Abandonner l’abondance ?

Abandonner l’abondance ?

Le Nouvel Ordre mondial et ses sectes

Par Salon Beige le 28 août 2022

Nous achevons ici la publication des conférences prononcées au colloque “Narratifs religieux alternatifs et formes de déviation sociale” .

Après L’Ordre du Temple Solaire ou la nostalgie des chevaliers sans croisade,

Personal Growth and Psychological Issues in Questionable Religious Organizations,

De l’ingérence à la subversion,

et Satanism as an Ideology of Total Terror,

voici la conférence d’Olivier ROUOT, consultant international, ancien rédacteur en chef de la revue catholique De Rome et d’ailleurs, et secrétaire général de l’Institut 1717 pour une nouvelle Alliance franco-russe: Le Nouvel Ordre mondial et ses sectes.



Olivier ROUOT

Le Nouvel Ordre mondial et ses sectes

Merci à tous ceux qui se sont exprimés jusqu’à maintenant, qui m’ont vivement intéressé et enrichi. Oui, je suis effectivement un consultant international. Mais en vous parlant ici, je tiens à le dire, je parle en tant que catholique et aussi en tant qu’amoureux de la Russie et, plus particulièrement, en tant que secrétaire général d’une association d’amitié franco-russe dont je suis l’un des trois cofondateurs. Cela peut juste vous permettre d’éclairer mieux mes propos qui suivent. Mes propos pourront peut-être agacer certains. J’en suis désolé, c’est moi. J’en ai l’habitude d’ailleurs. Ils sont peut-être un peu iconoclastes et pourtant ils représentent ce que je crois. Je voudrais rappeler un adage : de même que le démon est le singe de Dieu, de même, les sectes aiment à imiter les religions. Je voudrais juste résumer, pour introduire mon propos, que c’est en général un groupe organisé de personnes qui professent une doctrine, une pseudodoctrine, laquelle n’a en général pour origine que les révélations d’une seule et unique personne au caractère prétendument charismatique.

Et ensemble, ils recherchent surtout une position dominante ou une sorte de monopole qui leur assurerait non seulement une notoriété, un financement, mais aussi une sorte de vision un peu officielle. En général, leurs croyances et leurs pratiques les rendent nocifs. Bien souvent le gourou exerce un contrôle mental, contrôle psychologique et manipulation sur ses affidés qui est souvent épouvantable. Alors, outre les différents critères de dangerosité déjà évoqués, l’une des caractéristiques des sectes, c’est sa fermeture, son opacité la plus complète. Quitte, comme cela a été évoqué, à créer une vitrine, une vitrine respectable pour dissimuler des comportements réels. Non seulement les sectes tendent à prendre la place de Dieu tout simplement – dans des sociétés qui sont, malheureusement, déchristianisées, mais aussi elles profitent d’une certaine déshumanisation de nos sociétés aujourd’hui. Alors, bien sûr, cela a été rappelé, tous les gouvernements du monde, à peu près, luttent contre les dérives sectaires et cherchent à en protéger leurs populations. Mais, il faut bien l’avouer, les critères qui définissent une secte ne sont pas toujours faciles.Il faut bien reconnaître que l’État a longtemps hésité à s’immiscer – en France – dans un domaine aussi proche des convictions personnelles, de la foi et de la philosophie.

De fait, certaines organisations sectaires échappent totalement à la vigilance ou aux capacités de discernement des responsables publics. À moins, et c’est là que le mauvais esprit intervient, à moins qu’il ne s’agisse parfois de crainte, voire de connivence. Alors, il y a parmi toutes les sectes de l’univers une qui est particulièrement nuisible au genre humain et à toute la chrétienté en particulier, qui n’est jamais évoquée ou en tout cas plus à notre époque, sous cette étiquette de secte. Nommons-la, il s’agit de la franc-maçonnerie. Quelle que soit son obédience, la franc-maçonnerie est intrinsèquement perverse. Elle a été férocement combattue par l’Église catholique dès son avènement. L’avènement de la franc-maçonnerie date des années 1720, à peu près, puis elle a été combattue par l’ensemble de la chrétienté. Et pour cause, le vrai objectif de la franc-maçonnerie, c’est le service de Lucifer. Et monsieur Silantiev nous a montré bien sûr l’impact du satanisme dans notre société. Bien sûr, en 2022, évoquer Lucifer peut paraître un peu démodé et un peu anachronique, et pourtant… Alors, la franc-maçonnerie agit dans l’ombre, dans le mystère. Elle se vante elle-même parfois des lois qu’elle promeut ou de ses interventions sur des décisions politiques qui sont toutes des décisions négatives. La franc-maçonnerie est en amont des lois sur l’avortement, des lois sur le divorce, des lois sur l’euthanasie, des lois sur la crémation.

Autant de sujets qui ont toujours été, comment dirais-je, moralement réfutés par toute l’humanité dans le monde entier et par l’Église catholique bien sûr. La franc-maçonnerie se vante elle-même d’être en amont, ce n’est pas une, comment dirais-je, une croyance personnelle. La franc-maçonnerie œuvre à changer notre société en lui retirant progressivement ses traditions, son histoire, sa mémoire. Et si elle lutte tout particulièrement contre toute forme de chrétienté ou de foi. Sa cible privilégiée est la famille, comme toutes les sectes d’ailleurs. Car, partout dans le monde, la famille constitue une cellule, la cellule fondatrice de toute société heureuse ou équilibrée. La famille, c’est la pierre fondatrice du mur de soutien de notre humanité. Sans famille, que ce soit en France ou en Russie, en Israël ou au Maroc, le monde s’effondre. Mais les réflexions les plus graves, les décisions les plus déterminantes de la franc-maçonnerie restent secrètes. Leurs conversations, leurs chapitres, leurs travaux restent secrets. Et les membres de la franc-maçonnerie occupent des postes importants dans la société : les élus, des responsables politiques, des responsables médiatiques qui travaillent ensemble à refaire le monde dans le secret de l’horloge. Tout à l’heure, il était posé la question de la position de l’extrême droite. Mais en réalité, on trouve dans les loges des gens d’extrême droite, d’extrême gauche, de gauche, de droite, des écolos, etc., qui travaillent ensemble.

Sans moi, en tout cas, sans dire ce qu’ils font pour changer ma société. Et pour moi c’est vraiment un comportement sectaire. Par ailleurs, il est vrai, et chacun le sait, que les connivences maçonnes transcendent les clivages politiques, on vient de le voir. Elles se nourrissent aussi de liens internationaux. Évidemment, ne faut-il pas faire avancer la cause maçonnique ? Il est peu connu que sans le soutien des loges maçonniques et un soutien proactif, jamais la russophobie actuelle en Europe n’aurait pu ni s’installer ni perdurer, notamment par l’entremise des loges américaines. Et donc merci, merci à mon interlocuteur de tout à l’heure, à Maxime Perrotin, d’avoir évoqué le sujet, même discrètement.

Les loges américaines se montrent actuellement très influentes, par exemple, dans le soutien de Zelenski, dans les décisions de sanctions que les Européens doivent appliquer. Sans aucune indépendance, ces idées ne viennent pas d’eux. N’oublions jamais que les instances européennes comptent parmi les institutions mondiales qui hébergent en leur sein le plus de francs-maçons. C’est facile à démontrer. Mais comment s’étonner alors de ce déferlement de mesures d’origine américaine, relayées par l’Europe, qui nuisent le plus aux intérêts de l’amitié franco-russe ? Sans la franc-maçonnerie, cela ne serait pas possible. Et pourtant, où sont les publications officielles où les francs-maçons le disent ? Où sont les débats publics ? Où sont les travaux préliminaires ? Qui sont les responsables ? Qui les a élus ? Quelle est la doctrine ou le programme qui sous-tend ces influences ? A moi, on ne me l’a pas dit en tout cas. Cette opacité, associée au désir de nuire, à la dangerosité des actions, au soutien mutuel des membres sans aucun discernement ou esprit de justice, à une doctrine mystérieuse et cachée, mais ne sont-ce pas là les critères qui définissent ce qu’est une secte ? Pour moi, il n’y a pas l’ombre d’un débat. J’y reviendrai tout à l’heure.

Je ne vais pas faire la liste de tous ceux qui me paraissent éminemment sectaires sur la planète parce que nous continuerions jusqu’à 22 h. Néanmoins, il est un autre outil sectaire dont j’aimerais rapidement vous parler. Vous le connaissez tous. Il a un gourou, un vrai gourou à sa tête, un gourou connu, fort charismatique. Il tient des réunions totalement secrètes. Ses travaux comportent de grands volets, en général une partie publiée. On la trouve sur Internet ou dans les librairies, et l’autre, qui contient un agenda, contient des mesures extrêmement secrètes. Sa doctrine n’est pas intégralement dévoilée. Son désir affiché clairement de diriger le monde. Ses fidèles sont formés à cela. Ils sont même endoctrinés pour beaucoup et tous gardent le secret sur des travaux en fait sectaires. Leurs réunions sont protégées par des milices armées. Il est clair que le gourou se prend parfois pour Dieu, notamment quand il réfléchit à haute voix sur la surpopulation de la planète qu’il aimerait réduire.

Il a pu corrompre ou influencer la quasi-totalité des gouvernements du monde et des médias qui leur sont inféodés. Et pourtant, ces conseils ou ces instructions sont protégés par le plus grand des secrets. Sa puissance, mais aussi sa dangerosité fait l’objet chaque jour de milliers de commentaires dans le monde. Et pourtant, ça continue. Est-ce que je viens pas là de vous décrire une secte parfaite ? En fait, je viens d’évoquer le Forum de Davos et son président fondateur, Klaus Schwab. Je pourrais en trouver beaucoup d’autres. J’ai voulu attirer votre attention sur le fait que les sectes ne sont pas forcément cachées même quand elles sont extrêmement nombreuses, comme l’a démontré tout à l’heure Maxime Perrotin. Les sectes ne sont pas forcément issues du monde de Hergé, de Tintin. Les sectes aussi ont parfois pignon sur rue, sont parfois très efficaces, très populaires, mais elles agissent contre nos intérêts. Alors on pourrait définir, il faudrait pour cela une autre conférence, ce que signifient nos intérêts, bien sûr. Mais j’ai quand-même tendance à parler, à évoquer les intérêts de l’humanité. Alors j’ai l’air pessimiste, mais pas du tout. Je vais vous le prouver dans quelques secondes. Que peut-on conclure de ces descriptions qui ne sont jamais nommées ainsi ? En effet, jamais aucun journaliste ne traitera du Forum de Davos comme d’une secte.

Pourtant, pour moi, les définitions sont là. La plus grande ruse du démon, c’est de faire croire qu’il n’existe pas. Vous vous souvenez de cet adage. Le spectacle de la russophobie ambiante que je viens d’évoquer ? Cet empêchement qui est fait aux Européens de constituer une grande puissance chrétienne avec la Russie est un spectacle dramatique, un spectacle épouvantable qui, moi, m’émeut et m’attriste chaque jour. Cette terrible désolation a un but, évidemment. Vous connaissez l’adage policier qui dit : cherche à qui le crime profite ? Bien sûr, pour n’importe qui, même s’il est particulièrement atlantiste, on sait bien à qui le profite crime. C’est très clair. Mais sans l’aide de ces nombreux relais, de ces nombreuses sectes, dont les deux que je viens d’évoquer à l’instant, le crime serait beaucoup plus difficile à perpétrer. Ces sectes en général, notamment celles évoquées tout à l’heure par Maxime Perrotin, ces francs-maçons, ces partisans du démon, se nourrissent comme lui du mensonge. Exposée, la vérité est sans doute la première contre-offensive efficace. La vérité, l’information est un argument important contre cette subversion et ses partisans. D’ailleurs, la vérité ne doit-elle pas nous rendre libres ? Telle sera ma conclusion. J’ai voulu être plus rapide parce qu’on a déjà pris beaucoup de temps. Mais bien sûr, je suis prêt à répondre à toutes vos questions.

Modérateur : Merci beaucoup pour votre intervention, Monsieur Rouot. C’était très intéressant et effectivement, je voulais vous poser une question concernant les francs-maçons. Une des caractéristiques des sectes totalitaires fait que vous pouvez y entrer, mais que c’est difficile d’en sortir. Est-ce que c’est la même chose avec la franc-maçonnerie ?

Olivier Rouot : Oui, on voit parfois des livres ou des conférences de gens qui ont quitté la franc maçonnerie, qui nous apprennent qu’ils ont beaucoup souffert. Ils ont été surtout calomniés, détruits et leur réputation a énormément souffert. Il fut une époque où les francs-maçons n’hésitaient pas à tuer les membres qui dévoilaient des secrets ou qui s’en allaient. Je pense qu’on ne le fait pas, ou on le fait plus discrètement, certainement. Mais je crois que les gens qui quittent la franc-maçonnerie ont beaucoup de mal à la quitter et souffrent après d’un déficit d’image très important.

Modérateur : D’accord.

Un intervenant : Moi, j’ai aussi une petite question à Olivier Rouot. Qu’est-ce que vous pensez de ceux qui font un parallèle entre franc-maçonnerie et l’Opus Dei ?

Olivier Rouot : Alors, l’Opus Dei, on peut faire des parallèles, mais ce n’est pas du tout le même sujet. Bien qu’il y ait énormément de membres de l’Opus Dei qui soient francs-maçons. En fait, l’Opus Dei est un organisme de l’Église catholique issu du concile de Vatican II, qui est issu de la crise de l’Église et de son extrême modernisation. Même si cette extrême modernisation semble actuellement marquer le pas par rapport aux années 1965-75, il y a eu quand même une espèce de révolution dans l’Église que chacun d’entre vous connaît. L’Opus Dei affiche une dimension sectaire. Je n’hésite pas à le dire, ses membres n’ont pas tellement de liberté de parole, sont extrêmement encadrés. Lorsqu’ils y sont entrés célibataires, doivent rester célibataires. Je pense que c’est un des ordres de l’Église moderniste. Alors, après le parallèle avec la franc-maçonnerie, on ne peut pas le faire à 100 %. La franc-maçonnerie existe depuis 1717 ou 1720. L’Opus Dei est issu de la crise de l’Église, c’est une œuvre qui a certainement une volonté charitable, une volonté de purifier ses membres. Mais les Cathares aussi avaient cette volonté-là et je ne suis pas sûr que l’Église n’ait pas intérêt à faire le ménage dans cette organisation-là.

Un intervenant : Alors peut être une précision, quand on dit que l’Opus Dei qu’elle est faite par des élites pour noyauter les différents rouages de la société, influer, etc. Pourquoi ne pas les mettre sur le même plan que les francs-maçons dans ce cas-là?

Olivier Rouot : Ce que vous dites est juste.

Un intervenant : De manière sournoise, j’entends, de manière sournoise.

Olivier Rouot : Mais je ferai deux objections. La première, on est franc-maçon ou on ne l’est pas. Donc l’Opus Dei n’est pas la franc-maçonnerie. Qu’il ait effectivement des comportements qui y ressemblent – je suis d’accord avec vous. Et la deuxième objection, c’est qu’en fait je connais des dizaines de mouvements philosophiques, politiques, de réflexion, de jeunes, de vieux dont l’objectif est de noyauter l’État profond et d’investir l’État pour l’améliorer. Et ce n’est pas une caractéristique définitive selon moi. Je connais des catholiques, des protestants encore plus nombreux. Je connais des œuvres de jeunesse qui travaillent à se former pour être dans l’État, pour y apporter un sang neuf et une respectabilité supérieure à celle d’aujourd’hui. Et en fait, je ne suis pas sûr que ce soit une condition suffisante pour que ça ressemble à la franc-maçonnerie et je ne suis pas certain. Et bien sûr, on est dans un domaine que vous connaissez bien, qui est très flou et très difficile à discerner. On est dans un domaine qui n’est pas nécessairement malhonnête car quelque part, vouloir créer une élite qui dirige ce pays convenablement, eh bien, j’aimerais bien que cela existe, personnellement.

Un intervenant : Mais il faut voir aussi, comment dire, les plaintes qui ont été déposées – de la part de jeunes filles ou autres, qui ont travaillé pour rien, etc. Il faut lire la presse

Moderna Sues Pfizer Over COVID Vaccine Patent Infringement, But Patents ‘Belong to the World,’ Says Dr. Robert Malone

CDC Backtracks on COVID Guidance as Damning Studies Mount-Une fois de plus les « complotistes » avaient raison

Analysis by Dr. Joseph MercolaFact Checked

• August 26, 2022Download PDF

Story at-a-glance

• August 11, 2022, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reversed its COVID-19 guidelines, thereby vindicating every “misinformation spreader” out there
• The CDC is now advocating for taking personal responsibility and for everyone to decide for themselves “which prevention behaviors to use and when (at all times or at specific times), based on their own risk for severe illness and that of members of their household, their risk tolerance, and setting-specific factors”
• The CDC is also giving up on discrimination based on COVID jab status, stating, its “COVID-19 prevention recommendations no longer differentiate based on a person’s vaccination status because breakthrough infections occur.” They also admit natural immunity exists and works
• Testing is now reserved for those who “are symptomatic, or have a known or suspected exposure to someone with COVID-19,” isolation is only for those who are symptomatic and have tested positive, and contact tracing is now restricted to health care settings and select “high-risk congregate settings”
• The CDC’s about-face appears to be politically motivated, to give the Biden administration a “win” before the midterm elections. Post-election plans include “the biggest vaccination campaign in history,” so tyrannical overreaches may later resume, even as mounting data show the COVID shots are causing depopulation

Without fanfare, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, August 11, 2022, reversed all its COVID-19 guidelines. In fact, many have noted it appears the CDC wanted to bring as little attention to it as possible.¹ This is understandable, considering the new guidelines more or less admit the original rules were in error, without actually stating as much.

The new guidance is listed in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) under the title, « Summary of Guidance for Minimizing the Impact of COVID-19 on Individual Persons, Communities, and Health Care Systems — United States, August 2022. »² As noted by Jeffrey Tucker, founder and president of the Brownstone Institute:³

« It would have been fascinating to be a fly on the wall in the brainstorming sessions that led to this little treatise. The wording was chosen very carefully, not to say anything false outright, much less admit any errors of the past, but to imply that it was only possible to say these things now. »

The CDC insists that while COVID-19 infection continues to be a reality around the world, « high levels of vaccine- and infection-induced immunity and the availability of effective treatments and prevention tools have substantially reduced the risk for medically significant COVID-19 illness … and associated hospitalization and death. »

Consequently, COVID countermeasures that create « barriers to social, educational, and economic activity » can be ditched and everything can go back to normal.

CDC Introduces Personal Responsibility

Considering how hard health officials have fought to segregate, bully, demonize and dehumanize people who didn’t agree with their tyrannical and irrational COVID measures over the past 19 months, the new guidelines are refreshing, but they’re still like a slap in the face. First and foremost, the CDC is now suddenly advocating for taking personal responsibility — for everything:⁴

« Persons can use information about the current level of COVID-19 impact on their community to decide which prevention behaviors to use and when (at all times or at specific times), based on their own risk for severe illness and that of members of their household, their risk tolerance, and setting-specific factors …

Education and messaging to help individual persons understand their risk for medically significant illness complements recommendations for prevention strategies based on risk. »

Individual risk assessment and risk-based countermeasures are both something we « misinformation spreaders » have called for from the beginning. The risk is not identical for all; hence, risk reduction strategies should not be uniformly applied. Finally, 19 months late, the CDC agrees.

Under the subhead, « Protecting Persons Most at Risk for Severe Illness, » the CDC now takes a page straight out of The Great Barrington Declaration and recommends focused protection, meaning protecting those « at particularly high risk … because of older age, disability, moderate or severe immunocompromise, or other underlying medical conditions. »

Need anyone be reminded that doctors and scientists have been defamed and dragged through the mud for saying this? And Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and his former boss, Dr. Francis Collins, then-director of the National Institutes of Health, were the masterminds behind the effort to discredit and take down the authors of the Barrington declaration.⁵

CDC Reneges on Discrimination

The CDC is also giving up on discrimination based on COVID jab status:⁶ « CDC’s COVID-19 prevention recommendations no longer differentiate based on a person’s vaccination status because breakthrough infections occur … »

They even admit that « persons who have had COVID-19 but are not vaccinated have some degree of protection against severe illness from their previous infection, » and therefore are not to be treated any differently than someone who has received the COVID jab. As noted by Tucker:⁷

« Remember when 40% of the members of the black community in New York City who refused the jab were not allowed into restaurants, bars, libraries, museums, or theaters? Now, no one wants to talk about that.

Also, universities, colleges, the military, and so on — which still have mandates in place — do you hear this? Everything you have done to hate on people, dehumanize people, segregate people, humiliate others as unclean, fire people and destroy lives, now stands in disrepute.

Meanwhile, as of this writing, the blasted US government still will not allow unvaccinated travelers across its borders! Not one word of the CDC’s turgid treatise was untrue back in the Spring of 2020. There was always ‘infection-induced immunity,’ though Fauci and Co. constantly pretended otherwise.

It was always a terrible idea to introduce ‘barriers to social, educational, and economic activity.’ The vaccines never promised in their authorization to stop infection and spread, even though all official statements of the CDC claimed otherwise, repeatedly and often. »

Testing, Isolation and Contact Tracing Rules Reversed

And what about rules relating to testing, self-isolation during illness and the whole tracking and tracing business? Out the window!

• Testing is now reserved for those who « are symptomatic, or have a known or suspected exposure to someone with COVID-19. » Testing of asymptomatic individuals is only suggested in « congregate settings » where medical care is limited, such as homeless shelters and correctional facilities, and in such instances, testing « should include all persons, irrespective of vaccination status. »
• Isolation is only for those who are symptomatic and have tested positive. Infected individuals can end their isolation after as little as five days, if they’ve been fever-free for at least 24 hours without the use of fever-lowering medication, but should continue wearing a mask or respirator when around others through day 10.
• Contact tracing is now restricted to health care settings and select « high-risk congregate settings. »

Is It a Political Ploy?

While I’m glad the CDC has reversed its tyrannical COVID measures to something sensible and more aligned with reality, the problem, as I see it, is threefold.

First, there’s the lateness of the hour. Any public health agency worthy of such a designation would have reached these conclusions two years ago. Instead, they spent more than two years engaged in an active search and destroy mission against those advocating for the same sensible guidelines the CDC is now suddenly adopting.

Secondly, the timing of these reversals smacks of political bias. Mid-term elections are fast approaching, and the most disliked White House administration in American history needs a « win. »

With the CDC backtracking on COVID measures, they now have certain bragging rights. « See, we brought life back to normal » — which brings us to problem No. 3, which is that this reversal may be nothing more than a malicious ploy to get us to let our guard down, only to be hit with another, even more draconian fear campaign after the elections.

Biggest Vaccination Drive in History Is Coming This Fall

While that might sound paranoid, it’s straight out of the handbooks of tyranny. The way you drive people crazy is not through consistent high-pressure tyranny, but through waves of it. The ups and downs, with each wave being more intensely repressive than the last, create confusion and foster fear and anxiety, which breeds an infantile kind of reliance on authority to just fix it.

Mark Crispin Miller, a professor of media studies at New York University, appears to agree. In an August 13, 2022, Substack article, he writes:⁸

« Just as the CDC pretends to have backed off, the NHS [the British National Health Service] reveals (to just a few) what’s really coming at us in the fall: ‘The biggest vaccination drive in history.’ Those who think the worst is over better think again — because it really won’t be over til [sic] WE end it …

[The] NHS alone is obviously not equipped, and certainly does not intend, to undertake the biggest vaccination drive in history — a drive that must, and will, be global, just like the orchestration of the entire COVID crisis, of which this coming drive will be the culmination (or, to quote Bill Gates, the ‘final solution’).

Nor … is it likely that this biggest vaccination drive in history will be mounted on the now-exhausted pretext of protecting all humanity from COVID-19 (or the flu). What’s it going to be, then? Monkeypox? HIV? COVID-20? Cancer? All of the above?

Whatever new threat(s) may be used to justify this final drive could never be as lethal as the psychopaths who planned it, and those entities that will not stop promoting it (even as the CDC pretends to have backed off). »

Prepare for Another Round of Gaslighting

Thacker also wonders whether the CDC’s revised guidelines may be nothing more than a political backstop to prevent Democrats from sliding into the abyss:⁹

« … with a majority of Americans unhappy with the President’s pandemic policies, perhaps the CDC is relying on ‘midterm science’ to guide their new appreciation for natural immunity? »

One reason for suspecting the CDC’s sudden turn-about is political in nature is the fact that it makes an absolute mess out of the carefully scripted COVID narrative, which is supposed to be in lockstep with governments and media around the world. As a result of the CDC trying to give Biden’s White House a « win, » media and Big Tech now face a massive conundrum.

Everything the CDC is now recommending was blasphemy punishable by public shaming, deplatforming and delicensing, all the way up to the day the CDC posted the new guidelines. Every COVID article and fact check ever written is now completely off-script, as are countless public statements made by public health officials.

There’s no answer to this dilemma, so they’re going to pretend it never happened and hope no one remembers what they said all those days, weeks or months ago. If you remind them, be prepared to be gaslighted with denials. Thacker writes:¹⁰

« The media’s forgetfulness of what they reported just last year on vaccines and prior infection is part of the pandemic’s Great Misremembering, a collective amnesia where we march in step to government messaging, while failing to recall prior statements and moments of glaring contradiction.

For example, when the media reported that the NIH’s Anthony Fauci was fully vaccinated and still got COVID-19, and then they misremembered to report his prior statement, ‘When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not going to get infected’ … To help everyone join the Great Misremembering, here are some incidents you must fail to recall.

… Late in the pandemic’s first year, a group of researchers released a statement called the ‘John Snow Memorandum’¹¹ that helped to shape American policy … Among the signatories was Rochelle Walensky, then a Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, and now the Director of the CDC.

‘Any pandemic management strategy relying upon immunity from natural infections for COVID-19 is flawed,’ reads the statement signed by the current CDC Director.

Yes, the very same person who runs the CDC that now tells us to not differentiate between vaccine and natural infection warned us early in the pandemic that any pandemic policy that relies on natural infection is flawed. As you read the CDC’s new guidance, please remember to misremember the memorandum previously signed by the current CDC Director. »

Which Vaccines Will Be Pushed Next?

While we don’t yet know how they’re going to scare the population into getting more experimental shots — now that COVID jab uptake has tanked and more than 112 million doses have had to be discarded for lack of demand^12,13 — we at least have an idea of what those shots are going to be.

August 15, 2022, the U.K. became the first country to approve Moderna’s new bivalent COVID booster, which contains both the original concoction and mRNA to target an already out-of-date Omicron variant.¹⁴ The rest of the world will undoubtedly follow suit.

The British NHS will start rolling out the new bivalent COVID jab September 5, 2022, starting with care home residents and other housebound individuals.¹⁵ The wider rollout will begin September 12, just one day shy of the end of primary elections in the U.S.¹⁶

Of course, the monkeypox vaccine is also being pushed on certain groups,¹⁷ and there’s the seasonal flu vaccine, so there are options when it comes to « picking your poison. »

So, while the good news is that the CDC is now on the hook for having vindicated all us « misinformation spreaders, » the bad news is that there’s more insanity coming, and there’s no telling exactly what form that will take as of yet.

It looks like we’ll have a short reprieve during the U.S. election period, to put a positive spin on the Biden administration’s handling of the pandemic, and whatever the new agenda is, it’ll be rolled out afterward. We do know it’ll involve « the biggest vaccine campaign in history, » though, which could get interesting, seeing how people have woken up in droves to the fact that the COVID shots are maiming and killing without providing any benefit.

The More COVID Shots, the Higher the Reinfection Rate

Evidence that COVID reinfection rates go up in tandem with the number of COVID shots administered is also mounting, which is turning former believers into skeptics. As reported by Icelander Thorsteinn Siglaugsson in a Daily Sceptic article published in mid-August 2022:¹⁸

« Does anyone still recall the excitement in late 2020 when the vaccines against COVID-19 were finally in sight? The trial results were excellent, promising an end to the pandemic in 2021 … I believed in the narrative myself … I even took part in an attempt to have one of the manufacturers arrange a population-wide trial in Iceland, similar to what Pfizer did in Israel. Today I’m very glad we didn’t succeed.

Soon it will be two years since the trial results were out … Data on infection, hospitalization and mortality already show vaccination not only failing to prevent those, but in some cases being counterproductive. In short, the vaccines have failed to deliver what we were promised.

And even worse, the skyrocketing rate of side effects may mean that for most people vaccination makes no or little sense. Still, it is for the most part forbidden to discuss this fact … As an example, it is forbidden to say COVID-19 vaccines may cause death, even if a quick search on the internet shows confirmed cases where there is no doubt about the causality.

It is forbidden also to share evidence showing higher infection rates among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. It will therefore be interesting to see how those platforms will react to those who share the results of a new research letter published on August 3rd in Jama Network Open.¹⁹

The letter describes the result of a study which monitored for reinfection all Icelanders previously infected, during the Omicron wave, between December 1st 2021 and February 22nd 2022. The study shows a probability of reinfection of up to 15.1% among 18-29 year-olds, declining with age …

But the most interesting part is the comparison by vaccination status. It shows that for most age groups, those who have received two doses or more are more likely to become reinfected than those who have received no vaccination or one dose. »

Once the broad masses begin to accept the reality that more shots equal higher risk of COVID infection, how easy do you think it will be for government to convince them to take a bivalent COVID jab? And if resistance ends up being as high as I suspect it might be, come this fall, what measures might they take to, again, try to force people into compliance? Your guess is as good as mine.

COVID Shots Are Causing Depopulation

Another major hurdle in the plan to launch the biggest vaccination campaign in history is the evidence showing the COVID shots are already causing mass depopulation. As reported by The Exposé, August 7, 2022:²⁰

« COVID-19 vaccination is causing mass depopulation. This is an extremely bold claim to make. But unfortunately, this bold claim is backed up by a mountain of evidence contained in the confidential Pfizer documents and official Government data from around the world. »

Indeed, excess deaths have skyrocketed since the release of the COVID jabs, and the timing is so exact, it can’t be explained away. In the U.K., they’re now massaging data to try to hide it. As explained by The Exposé,²¹ the five-year average that deaths are now compared to are made up of mortality data from 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2021.

Excess deaths started climbing in 2021, after the rollout of the shots, and by including 2021 (rather than calculating a five-year average from 2015 to 2019, for accurate prepandemic figures), the excess mortality in 2022 appears closer to the five-year norm than it actually is. Excess deaths are also up in most of Europe, as illustrated in the graph²² below:

Eliminating confusion about the cause of these excess deaths are data comparing the mortality rates among those jabbed and the unjabbed. July 6, 2022, the British Office for National Statistics issued a report^23,24 showing the mortality rates per 100,000 are consistently lowest among the unvaccinated, in all age groups.

In the 18 to 39 age group, unvaccinated had a mortality rate of 14.1 per 100,000 during the month of May 2022, whereas those who got their first dose at least 21 days ago had a mortality rate of 42.6 per 100,000. The mortality rate for double-jabbed was 17.3 per 100,000 and triple-dosed had a mortality rate of 21.4 per 100,000.

As shown in the graph below, created by The Exposé,²⁵ the identical pattern repeats for every month, January through May 2022.

Infant Mortality Has Skyrocketed

The Exposé²⁶ also highlights data showing infant mortality is now far above the norm. In Scotland, official data show neonatal deaths were 119% higher in March 2022 than the annual norm. Live birth rates are also plummeting around the world.

Pfizer’s documents show nearly all pregnant women who participated in its trial — for whom birth outcomes were available — lost their babies. Only one of 29 known birth outcomes were classified as ‘normal.’ The remaining 28 miscarried.

In Germany, the birth rate for January through April 2022 was 11% lower than the seven-year prepandemic average. And the FDA, CDC and Pfizer can hardly be surprised, as Pfizer’s own documents show nearly all pregnant women who participated in its trial — for whom birth outcomes were available — lost their babies. Only one of 29 known birth outcomes were classified as « normal. » The remaining 28 miscarried.

The U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting (VAERS) database also listed 4,113 fetal deaths following COVID injection as of April 2022.²⁷ Compare that to the fetal death reports for all other vaccines reported to VAERS in the last 30 years. That number is 2,239.²⁸

Animal research²⁹ published in August 2021, in which female rats were given the Pfizer jab (BNT162b2), also found it increased certain birth defects (extra ribs) by 295% compared to controls, and doubled preimplantation loss (i.e., fertilized ova that fail to implant). In other words, it doubled the risk of infertility. As noted by The Exposé:³⁰

« With this being the case, how on earth have medicine regulators around the world managed to state in their official guidance that ‘Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy’? And how have they managed to state ‘It is unknown whether the Pfizer vaccine has an impact on fertility’?

The truth of the matter is that they actively chose to cover it up. We know this thanks to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request³¹ made to the Australian Government Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). »

You can read more about that in The Exposé’s July 19, 2022, article, « FOIA Reveals Pfizer & Medicine Regulators Hid Dangers of COVID Vaccination During Pregnancy After Study Found It Increases Risk of Birth Defects & Infertility. »³²

Final Thoughts

So, to wrap this up — yes, the CDC has vindicated truth tellers by reversing its COVID guidelines and basically adopting The Great Barrington declaration, but we’re nowhere near out of the woods yet. A major vaccination campaign is being planned for the fall, even as evidence mounts showing the shots are causing depopulation at a rate we’ve never seen before, outside of world war.

The shots are killing otherwise healthy working-age adults, they’re killing babies in the womb, and they’re causing infertility. They are, without a doubt, the most dangerous drugs ever made. So, enjoy this reprieve, but firm up your resolve to stand against another round of tyranny this fall.

Robert W Malone MD

	CoronaVax safety in the NetherlandsDr. Theo Schetters’ survey of public data from the NL and Ontario, CanadaRobert W Malone MD, MSAug 20As some may recall, Jill and I recently traveled to Belgium to meet with Drs. Mattias Desmit, Theo Schetters and many other key opinion leaders from that region, participated in meetings, and recorded podcasts aimed at a European audience. During that time, I recorded a podcast with Theo and Marlies Dekkers which focused on the mRNA Coronavirus genetic vaccines. To reduce the risk of censorship and deplatforming, that podcast was uploaded to the Substack servers, and together with an accompanying article can be found here.For those who do not know Dr. Schetters, he is an exceptional, gifted, and highly respected vaccinologist. Dr. Theo Schetters obtained a PhD in Medicine from Nijmegen University in the Netherlands, and received a visiting scientist award from the Royal Society (London) to work on malaria immunology at the National Institute for Medical Research in Mill Hill, London (UK). From 1988 to 2014 he worked at Intervet International (Boxmeer, The Netherlands) where he developed a vaccine against coccidiosis in chickens (Nobilis® Cox ATM) and a vaccine against Babesia infections in dogs (Nobivac® Piro). He is inventor of an improved vaccine formulation against diseases associated with Rhipicephalus ticks. Presently, he is director of ProtActivity, a company that focuses on vaccine development against ticks and tick-borne protozoal infections. In 2004 he received the Medal of Honour of the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montpellier 1 in France and was bestowed Professeur Invité as recognition for his contribution to longstanding collaborative research with the Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology of the University (head Prof. Andre Gorenflot). He is an editorial board member of “Veterinary Parasitology, Trials in Vaccinology” (Elseviers Science Publishers) and “Parasitology” (Cambridge University Press).As promised in the prior substack publication entitled “Data doesn’t lie: mRNA-vaccines and correlation to all-cause mortality”, Dr. Schetters has now provided a more comprehensive analysis and disclosure of the data which he briefly disclosed during our prior podcast.Below are copies of the slides in this current presentation, I will let Theo draw the conclusions.

Lawsuit filed: RW Malone vs. WP Company, LLCSometimes, you have to do what is right – no matter the personal costRobert W Malone MD, MSAug 19Over the last year, I have been defamed, slandered and censored. My words taken out of context and weaponized in attempts to discredit me.Who is Robert Malone is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Subscribe nowOn of the most egregious offenders has been the Washington Post. Their reporter first approached me with an offer to shadow me at the January, 2022 “Defeat the Mandates” Rally in DC with this message:Having been defamed and slandered by state-sponsored media before, I had learned enough about how these reporters approach their targets to politely turn down the offer to “profile” me by a WaPo reported who has “respect for you and your body of work.” For another example please see here , here , here and here.In retrospect, my gut instinct was right. I felt like I was being set up (I can’t get into the head or Mr. Bella and speak to his motives – maybe others can). Can you only imagine what would have been written and published IF I had agreed to have Mr. Bella shadow me – as he requested? Let my experience be a lesson to all concerned.Linked below is the PDF of the lawsuit filed today:Washington Post/Malone LawsuitTheir article was based on my speech at the Defeat the Mandates rally in DC.Here is a link to that video.« Defeat The Mandates DC » Dr. MaloneSome of the more defamatory statements the WaPo has said about me (listed in the lawsuit):The headline falsely states thatDr. Malone’s claims have been“discredited” and that his views constitute “misinformation”;“Robert Malone stood on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial before thousands of anti-vaccine and anti-mandate demonstrators Sunday, [and] the medical doctor and infectious-disease researcher repeated the falsehoods that have garnered him legions of followers”‘Regarding the genetic covid vaccines, the science is settled,’ [Malone] said in a 15-minute speech that referenced the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and John F. Kennedy. ‘They are not working.’ The misinformation came two days after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released its first studies”Dr. Malone’s “claims and suggestions have been discredited … as not only wrong, but also dangerous”‘There is a huge market for misinformation … The way he’s framed in the conspiracy-theory world is that he’s a courageous whistleblower rather than someone who is spreading misinformation — and it’s only enhancing his profile’”While Malone is a brilliant scientist who has a tremendous amount of experience and knowledge about vaccines, “there is reason to be concerned about how his newfound stardom could be a public health risk”“‘there’s a risk we’re all facing when he’s not accurately representing the information’“On [the Joe Rogan Experience], he promoted an unfounded theory called ‘mass-formation psychosis,’ telling Rogan that a ‘third of the population [is] basically being hypnotized’ into believing what the mainstream media and Anthony S. Fauci … report on the vaccines”“‘You have this individual [Dr. Malone] who has all these credentials and this history in the biomedical world, so that looks impressive. And he’s referencing a study that, on the face of it, may look impressive. But you don’t know that the study is fraudulent’ … Malone has ‘weaponized bad research’”“With his increased profile in recent weeks, some are calling on him to take a step back and reflect on the damage his misinformation is causing”The Washington Post then republished the Article on January 25, 2022 in a piece that accused me of spreading “dangerous lies”, “dangerous falsehoods”, “misinformation”, and “untruths”. WaPo went so far as to accuse me (Dr. Malone) of “leading his followers on a journey to illness, suffering and possible death”.My text from the Defeat the Mandates rally – January, 2022, which was the focus of the Washington Post article.I come to you with an open heart, as a physician committed to healing, bringing three simple words.  Each word rings like a bell in the soul of honest people.Integrity.  Dignity.  Community. Integrity is a commitment to truth, in what you say, how you live, and how you treat others.Dignity flows from respect, for ourselves, for each other, and for the world we live in.Community is what binds us together, to each other, and gives our lives purpose and meaning.Saint Augustine, the doctor of the Roman Catholic Church, famously said “The truth is like a Lion. You don’t have to defend it. Let it loose. It will defend itself.”Harry Truman, a warrior against war profiteering cabals, famously said “I just tell the truth, and they think it’s hell”.I was born in Palo Alto, raised in Goleta California, but when I return to my birth state I hardly recognize it.  What has happened to the open, freedom loving society of my youth?  Why has free speech become vilified, and why does the Los Angeles Times feel the need to label people Nazis without any evidence?  Do they forget that the Nazis came to power as a left-wing party, and that the hallmark of their rise was aggressive use of censorship, propaganda, and Mass Formation Psychosis to control people?I donated to the Obama and Biden campaigns – which I now regret.  What I have seen over the last two years, particularly here in California under World Economic Forum-trained Governor Gavin Newsome cannot be unseen.  Now the Uniparty wants to push him for President. He must be stopped before he and his party can expand their totalitarian mandates and laws.  There is no medical emergency.  There is no justification for these laws that the California Democratic party and their WEF allies want impose on us.This is my truth, and I believe it is self-evident.We should not have politicized the public health response to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, but here we are.  That is what has been done by the followers of the World Economic Forum party line. Regarding the genetic COVID vaccines, the science is settled.They are not working to prevent infection, replication, and spread of Omicron, and they are not completely safe. These vaccines were designed for a different virus, the Wuhan strain. Whether they made sense for protecting our elderly and frail from the original virus is irrelevant.  So let’s stop arguing about that. We must look forward. These genetic vaccines do not prevent Omicron infection, viral replication, or spread to others.  In our daily lives, with our friends, with our families, we all know that this is true. Data from all over the world indicates that the triple vaccinated may be at increased risk for infection, disease and death from Omicron.These genetic treatments are leaky, have poor durability, and even if every man, woman, and child in the United States were vaccinated, these treatments cannot achieve herd immunity and stop COVID. They are not completely safe, and the full nature of the risks remain unknown.  In contrast, the natural immunity which healthy immune systems develop after infection and recovery from COVID is long lasting, broad, and highly protective from disease and death caused by this virus.If there is risk, there must be choice. This is the fundamental bedrock truth of modern bioethics.All medical procedures, vaccines, and drugs have risks.All of us have the right to understand those risks, and to decide for ourselves whether we willingly accept those risks. To deny this is to deny human dignity.  These censorship and propaganda campaigns disrespect us.Evil has many roots. A willingness to deny human dignity is one of the largest.  In our hearts, and in our souls, we all know this is true.Although I am a physician who is deeply committed to the Hippocratic oath, I am above all a husband, father, and grandfather. Now I speak to you about our children, and about our responsibility to them. If nothing else, we must nurture and protect our children.  This is job one.  It is your job.  It is my job. It is not their job to protect us.  And during the last two years, our society and our public health response has failed to protect them.  Many things that our public health system has demanded we do to our children has directly harmed them. Self-harm, suicide and drug abuse in children have risen all around the world.  Anxiety, bullying, intimidation, coercion have become the norm. Measured IQ in the very young has dropped.  Fundamental childhood delays are measured.  And physical damage to children from injecting them with genetic vaccines in order to protect the elderly from a virus has happened. Children should never have been masked, and this type of abuse must never happen again.As a parent, it is your responsibility to protect your children. If they are harmed by these genetic vaccines, you are the one that will have to take care of them.  And you will carry that for the rest of your life and theirs. If your child is damaged by these vaccines, you will be left alone with your grief and the burden of care.These genetic vaccines can damage your children.  They may damage their brain, their heart, their immune system, and their ability to have children in the future.  And many of these types of damages cannot be repaired.So I beg you, please, get informed about the possible risks that your children may be damaged by these experimental medical products.  Don’t let anyone tell you what to do.  Think for yourself.  Because it is your responsibility to protect and nurture them.  If they are damaged, no state Governor, no federal public health official, no television doctor will be there to help you.  You, your family and your child will have to carry the load yourselves.~~~~~~~~~~Finally, there is hope.  We will get through this.  We are already breaking through the madness of crowds, the Mass Formation, the effects of the legacy media and big-tech promoted fear and psychological manipulation which have twisted public health policy. Omicron has destroyed the approved narrative that the vaccines are safe and effective, and that early drug treatment does not work.  The dark winter predicted by our president and pushed by his paid fearmongers in the media failed to materialize.We are a free people, and we have governed ourselves for almost 250 years now based on a constitution developed by farmers, tradesmen, shop-owners, and landholders.  These forefathers rejected a monarchy and oligarchy and created and fought for a constitution which remains an inspiration for the world.  A shining city on the hill.  A Camelot. We do not need the unelected World Economic Forum to manage us.  They cannot even manage themselves.When I was a child, a brilliant man said “Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country”. This is our country. We own this amazing gift, but we must defend it if we wish to keep it. Please keep his words in your minds and hearts. We can all be leaders, and now is the time to step up to the task.  We will survive this, and we will overcome these hardships, if we can just keep these three simple words in our hearts.Integrity.Dignity.Community.Who is Robert Malone is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscribe

en

Download for Free: Robert F. Kennedy’s New Book — ‘A Letter to Liberals’

• Home
• Donate
• Work for CHD
• Take Action
• Advocacy Hub
• The Defender
• CHD TV
• Exposing Causes
• Seeking Justice
• Protecting Our Future
• Chapters
• Science
• About Us
• Store
• Members Only
• Newsletter Sign Up
• Search

08/18/22

•

Big Tech › Views

Vaccine-Injured Have to ‘Talk in Code’ or Facebook Deletes Their Accounts

After he was injured in April 2021 by Pfizer’s COVID-19, “Nick” started a public vaccine injury group on social media hoping to find answers and share practical solutions to help others like himself deal with lasting physical effects, but members had to “talk in code” or face censorship.

By 

The Epoch Times

14

Link copied

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.

By Allan Stein

Nick started a public vaccine injury support group on social media about a year ago after receiving his one and only Pfizer shot for COVID-19.

That was back in April 2021, and he began suffering almost immediate neurological reactions after the injection, including temporary paralysis.

“I’ve had my entire life shattered by this vaccine,” Nick said, asking that his last name not be used. “It took me about nine months to get to a doctor willing to help me. They throw you under the bus. They leave you for dead.”

Nick launched the vaccine injury support group hoping to find answers and share practical solutions to help others like himself deal with lasting physical effects associated with COVID-19 injections.

The “absurd” part, he said, was the way that members used code to avoid being flagged or deleted. Words like “vaccine,” “injury” and “Pfizer” had to be avoided.

Nick continued:

“Basically, [Facebook has] filters set up. I’m at the point where I’m certain that the federal government and Big Tech and Pfizer are all intertwined. It’s quite disgusting.

“They’ll delete your account [and] ban you. So everybody has to talk in code. [Facebook] will flag the post, delete the post, and delete the group. You’re not allowed to ask for help. You have to spell it in weird words.”

Like an ‘underground railroad’

Nick said:

“Yeah, it’s bad. It’s basically like an underground railroad. It’s absurd.”

Nick said he experienced similar censorship on Reddit, where “a sea of people with the same problem” came looking for help and guidance.

“It was terrifying — this is happening — some sort of vaccine reaction,” Nick said. “Reddit constantly deleted me just for asking for help.”

He recently received the following message: “Your account has been permanently suspended from Reddit.”

“This is what you get for asking for help. All communications lost with the people that I was helping,” Nick said.

Catherine “Cat” Parker, who is vaccine injured and lives in Minnesota, launched the Vaccine Injury/Side Effects Support Group on Facebook in early 2022 when she couldn’t find information about vaccine injuries online.

Parker said:

“I saw many people needed a lot of emotional support and information. I decided I’d start helping people heal myself.”

Download for Free: Robert F. Kennedy’s New Book — ‘A Letter to Liberals’

Wither free speech?

Parker said she went into the project believing Facebook was a neutral corporate information technology platform for expressing different views and ideas.

“I would say within a month or so things would disappear” from the support group’s web page, Parker told The Epoch Times.

Parker continued:

“Or you’d get a message that would say ‘misinformation.’ But it’s gotten really bad now — banning and suspending us. I think my last one was for 28 days. I’ve lost count now. This is my normal account. I’ve got all my photography there too.”

Parker said when she does a Google search on her support group, “we don’t exist on the search list.”

At last count, her group had 1,200 members, many of them health care professionals, but Facebook metrics show almost zero traffic, she said.

Parker said she received the Johnson & Johnson shot in April 2021 when her construction company mandated it. She was given her Pfizer booster in November 2021 and now suffers from debilitating health issues.

“How much time do you have?” Parker said when asked to describe her symptoms, which include “autonomic disruptions,” Parkinson-like symptoms and adrenal insufficiency.

“There are so many things — tremors, bleeding, clots, imbalances, brain fog, migraines, memory loss, stuttering — it’s insane,” said Parker, a freelance photographer diagnosed with COVID-19 about a month ago.

Parker said:

“I don’t ever feel good anymore … the vaccine. I used to live life to the fullest: travel and spend time with friends and family. I don’t do anything like that anymore because I don’t feel good anymore.

“You can’t find any information because we’re being censored so bad.”

Parker’s site administrator, Donna Zuk Adley, who lives in Connecticut, has been banned multiple times for violating Facebook’s community standards, she said.

She’s currently in Facebook “jail” for 28 more days for contesting a six-day ban for an earlier post.

‘No comment’

“I’m not allowed to comment” on vaccine injuries,” Adley told The Epoch Times.

Adley said:

“I told the truth. So I guess telling the truth violates Facebook’s community standards policy. You have to follow the [vaccine] narrative because the narrative is a lie. They’re not following the science right now.”

“Facebook put me in Facebook jail for 30 days. I must create a new ID to get back as the group administrator.”

Adley believes a double Moderna jab caused her vaccine injuries: blurred vision, confusion, loss of smell and taste, slurred speech, heart palpitations, physical exhaustion and personality changes, to name a few.

She was recently let go from her job as a nursing home professional while on medical leave, refusing to take a booster shot.

Adley continued:

“I had brain, lung, heart and stomach damage, and you want me to get the booster, and you won’t accept my doctor’s medical exemption?

“This was medical rape. I did not give my consent. Putting me out in the street at 64 — that’s not a choice. No one can tell me that these human rights given to us by God can be taken away from us by a man.”

“I’m angry — angry because this is America. Why do we have a Constitution if we’re not abiding by it?” Adley said. “My body, my right — when did that go by the wayside?”

Parker said she plans to migrate from Facebook to TrialSite News, a free-speech platform based in Utah and is currently in negotiations.

Facebook did not return an email asking for a comment.

“I see [Facebook] shutting us down,” Parker said. “I’m blocked on Twitter now for six days — for ‘violence.’ I think I said the vaccine was “worthless as [breasts] on a boar.’ I’m from the South. We have some good sayings.”

Parker said her goal now is to enable honest conversations and ask questions about COVID-19-related vaccines and injuries.

People are “angry now,” she said. “There’s a lot of us. It’s going to be like a Revolutionary War.”

Reprinted with permission from The Epoch Times.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Subscribe to The Defender – It’s Free!

• Name*
• Email*

Suggest a Correction

The Epoch Times

The Epoch Times’ mission is to bring a truthful view of the world free from the influence of any government, corporation or political party.

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.

Republishing Guidelines

https://disqus.com/embed/comments/?base=default&f=childrenshealthdefense&t_i=184243&t_u=https%3A%2F%2Fchildrenshealthdefense.org%2Fdefender%2Fcovid-vaccine-injury-facebook-censorship%2F&t_d=Vaccine-Injured%20Have%20to%20%E2%80%98Talk%20in%20Code%E2%80%99%20or%20Facebook%20Deletes%20Their%20Accounts&t_t=Vaccine-Injured%20Have%20to%20%E2%80%98Talk%20in%20Code%E2%80%99%20or%20Facebook%20Deletes%20Their%20Accounts&s_o=default#version=d0dc4fd9a55aace111a31f671fcf591a

Donate Now

You make the difference.

Latest News

CDC Admits to Botched COVID Response, Announces Overhaul — Critics Say Plan Doesn’t Address ‘Unholy Alliance’ With Pharma

Without Warning, Facebook, Instagram De-Platform Children’s Health Defense Accounts

Kids Born Near Fracking Sites at Much Greater Risk of Developing Leukemia

More News

Latest Views

Depression and ‘Chemical Imbalance’ — Big Pharma Profits From Theory Scientists Say Doesn’t Exist

Vaccine-Injured Have to ‘Talk in Code’ or Facebook Deletes Their Accounts

Kim Iversen: What I Would Have Asked Fauci If I’d Been Allowed to Interview Him

More Views

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/embed/defender-sms-reminders

Get FREE News & Updates!

• Name*
• Email*

Children’s Health Defense^® is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Its mission is to end childhood health epidemics by working aggressively to eliminate harmful exposures, hold those responsible accountable, and to establish safeguards to prevent future harm.

en

Subscribe – It’s Free!

Become a member

Member login

Donations are tax deductible to the full extent of the law. EIN #26-0388604

Children’s Health Defense

•

Legal Disclaimer

•

Terms of Use

•

Privacy Policy

•

Donate

•

Work for CHD

•

Contact

•

Social

•

Sitemap

© 2016 – 2022 Children’s Health Defense^® • All Rights Reserved

Kids Born Near Fracking Sites at Much Greater Risk of Developing Leukemia

Children living near fracking and other « unconventional » drilling operations at birth face significantly higher chances of developing childhood leukemia than those not residing near such activity, according to research published Wednesday in Environmental Health Perspectives.

By 

Kenny Stancil

15

Link copied

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.

Adding further evidence of the negative public health impacts associated with planet-heating fossil fuel pollution, new research published Wednesday found that children living in close proximity to fracking and other so-called “unconventional” drilling operations at birth face significantly higher chances of developing childhood leukemia than those not residing near such activity.

The peer-reviewed study, published in Environmental Health Perspectives, examined the relationship between residential proximity to unconventional oil and gas development and risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the most common form of childhood leukemia.

Researchers compared 405 children ages 2 to 7 who were diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Pennsylvania between 2009 and 2017 to a control group of 2,080 children without leukemia matched on birth year.

They measured the connection between in utero exposure to unconventional oil and gas activity and childhood leukemia diagnoses in two exposure windows: a “primary window” of three months pre-conception to one year prior to diagnosis and a “perinatal window” of pre-conception to birth.

Children with at least one fracking well within 2 kilometers (1.24 miles) of their birth residence during the primary window had 1.98 times the odds of developing acute lymphoblastic leukemia compared with those whose neighborhoods were free from such fossil fuel infrastructure, they found.

Children who lived within 2 kilometers of at least one fracking well during the perinatal window were 2.8 times more likely to develop acute lymphoblastic leukemia compared with their unexposed counterparts.

Accounting for maternal race and socio-economic status reduced the strength of these relationships, but only slightly, with the adjusted odds of developing childhood leukemia 1.74 and 2.35 times higher for those exposed to unconventional oil and gas development during the primary and perinatal windows, respectively.

Download for Free: Robert F. Kennedy’s New Book — ‘A Letter to Liberals’

“Unconventional oil and gas development can both use and release chemicals that have been linked to cancer,” study co-author Nicole Deziel, an associate professor of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health, said in a statement.

Last summer, Physicians for Social Responsibility uncovered internal records revealing that since 2012, fossil fuel corporations have injected potentially carcinogenic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), or chemicals that can degrade into PFAS, into the ground while fracking for oil and gas — after former President Barack Obama’s U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approved their use despite agency scientists’ concerns about toxicity.

The possibility that children living in close proximity to such sites are “exposed to these chemical carcinogens is a major public health concern,” said Deziel.

Roughly 17.3 million people in the United States, including nearly four million children, live within a half-mile radius of active oil and gas production, according to the Oil & Gas Threat Map, a geospatial analysis released in May.

Not only do those people have a greater risk of suffering severe health problems from toxic air pollution, but as the research published Wednesday notes, fracking also contaminates drinking water — creating another pathway of exposure to cancer-linked chemicals.

The new study adds to a growing body of literature documenting the deleterious health and environmental consequences of fracking and other forms of fossil fuel extraction.

Research published earlier this year found that residential proximity to unconventional oil and gas development is correlated with a higher risk of dying early.

More broadly, the World Health Organization warned last year that burning coal, oil and gas is “causing millions of premature deaths every year through air pollutants, costing the global economy billions of dollars annually, and fueling the climate crisis.”

Other recent studies have estimated that slashing energy-related air pollution would prevent more than 50,000 premature deaths and save $608 billion per year in the U.S. alone, while eliminating greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 would save 74 million lives around the globe this century — demonstrating that the “mortality cost of carbon” is astronomical.

Despite this obvious case for rapid decarbonization, President Joe Biden has yet to use his executive authority to cancel nearly two dozen fracked gas export projects that are set to unleash pollution equivalent to roughly 400 new coal-fired power plants.

The researchers behind the paper published Wednesday hope that their findings will be used to improve public policy, including better regulation of “setback distances” — the required minimum distance between a private residence or other sensitive location and fracking wells.

Setback distances are currently being debated across the U.S., with some communities calling for setback distances to be lengthened to more than 305 meters (1,000 feet) or as far as 1,000 meters (3,281 feet), the authors wrote.

In Pennsylvania, where the study was based, the current setback distance is 152 meters (499 feet), up from 61 meters (200 feet) in 2012. Researchers, meanwhile, observed elevated risks of childhood leukemia from fracking activity within a 2,000 meter (6,562 feet) radius.

“Existing setback distances, which may be as little as 150 feet, are insufficiently protective of children’s health,” lead author Cassandra Clark, a postdoctoral associate at the Yale Cancer Center, said in a statement.

“We hope that studies like ours are taken into account in the ongoing policy discussion around UOG setback distances.”

Other critics of fracking have demanded far more extensive federal action, including prohibiting the practice entirely.

As “hundreds of scientific studies and thousands of pages of data have already shown over the last decade,” Food & Water Watch executive director Wenonah Hauter said last year, “fracking is inherently hazardous to the health and safety of people and communities in proximity to it.”

“This says nothing of the dreadful impact fossil fuel extraction and burning is having on our runaway climate crisis,” she added.

“Fracking threatens every person on the planet, directly or indirectly. It should be banned entirely.”

Originally published by Common Dreams.

Environnement

Le GIEC, un organisme pour maintenir les pauvres dans le sous-développement

Par Michel Janva le 17 août 2022 Les commentaires sont fermés

Christian Gérondeau vient de publier un pamphlet contre les mensonges du GIEC, soulignant que la nouvelle religion écologiste empêche le développement des pays pauvres. Autrement dit, en voulant sauver la planète, elle maintient la mortalité des pays les moins développés.

Pour sortir de la pauvreté, les pays en développement ont un besoin vital, comme nous l’avons eu nous-mêmes, d’une énergie abondante. Or l’essentiel de cette énergie ne peut-être que d’origine fossile, contrairement aux affirmations du GIEC. Selon l’auteur, cet organisme ment effrontément. Il l’a fait par exemple lorsqu’il a déclaré en 2011 dans un rapport célèbre, que l’humanité pourrait se passer des énergies fossiles en 2050 et que “près de 80 % des besoins d’énergie de l’humanité pourraient alors être satisfaits par les énergies renouvelables.” Or toutes les projections des institutions officielles montrent que ces dernières ne pourront répondre au mieux à cette date qu’à 10% des besoins et que les énergies fossiles en satisferont toujours près de 80 %.  Il faut dire que l’auteur de ce rapport fondateur n’était autre qu’un écologiste allemand dépourvu de tout diplôme, mais “Coordinateur international de Greenpeace pour les questions climatiques ” et rémunéré par l’industrie photovoltaïque.

Le livre énumère douze mensonges, qui concernent l’évolution de la température terrestre, la montée supposée des eaux, la survie de la faune et de la flore, etc… C’est que les Nations Unies ont été prises en main depuis 30 ans par les représentants des grandes ONG écologistes et tout particulièrement par les verts allemands, animés d’une vision profondément négative et culpabilisatrice de l’Homme.