« Je ne suis pas vaccinée et je soutiens ceux qui manifestent contre le passe sanitaire. On ne peut plus aller au café, prendre l’avion ou le train sans montrer sonAusweis, ce laissez-passer qu’on nous imposait pendant la guerre et que j’ai connu. » Une déclaration fracassante faite à l’occasion d’un entretien accordé à Valeurs actuelles, ce 10 août dernier.
Toujours dans la même veine, Brigitte Bardot persiste et signe : « Nous voilà maintenant avec une Kommandantur élyséenne qui nous remet dans ces conditions. Je trouve ça terrifiant et lamentable. Je propose que les Français fassent une grève des impôts, pour tous ceux qui n’ont plus le droit de vivre normalement, car ils ne sont pas vaccinés. Comme notre argent est porteur de virus, je pense qu’il serait bon de ne pas le donner à l’État. »
Le docteur Roger Hodkinson, vous vous en souvenez peut-être, qualifiait l’an dernier le Covid-19 de « plus grand canular jamais perpétré sur un public sans méfiance ». Il tire de nouveau la sonnette d’alarme au sujet des “vaccins” : « Nous vivons actuellement un cauchemar médical ».OD
(cliquer sur l’image pour voir la vidéo)
« Les scientifiques savent, ils ont juste peur de le dire. » Eminent ancien professeur à l’université de l’Alberta, une des plus grandes du Canada, Roger Hodkinson alerte sur les vaccins et les manipulations des discours face au Covid-19, dont il explique qu’aujourd’hui nous savons que ce n’est « pas pire qu’une mauvaise grippe saisonnière ».
Ancien professeur en pathologie, ancien PDG d’un grand laboratoire commercial, actuellement dirigeant d’une petite entreprise de biotechnologie spécialisée dans les technologies brevetées de diagnostique ADN, le fait d’arme dont il est le plus fier est d’avoir été président honoraire de l’action sur le tabagisme et la santé où il avait alerté sur les dangers du tabac sur les personnes. Il explique tout, « je n’ai plus rien à prouver, j’ai une carrière très bien remplie, je me sens obligé de me lever et de prendre des coups. Dans la grande majorité, je suis triste de le dire, les médecins et scientifiques tombent dans la décision binaire du choix entre l’éthique et le revenu, et choisissent le revenu car ils savent que s’ils se lèvent ils vont se faire massacrer. »
Dans cet entretien, Roger Hodkinson revient sur les discours de peur pour encourager la vaccination et évoque entre autres, les différents scandales autour du Covid-19 tels que Ferguson et les falsifications de Fauci. Un témoignage avec des paroles intenses, pour lui, nous vivons actuellement un « cauchemar médical ».
Un debriefing proposé en partenariat avec BonSens.org
Gold’s “Flash Crash” Explained: Charts, Fundamentals and Familiar Manipulations
August 12, 2021
By Egon von Greyerz
In this 23-minute MAMChat, Matterhorn principals Egon von Greyerz and Matthew Piepenburg address gold’s recent “flash crash” in the context of technicals, fundamentals, and good ol’ fashioned price manipulation from the bullion banks. Toward this end, Egon gives careful attention to the technical indicators and their bullish trends/confirmations while Matthew digs deeper under the hood to reveal the relationship between Basel III regs, bullion bank gold shortages and the motives behind gold’s recent price decline.
Egon then addresses the historical pricing and hence buying opportunities for gold when measured against the broader money supply, confirming that precious metals have never been so seductively undervalued as they are today. For longer-term investors rather than short-term speculators, gold is particularly well priced, positioned and essential in the current backdrop of just staggering debt, market and currency risk. In short, the “flash crash” is merely a buying opportunity.
As to debt risk, debt cycles and the template of increased centralized controls by banks and governments, Matthew walks through the all-too sad yet familiar patterns of debt crises leading to social and economic instabilities which then inevitably usher in increased centralized control over financial and social systems, a trend all too familiar today, as Egon’s personal journey through financial and (hence) gold cycles confirm.
The CDC has clearly and deliberately manipulated the COVID number in Florida obviously for political reasons. They combined several days of numbers to make headlines that Flordia has more COVID cases in a single day than anyone else. Secondly, I went to take a look and I have not seen hospitals overwhelmed. A friend went to the hospital with chest pains yesterday and was turned around within 4 hours with x-rays and an EKG.
One friend whose grandson works in a hospital said many nurses have walked out refusing to be vaccinated. They have argued that they worked for a year with COVID patients unvaccinated. Not it’s a health risk? Video Player00:0000:21
The CDC is totally untrustworthy as is the FDA and the NIH. When Fauci is appearing in a video for Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum saying the #1 problem is not COVID, but inequality, there is just nobody to trust anymore in healthcare in DC.
I have warned from the outset, viruses mutate. They will evolve to defeat a vaccine. The Delta variant is less lethal but spreads easier. Now there is the latest Lambda mutation which is running around South America which is vaccine-resistant. This entire narrative that ONCE every last person in the world is vaccinated, COVID will be defeated and we can return to normal. This is such outrageous FALSE information that should be shut down by YouTube and Facebook but they are in bed with this very conspiracy against humanity. COVID has already infected pets and it is in wildlife. Lions have tested positive in zoos. Basis health class 101 shows that viruses that can infect animals will never be eradicated.
What will happen to the financial markets when they wake up and realize – OMG – there will NEVER be a return to normal because COVID cannot be defeated by these vaccines! I believe it was not China nor the US military that unleashed COVID. It was set free ONLY by the people benefiting from this insanity. The sooner we have a REAL investigation, the sooner the world will wake up! Forget trying to prove the election was rigged, fine the lab person who was paid to release this virus in Wuhan.
The Federal Reserve’s take on the coin shortage says that there are ample coins in the economy, but the banks have also been closed so there was a shortage also created by the fact that businesses could not get coins from a local bank that was operating only in a virtual mode. This also contributed to the problem. So banks, mints, transportation, and mines were all shut down which has created the problem you see in coin shortages, but this similar problem has infected all of the economies. So we have shortages in just about everything.
What COVID has done is tapped into those who prefer welfare and have no problem not working as long as everything is free. Organizations have been formed to keep living for free with no consideration of what that really means to the economy as a whole. They are out in full force to prevent evictions and they only look at this from their perspective. If the landlords are not paid, then they cannot pay their mortgages, and then the banks foreclose. Living free is not a long-term solution but we can easily see how many would love Guaranteed Basic Income with no responsibilities. Without rents, landlords can’t pay mortgages but also repairs. So they will demand landlords repair their place but refuse to pay for anything. What will happen is simple. They will convert private property into state housing and then you will have converted New York City to one giant ghetto.
Everywhere you look there is help wanted signs yet unemployment will not decline. I get a lot of emails from small businesses that cannot go back to normal because there is not enough staff. We even have Judges who have totally lost their mind ordering Maryland must continue to pay the extra unemployment benefits. This is raising unemployment costs in taxes upon those who are working.
You really can’t make up this nonsense. Nobody in their right mind would have created such a system – even a socialist, which would just argue to confiscate property to prevent evictions. Those of us who are working will pay more in taxes to support those who want a free lunch and everything else.
Gold price manipulation is back in the form of a “flash crash“; below we skate through its details and ask: “Why now” and “how’s it done?”
Kneecapping the Competition
Many may remember figure skater Tonya Harding and the infamous pre-Olympic kneecapping of her competitor, Nancy Kerrigan, in 1994.
The scandal was simple: If there’s a stronger athlete on the rink who frightens you, “then take em out.”
Such nefarious deeds may seem unusual, but in the rigged arena of central-bank markets and derivative price fixing, this kind of desperate behavior is, well…par for the course.
When it comes to rigged markets, we’ve written extensively about the open charade which passes daily for “free market price discovery” in a nefarious COMEX trade which, for years, has been the scene of deliberate price fixing on paper gold via cleverly employed swaps, loans and precious metal “leases.”
This is not fable but fact.
Fear of Better Athletes
For the desperate architects behind a global financial system buoyed by increasingly worthless fiat currencies, their greatest fear was and remains that stubborn little athlete which mocks that otherwise pathetic little dollar, namely: Physical gold.
In simpler terms, gold is the Nancy Kerrigan to the dollar’s Tonya Harding.
Gold, after all, is the veritable “anti-dollar” when it comes to an actual and historically-confirmed store of value which can’t be printed/created at will like the Greenback.
This, of course, poses problems for an increasingly discredited financial system which thrives exclusively on both the artificial liquidity and false reputation of that otherwise debased and grotesquely over-created dollar.
Of course, the big boys and the bullion banks (central and commercial) know this.
They also loathe the thought of losing face or admitting their failure and guilt in destroying currencies, supply and demand forces or basic ethics.
For this reason, shady little figures from the BIS to the LBMA have been trying for decades to knee-cap gold’s natural price rise ever since shady little Nixon decoupled the dollar from its golden chaperone in 1971.
By the way, the result of that little “de-coupling” has been a 98% drop in the purchasing power of that dollar when measured against a single milligram of gold.
Stated otherwise, gold is embarrassing the world reserve currency: Its stubborn rise is proof of the dollar’s now open and obvious fall.
Solution? Knee-cap the better asset.
What About Basel 3?
But if the uber-levered COMEX arena was the shady “scene of the crime” for decades of gold kneecapping, why is gold taking yet another dramatic hit in price in this supposed “flash crash” so soon after Basel 3’s recent efforts to clean up the price-rigging smut in the derivatives arena?
In short: What gives?
How did gold “flash crash” from $1761 on a Friday to $1677 by Monday?
Why were billions worth of gold contracts being dumped into the overnight markets with no bidders to catch them in a fall not seen since the infamous “Covid” market implosion of March of 2020?
Or stated otherwise: What sane, institutional sellers would ever make such a concentrated, 24,000-contracts “bid-nuking” trade? What market forces (a jobs report?) would justify or motivate such a deliberate sell-off?
Well, as we see below, there may be a few Tonya Hardings lurking deep within a still very rotten derivatives trading rink conspiring to kneecap gold yet again with a flash crash…
Basel 3: A New Era or Old Tricks?
As we wrote in detail elsewhere, the Basel 3 regs of 2021 marked a new (and needed) era of less and less derivative trading among the commercial banks.
Given that the nominal value of all derivatives traded in 2020 was 7X the value of global GDP (!), such a belt-tightening in derivatives was long overdue.
On its surface, Basel 3 seemed immediately bullish for gold, which had been the victim of decades of deliberate and highly concentrated/levered shorts by a small handful of 8 powerful players against thousands of otherwise less powerful longs.
In other words, Basel 3’s slow removal of the derivative shotgun pointed at gold should have sent its price rising not falling, especially not on the scale of a flash crash and in a backdrop of extreme currency debasement.
So again: What gives?
The Sketchy Side of Derivatives
Part of the answer lies in sifting through some derivative fog. Bear with me…
Derivatives, for example, have more than one flavor or designation.
On the one hand, you have the kind that are traded on regulated exchanges, and on the other, you have the really shady kind that are traded on the OTC (over-the-counter) market, which is just a fancy term for arms-length, unregulated and highly illiquid (i.e., risky) trades.
As a former hedge fund manager, I, and many others in Wall Street, knew the OTC market is where truth and transparency went to die and scheming, front-running and price-fixing options (forwards, swaps, and credits) went to the moon.
In other words, the OTC is a sketchy place,
Despite comical assertions by folks like Larry Summers that derivatives were designed to hedge risk, everyone knew that the OTC arrangements were and are a place where bankers went to expand risk (and credit) not for business reasons but for trading profits.
Fortunately, the Lehman crisis ultimately reminded the world that: a) Larry Summers was bad at both math and honesty, and b) derivatives created rather than hedged risk.
The clever post-08 policy makers lurking behind their heavily lobbied-curtains needed a quick, damage-control response to the sub-prime (i.e., derivatives) crisis, which they achieved with calming semantics.
The “solution” came down to “regulations” which would add two euphemistically charming new words of wisdom to the derivatives quagmire, namely: 1) “high quality risk assets” (i.e., liquid assets) and 2) “net stable funding ratios” (i.e., banks required to have enough assets to cover liabilities).
Seems pretty smart, right? All was safe again, right?
Furthermore, with Basel 3 now requiring banks to have even more safe, liquid “good stuff” and less illiquid, levered “bad stuff” (i.e., too many derivatives), one would assume that real assets would move and price more fairly, including gold, right?
Well, let’s look closer, and you may start to see the reasoning for a flash crash.
Making Derivatives Simple?
Given gold’s fixed supply, its $835B slice of the mega-trillion-dollar derivatives pie seemed like a needle in a haystack.
In fact, at first glance, it would appear that the big boys, including the BIS, were not even concerned about little ol’ gold and its cozy corner of the derivatives trade.
But bankers are clever little foxes guarding their own henhouse, and came up with two intentionally complex ways to classify (and hence distort) the gold derivative trade, which in turn is broken down by two types of complex trading instruments, namely futures contracts and forward contracts.
Thankfully, I will not take you too deeply into those weeds, but suffice it to say that such deliberate complexity makes it nearly impossible for the average guy or gal on the street (or 20-something “financial journalist”) to unpack and hence discredit the sketchy games played on the rink of derivative-distorted gold pricing.
The first level of intentional complexity has to do with futures contracts vs. forward contracts.
Bear with me. It’s not as boring or “smart” as they want you to think it is.
Futures contracts are traded on registered exchanges for which institutional investors and just about anyone else have unfettered access.
Forward contracts, on the other hand, are traded in that shady little OTC market, for which normal investors have far less (if no) permitted access.
Instead, the only athletes allowed on that slippery rink for forward contracts are what are known as “principals” of “unregulated institutions,” which basically just means the big boys—i.e., commercial banks, major family offices, privately-held mega companies, sovereign wealth funds and other financial choir boys like central banks.
These lucky, big-boy “foxes” are allowed to trade forward contracts and do most of their ice-skating in and among other members of the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA), who settle their trades in either London or Zurich.
According to the foxes at the BIS, there were about $530B worth of forward contracts in this members-only rink last year.
Thanks to Basel 3, those banks/players are required to treat their contracts as “unallocated (paper) gold” (i.e., “bad stuff’), which are booked as liabilities on their balance sheets.
But as Basel 3 reminds, those same banks also need to show equal amounts of “good stuff” (i.e., real, physical gold) assets to match their “bad stuff” (paper gold) liabilities.
This means those $530B worth of derivatives (forward contracts) need to either: 1) be slowly removed from their books or 2) converted into “good stuff”—namely,” allocated (physical) gold.”
In sum, the banks need more physical gold to meet Basil 3, and by year end, gold demand (and pricing) among these foxes should be rising, right?
But here’s the embarrassing rub: there’s a very real possibility that those LBMA members don’t actually have enough physical gold assets (8,667 tons) to meet their balance sheet ($530B) paper liabilities. Are you seeing the potential motivations for a flash crash yet?
Banks Need More Gold Tomorrow than they “Report” Today
Unfortunately, however, what bankers say is not entirely a reflection of, well…reality.
Let’s do some armchair auditing and basic math…
The Physical Gold Supply Lie
Over 5,700 of those so-called 9500 “available” tons are held by the Bank of England, which is not in fact an LBMA member.
Yet even if it were, more than half of its “vaulted gold” has been leased out to other central banks.
In short, the required and promised gold just aint really there…
This leaves about 3800 or so tons of actual physical and vaulted gold in actual possession of the LBMA members, of which 1500 tons is already earmarked for gold ETF’s.
This means the actual and available amount of physical gold (roughly 2330 tons) does not meet the required 8667 tons needed to match the $530B of paper gold liability exposure at the LBMA membership club.
Uh-oh?
It would seem, alas, that the foxes don’t have enough real gold to meet the new regs.
Of course, if we wanted to know for sure, we could just check with the LBMA vault audits, right?
But it may surprise you to discover that no such audits have been reported.
This may explain why the LBMA members have been screaming like spoiled children to be granted an exemption from (or a start-date extension of) those pesky Basel 3 regs.
In other words, the member institutions of this insider-banking click don’t appear to own enough physical gold to meet the new regulations, which would suggest that the good ol’ days of the OTC derivative price manipulation of gold are waning.
A Forced “Clean-Up” & Pressure from China
But we are hardly the only ones calling BS on the 50-year derivative price manipulation in the gold space.
The big boys in China were taking note as well, and looking to strategically expand their role as a new zip code for fairer global gold trading.
This is because the Chinese are big fans of physical gold but no fans of US dollar policies (i.e., decades of exported US inflation) and the downward gold price-fixing by a small handful of Western banks.
In short, the Chinese want better price discovery in gold, as they fully recognize its golden future.
This would explain why the most active Chinese bank in London’s gold market, ICBI Standard Bank, recently bought Barclay’s 2,000-ton vault…
You can be sure that China’s growing interest as a better gold trading platform has forced the Bank of England to make an extra effort to repair its reputation (enter Basel 3) by forcing a tighter muzzle on the LBMA in particular, and OTC tricks in general, regardless of all the screaming from London.
More Gold Demand from Banks, Means More “Timely” Manipulation
This means western banks will be forced to buy more gold, as demand for this “barbarous relic” will be greater, rather than less, in the years ahead.
Which brings us back to the initial question above as to why certain parties would suddenly sell $4B (notional) worth of gold into a bid-crushing avalanche to embarrass (i.e., weaken) the gold price by 100 bucks in just 2 trading days?
Could it be that these same old western gold-manipulators wanted to see the price of this asset fall before they had to start buying more of the same? After all, aren’t these the entities that stand to benefit the most from this flash crash?
If that sounds manipulative and sketchy, well, such manipulation and sketchy is nothing new to these Basel 3-trapped banks…
In short, the simple, sad yet unspoken truth is that most commercial and central banks don’t actually have as much gold stored in their own vaults as they claim to have.
That is, they’ve been “fibbing, fudging and faking it” for years, which, again is nothing new and amounts to a basic job description for the bullion banks.
We’ve written elsewhere about this. Most of central bank gold is leased away rather than stored safely at home—and that gold aint coming back, especially from the Chinese…
“Conspiracy Theory” or Just Business as Usual?
In case you think this lack of gold is a conspiracy theory, be reminded that the New York Fed, responsible for storing earmarked gold for foreign central banks, recently refused to allow the Bundesbank and other national banks to inspect their own earmarked gold.
Why the refusal?
Take a wild guess: Because the Fed didn’t actually have enough of it.
The harsh reality is that the central banks, which have between them a declared ownership of 35,544 tons of physical gold, don’t have what they say they have.
Instead, they are concealing old leases, recent swaps and loans, and engaging in outright misappropriation of earmarked gold that simply isn’t where they say it is.
In short, after 50 years of market deception, the jig is up on these banks, and today they need to buy more gold (and fast) to save face. Time for a flash crash?
Why Buy High When You Can Fix the Price Lower?
My cynical yet experienced view is that this most recent tank in gold pricing was yet another price manipulation to make such Basel 3-required gold purchases less expensive and hence less painful for the foxy bankers.
Stated simply, a handful of sketchy banks just manipulated the gold price down so they could buy it on sale rather than on high.
The Official Price Explanations Don’t Fly
The pundits, talking heads and Fed apologists, however, will roll out the standard talking points and attribute the recent and dramatic “flash crash” in gold on positive job reports, technical “death crosses,” rising rates and a stronger dollar.
Ah, the ironies do abound.
If rates are rising, it’s only because inflation is rising faster, which portends rising rather than falling gold prices in the future, something gold investors, rather than speculators, understood long ago.
And as for rising rates strengthening that precious dollar, if you still believe that a dollar drowning in liquidityand sinking toward more rather than less inflation is “strengthening,” please take yet another look at the power of the dollar (and euro) when measured against gold:
Which brings us back to Tonya Harding…
A Darker Truth?
When gold is embarrassing the US dollar with as much visual clarity as the foregoing evidence confirms, the only option left for desperate banks is to break the rules and knee-cap the one thing which is causing them fear and the embarrassment.
The recent kneecapping of gold by those mysterious players in the OTC is nothing more than that: A Tonya Harding moment in the gold market.
Shame on that, and shame on them.
In the end, however, we all know what happens to Tonya.
COMMENT: Hello Mr Armstrong, In regards to your comments on “The-Real-Agenda-Reply”, I’d like to make a remark to where you said that Russia and China will defend their people; I wish that your statement were true but unfortunately, looking at their vaccine policies, either country seems to have the least interest taking up defence for their people. I have many close contacts in China and it is hell bent on vaccinating everyone right down the adolescent, with regionally mandating vaccinations or else… Regarding China and Russia not wanting to join the UN is just charades, for if they officially would, there would be no common enemy for the west or the Middle East for that matter. All governments work together, for I do not believe that China would be so “clumsy” to let Gates, Fauci or whoever leak a virus on their turf without knowing it and, if they truly care, would let this “deliberate slip up” pass… This is my 2 cents on the subject. Thank you for your terrific blog and all you do. God bless you. SR Video Player00:0002:09Video Player00:0000:21
REPLY: Don’t misunderstand me. I am not talking about nation-states that will put their people first. They will NOT surrender their power to this United Nations/WEF Cabal. My statement of thanking God for China and Russia is only in the context that they will stand up against other equally dangerous forces. Here we have Fauci saying he is not concerned about our LIBERTY and then he appears in a video of the World Economic Forum claiming that “inequality” is our #1 problem – not COVID.
BOARD MEMBERS OF WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM
Leyen resigned to take charge of EU so it didn’t look so conspiratorial
The World Economic Forum has all the key players in its pocket. This BUILD-BACK-BETTER slogan was created by the WEF and it was rolled out at the Davos meeting in January 2019. John Kerry said at DAVOS – ‘Normal wasn’t working.’ Even Gates bought BioNTech in September 2019 two months before the global assault with COVID which is like the Flu and there is NO VACCINE that will ever eradicate COVID. If you ever paid attention in health class, you would have learned that Smallpox could be eradicated BECAUSE it was not from animals. Any virus that is in animals provides the reservoir needed for it to always return. COVID has been found in 40% of the deer population so there will NEVER be an end to COVID. Because politicians have used this for political change, it means they will NEVER admit this was a scam so what is the end game? Do we remain with masks and social distancing forever to prevent civil protests and revolutions?
This nonsense that getting vaccinate will eliminate COVID shows that not everyone is plain stupid. The CDC recommendations have been inconsistent. The CDC then tells vaccinated people to wear masks and social distance and the White House tried to explain why this did not cover up a lie to start with. The CDC claimed if you were vaccinated there was a small risk of getting COVID. First, the Military says all personnel must be vaccinated, then when they realize there is huge resistance that changes the policy and says they can apply for an exception. Then because the vaccines are not working, the FDA approves now the third shot.
What happens to the financial markets when they wake up and realize that REAL SCIENCE says there will never come a day to eradicate COVID and as such, there will NEVER be a return to normal.
So in this context, Russia and China will stand in the way of this dream of creating a one-world government. For that, I am thankful. But this is NOT going to end nicely and we will most likely end up in war against Russia and Chins because, in truth, they stand in the way of this cabal.
(Natural News) Last Friday, the Governor of Tennessee signed an executive order authorizing the National Guard to medically kidnap unvaccinated people at gunpoint and forcibly take them to covid “involuntary internment” camps across the state. Now, new details have emerged about a similar plan initially launched by the CDC in 2020, which calls for nationwide covid concentration camps to be operated at the “camp / sector level” which will be populated by individuals designated “high-risk” who are forcibly ripped from their families and homes to be imprisoned by the CDC.
Among other horrors, this CDC document openly calls for separating couples and families, then admits this action will cause extreme psychological trauma among Americans who are targeted and ripped from their homes to be placed in covid concentration camps:
[I]n addition to the risk of stigmatization and feeling of isolation, this shielding approach may have an important psychological impact and may lead to significant emotional distress, exacerbate existing mental illness or contribute to anxiety, depression, helplessness, grief, substance abuse, or thoughts of suicide among those who are separated or have been left behind.
These CDC covid camps, the document explains, will be strictly-enforced prison camps called “green zones,” and the CDC explains that, “No movement into or outside the green zone” will be tolerated. It’s not clear how the CDC plans to enforce this, but it seems rather obvious that this will involve armed guards and physical security measures such as chain-link fences or razor wire.
The CDC considers unvaccinated people to be “high-risk,” which means Americans may be targeted for medical kidnapping and covid camp imprisonment merely for refusing to take deadly, experimental vaccines.
This shocking development is covered in today’s Situation Update via Brighteon.com:
About the author: Mike Adams (aka the “Health Ranger“) is a best selling author (#1 best selling science book on Amazon.com called “Food Forensics“), an environmental scientist, a patent holder for a cesium radioactive isotope elimination invention, a multiple award winner for outstanding journalism, a science news publisher and influential commentator on topics ranging from science and medicine to culture and politics. Follow his videos, podcasts, websites and science projects at the links below.
Mike Adams serves as the founding editor of NaturalNews.com and the lab science director of an internationally accredited (ISO 17025) analytical laboratory known as CWC Labs. There, he was awarded a Certificate of Excellence for achieving extremely high accuracy in the analysis of toxic elements in unknown water samples using ICP-MS instrumentation. Adams is also highly proficient in running liquid chromatography, ion chromatography and mass spectrometry time-of-flight analytical instrumentation. He has also achieved numerous laboratory breakthroughs in the programming of automated liquid handling robots for sample preparation and external standards prep.
The U.S. patent office has awarded Mike Adams patent NO. US 9526751 B2 for the invention of “Cesium Eliminator,” a lifesaving invention that removes up to 95% of radioactive cesium from the human digestive tract. Adams has pledged to donate full patent licensing rights to any state or national government that needs to manufacture the product to save human lives in the aftermath of a nuclear accident, disaster, act of war or act of terrorism. He has also stockpiled 10,000 kg of raw material to manufacture Cesium Eliminator in a Texas warehouse, and plans to donate the finished product to help save lives in Texas when the next nuclear event occurs. No independent scientist in the world has done more research on the removal of radioactive elements from the human digestive tract.
Adams is a person of color whose ancestors include Africans and American Indians. He is of Native American heritage, which he credits as inspiring his “Health Ranger” passion for protecting life and nature against the destruction caused by chemicals, heavy metals and other forms of pollution.
Adams is the author of the world’s first book that published ICP-MS heavy metals analysis results for foods, dietary supplements, pet food, spices and fast food. The book is entitled Food Forensics and is published by BenBella Books.
In addition to his lab work, Adams is also the (non-paid) executive director of the non-profit Consumer Wellness Center (CWC), an organization that redirects 100% of its donations receipts to grant programs that teach children and women how to grow their own food or vastly improve their nutrition. Through the non-profit CWC, Adams also launched Nutrition Rescue, a program that donates essential vitamins to people in need. Click here to see some of the CWC success stories.
With a background in science and software technology, Adams is the original founder of the email newsletter technology company known as Arial Software. Using his technical experience combined with his love for natural health, Adams developed and deployed the content management system currently driving NaturalNews.com. He also engineered the high-level statistical algorithms that power SCIENCE.naturalnews.com, a massive research resource featuring over 10 million scientific studies.
« Après avoir usé et abusé d’un faux libéralisme, la réorganisation sociétale semble promettre de ressusciter le modèle soviétique, au profit de privés cette fois. » Coup d’Etat planétaire
Les vaccinés tombent malades et les cas peuvent bien finir à l’hôpital. Ce qui précède converge avec l’information suivante qui nous parvient du CDC. Voici un extrait de son rapport hebdomadaire publié le 6 août 2021
En juillet 2021, 469 cas de COVID-19 associés à plusieurs événements estivaux et à de grands rassemblements publics dans une ville du comté de Barnstable, Massachusetts, ont été identifiés parmi les résidents du Massachusetts ; la couverture vaccinale parmi les résidents éligibles du Massachusetts était de 69 %. Environ les trois quarts (346 ; 74 %) des cas sont survenus chez des personnes complètement vaccinées (ceux qui avaient terminé un cycle de 2 doses de vaccin à ARNm [Pfizer-BioNTech ou Moderna] ou avaient reçu une dose unique de vaccin Janssen [Johnson & Johnson] ≥14 jours avant l’exposition).
Le séquençage génomique d’échantillons de 133 patients a identifié la variante B.1.617.2 (Delta) du SRAS-CoV-2, le virus qui cause le COVID-19, chez 119 (89 %) et la sous-lignée Delta AY.3 chez un (1 %). Dans l’ensemble, 274 (79%) patients vaccinés avec une infection déclarée étaient symptomatiques.Parmi les cinq patients COVID-19 qui ont été hospitalisés, quatre ont été entièrement vaccinés ; aucun décès n’a été signalé.
Les valeurs de seuil (Ct) du cycle de transcription inverse-amplification en chaîne par polymérase (RT-PCR) en temps réel dans les échantillons de 127 personnes vaccinées présentant des cas déclarés étaient similaires à celles de 84 personnes non vaccinées, pas complètement vaccinées ou dont le statut vaccinal était inconnu (médiane = 22,77 et 21,54, respectivement).
IMPORTANT RAPPEL
le CDC avait modifié les valeurs de seuil des cycles Ct pour les gens vaccinés.
Retour au rapport du CDC. La variante Delta du SARS-CoV-2 est hautement transmissible (54, respectivement). La variante Delta du SARS-CoV-2 est hautement transmissible (54, respectivement). La variante Delta du SARS-CoV-2 est hautement transmissible (1 ); la vaccination est la stratégie la plus importante pour prévenir les maladies graves et les décès. Le 27 juillet, le CDC a recommandé à toutes les personnes, y compris celles qui sont entièrement vaccinées, de porter des masques dans les lieux publics intérieurs dans les zones où la transmission du COVID-19 est élevée ou substantielle.*
Les résultats de cette enquête suggèrent que même les juridictions sans COVID-19 important ou élevé -19 pourrait envisager d’étendre les stratégies de prévention, y compris le masquage dans les lieux publics intérieurs, quel que soit le statut vaccinal, étant donné le risque potentiel d’infection lors de la participation à de grands rassemblements publics qui incluent des voyageurs de nombreuses régions avec des niveaux de transmission différents.
Et voici l’illustration de ce qui précède par le graphique. Nous voyons dans l’échantillonnage l’imposante présence de personnes vaccinées. Le rapport en défaveur des vaccinés devraient être encore plus important si on pondérait le nombre de résidents vaccinés (69%) par rapport au nombre de personnes vaccinés infectées (74%).
FIGURE 1. SARS-CoV-2 infections (N = 469) associated with large public gatherings, by date of specimen collection and vaccination status* — Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021
Abbreviation: MA DPH = Massachusetts Department of Public Health. * Fully vaccinated was defined as ≥14 days after completion of state immunization registry–documented COVID-19 vaccination as recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7031e2.htm?s_cid=mm7031e2_w
Quid des personnes non vaccinées qui ont déjà été en contact avec le virus?
Les chiffres pencheraient en faveur des personnes non vaccinées naturellement immunisées par contact avec le virus. Ces personnes seraient bien plus résistantes à la chose et à ses nouveaux variants. L’explication de texte nous vient de Futura Science (ICI)
Ré-infections au coronavirus : une mauvaise interprétation ou une défaillance des tests ?
Pourtant, plusieurs médias ont rapporté le cas de patients ayant été ré-infectés par le coronavirus. Le site chinois Caixin indiquait, par exemple, le 25 février que 14 % des personnes guéries du Covid-19 dans la ville de Guangdong, au sud du pays, avaient été testées à nouveau positives à l’issue de tests ultérieurs. Au Japon, le gouvernement a rapporté le cas d’une patiente ayant été soignée à l’hôpital et testée positive plusieurs semaines après.
En réalité, il ne s’agit probablement pas de ré-infection, mais plutôt d’une infection prolongée. La revue scientifique The Lancet indique que la charge virale peut perdurer jusqu’à 37 jours dans l’organisme. Autre hypothèse, une défaillance des tests : la sensibilité des tests de dépistage PCR (par analyse ARN) serait de seulement 53 % à 88 %. Il est aussi possible que les échantillons aient été mal conservés ou que la charge virale soit insuffisante pour être détectée.
Une étude chinoise menée sur des macaques ré-infectés avec le virus SARS-CoV-2 après la disparition d’une première infection se veut d’ailleurs plutôt rassurante : aucun des singes n’a développé de symptômes de la maladie ni de nouvelle charge virale, « ce qui suggère qu’une infection primaire protège effectivement du virus», indique l’étude.
Convergence avec les dires d’une sommité de la cardiologie et de l’édition scientifique
La chose est confirmée par le cardiologue et expert auprès du Sénat US, le Dr Peter McCullough dans une vidéo intitulée COVID Vaccine Has Likely Killed 45,000 and Injured Half a Million
La morale de l’histoire est d’oser choisir (si on a les moyens physiques) l’immunité naturelle
Alors me direz-vous comment se faire soigner au cas où on attraperait cette saleté (le mot qui convient)? Eh bien les Israéliens nous livrent la réponse dans un article du Jerusalem Post:
Mais alors me direz-vous pourquoi ne pas tenter le traitement?
La réponse est simple: Big Pharma ne le veut pas. Nous aurons l’occasion de revenir sur le sujet avec des éléments tangibles.
Morale de l’histoire: la peur du virus se comprend, mais la peur du vaccin ne peut être occultée. Or, à ce jour, l’Ivermectine et le protocole mis en place par des professionnels de la santé non formatés par la haute finance semble offrir une solution plus probante que les problèmes posés à court et surtout à moyen et long terme par une injection dont on ne sait rien.
Documentez-vous svp. Ecoutez tous les sons de cloche. Les gens qui vont à contre courant ne sont pas tous conspirationnistes ou complotistes. Il y a des scientifiques de 1 er plan sincères et qui ne dorment plus la nuit à cause de ces produits injectés massivement. Ecoutez ou ré-écoutez cette star allemande du domaine qui est à la retraite et qui a un enfant en bas âge. Il est sincère et fiable. 2 caractéristiques qu’un commercial de Big pharma risque de ne pas vous offrir: https://odysee.com/@Roms17:d/MESSAGE-URGENT-du-Dr-Sucharit-Bhakdi—Tout-%C3%A0-dire:6?
« Nous sommes en 2021 et on n’en a pas encore fini avec le coronavirus. La menace d’un nouveau confinement arrive. Tout le monde regarde vers l’Angleterre et leur nouveau variant. Ce qu’on va voir dans cette vidéo c’est si l’épidémie de COVID-19 est vraiment plus mortelle que la grippe de 2017 et de combien est l’écart. Je vous annonce tout de suite qu’en faisant tous les calculs j’ai complètement halluciné.
Dans la vidéo précédente, je vous avais montré où aller chercher les données des personnes décédées pour faire vous-même les calculs et arrêter de vous faire manipuler par des journalistes qui ne maîtrisent absolument pas les chiffres et ont juste pour but de faire le plus peur possible, parce que c’est vendeur. A l’aide de ces chiffres je vous avais montré que l’épidémie de coronavirus n’a que très légèrement augmenté la mortalité et seulement pour les plus âgés. Les moins de 65 ans ne sont pas du tout plus décédés en 2020 qu’en 2019 et les plus de 65 ans, un peu plus.
J’expliquais sur cette vidéo que les décès supplémentaires que l’on voit en 2020 viennent surtout de la pyramide des âges de la France. Les français vieillissent avec notamment les célèbres baby-boomers. Même si la plupart des personnes regardant ma vidéo ont eu des critiques positives, j’ai regardé en détail ce que disaient les commentaires. En l’occurrence, 2 internautes, au milieu de leurs insultes me reprochent de mettre trop de poids au phénomène démographique. Ils disent que les 30 000 décès montrés comme liés au Covid-19 en mars-avril sont une preuve irréfutable que la Covid-19 est extrêmement dangereuse et mortelle. J’ai donc creusé la question et étudié en détail les chiffres de décès par âge. Pour ça, j’ai comparé l’épisode de grippe de 2017 à l’épisode de Covid-19. Je vous avoue que je ne m’attendais absolument à ce que j’ai découvert. J’étais complètement scotché. En faisant cette comparaison vous allez voir qu’il ne faut plus dire que la Covid-19 est un peu plus mortelle qu’une grippe. La Covid-19 est en fait moins mortelle qu’une grippe. La seule raison pour laquelle nous avons eu une surmortalité plus forte en 2020 qu’en 2017, c’est uniquement que parce que les gens sont plus vieux.
Préparez-vous à tomber de votre chaise, on y va. »
About the author: Mike Adams (aka the “
naufrage/sauvetage 