We need your help today to defend persecuted pro-life and pro-family heroes from corrupt pro-abortion politicians. LifeSite has been around for 25 years, and we’ve always defended the truth, no matter the cost. Will you join our international mission by giving today?
(LifeSiteNews) — The City of Calgary, Alberta is attempting to draft a new bylaw that would limit pro-lifers from distributing pamphlets that show the horrors of abortion.
On Thursday, an executive committee is to hear a notice of motion that calls for a new bylaw to be drafted in regard to the pro-life practice of showing abortion victim imagery, often done through pamphlets distributed in mailboxes. The new bylaw, if passed, would require pro-lifers to conceal the pamphlets that show the graphic horrors of abortion within envelopes that warn the recipient of what is inside.
“We have to say that this is unacceptable,” Calgary Ward 2 Councilor Jennifer Wyness said Sunday in an interview with Postmedia. “People do not deliver pornography to get a message across and yet somehow this organization continues to do something that I would equate to pornography.”
“If this image were to go on the six o’clock news, it has to be blurred. If you were to publish it in your newspaper, it has to be blurred,” Wyness went on. “This image is regulated across all other platforms for public consumption, except when this organization chooses to put it on your front door.”
Wyness believes that concealing abortion imagery and providing a warning will help protect families who have suffered miscarriages or abortions from experiencing the so-called “trauma” that she says such images inflict on them.
“Children that find these images before the parents have questions about, ‘Well, what is that?’ Parents have to engage in sex education with children maybe before the child is ready, or the family is ready to engage in that conversation,” said Wyness, despite the fact that sex education in Alberta begins in Grade 4.
Calgary previously tried to limit abortion victim photography from being put in mailboxes by rewriting a bylaw in 2016 to make it illegal for anyone to put pamphlets into mailboxes where people have a “no junk mail” sign.
Calgary is also not the first city to push for a bylaw to require pro-life pamphlets to be concealed in an envelope. The city of London, Ontario already instated such a bylaw in 2021, wherein they require pro-life organizations to enclose their images of aborted children in envelopes that contain an explicit warning of what is contained within.
London’s Bill 259 2021 states that “no one shall send a graphic image of a fetus by mail or otherwise distribute such an image unless the image is contained in an opaque envelope, the exterior of the envelope includes a description of the contents, and the exterior of the envelope clearly identifies the sender. The penalty for violating this prohibition is a fine of $100 per image.”
The City of Toronto also attempted to curb the distribution of pro-life imagery in June, when Councilor Mike Layton motioned for the Toronto City Council to find some way of stopping the images from being circulated.
“Those are images that can come back to haunt children,” Layton said. “I’ve got two small girls, six and four, and I don’t want them seeing that imagery before we walk them home to go to bed.”
subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada World Catholic
“I don’t want them going to going to high school and having that kind of fear mongering happening outside of their high school, which could deter them from getting medical treatment if they were in a position that they would be seeking an abortion,” he went on to say.
Toronto has not yet come out with a bylaw that prevents or limits the circulation of abortion victim photography or that requires that it be hidden in an envelope.
Leave a legacy today!Now is your chance to join the LifeSiteNews family and leave a legacy that your loved ones will cherish forever. Support LifeSiteNews right now, and leave a legacy of life for your children, grandchildren, and beyond. Join with a $25 monthly gift to celebrate our 25th anniversary.
We need your help today to defend persecuted pro-life and pro-family heroes from corrupt pro-abortion politicians. LifeSite has been around for 25 years, and we’ve always defended the truth, no matter the cost. Will you join our international mission by giving today?
DENVER (LifeSiteNews) – A suspect has been arrested for the recent vandalism of a pro-life Catholic medical clinic in Denver.
On Saturday, the pro-life Catholic medical clinic Bella Health + Wellness in Englewood posted on Facebook asking for prayers for its staff and its clients in light of a vandalism attack on its clinic earlier that day.
“We are sad to have to share that our clinic was just vandalized,” the clinic’s Facebook post read. “If you could take a moment today to pray for our mission, our team and their families, and our patients, we would be grateful!”
The clinic also asked for people’s help to repair the damage done to their building before the clinic’s patients would begin to arrive the next day. It provided a link in the post for people to donate.
“Thank you for your prayers and support,” the post continued. “We will continue to stand strong in our mission to protect life and care for families.”
Satanic vandalism at Bella Health + Wellness, Denver/Facebook
The clinic shared pictures of the vandalism, which showed red lines obscuring the clinic’s logo on the glass front doors. Beside the doors, a message seemingly reading “ic RED ALL is Boy!” The vandalizer also spray painted messages on the clinic’s flower beds, as well as drawing various images including a demonic looking face on the clinic’s dumpster bin with the word “SATAN” scrawled next to it.
The incident was seemingly resolved quickly. Sunday night, the clinic posted a huge “thank you” to the Englewood police department, saying that they had rounded up the person responsible for the vandalism.
“Update on our clinic’s vandalism – huge thanks to the Englewood Police Department for finding and arresting the person who vandalized our building!” the clinic said. “We are so thankful for their hard work, sacrifices, and commitment to keeping Bella and our community safe! Thank you Englewood police officers!”
Leave a legacy today!Now is your chance to join the LifeSiteNews family and leave a legacy that your loved ones will cherish forever. Support LifeSiteNews right now, and leave a legacy of life for your children, grandchildren, and beyond. Join with a $25 monthly gift to celebrate our 25th anniversary.
We need your help today to defend persecuted pro-life and pro-family heroes from corrupt pro-abortion politicians. LifeSite has been around for 25 years, and we’ve always defended the truth, no matter the cost. Will you join our international mission by giving today?
Abp. Viganò: The Italian people have rejected globalism, now Prime Minister Meloni must deliver
We know that today’s politicians do not have the gift of honoring the commitments they have made to their electorate. Can we reasonably think that Giorgia Meloni will want to review her pro-globalist positions, returning to the role of being a true right-wing alternative to the woke left?
(LifeSiteNews) – The new political situation that emerges from the recent Italian elections confirms the common feeling of the electorate that some were able to grasp in advance. After two years of disturbing violations of the most elementary rights, and after two governments that have shown us that they are simply obeying the orders of supranational entities who act against the interests of Italy and the Italian people, the vote that has brought into power the so-called center-right, led by the political party Fratelli d’Italia, has unequivocally expressed support for a precise political line that goes far beyond the modest proposals of the program of the coalition parties.
This is evident above all from the fact that within this alliance there has been a redistribution of consensus in favor of that party that has been instinctively deemed worthy of the vote as the only opposition party. A very moderate opposition, but still an opposition, more in the perception of the average citizen than in reality.
The so-called “anti-system” parties, fragmented and convinced that they could overcome the three-percent barrier that would have permitted them sitting in Parliament, have about one million voters when taken all together. This is due both to the decision – by no means a coincidence – of the resigning government to convene the electoral rallies in the middle of summer; as well as to the very low visibility granted to them by the mainstream media; and to the lack of consistency of their program, whose credibility and feasibility seemed unconvinced and therefore destined to the dispersion of the vote.
Another hard-hearted guest is the abstentionist party, which stands at around 36 percent, but which sees within itself different and opposite motivations difficult to reduce to simply a generic “dissent.” It is therefore completely out of place, in my opinion, to mobilize abstention politically, attributing its representation in phantom non-voting parties, precisely because the choice not to go to the polls also implies the choice of not having any political representation.
Certainly, most of the abstainers express the will not to accept taking part in a game, so to speak, in which the rules are decided by others. But to these must also be added those who do not vote due to trivial disinterest, or more simply – and this seems to me to be the case of the majority – because they are disgusted by a political class that has proven to be unworthy and corrupt beyond words. In this, Fratelli d’Italia was partly saved because it had the caution to remain in the opposition, often inert or complicit, but at least officially outside the outgoing Draghi government.
On the other hand, the Partito Democratico [PD], the emblem of the radical chic Left that has never been sufficiently abhorred – and which has replaced the class struggle against the bosses with the struggle between those who are poor fueled by the globalist elite – has not been saved either.
The Democraticos have combined the worst of communist collectivism with the worst of consumer liberalism, in the name of an agenda that benefits the high finance lobby using emergencies like pandemics, energy crises, and wars with the sole purpose of destroying the traditional social fabric. Not that the other parties present together with the PD in the last government were better: the blow suffered in the elections by Lega, Forza Italia, and other minor parties is directly proportional to the ways in which they have betrayed those who have voted for them. And if the absolute inconsistency of Minister of Foreign Affairs Luigi Di Maio was definitively sanctioned by his lack of re-election, it is clear that former Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte was able to benefit from the incentive – at the limit of the exchange vote – of the citizenship income: his demonstrated ineptitude did not change the voting intentions of a bevy of far from disinterested clients.
Many of the votes lost by the PD have poured into Fratelli d’Italia, and this further confirms the expectations of those who have chosen the right-wing of Giorgia Meloni not for what it is, but for what it potentially can be; not for what she has said it will do, but for what everyone actually expects her to do. They voted for Meloni to defend those sound basic principles of civil coexistence, palely inspired by the social doctrine of the Catholic Church, but which Italians are not willing to give up: protection of the natural family, respect for life, security and the fight against illegal immigration, an end to gender and “LGBTQ+” indoctrination for minors, freedom of enterprise, the presence of the state in strategic assets, a greater weight in European affairs and – God willing! – the exit from the euro and the return to national sovereignty.
In short, Meloni is expected to behave like the leader of a moderate right-wing party, tendentially conservative, moderately sovereigntist. Nothing extreme – certainly not extreme Right – in spite of the alarmist proclamations of the Left; but at least not aligned with a NATO-prone Atlanticism or the suicidal Europeanism that characterized the action of the Draghi government, nor elected out of ideological fury against the destruction of civilization, culture, religion, and the identity of the Italian people.
— Article continues below Petition —
Join Bishops in calling out Pope Francis’ statement for contradicting the faith
1922 have signed the petition.
Let’s get to 2500!
Add your signature:
Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
According to some observers, the new movements – either deliberately or simply allowing themselves to be used by the system – have merely formed a fictitious opposition, making them prefer the logic of “holding their noses” by voting for Fratelli d’Italia. But in truth there are actually two fictitious oppositions: one internal to the system, Atlanticist and pro-European, and one external and divided into various parties, nominally anti-European and anti-Atlanticist, but composed of characters with a past that is inconsistent, to say the least, with the new programs. Many candidates of these anti-system movements were certainly honest people, largely homines novi, but it is undeniable that their presence has failed to convince those who consider it urgent not only to give a signal of strong discontent, but to see this discontent translate in the short term into incisive and determined government actions that remedy the disasters of the two previous legislatures.
Lega and Forza Italia have had a significant hemorrhage of voters, in my opinion motivated by the prostration of their leaders and key figures on the pandemic narrative and the Ukrainian crisis: Matteo Salvini and Silvio Berlusconi decided to obey the European Union (EU), the World Health Organization, NATO, and the diktats of their World Economic Forum puppet masters. An evil choice, as we have seen, which has been severely punished at the polls, but which remains largely shared also by Giorgia Meloni, who is a member of the Aspen Institute (which is part of the Rockefeller Foundation) and is openly Atlanticist and pro-European.
subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada World Catholic
In essence, the disconnect between voters and elected representatives, between citizens and the political class, has been repeated in the form of “desire,” so to speak, attributing to Fratelli d’Italia a role that the party itself has declared for weeks that it does not want to assume, since it does not intend to question either the policies of the EU or the aims of NATO and the American deep state. It is as if the average Italian had decided to vote for Meloni despite her being openly in continuity with the Draghi agenda, as if to force her hand so that – by virtue of an overwhelming majority – she gets bold and takes those steps that until the eve of the elections she promised not to take.
And just as there are some who fear that Meloni will behave “like a fascist” and who for this reason cry out for the democratic emergency threatening expatriation, so there are many – certainly all the voters of Fratelli d’Italia – who hope and pray that she acts as an Italian, as a patriot, and as a Christian. And they will know how to overlook the fact that in order to get to the Palazzo Chigi [the see of the prime minister] she gave reassurances that in reality she could deny in fact. It remains to be seen whether the first female prime minister will be able to distinguish herself from her predecessors or if she will prefer to bow to the deep state and continue the betrayal of the Italian people.
On the other hand, if the democratic vote must sanction those who represent the will of the sovereign people, Meloni herself cannot fail to take into account the fact that her voters demand radical choices from her, and that they consider her pre-election moderation simply as a strategic move to reassure “the markets.” Choices that even many members of Lega and Forza Italia would look upon favorably, beyond the vaccine or warmongering zeal of this or that parliamentarian or governor.
Salvini’s own words of remorse – just a few days before the vote – regarding the approval of lockdowns and the vaccine obligation betray his awareness that the deliberate suicide of these parties by their leaders has been badly digested by the grassroots. The same thing is happening in Fratelli d’Italia, where Meloni’s position on sending arms to Ukraine and on sanctions against Russia is not shared by one part of her party, both because it is blatantly self-defeating and because it is based on the false supposition that the international interlocutors will remain the same, without any significant changes. It is not absolutely certain that the Democrats will retain power in the U.S. mid-term elections in November, or that the investigations of Special Counsel John Durham will not involve President Joe Biden and his family, along with other Democrat politicians, in the scandals that are now emerging in the American mainstream. And it is not certain that the interventionist policy of the EU and NATO in Ukraine will remain unchanged in the face of evidence of the repeated bombardments by Zelensky against the civilians in Donbass and the Russian-speaking regions of Ukraine, in the face of the success of referendums calling for annexation by Russia, and the way that sanctions [against Russia] have been a total disaster for European countries.
Finally, the contiguity of the Biden administration with Kiev could lead to a chain reaction of changes, in which Biden sees the precarious electoral consensus he enjoys further eroded, making support for the puppet government desired by Biden’s Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland cease and consequently allowing for peace negotiations which, until now, have been stubbornly hindered by Washington. And given Donald Trump’s political clout and his declared hostility to the American deep state, a peacemaking deal would certainly be closer and more enduring if he were to return to the White House.
We know that today’s politicians do not have the gift of honoring the commitments they have made to their electorate. Nonetheless, can we reasonably think that Italy’s next prime minister will want to review her pro-Atlantic and European positions, returning to the role of being a true right-wing alternative to the hegemony of ordoliberalism and the woke left? In this case, it would be the voters who would benefit from it, and those who saw themselves “betrayed” would have no right to claim the violation of Italy’s pacts of submission to the European Commission, since they had no right to stipulate them in the first place. The “betrayal” of the powers hostile to Italy would be a virtuous action, since it would restore the sovereignty that has been usurped by the elite.
Conversely, obeying the elite and not following the interests of the nation would be an act of betrayal by the new government against those who have voted it into power. If the elite can be expected to boycott Italy (by means of spreads, interest rates, withdrawal of the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan [PNRR]) it is to be feared that the people, betrayed for the umpteenth time, in a condition of growing poverty and the deliberate persecution of businesses and workers, will barricade and protest as a result of their exasperation, something that we see the first signs of in other countries. In evaluating the costs and benefits, I want to hope that the Meloni government will not want to be complicit in this subversive operation which damages our country.
It is difficult to believe that the financial oligarchy has not taken this possibility into account. It is easier to believe that it was precisely in order to manage the exit strategy and contain the damage both on the front of the pandemic and vaccine fraud as well as on the front of the Great Reset, the digital transition and the green emergency that is strongly desired by the World Economic Forum (for ideological reasons) and by China (for economic reasons).
It seems to me that many people are becoming aware of the very serious coup d’état that is being carried out by supranational powers, capable of interfering with a heavy hand with the activities of governments and international bodies. The world of business and work is beginning to understand the deliberate action of destruction of the national economic fabric that has been carried out, first by COVID and then by the war in Ukraine. Every decision, every rule, every decree imposed by Draghi – with or without a parliamentary vote – has been deliberately chosen in order to cause the greatest damage possible for citizens, for companies, for employees, for pensioners, and for students. Anything that would have avoided deaths, full hospitals, closed businesses, and increases in unemployment has been scientifically excluded, carrying out instead whatever action would be most devastating, in blatant contrast to the announced goals.
Today we see thousands of companies which consume vast amounts of energy destined to suspend production or completely close down because the outgoing Draghi government does not intend to stop the scandalous speculation of [Italian multinational oil company] ENI on the price of energy that it also pays for at prices that are ten times lower. The market is being allowed to reign unchallenged, so that the Amsterdam stock exchange can destroy the economy of nations, disproportionately enrich multinational corporations, and serve the interests of the elite that is pressing for the establishment of a technological dictatorship in compliance with the United Nations’ Agenda 2030. An agenda that, today, is the object of indoctrination in the schools beginning in the elementary grades, and which ties PNRR funding to reforms and new unsustainable spending cuts.
If the globalist narrative is beginning to show signs of abating, especially among the classes that are normally the most influenced by the mainstream, those who hold power – real power, I mean – have probably already prepared for the next scenario, and are organizing a plan to sacrifice the scapegoats who, inevitably, the crowd will want to see on the chopping block. It will thus get rid of those inconvenient accomplices who are no longer useful, satisfying the people’s thirst for justice and even presenting themselves in the role of savior and moral authority.
The chosen victims will clearly be the most zealous apostles of the psycho-pandemic, the “virostars” [fake celebrity virologists] in conflicts of interest, some institutional representatives and perhaps a few “philanthropists” whom by condemnation the elite could also eliminate as their most annoying competitors. And it is not to be excluded that Bergoglio himself, the endorser of gene serums and the high priest of neo-pagan globalism, will fall victim to the execration of Catholics, who are tired of being treated as enemies, just as citizens are exasperated by the hostility of their rulers.
Giorgia Meloni is, for the moment, a potential prime minister. She is such for those who expect Fratelli d’Italia to be the voice of that true and motivated dissent against the entire political class and, as such, acts with strength and determination without allowing itself to be intimidated. She is a potential prime minister for those who have decided to grant her the trust that others have repeatedly disappointed and betrayed. This is an irrational gesture, motivated by growing concern for the fate of the nation and by the idea that an overwhelming majority in Parliament can give the new government certainty of action to make strong choices, for which it will obtain support from the electorate, to which it must respond as an expression of the will of the people. She is a potential prime minister because the two preceding prime ministers were anything but leaders, since they were simply the serving boys for Ursula Von der Leyen, Klaus Schwab, or Joe Biden.
If Giorgia Meloni really wants to be prime minister in actuality and not only potentially, she must first of all stand up against those who have not been elected by anyone and yet presume the power of giving stamps of political presentability to democratically elected heads of government whenever they find themselves in very serious conflicts of interests, beginning with Von der Leyen’s text messages to Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla [negotiating a megadeal for vaccines], continuing with the membership of world leaders in the World Economic Forum and concluding with Biden’s involvement in the financing of NASA biolabs in Ukraine and in the affairs of the main energy company in Kiev.
Italy is a nation that can recover, as it has always done in the past, if she learns how to recover the pride of her true identity, her true history, and her true destiny in the plans of divine providence. For decades, the Italian people have suffered as a result of decisions taken elsewhere, which have brought them nothing but damage and humiliation. The moment has come to raise our heads, to reject with disdain the “resilience” that requires us to be beaten without reacting.
The dystopian world of globalism must be rejected and fought against not only for our own sakes, but also for the sake of our children, to whom each of us wishes to leave a peaceful future with solid economic prospects for raising a family, without feeling marginalized or criminalized because we do not accept resigning ourselves to subversive plans that have been made by those who want to make us eat insects and force us into slavery, with the sole purpose of making us poor and controlling us in every aspect of our daily lives.
But this – I say this as a pastor, addressing myself in particular to Catholics – will be possible only if Italians recognize that the justice, peace, and prosperity of a nation can be obtained only where Christ reigns, where His law is observed, and where the common good is placed ahead of personal profit and the thirst for power. Let us turn to the Lord, and the Lord will know how to reward our faithfulness. Let us turn with confidence to Mary Most Holy, our Heavenly Mother, asking her to intercede with Her Son for our beloved Italy.
Leave a legacy today!Now is your chance to join the LifeSiteNews family and leave a legacy that your loved ones will cherish forever. Support LifeSiteNews right now, and leave a legacy of life for your children, grandchildren, and beyond. Join with a $25 monthly gift to celebrate our 25th anniversary.
Abp. Viganò: The Italian people have rejected globalism, now Prime Minister Meloni must deliver
We know that today’s politicians do not have the gift of honoring the commitments they have made to their electorate. Can we reasonably think that Giorgia Meloni will want to review her pro-globalist positions, returning to the role of being a true right-wing alternative to the woke left?
(LifeSiteNews) – The new political situation that emerges from the recent Italian elections confirms the common feeling of the electorate that some were able to grasp in advance. After two years of disturbing violations of the most elementary rights, and after two governments that have shown us that they are simply obeying the orders of supranational entities who act against the interests of Italy and the Italian people, the vote that has brought into power the so-called center-right, led by the political party Fratelli d’Italia, has unequivocally expressed support for a precise political line that goes far beyond the modest proposals of the program of the coalition parties.
This is evident above all from the fact that within this alliance there has been a redistribution of consensus in favor of that party that has been instinctively deemed worthy of the vote as the only opposition party. A very moderate opposition, but still an opposition, more in the perception of the average citizen than in reality.
The so-called “anti-system” parties, fragmented and convinced that they could overcome the three-percent barrier that would have permitted them sitting in Parliament, have about one million voters when taken all together. This is due both to the decision – by no means a coincidence – of the resigning government to convene the electoral rallies in the middle of summer; as well as to the very low visibility granted to them by the mainstream media; and to the lack of consistency of their program, whose credibility and feasibility seemed unconvinced and therefore destined to the dispersion of the vote.
Another hard-hearted guest is the abstentionist party, which stands at around 36 percent, but which sees within itself different and opposite motivations difficult to reduce to simply a generic “dissent.” It is therefore completely out of place, in my opinion, to mobilize abstention politically, attributing its representation in phantom non-voting parties, precisely because the choice not to go to the polls also implies the choice of not having any political representation.
Certainly, most of the abstainers express the will not to accept taking part in a game, so to speak, in which the rules are decided by others. But to these must also be added those who do not vote due to trivial disinterest, or more simply – and this seems to me to be the case of the majority – because they are disgusted by a political class that has proven to be unworthy and corrupt beyond words. In this, Fratelli d’Italia was partly saved because it had the caution to remain in the opposition, often inert or complicit, but at least officially outside the outgoing Draghi government.
On the other hand, the Partito Democratico [PD], the emblem of the radical chic Left that has never been sufficiently abhorred – and which has replaced the class struggle against the bosses with the struggle between those who are poor fueled by the globalist elite – has not been saved either.
The Democraticos have combined the worst of communist collectivism with the worst of consumer liberalism, in the name of an agenda that benefits the high finance lobby using emergencies like pandemics, energy crises, and wars with the sole purpose of destroying the traditional social fabric. Not that the other parties present together with the PD in the last government were better: the blow suffered in the elections by Lega, Forza Italia, and other minor parties is directly proportional to the ways in which they have betrayed those who have voted for them. And if the absolute inconsistency of Minister of Foreign Affairs Luigi Di Maio was definitively sanctioned by his lack of re-election, it is clear that former Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte was able to benefit from the incentive – at the limit of the exchange vote – of the citizenship income: his demonstrated ineptitude did not change the voting intentions of a bevy of far from disinterested clients.
Many of the votes lost by the PD have poured into Fratelli d’Italia, and this further confirms the expectations of those who have chosen the right-wing of Giorgia Meloni not for what it is, but for what it potentially can be; not for what she has said it will do, but for what everyone actually expects her to do. They voted for Meloni to defend those sound basic principles of civil coexistence, palely inspired by the social doctrine of the Catholic Church, but which Italians are not willing to give up: protection of the natural family, respect for life, security and the fight against illegal immigration, an end to gender and “LGBTQ+” indoctrination for minors, freedom of enterprise, the presence of the state in strategic assets, a greater weight in European affairs and – God willing! – the exit from the euro and the return to national sovereignty.
In short, Meloni is expected to behave like the leader of a moderate right-wing party, tendentially conservative, moderately sovereigntist. Nothing extreme – certainly not extreme Right – in spite of the alarmist proclamations of the Left; but at least not aligned with a NATO-prone Atlanticism or the suicidal Europeanism that characterized the action of the Draghi government, nor elected out of ideological fury against the destruction of civilization, culture, religion, and the identity of the Italian people.
— Article continues below Petition —
Join Bishops in calling out Pope Francis’ statement for contradicting the faith
1914 have signed the petition.
Let’s get to 2500!
Add your signature:
Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
According to some observers, the new movements – either deliberately or simply allowing themselves to be used by the system – have merely formed a fictitious opposition, making them prefer the logic of “holding their noses” by voting for Fratelli d’Italia. But in truth there are actually two fictitious oppositions: one internal to the system, Atlanticist and pro-European, and one external and divided into various parties, nominally anti-European and anti-Atlanticist, but composed of characters with a past that is inconsistent, to say the least, with the new programs. Many candidates of these anti-system movements were certainly honest people, largely homines novi, but it is undeniable that their presence has failed to convince those who consider it urgent not only to give a signal of strong discontent, but to see this discontent translate in the short term into incisive and determined government actions that remedy the disasters of the two previous legislatures.
Lega and Forza Italia have had a significant hemorrhage of voters, in my opinion motivated by the prostration of their leaders and key figures on the pandemic narrative and the Ukrainian crisis: Matteo Salvini and Silvio Berlusconi decided to obey the European Union (EU), the World Health Organization, NATO, and the diktats of their World Economic Forum puppet masters. An evil choice, as we have seen, which has been severely punished at the polls, but which remains largely shared also by Giorgia Meloni, who is a member of the Aspen Institute (which is part of the Rockefeller Foundation) and is openly Atlanticist and pro-European.
subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada World Catholic
In essence, the disconnect between voters and elected representatives, between citizens and the political class, has been repeated in the form of “desire,” so to speak, attributing to Fratelli d’Italia a role that the party itself has declared for weeks that it does not want to assume, since it does not intend to question either the policies of the EU or the aims of NATO and the American deep state. It is as if the average Italian had decided to vote for Meloni despite her being openly in continuity with the Draghi agenda, as if to force her hand so that – by virtue of an overwhelming majority – she gets bold and takes those steps that until the eve of the elections she promised not to take.
And just as there are some who fear that Meloni will behave “like a fascist” and who for this reason cry out for the democratic emergency threatening expatriation, so there are many – certainly all the voters of Fratelli d’Italia – who hope and pray that she acts as an Italian, as a patriot, and as a Christian. And they will know how to overlook the fact that in order to get to the Palazzo Chigi [the see of the prime minister] she gave reassurances that in reality she could deny in fact. It remains to be seen whether the first female prime minister will be able to distinguish herself from her predecessors or if she will prefer to bow to the deep state and continue the betrayal of the Italian people.
On the other hand, if the democratic vote must sanction those who represent the will of the sovereign people, Meloni herself cannot fail to take into account the fact that her voters demand radical choices from her, and that they consider her pre-election moderation simply as a strategic move to reassure “the markets.” Choices that even many members of Lega and Forza Italia would look upon favorably, beyond the vaccine or warmongering zeal of this or that parliamentarian or governor.
Salvini’s own words of remorse – just a few days before the vote – regarding the approval of lockdowns and the vaccine obligation betray his awareness that the deliberate suicide of these parties by their leaders has been badly digested by the grassroots. The same thing is happening in Fratelli d’Italia, where Meloni’s position on sending arms to Ukraine and on sanctions against Russia is not shared by one part of her party, both because it is blatantly self-defeating and because it is based on the false supposition that the international interlocutors will remain the same, without any significant changes. It is not absolutely certain that the Democrats will retain power in the U.S. mid-term elections in November, or that the investigations of Special Counsel John Durham will not involve President Joe Biden and his family, along with other Democrat politicians, in the scandals that are now emerging in the American mainstream. And it is not certain that the interventionist policy of the EU and NATO in Ukraine will remain unchanged in the face of evidence of the repeated bombardments by Zelensky against the civilians in Donbass and the Russian-speaking regions of Ukraine, in the face of the success of referendums calling for annexation by Russia, and the way that sanctions [against Russia] have been a total disaster for European countries.
Finally, the contiguity of the Biden administration with Kiev could lead to a chain reaction of changes, in which Biden sees the precarious electoral consensus he enjoys further eroded, making support for the puppet government desired by Biden’s Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland cease and consequently allowing for peace negotiations which, until now, have been stubbornly hindered by Washington. And given Donald Trump’s political clout and his declared hostility to the American deep state, a peacemaking deal would certainly be closer and more enduring if he were to return to the White House.
We know that today’s politicians do not have the gift of honoring the commitments they have made to their electorate. Nonetheless, can we reasonably think that Italy’s next prime minister will want to review her pro-Atlantic and European positions, returning to the role of being a true right-wing alternative to the hegemony of ordoliberalism and the woke left? In this case, it would be the voters who would benefit from it, and those who saw themselves “betrayed” would have no right to claim the violation of Italy’s pacts of submission to the European Commission, since they had no right to stipulate them in the first place. The “betrayal” of the powers hostile to Italy would be a virtuous action, since it would restore the sovereignty that has been usurped by the elite.
Conversely, obeying the elite and not following the interests of the nation would be an act of betrayal by the new government against those who have voted it into power. If the elite can be expected to boycott Italy (by means of spreads, interest rates, withdrawal of the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan [PNRR]) it is to be feared that the people, betrayed for the umpteenth time, in a condition of growing poverty and the deliberate persecution of businesses and workers, will barricade and protest as a result of their exasperation, something that we see the first signs of in other countries. In evaluating the costs and benefits, I want to hope that the Meloni government will not want to be complicit in this subversive operation which damages our country.
It is difficult to believe that the financial oligarchy has not taken this possibility into account. It is easier to believe that it was precisely in order to manage the exit strategy and contain the damage both on the front of the pandemic and vaccine fraud as well as on the front of the Great Reset, the digital transition and the green emergency that is strongly desired by the World Economic Forum (for ideological reasons) and by China (for economic reasons).
It seems to me that many people are becoming aware of the very serious coup d’état that is being carried out by supranational powers, capable of interfering with a heavy hand with the activities of governments and international bodies. The world of business and work is beginning to understand the deliberate action of destruction of the national economic fabric that has been carried out, first by COVID and then by the war in Ukraine. Every decision, every rule, every decree imposed by Draghi – with or without a parliamentary vote – has been deliberately chosen in order to cause the greatest damage possible for citizens, for companies, for employees, for pensioners, and for students. Anything that would have avoided deaths, full hospitals, closed businesses, and increases in unemployment has been scientifically excluded, carrying out instead whatever action would be most devastating, in blatant contrast to the announced goals.
Today we see thousands of companies which consume vast amounts of energy destined to suspend production or completely close down because the outgoing Draghi government does not intend to stop the scandalous speculation of [Italian multinational oil company] ENI on the price of energy that it also pays for at prices that are ten times lower. The market is being allowed to reign unchallenged, so that the Amsterdam stock exchange can destroy the economy of nations, disproportionately enrich multinational corporations, and serve the interests of the elite that is pressing for the establishment of a technological dictatorship in compliance with the United Nations’ Agenda 2030. An agenda that, today, is the object of indoctrination in the schools beginning in the elementary grades, and which ties PNRR funding to reforms and new unsustainable spending cuts.
If the globalist narrative is beginning to show signs of abating, especially among the classes that are normally the most influenced by the mainstream, those who hold power – real power, I mean – have probably already prepared for the next scenario, and are organizing a plan to sacrifice the scapegoats who, inevitably, the crowd will want to see on the chopping block. It will thus get rid of those inconvenient accomplices who are no longer useful, satisfying the people’s thirst for justice and even presenting themselves in the role of savior and moral authority.
The chosen victims will clearly be the most zealous apostles of the psycho-pandemic, the “virostars” [fake celebrity virologists] in conflicts of interest, some institutional representatives and perhaps a few “philanthropists” whom by condemnation the elite could also eliminate as their most annoying competitors. And it is not to be excluded that Bergoglio himself, the endorser of gene serums and the high priest of neo-pagan globalism, will fall victim to the execration of Catholics, who are tired of being treated as enemies, just as citizens are exasperated by the hostility of their rulers.
Giorgia Meloni is, for the moment, a potential prime minister. She is such for those who expect Fratelli d’Italia to be the voice of that true and motivated dissent against the entire political class and, as such, acts with strength and determination without allowing itself to be intimidated. She is a potential prime minister for those who have decided to grant her the trust that others have repeatedly disappointed and betrayed. This is an irrational gesture, motivated by growing concern for the fate of the nation and by the idea that an overwhelming majority in Parliament can give the new government certainty of action to make strong choices, for which it will obtain support from the electorate, to which it must respond as an expression of the will of the people. She is a potential prime minister because the two preceding prime ministers were anything but leaders, since they were simply the serving boys for Ursula Von der Leyen, Klaus Schwab, or Joe Biden.
If Giorgia Meloni really wants to be prime minister in actuality and not only potentially, she must first of all stand up against those who have not been elected by anyone and yet presume the power of giving stamps of political presentability to democratically elected heads of government whenever they find themselves in very serious conflicts of interests, beginning with Von der Leyen’s text messages to Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla [negotiating a megadeal for vaccines], continuing with the membership of world leaders in the World Economic Forum and concluding with Biden’s involvement in the financing of NASA biolabs in Ukraine and in the affairs of the main energy company in Kiev.
Italy is a nation that can recover, as it has always done in the past, if she learns how to recover the pride of her true identity, her true history, and her true destiny in the plans of divine providence. For decades, the Italian people have suffered as a result of decisions taken elsewhere, which have brought them nothing but damage and humiliation. The moment has come to raise our heads, to reject with disdain the “resilience” that requires us to be beaten without reacting.
The dystopian world of globalism must be rejected and fought against not only for our own sakes, but also for the sake of our children, to whom each of us wishes to leave a peaceful future with solid economic prospects for raising a family, without feeling marginalized or criminalized because we do not accept resigning ourselves to subversive plans that have been made by those who want to make us eat insects and force us into slavery, with the sole purpose of making us poor and controlling us in every aspect of our daily lives.
But this – I say this as a pastor, addressing myself in particular to Catholics – will be possible only if Italians recognize that the justice, peace, and prosperity of a nation can be obtained only where Christ reigns, where His law is observed, and where the common good is placed ahead of personal profit and the thirst for power. Let us turn to the Lord, and the Lord will know how to reward our faithfulness. Let us turn with confidence to Mary Most Holy, our Heavenly Mother, asking her to intercede with Her Son for our beloved Italy.
« Je rappelle au ministre de l’Intérieur que les députés sont les représentants du peuple et qu’il insulte ainsi des millions de Français. Ses propos sont contraires aux valeurs de la République », s’insurgeait Marine Le Pen au début du mois de juillet, après que Gérald Darmanin avait qualifié son groupe législatif d’ennemis. Ainsi donc, la cheffe du principal parti d’opposition, réputé « d’extrême droite » se réclame-t-elle aujourd’hui des « valeurs de la République ». Rien de surprenant, dira-t-on. Peut-être, mais alors cela veut dire que le discours « républicain » a entièrement triomphé dans ce pays et que plus aucune alternative ne peut être présentée à ce type de régime.
Or, malgré le lavage de cerveau mis en place depuis au moins la IIIe République et son école obligatoire (rappelons que l’école gratuite, elle, existait depuis fort longtemps, au moins depuis Jean-Baptiste de La Salle et ses frères des écoles chrétiennes, c’est-à-dire depuis le XVIIe siècle en France), il devrait être possible et pour la raison et pour le coeur d’imaginer une autre forme de gouvernement, plus juste, plus adaptée à la France, à son mouvement profond et à son âme. Une forme de gouvernement qui permette simultanément plus de grandeur et plus de souci du peuple.
Car qu’est-ce que la République française, celle-là que l’extrême droite a combattue durant deux siècles jusqu’à ce que, semble-t-il, faute de combattants elle finisse elle-même par s’y ranger ? Est-ce, la République, ce simple triomphe de la liberté et de l’égalité qu’on nous vend toute la journée, est-ce moins, est-ce plus ?
La République est née ici d’un coup de force prolongé, sanglant, araseur, qui renversa tout sur son passage, et qu’on appelle la Révolution française. Que les premiers promoteurs de cette révolution – Mirabeau, Lafayette – n’aient pas d’abord songé à l’établissement de la république et que la monarchie ait résisté trois ans aux bouleversements n’empêche que, et même si la révolution n’est pas un bloc contrairement au mot de Clemenceau, un profond mouvement se soit établi en elle qui semble n’avoir jamais été arrêté pour aller vers un nouveau type de régime où ce qu’on appelle le peuple est censé avoir le dernier mot et que l’on a qualifié de république. Mais à quel prix ce chambardement a-t-il été réalisé et pour quels beaux résultats ?
D’abord au prix de la guerre à outrance, justifiée par l’établissement d’un État qui accapare tous les droits, tous les pouvoirs, encore une fois au nom du peuple qu’il prétend représenter purement et simplement. Jean-Clément Martin, le grand historien de la période, le raconte ainsi : « Le moment révolutionnaire a ainsi justifié la violence au nom d’un État à prétention universelle et dans une perspective eschatologique. Il s’est en outre appuyé sur les premières innovations techniques qui ont changé la nature de la guerre et ont accompagné la massification des affrontements : les exemples pourraient être le ballon d’observation de la bataille de Fleurus ou les expérimentations scientifiques ayant permis la mise au point des obus de marine. L’illustration du changement passe par la professionnalisation des armées, l’exclusion définitive des femmes des troupes, l’emploi de la pique et aussi, significativement, la fin de la place de la danse dans la formation des officiers. La mobilisation générale de la population et l’usage de la technique sont dorénavant requis par les États pour régler leurs différends ».
Mais l’érection de cet État s’est surtout doublée d’un écartement de toute autre source de légitimité, de morale ou de justice. Le rôle que jouait auparavant l’Église catholique comme pouvoir spirituel, accompagnant, contredisant le pouvoir temporel et parfois le réduisant dans ses prétentions, a été entièrement aboli. Ce qui s’est nommé par la suite laïcité a en réalité accompli exactement l’inverse du but recherché, non plus une distinction des besoins de l’homme, mais une hégémonie à vocation totalitaire de l’un des pouvoirs sur l’autre, jusqu’à entièrement en faire disparaître l’efficace. L’homme est réputé ne plus se nourrir que de pain désormais, et cela seuls l’État ou le marché savent le réguler et sont réputés en connaître la mécanique. L’homme nu, donc, tout seul dans son froc, et en même temps dans la main visible de l’État ou dans la main invisible du marché. On peut prendre cet exemple au passage d’un décret d’août 1792 abolissant les congrégations, notamment enseignantes, « considérant qu’un État vraiment libre ne doit souffrir aucune corporation, pas même celles qui, vouées à l’enseignement public, ont bien mérité de la patrie ».
Cet homme seul, quand bien même il croyait être au pouvoir, fut broyé par la machine révolutionnaire mise en branle : 96 conventionnels périrent de mort violente, soit 12% de l’Assemblée même. En l’an II et III, il n’en siège plus guère que la moitié – les autres étant morts, ou en prison, ou cachés à la campagne par prudence. Durant la période d’un an et demi environ qu’on désigne comme la Terreur, plus de 17 000 personnes sont guillotinées en France. L’historien René Sédillot estime à 2 millions les morts dans les guerres de la République et de l’Empire. C’est peut-être ce genre de chose qui faisait dire à Joseph de Maistre, dès 1797 : « Il y a dans la Révolution française un caractère satanique qui la distingue de tout ce qu’on a vu et peut–être de tout ce qu’on verra ».
Poursuivra-t-on avec cette Lettre au Comité de Salut Public, qui glace encore le sang aujourd’hui ? « Il n’y a plus de Vendée ! Elle est morte sous notre sabre libre, avec ses femmes et ses enfants. Je viens de l’enterrer dans les marais et dans les bois de Savenay. J’ai écrasé les enfants sous les pieds de mes chevaux, massacré les femmes qui n’enfanteront plus de brigands. Je n’ai pas un prisonnier à me reprocher. J’ai tout exterminé. Nous ne faisons pas de prisonniers, car il faudrait leur donner le pain de la liberté, et la pitié n’est pas révolutionnaire…. Les routes sont semées de cadavres. Il y en a tant que sur plusieurs points ils font des pyramides ». Ainsi le général François Westermann, dantoniste et considéré comme « indulgent » qui sera à ce titre bientôt guillotiné, rendait-il compte à Paris de ses hauts faits, conformes d’ailleurs aux instructions de la Convention qui, par décret du 2 août 1793, « avait ordonné la destruction systématique et l’incendie de tout le pays, récoltes comprises, en même temps que la mise à mort des rebelles ».
La révolution ne fut qu’un mauvais moment à passer nous rétorquera-t-on, et la République, elle, fera flamber la torche de la liberté au-dessus du monde entier. Voire. Outre son instabilité consubstantielle (quatre fois, elle tomba en 150 ans), la République française s’est illustrée surtout par sa corruption, ses méthodes de police, sa rapacité et ses coteries. Rappelons rapidement : les crimes ignobles de la Première ; la chute rapide la Seconde ; le hasard de la IIIe, adoptée à une voix près ; les pleins pouvoirs votés à Pétain ; le coup d’État de 1958 qui instaura la dernière. Mais encore, pour les oublieux : l’affaire des fiches ; l’affaire Dautriche ; Panama ; l’assassinat de Marius Plateau ; l’affaire Stavisky. Etc.
Non, si de grands hommes, parce qu’ils furent de grands Français, ont pu la servir et mourir pour la patrie, la République avec quoi l’on nous bassine chaque jour ne mérite vraiment pas tant de respect. Mode de gouvernement provisoire, il est temps de se demander comment et par quoi la remplacer.
Quand les conséquences commencent à en apparaître aux yeux de tous, après la défaite de 1870, le sociologue conservateur Frédéric Le Play l’explique par le « régime de désagrégation de la famille issu de la Terreur et du Code civil » : le partage égalitaire des héritages est un encouragement à l’enfant unique.
la conscription, la levée en masse précisément, la « guerre totale » (Robespierre)
C’est le même qui popularisa la guillotine et l’hémicycle du Palais-Bourbon, sur le modèle du « théâtre anatomique », c’est-à-dire le lieu où l’on dissèque. Inspiré de la forme des temples protestants, il s’agit de valoriser l’oeil. C’est un panoptique. La République parlementaire est une chirurgie.
On notera l’opposition du pouvoir législatif, ouvert au public et à tous les vents, au pouvoir exécutif, lui renfermé, restreint, secret.
Quand les conséquences commencent à en apparaître aux yeux de tous, après la défaite de 1870, le sociologue conservateur Frédéric Le Play l’explique par le « régime de désagrégation de la famille issu de la Terreur et du Code civil » : le partage égalitaire des héritages est un encouragement à l’enfant unique.
la conscription, la levée en masse précisément, la « guerre totale » (Robespierre)
C’est le même qui popularisa la guillotine et l’hémicycle du Palais-Bourbon, sur le modèle du « théâtre anatomique », c’est-à-dire le lieu où l’on dissèque. Inspiré de la forme des temples protestants, il s’agit de valoriser l’oeil. C’est un panoptique. La République parlementaire est une chirurgie.
On notera l’opposition du pouvoir législatif, ouvert au public et à tous les vents, au pouvoir exécutif, lui renfermé, restreint, secret.
Profession de foi de IdL: *Je suis libéral, c’est à dire partisan de la liberté individuelle comme valeur fondamentale. *Je ne crois pas que libéralisme soit une une théorie économique mais plutôt une théorie de comment appliquer le Droit au capitalisme pour que ce dernier fonctionne à la satisfaction générale. *Le libéralisme est une théorie philosophique appliquée au Droit, et pas à l’Economie qui vient très loin derrière dans les préoccupations de Constant, Tocqueville , Bastiat, Raymond Aron, Jean-François Revel et bien d’autres; *Le but suprême pour les libéraux que nous incarnons étant que le Droit empêche les gros de faire du mal aux petits,les petits de massacrer les gros mais surtout, l’Etat d’enquiquiner tout le monde.
« Il y a un ordre du jour plus important qui guide tout ça. Et il concerne la vie et la mort… Ces gens essaient littéralement de nous tuer… Parce que, et c’est un autre point qu’il faut que les gens comprennent, ils ont infiltré tous les niveaux de la société. Et ça fait 30 ans qu’ils le font. C’est pour ça que tout le monde agit au même rythme… Ils ont été très bons dans ce qu’ils ont fait… Nous devons comprendre que nous ne pouvons pas faire confiance à nos dirigeants car ce ne sont pas nos dirigeants. Ce sont des gens qui ont été infiltrés dans le système judiciaire, la médecine, l’économie, la politique… Nous ne pouvons compter que sur nous-mêmes. Nous éloigner du système… Les balayer quand nous en avons l’occasion… toutes ces ONG, ces corporations, qui sont déjà en train de s’effondrer. Créer nos propres communautés autosuffisantes et nous connecter les uns aux autres. C’est ce qui nous donne du pouvoir ».
Deux annonces ont circulé dans les derniers jours de ce mois d’août qui faisaient encore réagir la presse subventionnée il y a quelques mois seulement : l’Agence Européenne du Médicament (AEM) a annoncé examiner un nouveau vaccin anti-Covid faisant intervenir des nanotechnologies. D’autre part, l’un des représentants du Forum Économique de Davos a exprimé l’idée « qu’il existe des raisons solides et rationnelles de micropucer les enfants ». À leurs yeux, la population semble être prête à accepter l’inacceptable et c’est ce qui ferait la force de la troïka du Forum Économique Mondial (FEM) et de ses ambassadeurs. Récapitulatif d’une manipulation basée sur un agenda bien huilé.
L’Agence européenne du Médicament (AEM) examine un « vaccin » antiCovid à base de nanotechnologies
Un nouveau « vaccin » anti-covid, nommé Skycovion, conçu par le laboratoire pharmaceutique britannique GSK et le sud-coréen SK Bioscience (SK Chemicals selon les sources) est actuellement soumis à l’examen de l’AEM. L’information serait banale si le fabricant n’avait pas annoncé l’utilisation — et donc l’injection — de nanotechnologies introduites dans son produit.
La presse évoque plutôt l’utilisation de nanoparticules, mais il y a souvent une confusion entre nanotechnologies et nanoparticules. Ces dernières sont déjà utilisées dans les injections actuellement commercialisées comme les liposomes (enveloppe lipidique) qui protègent le matériel injecté et c’est admis par la presse grand public. Ce qui ne l’est pas – pas davantage par les fabricants de l’industrie pharmaceutique et les autorités de régulation sanitaire – c’est la présence d’oxyde de graphène auquel nous avons consacré un dossier, mais aussi de nanotechnologies destinées à créer un nanoréseau intracorporel, ce qu’on appelle un « wireless body area network » déjà utilisé en médecine de pointe.
Pour l’instant, aucune information n’est vraiment disponible sur le contenu de ce produit et il ne faut pas s’attendre à une réelle transparence tant sur la nature des nano éléments que sur leur programmation (cf. ci-dessous nanoparticules auto-assemblées) ou sur l’adjuvant utilisé. L’EMA donne pour l’instant une information à minima :
Skycovion est un vaccin à nanoparticules autoassemblées ciblant le domaine de liaison au récepteur de la protéine de pointe du Sars-Cov 2 […], développé conjointement avec l’Institut de Conception de Protéines de l’Ecole de médecine de l’université de Washington, en combinaison avec l’adjuvant de GSK.
Ce n’est pas la présence de nanoparticules en soi qui pose problème, mais la nature de ces particules (l’oxyde de graphène est particulièrement toxique, on pourrait le retrouver « officiellement dans ce vaccin ; l’EMA ne donne cependant aucune indication) ainsi que l’utilisation de nanotechnologies.
L’usage de micropuces sous-cutanées couplé à la vaccination avait en revanche été démenti par la presse à un moment où il y avait confusion auprès de l’opinion publique sur ces deux technologies.
Le FEM annonce la justification du micropuçage des enfants
C’est dans un article du FEM daté du 16 août 2022 qui fait l’éloge du transhumanisme et de la réalité augmentée que l’on peut lire la promotion du micropuçage présenté comme une évolution naturelle :
Aussi effrayants que puissent paraître les implants de puces, ils font partie d’une évolution naturelle qu’ont connue autrefois les articles à porter. Les prothèses auditives ou les lunettes qui ne sont plus stigmatisées.
Bien sûr les intentions cachées restent cachées et il ne sera pas expliqué aux populations que les nanotechnologies qui ont déjà été injectées aux populations via les « vaccins » anti-Covid couplés à une micropuce sous-cutanée permettront d’influencer et de diriger leur comportement. Les progrès de la bio-informatique permettent de pirater l’esprit d’une personne, ce que la très grande majorité des citoyens considère comme de la science-fiction. Et pourtant.
Relayé par Aube digitale, le contenu de l’article du FEM précise également que la micropuce sera relayée par les influenceurs.
Cette technologie a besoin « d’un soutien, d’une vision et d’une audace appropriés », qui seront bien sûr fournis par vos suzerains technocrates, les mêmes personnes qui tentent désespérément de censurer l’internet pour ne pas être critiquées.
« La technologie d’augmentation sera utile à toutes les étapes de la vie : les enfants dans un environnement d’apprentissage, les professionnels au travail et les personnes âgées ambitieuses. Les possibilités sont multiples », écrit Philips.
« Devriez-vous implanter une puce de suivi à votre enfant ? », demande le scientifique, qui ajoute : « Il existe des raisons solides et rationnelles à cela, comme la sécurité. »
Tout est dit. Leur objectif est de prendre le contrôle des enfants. Les personnes âgées sont formatées et elles ont peu d’intérêt selon les déclarations de la caste dans le Nouvel Ordre des Barbares, la « vaccination » permet de justifier l’accès aux enfants, aux nouvelles générations, à ceux qui vont faire le monde de demain… mais comme esclaves des nouveaux maîtres.
Un agenda bien huilé dans le but de diriger la population mondiale comme du bétail
Quelle est la méthode du FEM et de ses seigneurs ?
Ils ont observé les annonces faites par les personnes éveillées dénonçant leurs activités et leur agenda au cours de la campagne de vaccination mondiale tout en dénonçant des propos complotistes. Et cela a fonctionné, leur politique mortifère a été suivie par la grès grande majorité de la population mondiale qui a reçu ces injections qui tuent et vont continuer de tuer. L’essentiel pour la Caste consiste à ne pas perdre la guerre de la communication, de l’information et donc de la manipulation des masses.
Puisque les populations ont accepté les injections — parfois sous la contrainte, mais finalement de manière aisée (69 % de la population européenne a reçu au moins une injection contre Covid au 22 août 2022, et 81 % de la population française — source The world in data), ils peuvent se permettre d’avancer en annonçant ce qui finalement ne semble pas choquer les populations : l’injection de nanotechnologies ou l’utilisation de micropuces. Le message est assez clair, « vous êtes du bétail et nous vous traitons comme des animaux d’élevage ».
« la vaccination a besoin d’un coup de pouce technologique par des systèmes d’identification numériques sécurisés pouvant stocker les antécédents médicaux d’un enfant ».
Il fallait bien que ce soit le copain de Bill Gates qui l’annonce sinon cela aurait pu susciter des soupçons. Voici comment l’élite mondialiste prévoit de conduire les populations au marquage numérique grâce à l’épidémie de Covid et la vaccinatio
Ci-dessus, tableau de Pieter Brueghel l’Ancien (1567−1569) : Le Pays de Cocagne Le Pays de Cocagne est, dans l’imaginaire de certaines cultures européennes, une sorte de paradis terrestre, une contrée miraculeuse où la nature déborde de générosité pour ses habitants et ses hôtes. Loin des famines et des guerres, Cocagne est une terre de fêtes et de bombances perpétuelles, où l’on prône le jeu et la paresse, et où le travail est proscrit. Le tableau de Brueghl montre trois personnages endormis ou somnolents, repus, sous un arbre qui porte une table couverte de mets. Un clerc, un chevalier et un paysan y représentent les trois ordres de la société médiévale : le clergé, la noblesse d’arme et la paysannerie, tous trois ici égaux dans l’abondance et la quiétude opulente. Ici les soldats ont déposé leurs armes, les agriculteurs leur fléau, les étudiants se couchent sur leurs livres, pour une trêve perpétuelle sous les auspices d’une nature généreuse. Le pays de Cocagne peut être vu comme une expression de l’aspiration à la prospérité universelle, à la paix et à l’égalité, un paradis terrestre, une utopie [source Wikipédia].
Les Français, tous Abondanciers au pays de Cocagne ?
Dans sa faconde, fidèle à son « En même temps », Macron a déclaré ce mercredi 24 août, jour de la Saint Barthélémy : « Au fond, nous vivons la fin de ce qui pouvait apparaître comme une abondance, celle des liquidités sans coût… » Vous l’avez compris :
… son « quoi qu’il en coûte » a vécu.
Fini les lendemains qui déjantent. Place aux lendemains qui déchantent. Le massacre des Français opulents est annoncé.
Il le sait, Macron, çà ? 9 millions de personnes vivent sous le seuil de pauvreté qui s’élève à 977 euros de revenus par mois. Ce sont les chômeurs et les jeunes de 18 à 29 ans qui sont le plus touchés par la pauvreté. Quant aux autres, ceux qui ne sont pas « pauvres », ils sont pléthore à vivre chichement, à rouler au gasoil et fumer leur clope pour tenir.
Et ce n’est pas tout. Macron a appelé le gouvernement à l’unité face à « la grande bascule »(1) qui marque la rentrée avec la fin de l’abondance, des évidences et de l’insouciance. Bref, c’est du La Fontaine, après avoir été cigale, ils nous faudra devenir fourmi.
Pourtant, ce proverbe est bien français : Abondance de biens ne nuit pas. Macron qui, par ailleurs, se plait à citer Jean Jaurès, n’a pas dû retenir cette citation : « L’abondance est le fruit d’une bonne administration. »
Michel Lebon
(1) Comprendre The Great Reset, de son mentor Klaus Schwab
Shutterstock
Bella Health + Wellness, Denver/Facebook
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò
naufrage/sauvetage 