It is unbelievable that you listen to the things coming from the Australian government talking about two deaths due to COVID, one was 90, and the other 80, who were not vaccinated. They are saying that 25% of the people over 70 are not vaccinated and that is unacceptable.
They have used this to impose a lockdown where you are never allowed to leave your home for beyond 5 km regardless of the excuse – you will be thrown in jail. They have increased the fine to $500 for ANYONE who does not have a mask on – vaccinated or not proving vaccinations do not work.
The police have the power to shut down any business they demine in their sole discretion is not complying. They have turned Sydney into a concentration camp telling people that the sooner they get vaccinated the sooner their freedom will be restored. They are telling people to rat out any neighbor precisely the same tactics as the Stasi of East Germany.
The long-term implications of these measures are to break society completely for once you turn neighbor against neighbor, there is no putting civilization back together again.
MARCHING ORDERS have gone out around the world to turn society inside out and at each other’s throats. Listen to this announcement. If you cannot work, call the government and you will be given GUARANTEED BASIC INCOME. They will call anyone who points these things out which are PRECISELY the recommendations from the WEF is just coincidence and thus a conspiracy theory.
When the computer highlighted August to October as a Dark Period, I really hate to see this unfold. Civilization is formed when it is the benefit of everyone coming together. Civilizations collapse when they become divided which is precisely what those in governments around the world are doing to retain power. History warns, that they will fail but in the process, perhaps now you can see how Socrates was also forecasting that nations will divide usually along the same lines that previous conflicts took place
In the USA, there are two upcoming regularly scheduled elections for governor where the Democrats may lose. In New Jersey, Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy is seeking a second term, and in Virginia, Democrat Ralph Northam faces the state’s unique one-consecutive-term limit on governors. Then there is yet a third race in California, which is the recall election of Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom.
Meanwhile, the Democrats, who have barely a 50.4% majority, yet act like dictators with a 100% mandate, know they are in big trouble. The Republicans only need one more seat in the Senate, and Biden’s agenda fails. Clearly, looking ahead to next year, that means every Senate race really matters. The Democrats are eager to launch an attack to gain more seats and their blocking of election audits is not helping the level of confidence that is so vital to maintaining the nation.
The Democrats’ best opportunity to gain one more seat has been focused on Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Sen. Pat Toomey, a Republican, is not running for reelection, which means it’s up to the GOP to hold this seat without him. The Democrats are looking to take seats in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Florida, and Wisconsin. The Republicans have their eyes on Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, and New Hampshire.
The Upcoming Elections
Germany September 26, 2021 Iceland September 25, 2021 Norway September 13, 2021 Russia September 19, 2021 Hong Kong December 19, 2021 Iraq October 18, 2021
Australia 2022 France June 2022 Hungary April 2022 Latvia October 22 Malta June 2022 Philippines May 9, 2022 Serbia 2022 Slovenia June 2022 Sweden September 11, 2022 USA November 8, 2022
There are rumors that various heads of state realize that they would be voted out of office. There is serious discussion about “suspending” all elections as long as a “pandemic” exists. I reported in June that an actual bill was submitted in Canada calling for precisely that — the end of democracy using COVID as the excuse. This dark period we are entering seems to be laced with not just civil unrest in Europe, but important elections. Germany could be in for a serious wake-up call. Right now, the polls in Germany still claim that Merkel’s party is ahead (CDU) with 28%. That is followed by the Greens 18%, FDP 12%, AfD 11%, and LINKE 7%.
In France, there were elections in June, and Macron’s La République En Marche won only 10.9% of the votes while the far-right National Rally, led by Le Pen, won 19.1%. The right-wing party Les Republicains took 29.3% of the vote, while an unprecedented 68% of the population didn’t bother to vote. This is clearly a warning to Macron that he is lucky this is not the old days with an approval rating of that low. Even Loui XVI, who was beheaded, had a higher approval rating than Macron. With Panic Cycles appearing in 2022 for our election models, this is clearly not just a domestic issue. The last time this took place FDR was elected, but so was Hitler
Politics
Posted Jul 30, 2021 by Martin Armstrong
Spread the love
In the USA, there are two upcoming regularly scheduled elections for governor where the Democrats may lose. In New Jersey, Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy is seeking a second term, and in Virginia, Democrat Ralph Northam faces the state’s unique one-consecutive-term limit on governors. Then there is yet a third race in California, which is the recall election of Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom.
Meanwhile, the Democrats, who have barely a 50.4% majority, yet act like dictators with a 100% mandate, know they are in big trouble. The Republicans only need one more seat in the Senate, and Biden’s agenda fails. Clearly, looking ahead to next year, that means every Senate race really matters. The Democrats are eager to launch an attack to gain more seats and their blocking of election audits is not helping the level of confidence that is so vital to maintaining the nation.
The Democrats’ best opportunity to gain one more seat has been focused on Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Sen. Pat Toomey, a Republican, is not running for reelection, which means it’s up to the GOP to hold this seat without him. The Democrats are looking to take seats in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Florida, and Wisconsin. The Republicans have their eyes on Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, and New Hampshire.
The Upcoming Elections
Germany September 26, 2021 Iceland September 25, 2021 Norway September 13, 2021 Russia September 19, 2021 Hong Kong December 19, 2021 Iraq October 18, 2021
Australia 2022 France June 2022 Hungary April 2022 Latvia October 22 Malta June 2022 Philippines May 9, 2022 Serbia 2022 Slovenia June 2022 Sweden September 11, 2022 USA November 8, 2022
There are rumors that various heads of state realize that they would be voted out of office. There is serious discussion about “suspending” all elections as long as a “pandemic” exists. I reported in June that an actual bill was submitted in Canada calling for precisely that — the end of democracy using COVID as the excuse. This dark period we are entering seems to be laced with not just civil unrest in Europe, but important elections. Germany could be in for a serious wake-up call. Right now, the polls in Germany still claim that Merkel’s party is ahead (CDU) with 28%. That is followed by the Greens 18%, FDP 12%, AfD 11%, and LINKE 7%.
In France, there were elections in June, and Macron’s La République En Marche won only 10.9% of the votes while the far-right National Rally, led by Le Pen, won 19.1%. The right-wing party Les Republicains took 29.3% of the vote, while an unprecedented 68% of the population didn’t bother to vote. This is clearly a warning to Macron that he is lucky this is not the old days with an approval rating of that low. Even Loui XVI, who was beheaded, had a higher approval rating than Macron. With Panic Cycles appearing in 2022 for our election models, this is clearly not just a domestic issue. The last time this took place FDR was elected, but so was Hitler
There is no question that this entire COVID restriction is being orchestrated to force the Great Reset upon the world. While Australia has barred public gatherings restricting people’s movements beyond 5 km from their residence, Biden is also pushing the same guaranteed basic income scheme to undermine the entire economy. The Treasury Department said in a report last week that about 8.2 million adults were behind on their rent or mortgage as of July 5 and have low confidence they can pay on time next month, a Census Bureau survey showed. They are wiping out rental properties. Maybe BlackRock has a special deal like Gates being paid not to grow food.
The Supreme Court rules that the CDC had no such power to impose a moratorium on rents. This is just the problem we have with the rule of law. They get to do whatever they like and we have the burden to prove it is unconstitutional. Meanwhile, they get to do whatever they desire and we have no power to defend the constitution for the system is skewed against us.
Biden has now asked for Congress to quickly enact legislation to extend the moratorium. The problem we have is that they are defacto taking private property and turning it into public housing. This in itself violates the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause, which states that “private property [shall not] be taken for public use, without just compensation.”
Then, some businesses join the government’s tyranny like Shake Shack, which has shown its true colors where I will never be a customer. Danny Meyer’s Union Square Hospitality Group will require proof of vaccination against COVID-19 from its staff as well as anyone who wants to eat or drink inside the group’s various restaurants across New York City and Washington, DC.
Obviously, if you just look at the details you will see in Britain, more people are dying from COVID who are already vaccinated compared to non-vaccinated. (see Page 18). Australia imposed a virtual concentration camp claiming 177 people had covid in Sydney. The population of Syndey Australia is just under 6 million. They have destroyed their freedom for 177 cases?
It is absolutely stunning how such EVIL is allowed to take over the entire world. They are imposing, by sheer force, a new Marxism regime with the end goal being a one-world government ending democracy. The press is cheering this transition and refuses to report the truth. I truly wish I was not still alive to have to watch what these people are doing to destroy civilization as we have known it. I believe they are given a new modern meaning to the same tyranny against which Patrick Henry spoke out.
If you’re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!(Psst: The FTC wants me to remind you that this website contains affiliate links. That means if you make a purchase from a link you click on, I might receive a small commission. This does not increase the price you’ll pay for that item nor does it decrease the awesomeness of the item. ~ Daisy)
by Aden Tate
You’ve likely heard a word tossed about in the narrative of late that has you somewhat dumbfounded: transhumanism.
What on earth does that mean?
What is Transhumanism?
While the term has been around for decades, it’s always been a fringe aspect of the scientific community. And by fringe, I mean fringe of the fringe. Nobody knew what transhumanism was. However, now the movement is growing like never before, and the well-informed American needs to know what it encompasses.
The end goal of transhumanism: defeat suffering, pain, disease, inequality, and death through biotechnological implants.
Do you remember the Borg from Star Trek? While perhaps not as grotesque, transhumanism seeks a similar path to reach its end goal. In some cases, you can see aspects of transhumanism in today’s culture. Ever seen anybody with a prosthetic leg? Transhumanists would claim them as one of their own.
But that only scratches the surface of the situation. A true transhumanist wants to see things go much further. Brain implants, neural links to the internet, and much more are all part of their ultimate goals.
The Difference Between Posthumanism and Transhumanism
It’s important to note that there is a difference between transhumanism and Posthumanism. Yet, just as socialism is the stepping-stone to communism, one is the stepping-stone to the other.
Transhumanism seeks to use technological implants to improve the human condition.
Posthumanism aims to eradicate humanity as we know it altogether.
Within the realm of Posthumanism, the ultimate end goal is the death of death – to become immortal. And for that to happen, you have to become a machine. Such is the end goal of Posthumanism.
What Are the Aspects to Usher in a Transhumanist World?
There are several talking points transhumanists will reference when discussing how to reach their end goals. Chief of these are:
Nanotechnology – If you’ve ever seen Johnny Depp’s Transcendence and witnessed how nanotechnology was used in medicine there to make the sick well, the injured whole, and the weak strong, this is precisely what they are talking about.
According to transhumanists, using nanotech to become stronger, smarter, and teleport are all potential uses for such science.
Molecular assemblers – This is the creation of living material or lifeforms. 3D bioprinting could somewhat be an aspect of this. If you have a burn victim who needs a skin graft but whose burns are so complete that he doesn’t have any locations to harvest from, then 3D bioprinting could print the skin graft for him.
Designer babies would probably fall under this umbrella as well. Imagine the notion of showing up to a fertility clinic and choosing the traits you want your child to have (boy, blue eyes, athletic, intelligent, etc.) and then having a scientist compile those genetic traits together for you into an embryo. According to transhumanists, the end goal is a healthier child that meets your expectations and wishes.
Epigenetics – This is the act of changing genes. While this is already possible (and happens) by the lifestyle you live, transhumanists want to take things a step further. They actively want to change your DNA to improve your disease resistance, to make you stronger, smarter, and so on. If you’ve seenIron Man 3 with the fire people, it’s pretty much the same concept.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) – Regularly touted as a means for improving our knowledge base, AI is argued as being the perfect scientist, and thus, the ideal means of further improving our condition. Done via the generation of a ‘superintelligence,’ a self-conscious AI connects to the internet. The AI quickly gains more knowledge than all of humanity combined, throughout all of history. This type of knowledge would mean we’d get sooner access to improvements in surgery, medicine, fuel, and the like.
Uploads – This is a concept considerably pushed by Ray Kurzweil, likely the most famous transhumanist around. It’s the point at which mankind melds with machines, entering a virtual world.
What’s the Background Story Here?
To my knowledge, the earliest notions of transhumanism can be found in a 1929 article by JD Bernal titled The World, The Flesh, and The Devil. Bionic implants, cognitive enhancement, and space colonization were all discussed here. While there are arguments made for transhumanism being a thought process even further back, I think this paper is the most modern example.
However, the first self-described transhumanists didn’t meet until the early 1980s in Los Angeles at the University of California. The movement continued to spread as Nick Bostrom founded the World Transhumanist Association in 1998 (now Humanity+).
Milestones were made for the movement. Among those were:
Kevin Warwick has a 100-electrode array implanted into the nerves of his left arm in 2002 that directly linked his nervous system to the internet.
Artist Neil Harbisson had a curved antenna implanted into his brain, allowing him to see infrared and ultraviolet colors.
As you can see, transhumanist thought has been around for quite some time. As time goes on, it will become more frequently and openly discussed. You can check out Steve Quayle’s book on the subject for more information.
Are There Moral Conundrums With Transhumanism?
Just as with anything, there will be pros and cons, and transhumanism is no exception here.
What are your thoughts on:
George Washington having wooden teeth?
What about a little girl getting a cochlear implant?
Are you ok with a little boy getting a prosthetic leg after a freak accident leaves him missing his original?
What are your thoughts on braces?
All of these situations had a problem solved by an implant/addition created by current technology. It’s hard to have a problem with such.
But do transhumanists take things a step further? I believe they do.
How Far Are Transhumanists Willing to Go?
Uploads: Remember, this is the melding of man with machine. Ray Kurzweil points out in his book The Singularity is Near, this is when your consciousness is uploaded to a cloud. Uploads enable a person to theoretically teleport and manifest anywhere on earth. These capabilities are made possible by an ever-present cloud of nanobots that reassemble the person.
Can the soul be transferred out of your body to a machine, though? Nope. To me, that is mass murder/suicide. A simulation may predict how you would react in every situation. However, it wouldn’t be the real you. The real you would have died at the moment of upload.
Nanotechnology | Epigenetics: If ever-present nanotechnology is a goal, what about those who don’t consent to such. Is this not akin to a sheddable vaccine? Is it not a violation of informed consent? If I don’t want nanotechnology interacting with my body, what right does anyone have to force me to do so?
Molecular Assemblers: What could be the cost of tinkering with genetic material? What if problems arise we can’t undo? Could we very easily end up with a Will SmithI Am Legend type scenario? Or, humans being genetically engineered to be tiny dolls, super polite waitresses, or other one-shot entities like those in Cloud Atlas?
Artificial Intelligence: How much of your autonomy are you willing to give up to a machine? Eventually, one should ask, “How much government control should we hand over to artificial intelligence?”
Are There Dangers to Transhumanism?
Aside from the moral qualms, there are some veritable dangers to transhumanist philosophy as well.
The Singularity: As pointed out above, this would be mass suicide/murder. In a world where climate change is a chief concern, though, it could be argued the more uploads we have, the more negligible effect we’ll have as a whole on the planet. Could mandatory uploads result? This point is most certainly very remote and far out. However, if transhumanists are going to raise it, we should think of some response aforehand, should we not?
Nanotechnology: Both Michael Crichton and Nick Bostrom have pointed out the dangers of self-replicating nanotechnology – something many transhumanists favor. How do you get self-replicating nanotechnology to stop? Does it reproduce indefinitely, becoming a new problem? Could nanotechnology be hacked? What’s to stop somebody from using your body’s nanobot to drill a hole through your heart, eat your pancreas, or cause a blood clot? What if you were given nanotechnology with capabilities you weren’t entirely made aware of?
Epigenetics: DNA is notoriously complex. While one may believe they’ve created a solution, what if they’ve made a bad genetic trait that’s not revealed till 30 years down the road? Puberty is genetic, striking 13 years or so after birth. Baldness is genetic, striking decades after birth. Who’s to say they won’t create something more severe like psychosis that spontaneously demonstrates at the age of 25?
We literally have no idea. Why? Because it’s never been done before? What if the bad trait created becomes inherited? Perhaps it’s that somebody’s arm rots off when they turn 38. We end up with a whole generation of kids who are bound to suffer the same fate. Once more, while that’s an extreme example, it gets us to think about the host of potential possibilities that need to be considered before engaging in such an action.
What is the Future of Transhumanism?
According to Klaus Schwab, “The Fourth Industrial Revolution will lead to a fusion of our physical, digital, and biological identity.”
Istvan’s Coffin Shaped Immortality Bus
Some wonder if this is verification the Great Reset is foundationally driven towards transhumanism. We’ve most certainly seen it’s a growing movement. In 2016, noted transhumanist Zoltan Istvan actually ran for US president.
So where are we going to turn next? It’s hard to say. I believe that nanotechnology will be one of the prime movers in the near future. However, I do know this: transhumanism is here to stay, and it is only going to gain even more momentum within the next few years.
It pays to stay well-informed on what is happening here. This movement is going to impact your life.
What are your thoughts on Transhumanism?
Where do you think this movement will lead? Do you consider it a benign, positive science, a threat to mankind, or something in between? Let’s discuss it in the comments.
Vous avez probablement entendu un mot lancé dans la presse ces derniers temps qui vous a laissé quelque peu perplexe : le transhumanisme.
Que diable cela signifie-t-il ?
Qu’est-ce que le transhumanisme ?
Bien que le terme existe depuis des décennies, il a toujours été considéré comme un aspect marginal de la communauté scientifique. Et par « marginal », je veux dire « marginal de chez marginal ». Personne ne savait ce qu’était le transhumanisme. Mais aujourd’hui, le mouvement prend de l’ampleur comme jamais auparavant, et l’Américain bien informé doit savoir ce qu’il englobe.
L’objectif final du transhumanisme : vaincre la souffrance, la douleur, la maladie, l’inégalité et la mort grâce à des implants biotechnologiques.
Vous vous souvenez des Borgs dans Star Trek ? Même s’il n’est pas aussi grotesque, le transhumanisme cherche un chemin similaire pour atteindre son objectif final. Dans certains cas, vous pouvez voir des aspects du transhumanisme dans la culture d’aujourd’hui. Avez-vous déjà vu quelqu’un avec une prothèse de jambe ? Les transhumanistes les considéreraient comme l’un des leurs.
Mais cela ne fait qu’effleurer la situation. Un vrai transhumaniste veut voir les choses aller beaucoup plus loin. Les implants cérébraux, les liens neuronaux avec Internet et bien d’autres choses encore font partie de leurs objectifs ultimes.
La différence entre le posthumanisme et le transhumanisme
Il est important de noter qu’il existe une différence entre le transhumanisme et le posthumanisme. Cependant, tout comme le socialisme est le tremplin vers le communisme, l’un est le tremplin vers l’autre.
Le transhumanisme cherche à utiliser des implants technologiques pour améliorer la condition humaine.
Le posthumanisme vise à éradiquer complètement l’humanité telle que nous la connaissons.
Dans le domaine du posthumanisme, le but ultime est la mort de la mort – devenir immortel. Et pour cela, il faut devenir une machine. Tel est le but ultime du posthumanisme.
Quels sont les aspects permettant d’instaurer un monde transhumaniste ?
Il existe plusieurs points de discussion auxquels les transhumanistes se réfèrent lorsqu’ils discutent de la manière d’atteindre leurs objectifs finaux. Les principaux d’entre eux sont les suivants
Les nanotechnologies – Si vous avez vu le film Transcendancede Johnny Depp et que vous avez été témoin de l’utilisation des nanotechnologies en médecine pour guérir les malades, soigner les blessés et renforcer les faibles, c’est précisément de cela qu’ils parlent.
Selon les transhumanistes, utiliser les nanotechnologies pour devenir plus fort, plus intelligent et se téléporter sont autant d’utilisations potentielles de cette science.
Assembleurs moléculaires – Il s’agit de la création de matériel vivant ou de formes de vie. La bio-impression en 3D pourrait en être un aspect. Si vous avez une victime de brûlures qui a besoin d’une greffe de peau mais dont les brûlures sont si complètes qu’il n’a aucun endroit où prélever, alors la bio-impression 3D pourrait imprimer la greffe de peau pour lui.
Les bébés sur mesure relèveraient probablement aussi de cette catégorie. Imaginez que vous vous rendiez dans une clinique de fertilité et que vous choisissiez les caractéristiques que vous souhaitez donner à votre enfant (garçon, yeux bleus, sportif, intelligent, etc.), puis qu’un scientifique compile ces caractéristiques génétiques pour vous dans un embryon. Selon les transhumanistes, l’objectif final est un enfant en bonne santé qui répond à vos attentes et à vos souhaits.
L’épigénétique – C’est le fait de modifier les gènes. Si cela est déjà possible (et se produit) par le mode de vie que vous menez, les transhumanistes veulent aller plus loin. Ils veulent activement modifier votre ADN pour améliorer votre résistance aux maladies, vous rendre plus fort, plus intelligent, etc. Si vous avez vu Iron Man 3 avec les hommes de feu, c’est à peu près le même concept.
Intelligence artificielle (IA) – Régulièrement présentée comme un moyen d’améliorer notre base de connaissances, l’IA est considérée comme le scientifique parfait, et donc le moyen idéal d’améliorer encore notre condition. Grâce à la génération d’une « superintelligence », une IA consciente d’elle-même se connecte à l’internet. L’IA acquiert rapidement plus de connaissances que toute l’humanité réunie, à travers toute l’histoire. Ce type de connaissances signifierait que nous aurions plus rapidement accès à des améliorations en chirurgie, en médecine, en carburant, etc.
Téléchargements – Il s’agit d’un concept considérablement poussé par Ray Kurzweil, probablement le transhumaniste le plus célèbre. C’est le moment où l’humanité se fond avec les machines, entrant dans un monde virtuel.
Quelle est la toile de fond de cette histoire ?
À ma connaissance, les premières notions de transhumanisme se trouvent dans un article de 1929 de JD Bernal intitulé The World, The Flesh, and The Devil. Il y est question d’implants bioniques, d’amélioration des fonctions cognitives et de colonisation spatiale. Bien que des arguments aient été avancés pour justifier que le transhumanisme soit un processus de pensée encore plus ancien, je pense que cet article en est l’exemple le plus moderne.
Cependant, les premiers transhumanistes autoproclamés ne se sont pas rencontrés avant le début des années 1980 à Los Angeles, à l’université de Californie. Le mouvement a continué à s’étendre lorsque Nick Bostrom a fondé l’Association mondiale des transhumanistes en 1998 (aujourd’hui Humanity+).
Des étapes importantes ont été franchies pour le mouvement. Parmi celles-ci, citons :
Kevin Warwick s’est fait implanter en 2002 un réseau de 100 électrodes dans les nerfs du bras gauche, qui reliait directement son système nerveux à l’internet.
L’artiste Neil Harbisson s’est fait implanter une antenne incurvée dans le cerveau, lui permettant de voir les couleurs infrarouges et ultraviolettes.
Comme vous pouvez le constater, la pensée transhumaniste existe depuis un certain temps. Au fil du temps, elle sera de plus en plus fréquemment et ouvertement discutée. Pour en savoir plus, vous pouvez consulter le livre de Steve Quayle sur le sujet.
Le transhumanisme pose-t-il des problèmes d’ordre moral ?
Comme dans toute chose, il y a du pour et du contre, et le transhumanisme ne fait pas exception.
Que pensez-vous de :
George Washington ayant des dents en bois ?
Et si une petite fille avait un implant cochléaire ?
Êtes-vous d’accord pour qu’un petit garçon reçoive une prothèse de jambe après avoir perdu la sienne à la suite d’un accident ?
Que pensez-vous des appareils dentaires ?
Dans toutes ces situations, un problème a été résolu par un implant ou un ajout créé par la technologie actuelle. Il est difficile d’avoir un problème avec cela.
Mais les transhumanistes poussent-ils les choses un peu plus loin ? Je crois que oui.
Jusqu’où les transhumanistes sont-ils prêts à aller ?
Téléchargements : Rappelez-vous, c’est la fusion de l’homme et de la machine. Ray Kurzweil souligne dans son livre The Singularity is Near que votre conscience est mise en ligne dans le cloud. Les téléchargements permettent théoriquement à une personne de se téléporter et de se manifester n’importe où sur terre. Ces capacités sont rendues possibles par un nuage omniprésent de nanorobots qui réassemblent la personne.
Mais l’âme peut-elle être transférée de votre corps à une machine ? Non. Pour moi, c’est un meurtre/suicide de masse. Une simulation peut prédire comment vous réagiriez dans chaque situation. Cependant, ce ne serait pas le vrai vous. Le vrai vous serait mort au moment du téléchargement.
Nanotechnologies | Épigénétique : Si la nanotechnologie omniprésente est un objectif, que faire de ceux qui n’y consentent pas. Ne s’agit-il pas d’un vaccin pouvant être éliminé ? Ne s’agit-il pas d’une violation du consentement éclairé ? Si je ne veux pas que les nanotechnologies interagissent avec mon corps, de quel droit peut-on me forcer à le faire ?
Assembleurs moléculaires : Quel pourrait être le coût du bricolage du matériel génétique ? Que se passe-t-il si des problèmes surviennent et que nous ne pouvons pas les résoudre ? Pourrions-nous très facilement aboutir à un scénario du type « Je suis une légende » de Will Smith ? Ou des humains génétiquement modifiés pour devenir de minuscules poupées, des serveuses super polies ou d’autres entités uniques comme celles du film Cloud Atlas ?
L’intelligence artificielle : Quelle part de votre autonomie êtes-vous prêt à céder à une machine ? En fin de compte, on devrait se demander : « Quelle part du contrôle gouvernemental devrions-nous céder à l’intelligence artificielle ? »
La singularité : Comme indiqué plus haut, il s’agirait d’un suicide/meurtre de masse. Mais dans un monde où le changement climatique est une préoccupation majeure, on pourrait faire valoir que plus nous aurons de téléchargements, plus notre effet global sur la planète sera négligeable. Des téléchargements obligatoires pourraient-ils en résulter ? Ce point est très certainement très éloigné et lointain. Cependant, si les transhumanistes le soulèvent, nous devrions réfléchir à une réponse préalable, n’est-ce pas ?
Les nanotechnologies : Michael Crichton et Nick Bostrom ont tous deux souligné les dangers de la nanotechnologie auto-réplicative – une idée qui a la faveur de nombreux transhumanistes. Comment faire pour que la nanotechnologie auto-réplicative s’arrête ? Se reproduit-elle indéfiniment, devenant un nouveau problème ? Les nanotechnologies peuvent-elles être piratées ? Qu’est-ce qui empêcherait quelqu’un d’utiliser le nanorobot de votre corps pour percer un trou dans votre cœur, manger votre pancréas ou provoquer un caillot de sang ? Que se passerait-il si on vous donnait des nanotechnologies dotées de capacités dont vous n’êtes pas entièrement conscient ?
L’épigénétique : L’ADN est notoirement complexe. Si l’on croit avoir créé une solution, que se passe-t-il si l’on a créé un mauvais trait génétique qui ne sera révélé que 30 ans plus tard ? La puberté est génétique et survient environ 13 ans après la naissance. La calvitie est génétique, elle apparaît des décennies après la naissance. Qui dit qu’ils ne vont pas créer quelque chose de plus grave comme une psychose qui se manifeste spontanément à l’âge de 25 ans ?
Nous n’en avons littéralement aucune idée. Pourquoi ? Parce que ça n’a jamais été fait auparavant ? Et si le mauvais trait créé devenait héréditaire ? Peut-être que le bras de quelqu’un pourrit à l’âge de 38 ans. On se retrouve avec toute une génération d’enfants qui vont subir le même sort. Une fois de plus, bien qu’il s’agisse d’un exemple extrême, il nous amène à réfléchir à la multitude de possibilités potentielles qu’il faut envisager avant de s’engager dans une telle action.
Quel est l’avenir du transhumanisme ?
Selon Klaus Schwab, « la quatrième révolution industrielle conduira à une fusion de notre identité physique, numérique et biologique. »
Le bus de l’immortalité en forme de cercueil d’Istvan
Certains se demandent s’il s’agit d’une vérification que le Grand Reset est fondé sur le transhumanisme. Nous avons très certainement vu que c’est un mouvement en pleine expansion. En 2016, le transhumaniste Zoltan Istvan s’est présenté aux élections présidentielles américaines.
Alors, vers quoi allons-nous nous tourner ? C’est difficile à dire. Je pense que les nanotechnologies seront l’un des principaux moteurs dans un avenir proche. Mais ce que je sais, c’est que le transhumanisme est là pour rester, et qu’il ne peut que prendre de l’ampleur dans les prochaines années.
Il est utile de rester bien informé sur ce qui se passe ici. Ce mouvement va avoir un impact sur votre vie.
(Natural News) Government authorities and large health care groups are ordering the vaxtermination of their own members and workers, demanding spike protein murder shots be injected into millions of victims who work in the government and health care sectors.
NYC mayor Bill de Blasio, for example, just announced covid mandates (vaccinate or endure daily tests with high false positive rates) for all 314,000 city workers. This is government targeting government in the vaccine depopulation war. What it means is that if covid vaccines produce any significant number of fatalities or hospitalizations, NYC will suffer personnel losses and large increases in health care costs for its own workers, plunging the city into a dire situation where there are no longer enough city workers alive to keep the city running.
Similarly, the American Medical Association and dozens of other medical groups have colluded to call for mandatory vaccines of all health care workers. Their public demand falsely claims that covid vaccines are “safe and effective,” even though the FDA has made no such determination, and the manufacturers of the vaccines openly admit in their own documents that these vaccines have unknown consequences and are experimental medical interventions.
Both the State of California and the Veterans Administration have announced mandatory vaccine requirements for all their workers. In California alone, 15.4% of the workforce is employed by the government, according to 247WallSt.com, and there are 2.5 million government workers in the state of California (although not all of them work for the state itself and may instead work for county or city governments).
In Arizona, a large health care group known as Banner Health has announced mandatory vaccine requirements for its 52,000 employees. Any who refuse the vaccine will be fired after November 1st, right as the winter flu season is rising, likely increasing the demand for health care services.
In all, we are now seeing governments and health care “authorities” ordering the vaxtermination of their own workers and employees on a scale never witnessed in the history of human civilization. This is a genocidal self-culling operation that clearly seeks to murder as many people as possible as a way to collapse the nation.
Watch this Maryland nurse warn the world about what’s really happening with vaccine deaths and injuries, although the lying corporate media (paid off by Big Pharma) and criminal Big Tech platforms (also paid off by Big Pharma) are censoring all health care workers who are warning about covid vaccines:
When mayors like Bill de Blasio order 314,000 government workers to be vaccinated with a dangerous, deadly, unproven experimental gene therapy intervention, he’s actually promoting a novel way to slash the size of government. Within as little as 18 months, tens of thousands of those workers may be injured or dead from covid vaccines in NYC alone, according to various warnings from a growing number of qualified medical professionals such as Drs. Hoffe, McCullogh, Tenpenny, Martin, Northrup, Madej, Merritt, Zelenko and others.
Across California, if all government workers are forced into covid vaccines, a mere 10% fatality rate could mean 250,000 government workers dying in the near future, leaving California government at a devastating loss for its own continuity of government (C.O.G.) sustainability.
It’s difficult to see how local and state governments that are currently mandating gene therapy jabs will continue to function if these risky medical experiments turn out to cause serious health complications. Should these experimental gene therapy injections (“vaccines”) produce substantial adverse reactions, hospitalizations and permanent injury, cities, states and the federal government will also be financially devastated by exploding health care costs incurred by their own surviving workers.
Most blue cities and blue states are already on the verge of bankruptcy right now. And that means their ability to cover the added financial strain of retirement pensions and vaccine injury health care costs may be too much to bear.
Vaxtermination of doctors, nurses and health care workers
Thanks to the AMA, which has abandoned its own stated guidelines for medical ethics and informed consent, vaccine-induced fatalities and injuries will disproportionately impact health care workers, causing widespread shortages in doctors, nurses and other workers at the precise time the rest of the nation is suffering from vaccine injuries and desperately needing medical assistance.
This action on the part of the AMA is beyond merely criminal. It is the self-destruction of the entire promise of medical “authority” from the western medical system, which now admits that it will murder its own practitioners in order to enhance the profits of Big Pharma.
No doctor is really valued by the AMA, as they are throwing their own doctors under the spike protein steamroller of Big Pharma’s experimental mRNA gene therapy injections, with unknown consequences backed by nothing but fraudulent promises and a hard political push for mass obedience.
Just recently, a medical assistant from Minneapolis had both of her legs amputated after receiving the Pfizer covid vaccine, reports the UK Daily Mail. The highlights from the story are nothing less than horrifying:
Jummai Nache, from Minneapolis, Minnesota, received the second dose of her COVID-19 vaccine on February 1
Days later, she felt chest pains and was rushed to the hospital, where she tested positive for the virus
Doctors diagnosed her with arterial blood clots multiple inflammatory syndrome (MIS), a condition where multiple organs in the body become inflamed.
Jummai’s health rapidly deteriorated and she had to have of her legs amputated
Medical experts are unsure whether the vaccine caused her complications, while her husband searches for answers
Jummai will soon need her hands amputated as well, though her heart has fully recovered
The lying corporate media — guilty of a conspiracy to mass murder millions of human beings — won’t cover Jummai’s story, since all those who are injured by vaccines are immediately blacklisted and smeared by the pharma-controlled media.
And because corrupt government has granted vaccine makers absolute legal immunity against lawsuits over injuries caused by their products, Big Pharma won’t be helping Nache pay any of her long-term care costs or immediate medical costs.
There is a GoFundMe page for Jummai Nache where she has so far raised $127,000 to help cover medical expenses. Note that she will soon need both hands amputated as well, which means her lifetime medical assistance costs will surely be in the many millions of dollars. Please consider supporting her if you are able.
It is critical to note here that the injuries she has sustained are consistent with vaccine-induced blood clots caused by the spike protein, trillions of which are generated in her own cells after an mRNA gene therapy injection. Nache is, technically, a victim of biological warfare, and that same war is being waged against doctors, nurses, government workers and just about every human being across the world.
“Vaxtermination” is the correct term to describe what’s happening today. Human beings are being vaxterminated, and the mass murderers are running the medical institutions, the media, the science journals and the big tech platforms.
Get more details of this vaccine holocaust in today’s Situation Update podcast, via Brighteon.com:
Animal Farm 2.0: Where Some Animals Are More Co-Equal Than Humans
In Butjadingen, Germany, there exists a farm unlike any nearby. It has animals commonly found on farms—cows, chickens, pigs, geese and dogs. However, the farm exists more to serve the animals than to contribute to the food supply.
Hof Butenland, as the place is called, is an animal sanctuary, a kind of retirement home. The farm owners brag that their cows don’t have to produce milk and pigs can sleep late. No animal serves humans, and all co-exist as equals. All the animals have to do is live peacefully in their final years.
At the same time, the farm makes a political and ecological statement about how food is produced. Neighboring farmers see the experiment’s philosophy as a threat to their livelihood. Jan Gerdes and partner Karin Mück, the farm’s legal owners, make no secret that they see their policy of total egalitarianism for all species as a revolutionary move that will help save the planet. They would like to see all farms modeled on theirs.
Animal Farm 2.0
The place is revolutionary. A New York Times feature article paints a glowing picture of life on the farm. The farm takes the scenario in George Orwell’s Animal Farm a step further. The animals have not revolted and taken over the farm, expelling all humans. Instead, the animals are in charge, with humans doing their bidding.
The socialist framework has also been changed and updated. These animals are no longer engaged in the revolutionary struggle. They have advanced to live in a socialist utopia where everything is provided to them. Animals are free to roam the 100-acre farm and live in its red brick barns built in 1841. There are no pigs that dominate the other animals as in Orwell’s story. Everyone gets along in perfect harmony.
The animals in the Butjadingen eco-equal paradise do not have to worry about supporting themselves. Like their eco-socialist human counterparts, they live off other people’s money. The farm survives due to the generosity of rich human outsiders who donate to the enterprise. The funds allow free veterinary care for all while a wind turbine supplies the electricity.
Visitors come to marvel at this pastoral scene of peace and love. They might later send care packages with hand-written notes addressed to a favorite cow or pig, all of which are curiously given human names.
Not All Animals Are Equal
Not every animal can live in Hof Butenland as space is limited. Nor does this carefully fenced-in sanctuary boast of open borders or a mass migration policy. Its privileged occupants are old farm pets, rescue dogs, and abandoned or research animals. The latter enjoy a special status. Indeed, in her violent activist days, farm-owner Karin Mück spent some weeks in solitary confinement in 1985 after breaking into a laboratory to “liberate” its test animals.
However, as in Animal Farm, not all are equal. One species is especially exploited. The humans are constantly working to make sure the animals do not have to work. The land is no idyllic paradise where everything naturally takes care of itself. Two full-time employees are needed to make sure the animals have food, protection and water. When the animals get old, they arrange to have them duly euthanized.
In addition, animal equality at Butjadingen is carefully choreographed. Some animals need not apply. The inescapable reality is that not all animals get along. Some will eat others if given a chance. Thus, no retiring circus lions or worn-out wolves make it to Hof Butenland. The diet is strictly and by necessity vegan…
Hof Butenland is an example of unreal egalitarian schemes. Despite being a farm, it highlights all the leftist themes: political, ecological, or metaphysical. And like all socialist experiments, the farm is an artificial development detached from reality. It survives by living off the economic system it seeks to undermine.
The problem with the farm is not the animals. They are the victims of artificial constructs that seek to put them in human contexts. Such delusional schemes eventually fail because everything against nature fails. Left to itself, the system will fall apart and revert to the savage ways of the wild. The animals at Animal Farm 2.0 could eventually suffer a tyranny far worse than those in George Orwell’s original tale.
In a Handwritten Letter, Pope Francis Endorses Fr. Martin’s Pro-homosexual Activism
On June 21, Pope Francis sent Fr. James Martin, S.J. a handwritten letter praising his “pastoral zeal” in his LGBTQ ministry. Tragically, Father Martin supports the homosexual movement’s agenda to normalize the “intrinsically evil” sin of sodomy.1
Although shocking, the June 21, 2021 letter does not seem to have caused much surprise given Pope Francis’s welcoming position toward homosexuality, one fully shared by his Jesuit confrere.
To better understand and assess the gravity of Pope Francis’s gesture, it seems helpful to place it in context.
According to Vatican News, the Holy See’s news portal, the “letter was sent to coincide with the Outreach LGBTQ Catholic Ministry Webinar, which was held on Saturday [June 26, 2021]. Fr. Martin posted the letter on his Twitter feed on Sunday.”2
Gerard O’Connell, the Vatican correspondent for the Jesuit America Magazine, confirms this information and adds some details: “Pope Francis has again encouraged the ministry of James Martin, S.J., to L.G.B.T. persons, and with words that could also encourage others in this work. He did so on the eve of the Outreach 2021 L.G.B.T. Catholic ministry conference … of which the Jesuit priest was the main organizer. Some weeks ago, Father Martin … had informed the pope about the conference in a private mail and explained its purpose…”3
It is clear from The Tablet’s reporting that Father Martin solicited the pope’s support for the LGBTQ conference and that he shared the letter with the webinar participants: “[t]he Jesuit priest also reminded Francis about a 26 June conference on LGBTQ Catholic ministry. On an earlier occasion, Fr. Martin had asked if Francis would send a message to the online gathering. The Pope’s reply was first shared with the conference participants. After sharing Francis’ letter with the conference, Fr. Martin posted it on social media.”4
There is no reason to doubt the truth of these reports. Pope Francis’s letter was a gesture of support for the pro-homosexual webinar.
The Outreach 2021 LGBTQ Catholic Ministry Webinar
Sponsored by America Media and Jesuit Fordham University’s Center on Religion and Culture, the conference’s title is self-explanatory: Outreach 2021 LGBTQ Catholic Ministry Webinar.
The choice of the conference’s keynote speaker says everything about the event’s orientation. It was none other than “Sr. Jeannine Gramick, S.L., co-founder of New Ways Ministry.” She spoke on “Fifty Years of LGBTQ Ministry.” Another speaker was “Fr. Bryan Massingale, a gay priest and theologian.”5
As is well known, in 1999, with Pope John Paul II’s approval, Sister Gramick was “permanently prohibited from any pastoral work involving homosexual persons” by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. This canonical sanction was imposed because she was against the “intrinsic evil of homosexual acts and the objective disorder of the homosexual inclination.” Her beliefs were deemed “doctrinally unacceptable because they do not faithfully convey the clear and constant teaching of the Catholic Church in this area.”6
Thus, one may conjecture that the Zoom webinar intended to modify, at least through facts, the “clear and constant teaching of the Catholic Church” on homosexual sin.7 In other words, to treat homosexuality as something normal, thus practically obliterating traditional doctrine, without formally denying it.
Informal in its appearance and personal details, the pope’s letter reinforces the idea that the Church is changing its position on this matter.
Pope Francis’s Letter to Father Martin and “Homo-Heresy”
The Vatican News article quotes the pope’s letter as stating: “God’s ‘style’ has three elements … closeness, compassion and tenderness. This is how he comes closer to each one of us. Thinking about your pastoral work, I see that you are continually seeking to imitate this style of God. You are a priest for all men and women, just as God is a Father for all men and women. I pray for you to continue in this way, being close, compassionate and with great tenderness.”8
To say that a priest who labors to change Catholic doctrine on the intrinsic evil of the homosexual act is “continually seeking to imitate this style of God” is tantamount to claiming that God now desires that sin and that those who commit it are united to Him. This is wrong. More precisely, it is a moral heresy that has been called “homo-heresy.”9
On the contrary, the “style of God” never favors sin. Instead, it tries, through Divine grace, to bring the sinner to repentance and the abandonment of sin.
“Pope: Contradiction Turned Into a System”
It seems clear that Pope Francis wrote the letter to support the Outreach 2021 webinar and its pro-homosexual message.
Someone could object, however, that the pope does not really support the homosexual movement since he recently issued or approved two measures that disfavor it, namely:
(1) The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’s response against the blessing of homosexual pairs; and,
(2) The note from the Holy See’s Secretariat of State against the Zan bill in Italy, which, if approved, would establish a homosexual dictatorship that would persecute the Catholic Faith.
Taking a Principled not a Personal Stand
As practicing Catholics, we are filled with compassion and pray for those who struggle against violent temptation to sin, be it toward homosexual sin or otherwise.
We are conscious of the enormous difference between these individuals who struggle with their weaknesses and strive to overcome them and others who transform their sin into a reason for pride, and try to impose their lifestyle on society as a whole, in flagrant opposition to traditional Christian morality and natural law. However, we pray for them too.
According to the expression attributed to Saint Augustine, we “hate the sin but love the sinner.” And to love the sinner, as the same Doctor of the Church explains, is to wish for him the best we can possibly desire for ourselves, namely, “that he may love God with a perfect affection.” (St. Augustine, Of the Morals of the Catholic Church, No. 49, www.newadvent.org/fathers/1401.htm)
In reality, these two measures and the letter to Father Martin are not opposed. They complement each other as the thesis and antithesis in a Hegelian strategy, as we will see below.
For Vatican observer Luigi Accattoli, of the daily Corriere della Sera, the letter is an “image correction” rather than an “orientation correction.” The journalist writes: “The Pope’s new move toward homosexuals has been to support an American Jesuit, James Martin, under attack by the Catholic right…. After the Vatican Secretariat of State issued a ‘note’ to the Italian government on the Zan projected bill, and above all after May’s declaration by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith that ‘blessing’ homosexual couples in church is unacceptable, one can interpret this move as an image correction, rather than a change of orientation.”10
In other words, Pope Francis expressed support to Father Martin to make clear that the two measures above (taken for political reasons) did not change his position toward the homosexual movement.
In an article titled “Pope: Contradiction Turned Into a System,” Prof. Stefano Fontana, Director of the Cardinal Van Thuân International Observatory on Church Social Doctrine, takes the analysis deeper, drawing attention to the pope’s contradictory Hegelian style. Pope Francis acts as if he did not accept the principle of contradiction, which is at the basis of human thought. Prof. Fontana states: “The pope’s letter of support to Father James Martin, a committed supporter of LGBT rights, raises, among other things, a problem of method, that is, living in contradiction as the rule of his ministry. So a few days after the Note of the Secretariat of State challenging the Zan bill, he makes a gesture in the opposite direction.”11
Further on, Prof. Fontana writes:
“Contradictions of this kind have become habitual in this pontificate and characterize it in a very obvious way. If gender ideology is a “mistake of the human mind,” why invite Father Martin to continue working for LGBT rights? If the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has given the German synod specific guidelines on the blessing of gay couples, why does Pope Francis invite the president of the German bishops to continue on the synodal path? Another contradiction: do the episcopal conferences have doctrinal competence or not? And why is it that, when they present at Santa Marta or the Holy Office, contradictions that need to be resolved definitively, the answer is to discuss them?”12
Pope Francis’s contradictory attitudes are numerous and illustrate his Hegelian strategy of doing or saying something at one moment and then doing or saying the opposite soon afterward or, at least, giving that impression.13 By using this dialectical strategy, the homosexual movement’s agenda is advanced, despite the opposition.
Pray for the Church
Just a few days ago, we celebrated the feast of Saints Peter and Paul—the Prince of the Apostles and the Apostle to the Gentiles. Both are united by faith and martyrdom, shedding their blood for the solid building of the Church. Today, when the Immaculate Bride of Christ is going through a terrible crisis allowed by Divine Providence for the punishment of our sins, let us pray to them, asking to share in their fidelity. Let us beseech them to hasten the end of the Church’s great trial.
May Our Lady, Mother of the Church, and who alone conquered all heresies, come quickly to our rescue.
8.Vatican News, op.cit. The article further states, “Pope Francis also thanked Fr. Martin for his pastoral zeal and his ‘ability to be close to people, with the closeness that Jesus had, and which reflects the closeness of God.’”
J’ai presque rigolé quand j’ai lu cette information.
A croire que Bruno le Maire a un frère espagnol… et qu’ils ont là-bas les mêmes mamamouchis qu’ici ce qui n’est pas loin de la réalité puisque rien ne ressemble plus à un mamamouchi européiste d’un pays européen qu’un autre mamamouchi européiste d’un autre pays européen…
Dans le genre crétinerie analytique nous tenons une perle.
Figurez-vous que selon la ministre de l’économie espagnole, « si la croissance est soutenue pendant l’été, nous devrions être proches du niveau d’emploi de février 2020 durant l’automne », a déclaré Nadia Calvino !
Hahahahahahaha.
Y-at-il quelqu’un pour signaler à la ministre que l’Espagne n’a plus de touristes ou si peu, qu’il y a des restrictions et des cas un peu partout et que son économie est désorganisée ?
Non ?
Personne !
Comme en France, la croissance prévue est de 6.5 % !
Hahahahahahahahahahaha….
Ils diront que leurs prévisions ne pouvaient pas prévoir la 4ème vague hahahahaha.
La lutte contre le pass sanitaire et toute obligation vaccinale directe ou indirecte doit être totale parce qu’elle conduit notre classe politique à mettre en place une société de la surveillance totale.
D’un point de vue philosophique et économique, je pense que de la liberté nait la créativité. Et c’est la créativité qui permet de créer les conditions d’une évolution positive de l’humanité. C’est la créativité qui permettra de relever l’ensemble des défis écologiques, techniques, scientifiques auxquels nous serons confrontés tout au long de notre évolution.
Toutes les sociétés qui castrent la créativité des hommes sont des sociétés mortifères et qui terminent toujours dans une forme de pauvreté et de médiocrité au mieux et conduisent à des économies de la subsistance !
« Cela fait 7 jours que des millions de Français sont victimes des premières lois de discrimination, non pas parce qu’ils sont malades, mais non « vaccinés ». Ne les oublions pas ».
Ne vous y trompez pas.
On peut débattre du « vaccin », mais le pass sanitaire comme les obligations castratrices se combattent. Et non, aucun, encore une fois aucun argument n’est recevable lorsque l’on veut « pourrir » la vie de la moitié de la population alors que nous sommes confrontés à une maladie certes grave mais je rappelle qu’il y a des alternatives.
Hier je vous parlais de la la technique de guérilla numéro 1.
1er principe de guérilla économique et pacifique que je vous invite à adopter, à partager et systématiser. La pression psychologique.
Vous êtes en vacances, appelez les activités de votre secteur. « Bonjour Monsieur, Madame, je voulais savoir si nous pouvions venir sans pass sanitaire. Haaa… non, impossible, il faut un pass ? D’accord, je comprends, dans ces conditions nous ne pourrons pas venir. C’est dommage. Bon courage à vous ».
Si nous sommes des milliers à faire cela, nous rendons palpable notre absence de consommateur, nous rendons visible la perte de chiffre d’affaires, et nous affaiblissons le moral de l’adversaire.
Soyez évidemment en toutes circonstances courtois et élégant. Demandez leur également s’ils ont une baisse de la fréquentation… vous les obligerez gentiment à dire que cela ne va pas…
Le principe de la guérilla économique totale est simple.
Rendre le coût du pass sanitaire inacceptable pour l’Etat
Technique numéro 2. Ce sont deux éléments de langage que vous devez répéter inlassablement dans tous vos messages sur les réseaux sociaux, dans vos écrits à vos députés ou sénateurs, dans vos envois aux médias et aux journalistes et de façon plus large dans toutes vos correspondances.
1/ Il y a des alternatives ! Regardez l’exemple de la Suède. Pas de confinement, pas de pass vaccinal exigé source ici avec tableau comparatif de tous les pays européens. Donc ce n’est pas une question sanitaire, mais bien une question politique de réduction des droits et des libertés inacceptable. Répétez et répétez encore qu’il y a des alternatives. Toute la politique gouvernementale est basée sur la peur et l’absence d’alternatives. Montrez que l’on peut faire autrement aidera à gagner la bataille de l’adhésion.
2/ Apprenez au plus grand nombre la définition de la santé selon l’OMS. Il n’y a là rien de complotiste et ce n’est on ne peut plus officiel !
« La santé est un état de complet bien-être physique, mental et social et ne consiste pas seulement en une absence de maladie ou d’infirmité ».
Physiquement on meurt plus de cancer que de Covid… cela ne veut pas dire que le Covid n’est pas grave, cela veut dire que l’on ne peut en aucun cas réduire la santé des gens au Covid ! C’est un mensonge. Pointez-le en toutes circonstances.
La santé c’est aussi un bien-être social. Quel est le bien-être social des sous-citoyens discriminés parce que non-vaccinés ?! Cela rentre en collision directe avec les principes de la santé de l’OMS. Sans intégration sociale il n’y a pas de bonne santé ! La ségrégation est inadmissible quel qu’en soit le motif.
La santé c’est le bien-être mental, alors que les politiques menées par ce gouvernement non seulement ne règlent jamais rien, c’est au mieux mauvais depuis le début, des masques aux mensonges, et les confinements successifs, les couvre-feu et toutes les mesures restrictives de la vie affectent directement la santé mentale de nos concitoyens.
On vous rétorquera alors… il n’y a pas d’alternative !
Reportez-vous alors au premier élément de langage et parlez de la Suède.
En Suède 0 confinement et il reste encore des Suédois car ils ne sont pas tous morts du Covid, et prennent moins d’anxiolytiques que les Français qui sont rendus fous par ce gouvernement.
Gagner les coeurs, gagner l’adhésion.
Les vaccinés ne sont pas nos ennemis, ils sont nos alliés. L’objectif est de les rallier à la réflexion, car le sujet N’EST PAS la vaccination mais le PASS Sanitaire.
Il y en a de plusieurs types.
Le vacciné qui avait très peur. Respectez le, soyez bienveillant et dites lui toujours que la vaccination est un acte intime et que vous êtes heureux pour lui s’il se sent mieux et plus sécurisé.
Le vacciné en marche, vacciné par conviction. Ne perdez pas de temps avec lui. Ils sont très minoritaires. 3% environ.
Les vaccinés forcés et contre leur gré. Ils sont très nombreux et plus l’Etat, avec sa propagande et ses menaces, les pousse à la piqûre, plus ils sont en réalité mécontents. C’est la cible prioritaire de notre communication pour les convaincre que la vaccination est une chose, et que le pass en est une autre.
Laissez la haine au gouvernement !
Faites preuve d’amour envers les autres vaccinés.
Faites preuve de compassion.
Faites preuve de compréhension envers tous ceux qui sont vaccinés ou veulent se vacciner. Ne cherchez jamais à les convaincre de ne pas le faire. C’est un choix intime et chacun doit rester libre de le faire ou pas. Respectez cette liberté, défendez-là. Ce que nous défendons ce n’est pas la vaccination ou son absence, c’est la liberté de choix, celle de choisir ce que l’on se fait injecter ou pas, et c’est l’idée de ne pas subir une discrimination sociale si l’on fait un choix qui ne convient pas à nos dirigeants.
Laissez la haine aux journalistes, aux ministres, au gouvernement et au président.
Parlez sans cesse de leur haine, de leurs excès, de leurs violences. Montrez-les pour ce qu’ils sont.
Montrez qu’ils perdent la tête quand nous, nous la gardons froide.
Il faut rallier au boycott le plus de gens possible pour rendre le coût du pass sanitaire inacceptable pour l’Etat.
Restez pacifique, restez calme, vous n’êtes pas démunis, vous pouvez tous lutter, chacun à votre place, mais plus que tout, vous n’êtes pas seuls. Vous êtes des millions.
Si nous acceptons la discrimination une seule fois pour les non-vaccinés, alors un jour, et en fonction des circonstances, nous l’aurons pour d’autres, d’autres catégories.
Aucune épidémie, je dis bien aucune, n’autorise des politiques à fouler aux pieds nos libertés, notre Constitution et nos principes d’égalité et de liberté.
On lutte au contraire contre les épidémies et contre toutes les épreuves en fonction de nos principes d’égalité et de liberté.
naufrage/sauvetage 
