective treatments is occurring, we need look no further than the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization for Vaccines (EUA) to Prevent COVID-19 that was issued in October 2020. On page six of this document, under Section lll, Criteria and Consideration for the Issuance of an EUA for a COVID-19 Vaccine, the last bullet point clearly states that the FDA may issue an EUA only if the FDA has determined that “there is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.” This statement means that the entire premise of the EUA is based on a presupposition that there is no alternative intervention available.
In reality, there are several inexpensive off-patent products to choose from, as we cited above—and as the FDA well knows. However, if it were to allow a cheap and readily available product like HCQ to dominate the market, the pharmaceutical industry—which appears to dictate policy to the FDA—would stand to lose billions in sales of COVID-19 vaccines.
Is greed behind Big Pharma’s suppression of information on the alternative products? Most assuredly. And will Big Pharma’s cozy relationships with government agency officials and with the media (the latter being largely dependent upon pharmaceutical advertising for its existence) prevent word of these alternative products from ever reaching the majority of public? It would seem so. In other words, the EUA would not have been issued had the truth about alternative products been allowed to be widely shared.
But because that truth has been suppressed, “COVID-19 vaccine” deaths are mounting.
As of August 2021, at least 21,000 people in the 27 countries comprising the European Union (EU) have died from being injected with these gene-altering devices, according to data collected by EudraVigilance. In the US, meanwhile, more than 13,000 people have succumbed to the shots, according to the data supplied to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The US figure is shocking: It means that these experimental injections have caused more deaths in a 6-month period than has the combination of 70 different approved vaccines in circulation over the last 30 years. As if that weren’t bad enough, a Harvard Study concluded that only 1% of injuries and deaths from all vaccines in the US are ever reported to VAERS. Even if the reporting is as high as 10%, that’s still low compared to the actual statistics.
And yet, the COVID-19 gene-modification injections are still being aggressively pushed by the propagandists and their unscientific, unproven theories—and this despite the evidence that asymptomatic spread is not possible; that we do not need the injections and that they are neither safe nor effective; that COVID-19 is nowhere near as life-threatening as it was predicted to be; and that children need no protection from this virus. Besides, in spite of their insistence, there is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID-19.
Governments around the world continue to bribe and coerce citizens—in direct violation of the Nuremburg Code and only ostensibly “in the interest of public health”—into taking these injections. Those of us who have been researching and reading about this subject since its inception know that it has never been about preserving public health. It has always been about the goal of implementing a global biosecurity plan and a transhumanist control grid that, if allowed to come to fruition, would signify the end of the human species.
This largely manufactured crisis has provided the perfect launching pad for biodigital convergence to take place. For those of you who think the notion of combining the human body with digital systems is hyperbole or fantasy, may I draw your attention to the “Exploring Biodigital Convergence” document issued February 11, 2020, by Policy Horizons Canada. The document indicates that the Canadian policy steering committee has discussed the frightening concept of altering the evolution of the human body through the integration of biological and digital nano-technologies. Indeed, it turns out that the broad genetic modification of the human species being engineered by the experimental COVID-19 injections is just the first phase of this transhumanist convergence.
As if the Canadian document were not alarming enough, elsewhere an even greater menace to humanity is being rolled out. In May of 2021, the UK Ministry of Defence issued a “Human Augmentation—The Dawn of a New Paradigm” document. It was worked on by the UK’s Development, Concept and Doctrine Centre (DCDC) in partnership with the German Bundeswehr Office for Defence Planning. Their purpose is “to understand the future implications of human augmentation (HA), setting the stage for more detailed defence research and development.”
By incorporating research from German, Swedish, Finnish, and UK defence specialists, the DCDC project attempts to better apprehend how emerging technologies, such as genetic engineering, brain-computer interfaces, and bioinformatics, can further enhance security and defence capabilities. Although it is being touted as a strategic tool for military use, HA will undoubtedly, like the development of so many military programs throughout history, be eventually deployed for use in the civilian sector.
I must say in no uncertain terms: The transhumanist projects in Canada, in the UK/Europe, and likely surreptitiously in other countries, combined with our willful destruction of the ecosystem, are the two greatest existential threats facing humanity today. Perhaps ever.
Concluding Remarks
We are being relentlessly bombarded by a belief that lays blame squarely on one ancient virus (including its variants) as the sole culprit causing a global health crisis. Yet there exists not a shred of evidence proving that the virus called SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease named COVID-19. This myopic view is preventing us from understanding the true, helpful nature of viruses, as we have detailed above. For, viruses are our friends.
Moreover, this view is blinding us to the real ecological disaster unfolding around us, which viruses are trying to help us uncover and recover from.
Not only is humanity marching towards its own extinction but it is also moving rapidly away from science and is instead suffocating in technocratic anti-science dogma—a dogma that has turned into a rigid religion whose adherents worship many deities, two of whom are named “Vaccines” and “Technology.”
As I explained at the beginning of this article (Part I), we are living in unprecedented times, in which humans can be genetically altered beyond recognition and the natural world is being ravaged almost beyond repair.
Yet, though these threats are lethal, there are also signs of hope. It is not too late to envision another possible path—one that does not point to our doom but, rather, invites us to accept that humanity has been made, from the beginning, to be an intrinsic part of nature. If we learn from the errors of our ways, we have a window of opportunity to step back from the abyss of transhumanism and species extinction. We can instead embrace our beautiful planet with all of its glorious biodiversity—an earth teeming with abundant life that offers a glimpse of the perfect universe made by God, Spirit, and bestowed on divinity’s spiritual creation.
Let us allow our good earth and our innate goodness to be made apparent instead of obscured and eventually annihilated.
Earth and every man, woman, child, and creature inhabiting it are actually infinite, eternal, divine ideas created by an infinite, eternal, divine Mind. It is time for us to acknowledge this truth—and demonstrate it in our lives.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
David Skripachas a Bachelor of Technology degree in aerospace engineering. During his two tours of duty as a captain in the Canadian Air Force, he flew extensively in the former Yugoslavia, Somalia, Rwanda, Ethiopia, and Djibouti. Using an inquisitive mind, a keen eye for detail, and problem-solving skills honed during his university years and throughout his career, David devoted over one hundred hours to researching the latest scientific findings in the fields of virology and microbiology to bring this article to fruition.
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
Global surface temperature was 1.09 [0.95 to 1.20] °C higher in 2011– 2020 than 1850–1900, with larger increases over land (1.59 [1.34 to 1.83] °C) than over the ocean (0.88 [0.68 to 1.01] °C). The estimated increase in global surface temperature since AR5 is principally due to further warming since 2003–2012 (+0.19 [0.16 to 0.22] °C). Additionally, methodological advances and new datasets contributed approximately 0.1ºC to the updated estimate of warming in AR6
The likely range of total human-caused global surface temperature increase from 1850–1900 to 2010–2019 is 0.8°C to 1.3°C, with a best estimate of 1.07°C.
Global mean sea level increased by 0.20 [0.15 to 0.25] m between 1901 and 2018. The average rate of sea level rise was 1.3 [0.6 to 2.1] mm yr between 1901 and 1971, increasing to 1.9 [0.8 to 2.9] mm yr between 1971 and 2006, and further increasing to 3.7 [3.2 to 4.2] mm yr between 2006 and 2018 (high confidence).
In 2011–2020, annual average Arctic sea ice area reached its lowest level since at least 1850 (high confidence). Late summer Arctic sea ice area was smaller than at any time in at least the past 1000 years (medium confidence). The global nature of glacier retreat, with almost all of the world’s glaciers retreating synchronously, since the 1950s is unprecedented in at least the last 2000 years (medium confidence).
It is likely that the global proportion of major (Category 3–5) tropical cyclone occurrence has increased over the last four decades, and the latitude where tropical cyclones in the western North Pacific reach their peak intensity has shifted northward; these changes cannot be explained by internal variability alone (medium confidence). There is low confidence in long-term (multi-decadal to centennial) trends in the frequency of all-category tropical cyclones.
Global surface temperature will continue to increase until at least the mid-century under all emissions scenarios considered. Global warming of 1.5°C and 2°C will be exceeded during the 21st century unless deep reductions in CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions occur in the coming decades.
It is very likely that heavy precipitation events will intensify and become more frequent in most regions with additional global warming. At the global scale, extreme daily precipitation events are projected to intensify by about 7% for each 1°C of global warming (high confidence).
It is virtually certain that global mean sea level will continue to rise over the 21st century. Relative to 1995-2014, the likely global mean sea level rise by 2100 is 0.28-0.55 m under the very low GHG emissions scenario (SSP1-1.9), 0.32-0.62 m under the low GHG emissions scenario (SSP1-2.6), 0.44-0.76 m under the intermediate GHG emissions scenario (SSP2-4.5), and 0.63-1.01 m under the very high GHG emissions scenario (SSP5-8.5), and by 2150 is 0.37-0.86 m under the very low scenario (SSP1-1.9), 0.46- 0.99 m under the low scenario (SSP1-2.6), 0.66-1.33 m under the intermediate scenario (SSP2-4.5), and 0.98-1.88 m under the very high scenario (SSP5-8.5) (medium confidence).
Changes in Global Surface Temperatures
Key Snip Synopsis
Temperatures have risen a a best estimate of 1.07°C since 1850 due to man-made causes.
The sea rise between 1971 and 2006 was 1.3 mm per year. That’s 0.0511811 inches per year.
The sea rise between 2006 and 2018 was 3.7 mm per year. That’s 0.145669 inches per year.
Under all emissions scenarios, global warming of 1.5°C and 2°C will be exceeded during the 21st century.
After 41 years of promoting a fuzzy and unsatisfying estimate of how much warming might result from a doubling of atmospheric CO2, the world’s climate science arbiter has finally offered the first real improvement in the history of modern climate science.
The U.N. panel now says the dire emissions scenario it promoted for two decades should be regarded as highly unlikely, with more plausible projections at least a third lower.
The report also notes, as the press never does, the full impact of these emissions won’t be manifested until decades, even a century, later. The ultimate likely worst-case effect of a doubling of CO2 might be 4 degrees, but the best estimate of the “transient climate response” this century is about 2.7 degrees, or 1.6 degrees on top of the warming experienced since the start of the industrial age.
You might not wish this on your least-favorite planet, but compare it with media coverage of the U.S. National Climate Assessment in 2018, which paraded as a nearly foregone conclusion a temperature increase of 6.1 degrees.
This week’s massive rainstorm in the Northeast reflexively was described as a consequence of climate change. Never mind that heavy rains always happened and, in any case, climate policy can’t be a solution for a New York City storm-drain system designed not to withstand a five-year storm, let alone a 100-year storm.
Or take the U.S. government’s claim that July was the hottest month on record. Unmentioned in any news report that I could find, the margin of error in this measurement was 10 times as large as the purported difference over the previously claimed hottest month of July 2016.
Code Red For Humanity?
The words most quoted in the press weren’t found in the U.N. report or even its executive summary. They were the claims of a pair of U.N. officials that the report heralded a “code red for humanity” and, even more devoid of meaning, that “no one is safe” from a warming planet.
Even if you believe the science, the one thing neither the media nor any panels like to discuss is costs.
Create high-quality union jobs that pay prevailing wages
Guaranteeing a job with a family sustaining wage, adequate family and medical leave, paid vacations, and retirement security to all people of the United States
The $90 trillion proposal came from former US vice president Al Gore, former president of Mexico Felipe Calderon, and their colleagues on The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate.
1967 Salt Lake Tribune: Dire Famine Forecast by 1975, Already Too Late
1969 NYT: “Unless we are extremely lucky, everyone will disappear in a cloud of blue steam in 20 years. The situation will get worse unless we change our behavior.“
1970 Boston Globe: Scientist Predicts New Ice Age by 21st Century said James P. Lodge, a scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research.
1971 Washington Post: Disastrous New Ice Age Coming says S.I. Rasool at NASA.
1972 Brown University Letter to President Nixon: Warning on Global Cooling
1974 The Guardian: Space Satellites Show Ice Age Coming Fast
1974 Time Magazine: Another Ice Age “Telling signs everywhere. Since the 1940s mean global temperatures have dropped 2.7 degrees F.”
1974 “Ozone Depletion a Great Peril to Life” University of Michigan Scientist
1976 NYT The Cooling: University of Wisconsin climatologist Stephen Schneider laments about the “deaf ear his warnings received.”
1988 Agence France Press: Maldives will be Completely Under Water in 30 Years.
1989 Associated Press: UN Official Says Rising Seas to ‘Obliterate Nations’ by 2000.
1989 Salon: New York City’s West Side Highway underwater by 2019 said Jim Hansen the scientist who lectured Congress in 1988 about the greenhouse effect.
2000 The Independent: “Snowfalls are a thing of the past. Our children will not know what snow is,” says senior climate researcher.
2004 The Guardian: The Pentagon Tells Bush Climate Change Will Destroy Us. “Britain will be Siberian in less than 20 years,” the Pentagon told Bush.
2008 Associate Press: NASA Scientist says “We’re Toast. In 5-10 years the Arctic will be Ice Free”
2008 Al Gore: Al Gore warns of ice-free Arctic by 2013.
2009 The Independent: Prince Charles says Just 96 Months to Save the World. “The price of capitalism is too high.”
2009 The Independent: Gordon Brown says “We have fewer than 50 days to save our planet from catastrophe.”
2013 The Guardian: The Arctic will be Ice Free in Two Years. “The release of a 50 gigaton of methane pulse” will destabilize the planet.
2013 The Guardian: US Navy Predicts Ice Free Arctic by 2016. “The US Navy’s department of Oceanography uses complex modeling to makes its forecast more accurate than others.
2014 John Kerry: “We have 500 days to Avoid Climate Chaos” discussed Sec of State John Kerry and French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabious at a joint meeting.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Agenda ID2020 – is hardly mentioned by any media, let alone the mainstream. Agenda ID2020, if carried out, is the ultimate control by a small elite – of the One World Order (OWO), also called the New World Order (NWO) – over the world population. It is a mechanism that would allow controlling every movement of each one of the 7.9 billion people of planet earth, including everyone’s health records, cash flows, bank accounts, as well as our behavior in this ultra-controlled society – which I refrain from calling civilization anymore.
Sounds crazy. Yes, but that’s the plan. No conspiracy theory.
“What is the infamous ID2020? It’s an electronic ID program that uses generalized vaccination as a platform for digital identity. … The program harnesses existing birth registration and vaccination operations to provide newborns with a portable and persistent biometrically-linked digital identity.
Let Dr. Vernon Coleman describe in simple terms the mechanisms that mankind – you and me – might be confronted with, if the super power elite, the NWO has its way. Watch this 10- min. video on controlling the people – vaccines, microchips and electromagnetic fields (EMF) – an old science turned new…
Wikipedia describes Dr. Vernon Coleman as an English author, columnist and former general practitioner.
He has written over 100 books, including works about human health, politics, cricket, and animal issues, and a range of novels.
It is High Noon, but never too late to Act in solidarity, despite covid-dictated ‘wanton social distancing’, and prevent this human disaster.
*
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Peter Koenig is an economist and geopolitical analyst. He is also a water resources and environmental specialist. He worked for over 30 years with the World Bank and the World Health Organization around the world in the fields of environment and water. He lectures at universities in the US, Europe and South America. He writes regularly for Global Research; ICH; New Eastern Outlook (NEO); RT; Countercurrents, Sputnik; PressTV; The 21st Century; Greanville Post; Defend Democracy Press; The Saker Blog, the and other internet sites. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed – fiction based on facts and on 30 years of World Bank experience around the globe. He is also a co-author of Th
Ce décret « interdit aux médecins non autorisés dans le Dakota du Sud de prescrire des substances provoquant l’avortement ». De même, il prévoit l’interdiction de la livraison de ces produits par courrier. Tout recours à la télémédecine dans le processus d’IVG devient illégal. Enfin, la délivrance ou la fourniture dans les écoles de substances provoquant l’avortement seront interdites.
Concernant les avortements médicamenteux, le gouverneur ordonne « au département de la santé de collecter des données sur le nombre d’avortements pratiqués » et de renforcer « les exigences de déclaration pour les complications dans les salles d’urgence ».
Aujourd’hui, la loi de cet État interdit les avortements au-delà de vingt-deux semaines de grossesse.
Pour Kristi Noem, « l’administration Biden continue d’outrepasser son autorité et de réprimer les législatures qui défendent les enfants à naître pour adopter des lois pro-vie fortes. Ils travaillent actuellement pour faciliter la fin de la vie d’un enfant à naître via l’avortement par télémédecine. Cela ne se produira pas dans le Dakota du Sud ». Elle a ajouté : « Je continuerai à travailler avec l’Assemblée législative et mon défenseur des enfants à naître (Miller) pour faire en sorte que le Dakota du Sud reste un État pro-vie fort ».
Source : USA Today, Joe Sneve et Nicole Ki (08/09/2021)
Ce jeudi, le ministre de la santé Olivier Véran a annoncé que la gratuité de la « contraception hormonale »[1] serait étendue aux femmes jusqu’à 25 ans à partir du 1er janvier prochain. Actuellement, cette mesure concerne les jeunes femmes mineures[2]. « Il y aura une prise en charge de la contraception hormonale, du bilan biologique qui peut aller avec, de la consultation de prescription et de tous les soins qui sont liés à cette contraception jusqu’à 25 ans” », a-t-il déclaré sur France 2. Cette décision serait motivée par le « recul de la contraception chez un certain nombre de jeunes femmes », en raison de son coût principalement. Cette mesure représente « un effort de 21 millions d’euros » par an a encore annoncé Olivier Véran.
Dans un tweet, Pascale Morinière, vice-présidente des Associations Familiales Catholiques, s’interroge sur l’utilité de cette extension : « Les Françaises ont le record contraceptif mondial mais encore une grossesse sur trois est non désirée » écrit-elle, mettant en évidence le paradoxe contraceptif.
[1]« Toutes les contraceptions féminines prises en charge par l’Assurance-maladie, sans distinction » a par la suite précisé le ministère de la santé (certaines pilules, les stérilets, les implants et les diaphragmes).
[2] Depuis 2013, la contraception hormonale est gratuite pour les jeunes femmes de 15 à 18 ans ; depuis août 2020, les jeunes filles de moins de 15 ans sont également concernées.
naufrage/sauvetage 