Utiliser un vaccin pour tuer les « mangeurs inutiles » !-Prrofession gendarme
lettreelectroniqueLaisser un commentaireModifier Utiliser un vaccin pour tuer les « mangeurs inutiles » !-Prrofession gendarme
30 mai 2022 | Catégorie: Actualités, Tribune
Vue(s) :2 020
En 2004, un livre dévoile l’utilisation de vaccins pour tuer les « mangeurs inutiles » préconisée par les Élites Mondialistes !
Final Warning: A History of the New World Order (Dernier avertissement : une histoire du Nouvel Ordre Mondial), ce livre de David Rivera, publié en 2004, traite du gain de fonction et de la recherche de virus pour le dépeuplement (l’élimination des « mangeurs inutiles »).
Le Club de Rome (cercle de réflexion rassemblant scientifiques, décideurs économiques et hauts fonctionnaires) se fit mondialement connaître en préconisant de stabiliser la population et la production à l’échelle mondiale, en d’autres termes, un génocide doit être planifié pour éliminer les personnes qualifiées de « mangeurs inutiles ».
Ce génocide sera réalisé en recourant à des guerres « ciblées » dans les pays avancés, et même une frappe nucléaire limitée à un emplacement stratégique ; ainsi que des famines et des maladies créées dans les pays du tiers monde.
Dans son roman de 1976, « Ceremony of the Innocent », Taylor Caldwell explique clairement la raison d’être de leurs actions : « … il n’y aura pas de paix dans un monde tourmenté, seulement une série programmée et systématique de guerres et de calamités – jusqu’à ce que les comploteurs atteignent leur objectif : une humanité épuisée prêt à se soumettre à une économie marxiste planifiée et à un asservissement total au nom de la paix. »
Ont-ils déjà commencé leurs plans génocidaires ?
En 1969, lors d’une audience sur les crédits parlementaires, l’unité de guerre biologique du ministère de la Défense demanda des fonds pour développer, par épissage génétique, une nouvelle maladie qui résisterait au traitement et détruirait le système immunitaire des victimes. Ils ont reçu 10 millions de dollars, pour produire « un agent biologique de synthèse, un agent qui n’existe pas naturellement et pour lequel aucune immunité naturelle n’aurait pu être acquise ».
Dans le Bulletin de l’Organisation mondiale de la santé (OMS) de l’ONU de 1972, volume 47, page 251, il est dit : « Il faudrait essayer de voir si les virus peuvent en fait exercer des effets sélectifs sur la fonction immunitaire. Il faudrait examiner la possibilité que la réponse immunitaire au virus lui-même peut être altérée si le virus endommage, plus ou moins sélectivement, la cellule répondant au virus.
Des dérivés d’ovins et de bovins ont été couramment utilisés pour fabriquer des vaccins, cependant, certains virus communs à ces animaux peuvent interagir indéfiniment, formant une nouvelle souche de virus mortels appelés rétrovirus.
En 1974, l’Académie nationale des sciences a recommandé que « les scientifiques du monde entier se joignent aux membres de ce comité pour différer volontairement les expériences (liant) les virus animaux ».
Le Dr Robert Strecker, gastro-entérologue praticien, titulaire d’un doctorat. en pharmacologie, qui a été embauché comme consultant pour travailler sur une proposition de soins de santé pour la Security Pacific Bank, a déclaré : « Je ne pense pas qu’il y ait le moindre doute que le SIDA est un problème créé par l’homme. La question est de savoir s’il a été créé accidentellement ou intentionnellement. Je crois que le virus du sida a été programmé, produit et déployé.
La théorie la plus courante sur l’origine du SIDA était qu’il provenait de singes verts en Afrique. Pourtant, plusieurs virologues ont déclaré que le virus du sida n’est présent naturellement chez aucun animal. De plus, il aurait été statistiquement impossible d’atteindre le point où nous en sommes actuellement, à partir d’un seul épisode. Si le virus du SIDA était originaire des singes, alors la maladie aurait fait surface chez les Pygmées, qui sont plus proches d’eux, et les utilisent comme source de nourriture, pourtant, elle est apparue d’abord dans les villes. Une autre preuve préjudiciable vient du fait que le SIDA s’est produit pratiquement simultanément aux États-Unis, en Haïti, au Brésil et en Afrique centrale.
Les recherches de Strecker ont indiqué que le virus du SIDA (nom de code « MKNAOMI ») a été développé par le Frederick Cancer Research Facility de l’Institut national du cancer, en coopération avec l’OMS, dans leurs laboratoires à Fort Detrick, Maryland (qui jusqu’en 1969 faisait partie de l’unité de guerre bactériologique de l’armée américaine, connue sous le nom d’unité des maladies infectieuses de l’armée, ou division des opérations spéciales) ; en combinant le virus de la leucémie bovine (vache) et le virus visna-maëdi (mouton) et en les injectant dans des cultures de tissus humains.
Le virus de la leucémie bovine est mortel pour les vaches, mais pas pour les humains ; et le virus visna est mortel pour les moutons, mais pas pour l’homme. Cependant, lorsqu’ils sont combinés, ils produisent un rétrovirus qui peut modifier la composition génétique des cellules dans lesquelles ils pénètrent.
Il a déclaré : « Si l’on analyse les gènes du virus du sida humain et les gènes du virus de la leucémie bovine du bétail et du virus visna du mouton, et que l’on les compare, les gènes semblent liés. Comment est-il possible que le virus bovin- qui ressemble au SIDA et produit une maladie semblable au SIDA, et qui a produit une pneumonie à pneumocystis carinii chez les chimpanzés en 1972 – n’a pas été analysée et comparée au SIDA … jusqu’en 1987 lorsque Matthew Gonda, publie un article dans le magazine Nature qui décrit un virus qui ressemble au SIDA, appelé virus visna bovin, et a suggéré qu’il était le plus étroitement lié au SIDA et pourrait bien être son précurseur. »
Le 11 août 1988, Ted Strecker, le frère du Dr Strecker, a été retrouvé abattu dans sa maison de Springfield, Missouri. Sa mort a été qualifiée de suicide.
Le 22 septembre 1988, le représentant de l’État de l’Illinois, Douglas Huff, de Chicago, a été retrouvé mort à son domicile. L’autopsie a révélé qu’il était décédé d’un accident vasculaire cérébral à la suite d’une overdose de cocaïne et d’héroïne.
Il se trouve que Douglas Huff était un fervent partisan du travail du Dr Strecker pour faire connaître la dissimulation du sida. Coïncidence ou complot ?
(Note : Il y avait un programme de vaccination contre la variole en Afrique par l’OMS. Certains chercheurs pensent que le programme de vaccination contre la variole de 1972 a été utilisé pour introduire le virus dans la population.)
Le 11 mai 1987, le London Times a publié un article intitulé « Smallpox Vaccine Triggered AIDS Virus », écrit par le rédacteur scientifique Pearce Wright, qui a lié le programme de vaccination de masse de l’Organisation mondiale de la santé dans les années 1970 à l’épidémie de SIDA, car l’Afrique centrale était au centre du programme, et elle est devenue la zone la plus touchée au monde.
A History of the New World Order
PDF GRATUIT ICI
Source :
https://henrymakow.com/2022/05/final-warning.html
https://bouddhanar.blogspot.com/2022/05/en-2004-un-livre-devoile-lutilisation.html
Source : Changera3
Maître Reiner FUELLMICH est formel ! Les Vaccins sont là pour tuer …! (Hd 720)-Profession gendarme-Voir lavidéo sir le site
lettreelectroniqueLaisser un commentaireModifier Maître Reiner FUELLMICH est formel ! Les Vaccins sont là pour tuer …! (Hd 720)-Profession gendarme-Voir lavidéo sir le site
30 mai 2022 | Catégorie: Actualités, Tribune
Cet avocat international est le contraire d’un « farfelu »…Faîtes vos recherches.
Source : Rumble
Jon Rappoport:Of course I support the war heart and soul
lettreelectroniqueLaisser un commentaireModifier Jon Rappoport:Of course I support the war heart and soul
| Of course I support the war heart and soul |
| by Jon Rappoport |
| (To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.) |
| I have six tanks I want to sell.I need a buyer in the Ukraine.With the profits, I can buy a large island in the South Pacific, staff it, and retire there.Now I know there is a great deal of delusionary news surrounding the war.The hotel was hit by a Russian missile.No, it was a Ukrainian weapon.Putin has cancer.No he doesn’t; he’s fine.He’s already handed over control of the government to an assistant.Absurd. He’s very much in charge.The ruble is tanking.No, it recovered. It’s stronger than ever.A negotiated settlement is possible.Will never happen.And so forth and so on.All I know is, I have tanks to sell.The US government can invent the money to buy them and then give them to the Ukraine, or I can sell directly to a Ukrainian buyer.This is the limit of my knowledge and responsibility.I’ve giving 600 men jobs making tanks. That’s another fact I’m sure of.Wars start and stop all the time. I don’t have anything to do with either process. I make tanks.Nobody from Russia wants to buy them. So I look to the Ukraine. I support the Ukraine. Why wouldn’t I? Why wouldn’t the US government? If the US could sell weapons to Russia, it would.Maybe it already is. That’s not my area of expertise.I make tanks and I sell them.My customers are mainly people who can’t afford them. That’s where the donor US government comes in.From each according to his ability to invent money, to each who can buy, no matter how.I’ve found that formula works. That’s all I know.If I were given to speculation, I wouldn’t have the time to make tanks.I notice many people want to outlaw guns, but nobody wants to outlaw tanks.This is good. |
La Voix de Dieu Magazine :Nouveaux Cardinaux : L’homosexualisme est le principal critère de sélection de François
lettreelectroniqueLaisser un commentaireModifier La Voix de Dieu Magazine :Nouveaux Cardinaux : L’homosexualisme est le principal critère de sélection de François
La Voix de Dieu MagazineNouveaux Cardinaux : L’homosexualisme est le principal critère de sélection de François
Les coeurs unis Magazine Mai 30 Nouveaux Cardinaux : L’homosexualisme est le principal critère de sélection de François
| La Voix de Dieu Magazine | tes) |
Parmi les nouveaux cardinaux, 16 ont moins de 80 ans et ont le droit de voter lors d’un conclave. Tous sont d’ardents partisans de François.
Après ce consistoire, François aura nommé 83 des 132 cardinaux votants. 87 votes sont suffisants pour choisir le prochain pape.
Comme il l’a fait précédemment, François a contourné d’importants archidiocèses. Il a nommé l’homosexualiste McElroy de San Diego, un diocèse suffragant de Los Angeles dont l’archevêque José Gomez a été écarté. Au Nigeria, François a choisi l’évêque Okpaleke d’Ekwulobia plutôt que l’archevêque Kaigama d’Abuja, et en Italie, l’évêque Cantoni de Côme plutôt que l’archevêque Delpini de Milan.
François préfère choisir des figures faibles et compromises comme Cantoni et McElroy, qui ne le mettront pas dans l’ombre. McElroy, par exemple, un favori de McCarrick, connaissait les actions de celui-ci. Si les médias étaient honnêtes au sujet des « abus », ils pourraient facilement empêcher McElroy de devenir cardinal.
Sur les sept cardinaux électeurs des États-Unis – le plus grand nombre de l’histoire – cinq sont des homosexualistes : Cupich, Tobin, Farrell, Gregory et maintenant McElroy.
CatholicSat écrit sur Twitter.com qu’un bon nombre de nouveaux cardinaux sont ouvertement favorables aux concubinages homosexuels reconnus par l’Etat. Pour le diacre Nick Donnelly, l’idée maîtresse du pontificat bergoglien est de « sortir le tapis de bienvenue pour les sodomites actifs ».
Le néo-cardinal Leonardo Steiner de Manaus, au Brésil, a autorisé une présentation de 2021 homosexuels dans une paroisse tout en supprimant l’évangélisation des villages indigènes.
Après sept (!) ans, François l’homme du dialogue rencontrera le Collège des Cardinaux après le consistoire d’août, prétendument pour discuter de la Constitution Apostolique Praedicate evangelium.
Why Die for Biden?
lettreelectroniqueLaisser un commentaireModifier Why Die for Biden?
Global Research, March 20, 2022
Mises Wire 15 March 2022
Region: Europe, Russia and FSU, USA
Theme: US NATO War Agenda
In-depth Report: UKRAINE REPORT
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Visit and follow us on Instagram at @globalresearch_crg and Twitter at @crglobalization. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
***
As you would expect from brain-dead Biden and the people controlling him, American policy has been moving in the wrong direction. Whatever you think about the situation in the Ukraine, one thing is obvious. It’s a crisis. Shouldn’t we try to stay out of danger? Instead, the US has led the way in imposing drastic economic sanctions on Russia, backing Putin into the wall. What if he gets desperate and uses atomic weapons? This could result in the end of civilized life on our planet. Is this what Americans want?
The danger isn’t just something I and other critics of American policy have conjured up.
President Vladimir Putin said on Saturday [March 5] that Western sanctions on Russia were akin to a declaration of war and warned that any attempt to impose a no-fly zone in Ukraine would lead to catastrophic consequences for the world. . . “These sanctions that are being imposed are akin to a declaration of war but thank God it has not come to that,” Putin said, speaking to a group of flight attendants at an Aeroflot training centre near Moscow. He said any attempt by another power to impose a no-fly zone in Ukraine would be considered by Russia to be a step into the military conflict.
The neocon warmongers brush this danger aside. They say that “we” have to do something to defend the Ukraine from an unprovoked Russian attack. But this totally distorts what is happening there. The Ukrainian government started things by moving against Donbass, a territory that declared independence and is allied with Russia. According to the Ukrainian government, the Ukrainians can secede from Russia but people can’t secede from the Ukraine. As Rick Rozoff pointed out in an article on February 2,
Two-thirds of Ukrainian army servicemen have been amassed along the Donbas contact line, Eduard Basurin, spokesman for the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) militia, said on Thursday.
“Another three brigades are on their way [to Donbas], which is 20,000 to 25,000 troops more. The total number will reach 150,000, not to mention the nationalists. This is about two-thirds of the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ personnel,” Basurin said on the Rossiya 1 television channel (VGTRK) on Thursday.
The Ukrainian troops are stationed along the 320-kilometer front line, he said…. The situation in Donbass has reached a critical mark in the past week due to Ukraine’s aggressive actions, Donetsk People’s Republic representative at the Minsk talks, DPR Foreign Minister Natalia Nikonorova said on Thursday.
Why Putin Took Military Action
But the provocative actions against Russia go much further back. Vasko Kohlmayer gives an excellent account of these and highlights the danger of nuclear war that reckless American policy has caused:
The war drums are, of course, beating for US involvement in the Ukrainian conflict.
“Declare a NoFlyZone over Ukraine,” tweeted Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.).
Lindsey Graham, a powerful US Senator, went so far as to publicly advocate the assassination of the Russian head of state. Tweeted he:
Is there a Brutus in Russia? Is there a more successful Colonel Stauffenberg in the Russian military? The only way this ends is for somebody in Russia to take this guy out. You would be doing your country—and the world—a great service.
Such brazen incitement to murder by a highly positioned US official could be construed as a war act by the other side.
Watching the mounting hysteria, we can be certain that the beating of the war drums is going to become only louder in the days ahead…. Before the situation escalates into a nuclear Armageddon, ordinary people would do well to ask themselves whether we have any dog in this fight.
And if we do, what is the size of this dog? Is it big enough to run the risk of nuclear annihilation?
Until last week, most Americans knew almost nothing about Ukraine. If you asked them what is its capital or major river, you would get no response…. What triggered Putin was the globalists’ push to expand NATO to Russia’s doorstep in Ukraine. The globalists wanted to make it part of their New World Order which they use to prettily enrich themselves.
Joe Biden’s family has been at it for years already. They pulled millions from that land through the President’s son Hunter in one of the most brazen and shameless schemes of influence peddling in American history…. If Trudeau, Biden and their friends want us to go to war with Russia, they must explain to common people how exactly it is in their vital interest that Ukraine join NATO.
Until they give us a good reason, we should say NO to the war in Ukraine.
The Russians have made it amply clear what they want. They want a neutral Ukraine that is free of NATO. This is a reasonable demand. To start World War III over this would be an act of most regrettable foolishness.
Is there anything we can do to deescalate the situation? The greatest congressman in American history, Dr. Ron Paul, has the answer. American should end its encirclement of Russia and disband NATO. Let’s look at his vital message to us:
When the Bush Administration announced in 2008 that Ukraine and Georgia would be eligible for NATO membership, I knew it was a terrible idea. Nearly two decades after the end of both the Warsaw Pact and the Cold War, expanding NATO made no sense. NATO itself made no sense.
Explaining my “no” vote on a bill to endorse the expansion, I said at the time:
NATO is an organization whose purpose ended with the end of its Warsaw Pact adversary…. This current round of NATO expansion is a political reward to governments in Georgia and Ukraine that came to power as a result of US-supported revolutions, the so-called Orange Revolution and Rose Revolution.
Providing US military guarantees to Ukraine and Georgia can only further strain our military. This NATO expansion may well involve the US military in conflicts unrelated to our national interest …
Unfortunately, as we have seen this past week, my fears have come true. One does not need to approve of Russia’s military actions to analyze its stated motivation: NATO membership for Ukraine was a red line it was not willing to see crossed. As we find ourselves at risk of a terrible escalation, we should remind ourselves that it didn’t have to happen this way. There was no advantage to the United States to expand and threaten to expand NATO to Russia’s doorstep. There is no way to argue that we are any safer for it.
NATO itself was a huge mistake…. I believe as strongly today as I did back in my 2008 House Floor speech that, “NATO should be disbanded, not expanded.” In the meantime, expansion should be off the table. The risks do not outweigh the benefits!
The same people who imposed covid tyranny on us now want us to risk war with Russia. Let’s stop them before it’s too late.
Western Civilization at a Crossroads: Mythical Hegemony or Win-Win Paradigm?
lettreelectroniqueLaisser un commentaireModifier Western Civilization at a Crossroads: Mythical Hegemony or Win-Win Paradigm?
Western Civilization at a Crossroads: Mythical Hegemony or Win-Win Paradigm?
By Matthew Ehret-Kump and Edward Lozansky
Global Research, May 29, 2022
Theme: History
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Visit and follow us on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
***
As the world is moving slowly but surely to the edge of the abyss, there is a parallel crisis going within the nations that claim to exemplify the best of “western values” while undermining and violating them at every point.
Of course, the West blames all the problems of the world on the East, particularly Russia and China but there are some “dissident” voices that need to be heard at least for the sake of those who are interested in searching for ideas that might avoid Armageddon.
Rudyard Kipling once wrote:
“East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet, Till Earth and Sky stand presently at God’s great Judgment Seat.”
In his poem, Kipling was expressing his belief that cultures of the East and West were so intrinsically different that any hope for harmony or mutual interest was little more than a delusion.
How could such a worldview possibly mesh with the cultures of Orthodox Russia, Confucian China, or the Islamic world? To the degree that those cultures maintained their ancient traditions and values, it obviously could not, as only total submission to a hegemon could resolve the conflict.
However, instead of looking to those modern heirs of Kipling’s vision based in Washington D.C. as the role models for ‘western civilization’, it would be much more appropriate to look instead to the much more dignified example of the founding fathers of America. Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, John Jay and John Quincy Adams were men who believed in peaceful conflict resolutions, promoted diplomacy over war, and sought solutions based in mutual self-interest for all parties.
Those were also the days when Russia helped the newborn nation to withstand the pressure of the colonial British Empire. This spirit of friendship was rekindled when Russia saved the union during the Civil War, and again as both nations fought to put down fascism in WW2.
The 1991 collapse of the USSR presented a unique chance for America to return the favor and exercise a geostrategic vision by sharing its best accomplishments in a win-win paradigm.
Russia and even the USSR under the late Gorbachev time frame were ready for the full integration with the West but instead, she was hollowed out under the dark age of looting overseen by the administration of Bill Clinton and IMF-imposed regime. They ensured that Russia’s industries were crushed, new oligarchs were built up on the riches of privatized state assets, which lead to the 1998 default of its economy.
At the same time, instead of dissolving itself as the Warsaw military block did, NATO continued its “drang nach Osten” with a broader ‘full spectrum dominance’ agenda encircling Russia with a missile shield that countless experts have warned can be made offensive in short notice.
At the same time another most visible destruction took place in Ukraine which today has become the sparkplug for a potential thermonuclear WW3.
This country that enjoyed one of the highest per capita economies of Europe in 1990 could have prospered by choosing neutral military status, while taking the best that the West and East could offer. Instead the West decided to turn it into anti-Russia strategic beachhead.
As a result, the Ukrainian economy has been devastated. It has lost its once powerful rocket/aviation/space/automotive industries, and is now ranked among the poorest in Europe and most corrupt states on Earth.
Along with the destruction of industry came the collapse of the population that has fallen from 52 million in 1990 to 37 million today. Outraged by the continuing resistance of the Ukrainian people to join NATO, the West orchestrated the 2014 regime change coup that resulted in the current military collision with Russia.
At the beginning of this war, it looked like Kyiv was ready to reach a compromise with Moscow, but Washington said NO. Instead, the USA, and NATO countries pour billions of dollars and huge numbers of the most sophisticated weapons to Ukraine urging it to continue the fighting that now threatens all of humankind with a nuclear catastrophe.
These are the gifts of the ugly counterfeit of ‘western values’ which proclaimed its absolute victory in the Cold War as ‘an end of history’. Then-senator Joe Biden in his 1992 ‘How I learned to love the New World Order’ embodied this arrogant paradigm stating: “Having contained Soviet Communism until it dissolved, we need a new strategy of ‘containment’ based, like NATO, on collective action”.
These champions of western values don’t mind Ukraine’s glorification of WW2 Nazi collaborators and modern day neo-Nazis. They pretend not to notice the elimination of Ukrainian political opposition parties, nor the destruction of the free media. These pretenders of western values even look the other way when the water supplies are cut off to the people of Crimea.
Back in 2015, the US Congress banned the Pentagon from training and equipping the Azov Battalion. Congressional representatives called it a “disgusting Nazi formation”. Now its members are presented as valiant heroes, the “defenders of Mariupol”.
This and the horrifying results of the western wars in the Middle East with hundreds of thousand killed, millions wounded, and tens of millions war refuges prove that those who keep speaking about western values, are like Kipling, merely Utopians ideologically committed to an age of total world’s domination under a modern remix of ‘the white man’s burden’.
This ideology underlies the downfall of every major empire throughout history, as it is only capable of destroying the diversity, and creative vitality so necessary for humanity to thrive and progress. It is a culture of dark ages, war and ignorance and it is everything that those leading figures of the renaissance and American Revolution sought to extinguish forever from the face of the Earth.
When the very thing which both Reagan and Gorbachev ruled out now presses ominously upon our future, it is worth asking if the West has lost the moral fitness to survive, or is there the power to restore the true heritage of 1776 with a look towards cooperating with nations of Eurasia before we light the world on fire?
What Does 5G Sound Like? Expert Investigation
lettreelectroniqueLaisser un commentaireModifier What Does 5G Sound Like? Expert Investigation
By Matt Cossey
Global Research, May 29, 2022
Biome Living 3 March 2022
Region: Oceania
Theme: Science and Medicine
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Visit and follow us on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
***
5G is now installed and switched on across millions of sites all over the world and so my testing has begun. Many are wondering: what does 5G sound like?
Today I’ll share with you the radiation levels plus the eerie sound of 5G radiation coming off the transmitters.
The radiation from 5G (RF/microwaves) is an invisible environmental pollutant, beyond our awareness.
My goal – using specialized equipment, is to reveal both what 5G beam forming radiation sounds like and how much radiation I’m being exposed to 600 meters away from the 5G transmitters.
Location of tested 5G installation
The 5G site tested was in Kings Cross, Sydney and goes by RFNSA ID number 2011007. I set up 615 meters away from the 5G transmitters with an unobstructed view of the entire installation.
The testing equipment used was some of the best available in the world. The Gigahertz Solutions HFW59D + HP33 filter and directional antenna to measure only the 5G radiation at a frequency of 3.5 GHz.
5G Dangers, 5th Generation Wireless Technology. Health and Environmental Impacts
High radiation levels 600m (2,000ft) away
A maximum power density of 12,600 uW/m2 (crest factor applied) was detected from 615 meters away (2,018 ft) – that’s 12 times the IBN extreme level. This is also from the 5G transmitters alone, not including 3/4G which is also present at the site.
This is a concern, especially since almost no one is using 5G phones (when I conducted this test in December 2019). Meaning that the radiation from 5G transmitters is likely to power up even more as people start using 5G enabled devices.
Radiation level as compared to IBN guidelines from Germany
5G is dramatically increasing exposures
Since the early 1900s, our exposure to non-native EMFs has been creeping up slowly. However, it’s only been in the last 25 years or so that our exposures have exploded beyond belief.
This is thanks mainly due to the increased cell tower density (demand for high bandwidth data on mobile devices) and the wireless technology we’re bringing into our homes (Wi-Fi, cell phones etc).
However, in early 2019 as 5G was being installed around the globe, most people were very unaware of something of great significance. A major escalation of our exposure to radio frequency / microwave radiation – specifically from 5G.
A small study I conducted proved that once 5G was installed at cellular base station sites – there was almost always a significant increase in radiation.
From the graph below, you can very easily see the radiation levels before and after 5G was installed.
Those affected most will not only be those living in direct line of sight to a cell tower. It’s going to impact all of us when just simply driving around.
When driving (or walking around for that matter) you’re getting significant exposures as you pass the 4 / 5G transmitters. Which are now basically everywhere.
Often, 5G (and 4G) transmitters are placed hanging off highway signage, rooftops, cell tower structures – even inside tunnels and right above their entrance / exits.
What does 5G sound like?
During my investigation I also managed to capture the sound of 5G which is something else! It has no resemblance to the smooth high pitch sound of 3 / 4G transmitters. It’s highly erratic and almost sounds like static electricity.
One can only imagine what kind of biological harm this kind of field has. Just listening to its erratic sound speaks for itself – listen below!Audio Player
00:00
00:00
Use Up/Down Arrow keys to increase or decrease volume.
Sound of 5G coming off the transmitters
I’ve been getting a lot of people experiencing symptoms, not only from 5G but from all 4 EMFs of concern in general. Very common is headaches, ringing in the ears or feeling a vibration in the head.
This has me concerned… It would be interesting to hear what others are feeling around 5G towers, especially those suffering from electro-hypersensitivity (EHS).
Remember to keep your distance and limit exposure!
Rand Paul: ‘Elitists want a One World Government; It’s not a conspiracy theory’
lettreelectroniqueLaisser un commentaireModifier Rand Paul: ‘Elitists want a One World Government; It’s not a conspiracy theory’
“It’s in their mission statement; This is everybody’s worst nightmare.”
By Steve Watson
Global Research, May 30, 2022
Summit News 27 May 2022
Theme: Intelligence
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Visit and follow us on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
***
Senator Rand Paul appeared on Fox News Thursday and discussed the ongoing World Economic Forum gathering in Davos Switzerland, remarking that it is not a conspiracy theory to suggest the organisation is seeking a one world government, rather it is “in their mission statement.”
Paul urged that
“The real danger here that’s even more dangerous than all their phony caring about carbon footprint, the real danger is this; look how bad your government is in a country where you get to vote for these people.”
Video: Monopoly — Who Owns the World?
“This would be a government, a world government where you don’t get to vote on anybody. This is everybody’s worst nightmare,” Paul asserted, referring to the ‘penetration’ of the WEF, to quote its head Klaus Schwab, into national governments.
“The bureaucracy that we have trouble in our United States because we don’t get to vote on them, we vote indirectly,” Paul said, adding “Can you imagine the one-world bureaucracy of all these elitists and their private jets that would rule our country and we wouldn’t get to vote?”
The Senator continued,
“So I’m dead set against this and they used to call people that talked about one-world government used to say it’s a conspiracy. We would always say no, it’s in their mission statement.”
“They say it at every meeting. That’s what they’re for,” Paul proclaimed, adding “lack of sovereignty means lack of freedom, it means lack of responsiveness and it’s completely antithetical to everything our country stands for.”
Watch video by clicking the image below.
*
Retired US General Calls for “Coalition of the Willing” for Naval Conflict with Russia
lettreelectroniqueLaisser un commentaireModifier Retired US General Calls for “Coalition of the Willing” for Naval Conflict with Russia
By Andre Damon
Global Research, May 30, 2022
WSWS 25 May 2022
Region: Russia and FSU, USA
Theme: Intelligence, US NATO War Agenda
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Visit and follow us on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
***
The governments of the United States, the United Kingdom and other NATO members are preparing a major new stage of the US-NATO war against Russia by using their warships to break the Russian blockade of Ukrainian ports, creating the conditions for a direct shooting war between NATO and Russian naval forces.
This massive escalation by the US and NATO is being billed as a “coalition of the willing,” echoing the words used by the Bush administration to describe the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
Retired four-star General Jack Keane, chairman of the Institute for the Study of War and chairman of AM General, the maker of the Humvee military vehicle, called on Wednesday for the creation of an “international coalition of warships led by the United States” to secure control over the Black Sea.
General Jack Keane calls for a “coalition of the willing”
“We… go to the port of Odessa and let the ships… pick up the grain that needs to be picked up and escort them out,” Keane told Fox News.
“The other risk is the Russian Navy is there. They could see this as a provocation, and we could have a prospective confrontation.”
He said it was “well within the risk profile to get this done.”
Keane developed the comments of Admiral James Stavridis, who earlier this month said that the Black Sea would be “the next major front in the Ukraine war.”
Responding to an earlier version of Keane’s remarks, the Wall Street Journalpublished an editorial entitled “Breaking Russia’s Ukrainian Grain Blockade.” It declared, “A Black Sea mission to escort commercial ships may be needed to prevent a global food shortage.”
The Journal enthusiastically agreed with Keane’s proposal and wrote:
The mission would be to form an international coalition of warships to escort commercial vessels safely out of Odessa and the Black Sea. This would work as a coalition of the willing, and not a North Atlantic Treaty Organization project that would let Mr. Putin claim it is another NATO provocation.
The Journal continued:
There are military risks… Some critics will claim an escort mission would be too risky as a naval version of a “no-fly zone.” But it is much different… No military engagement would be needed if Russia doesn’t interfere.
Technically, this could be said about any military conflict. If the opposing army simply lays down its arms, no fighting will be necessary.
Of course, despite the optimistic assurances of Keane about the “risk profile,” the idea that Russia would simply stand by while US and UK ships break its blockade is highly unlikely.
In almost any conceivable scenario, this operation could rapidly turn into a major naval battle, just like “no-fly zone” is a synonym for open and direct war between Russia and NATO.
Not even bothering to hide its cynicism, the Journal made clear that this major escalation would be “best planned and pitched as a humanitarian operation.” That is, a direct shooting war between the two largest nuclear powers would be “pitched” as a way to end world hunger.
The language of Keane and the Wall Street Journal dovetails perfectly with the rhetoric of US officials and those of its imperialist allies.
Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on Tuesday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen accused Russia of bombing Ukrainian food infrastructure and “hoarding its own food exports as a form of blackmail.” She said, “holding back supplies to increase global prices, or trading wheat in exchange for political support. This is using hunger and grain to wield power.”
Secretary of State Antony Blinken accused Russia of carrying out “a deliberate effort” to undermine global food supplies.
Blinken stated,
“[T]he Russian military has repeatedly blocked safe passage to and from Ukraine by closing the Kerch Strait, tightening its control over the Sea of Azov, stationing warships off Ukrainian ports. And Russia has struck Ukrainian ports multiple times.”
He added,
“The food supply for millions of Ukrainians—and millions more around the world—has quite literally been held hostage by the Russian military.”
Earlier this week, US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin announced that the US would provide Ukraine with Harpoon anti-ship missiles via an intermediary, Denmark. The Harpoon is the standard anti-ship armament of the US Navy, capable of sinking large warships.
On Friday, Ukrainian Ministry of Internal Affairs adviser Anton Gerashchenko tweeted that
“The US is preparing a plan to destroy the [Russian] Black Sea Fleet” as part of a “plan to unblock the ports.” He continued, “Deliveries of powerful anti-ship weapons (Harpoon and Naval Strike Missile with a range of 250–300 km) are being discussed.”
Last month, the United States provided intelligence to Ukraine that allowed it to attack and sink the Russian missile cruiser Moskva, the flagship of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet.
The first countries to officially endorse the NATO-led naval operation in the Black Sea were Lithuania and the United Kingdom. On Monday, Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis called for a plan to break the blockade, declaring, “We would need a coalition of the willing—countries with significant naval power to protect the shipping lanes and countries that are affected by this.”
The Guardian reported that UK Foreign Secretary Liz Truss agreed with the proposal, including “demining the harbour and providing Ukraine with longer-range weapons to defend the harbour from Russian attack.”
The plans now being discussed would mark a significant new escalation of the war, raising the prospect of NATO and Russian warships firing on each other, the potential invocation of NATO Article 5 and the abandonment of all restraints on the conflict, with catastrophic consequences for all humanity.
Argentine Minister: ‘We can’t be sure there aren’t nuclear weapons in the Falklands.’
lettreelectroniqueLaisser un commentaireModifier Argentine Minister: ‘We can’t be sure there aren’t nuclear weapons in the Falklands.’
By Matt Kennard
Global Research, May 30, 2022
Declassified UK 26 May 2022
Region: Europe, Latin America & Caribbean
Theme: History, Intelligence
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Visit and follow us on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
***
On the 40th anniversary of the Falklands War, Declassified sits down with Argentina’s minister responsible for the disputed islands at his office inside the Foreign Ministry in Buenos Aires.
“Let me be very clear,” Guillermo Carmona says, pointing at a map of the South Atlantic sea hanging on his wall. “Las Malvinas, Sandwich and Georgia islands…these are Argentinian, they are occupied by a foreign power.”
The foreign power he is talking about is Britain.
Carmona, Argentina’s minister responsible for the South Atlantic, is talking from his office at the top of the Foreign Ministry in Buenos Aires. The floor-to-ceiling windows give panoramic views of the attractive city dubbed the Paris of South America.
The offices are a stone’s throw from the Casa Rosada (Pink House), the palatial presidential mansion from which Eva “Evita” Peron famously spoke from the balcony.
Carmona is speaking exclusively to Declassified as Argentina and Britain mark the 40th anniversary of the war over the Falklands in 1982 (in Argentina the islands are called “las Malvinas”).
“We don’t say that they will be Argentine someday,” he continues. “Ever since Argentina existed as an independent state, these territories were always claimed as Argentina.”
A map of British Overseas Territories in the South Atlantic claimed by Argentina. (Photo: UK government)
Nuclear weapons
Carmona found out about Declassified after we discovered a document at the National Archives in January showing that the UK had deployed 31 nuclear weapons to the South Atlantic during the 1982 war.
In the aftermath, the Argentine Foreign Ministry released a statement saying it was planning “to raise this situation before the relevant international organisations”.
“Your publication about the nuclear weapons in the Malvinas war was very important for us,” Carmona tells me. “The files are not recent, they were published during the Macri days, and it’s remarkable how the diplomats in London did not take note of the declassification.”
Mauricio Macri, a right-wing businessman, was president from 2015-19 and oversaw an improvement in relations with Britain (Carmona contends this is mainly because he eased Argentine opposition to UK sovereignty in the South Atlantic).
Carmona adds that Declassified’s discovery was “very serious, it confirmed what we have known since 2003” when the UK Ministry of Defence first admitted it had brought nuclear weapons to the 1982 war.
“But from Declassified we learnt of the amazing number of weapons that were brought,” he says. “This confirms how untransparent and lacking in good faith UK actions after the war were.”
Argentine Minister ‘Was Pissed’ When He Agreed Controversial Falklands Deal with UK
Carmona continues:
“It also shows the lack of transparency currently. We can’t be sure that there are no nuclear weapons in the Malvinas now. The UK hasn’t been transparent.” He pauses.
“If something like that happened during the war how can we assume it didn’t happen after the war, especially considering the militarisation process, which is ongoing?”
Strategy
Forty years on from the Falklands war, the UK still refuses to negotiate with Argentina as it is obliged to do by the UN. In the face of this intransigence on the British side, how does Carmona hope to make a breakthrough on the issue?
Carmona tells me there are four planks to his strategy.
“The first is persisting with the claim of sovereignty with the UK. The second is to keep gathering international support. We are not only protected by international law and history, but also almost all countries worldwide stand by Argentina in its claim for abiding by international law.”
He adds:
“Thirdly Argentina, in areas that are not under dispute with the UK, needs to effectively exercise sovereignty. For example, in our sea, we are fighting illegal fishing with policies for the preservation of maritime environments, developing hydrocarbon and mining resources in a sustainable way, and strengthening our Antarctic logistics. That is showing that we care for what belongs to us.”
The first three strategies rely on Argentina. But, Carmona says, the last one doesn’t.
“That is to make the most of any opportunities the international scenario can provide. I always use two examples in this respect. Panama did those three things I mentioned persistently, and when there was an opening, a window of opening with Carter, it was ready to take the opportunity.”
In 1977, President Jimmy Carter signed the Panama Canal Treaty, which ceded US control of the canal beginning in 2000 and guaranteed the neutrality of the waterway thereafter.
Carmona continues:
“Something similar is what happened with China with Hong Kong, which persisted in showing it exercises sovereignty, garnered international support and… the end of the Cold War was the window and opportunity which they grabbed.”
Carmona takes time to think through his methodical answers. He comes across as an unusually serious politician, well drilled on the minutiae of his brief and not prone to grandstanding.
Penguins on the Falkland Islands. (Photo: Creative Commons)
‘Second class citizens’
The population living on the Falklands voted overwhelmingly to remain part of the UK in 2013. How would Carmona assure them that Argentinian rule would protect them?
“We have to bear in mind that the islanders, the people living on the islands, have been very badly treated by UK governments for a long time,” he says. “As sort of second-class citizens, and this is very clear when you analyse the history of the families living on the islands since the occupation in 1833 [the year the islands were formally annexed by Britain].”
But, Carmona says, this poor treatment continues up to the present.
“The UK government did nothing about those who were locked down on the islands during the pandemic. There are residents especially of Chilean origin who for the last two years haven’t been able to go back to where they are from, because the UK lacked the commitment to finding a solution.”
Carmona adds that
“Argentina is committed to respect the interests of the people on the Islands…any islander born on the islands will be considered an Argentine citizen.”
The British position, however, is clear: “The people of the Falklands are British and have chosen to be so. They have the right to self-determination as set out in the UN Charter.”
But Carmona says “within the UN scope this self determination right is not applicable because there is a pre-existing colonial situation.”
He adds:
“We should not lose track of the fact that the population in the islands, though its composition has changed in time, were planted in Malvinas in 1833 after a military invasion, which displaced the Argentine authorities and also displaced the inhabitants.”
“That’s why when we look at the inhabitants’ issue in Malvinas it is sort of similar with the Chagos case where the original population was displaced by a military UK action,” he adds.
The UK forcibly depopulated the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean in the 1960s, in order to establish a military base there.
‘Totally anachronistic’
Carmona concludes:
“I am absolutely sure that if we moved on in the negotiations over sovereignty the islanders would have a better life.” But he admits “it is pretty clear the UK is reluctant to go back to the negotiating table.”
According to Carmona
“there was a period of time from 1965 to 1982 when there were negotiations, there was dialogue and talks. This was a fruitful period of time in the relationship between both countries.”
Shortly before the 1982 war, the UK had announced that negotiations would be frozen for a ten year period.
“It’s been 40 years since then, not ten as they announced,” Carmona tells me. “So we believe it’s about time to go back to talking, to honour the UN General Assembly resolutions.”
“The UK’s reluctance stems from them comparing the Argentine democratic governments with the military regimes,” he adds. “Next year will be 40 years of democracy in Argentina. We believe Argentina deserves different treatment by the UK government.”
I finish by asking if Carmona has a message to the British people. He gives a wry smile then says,
“Colonisation was typical of the days of the British Empire, but now it’s totally anachronistic. Maintaining that anachronism has costs for the reputation of the UK government and the UK in general. It also has costs for British taxpayers.”
He pauses before continuing:
“In the 21st century, our expectation is to do away with these colonial situations, which were typical of a world defined by the empire. Global Britain, as proposed by the Conservative UK government, moves us all back in time.”
Créez un site Web ou un blog gratuitement sur WordPress.com.
naufrage/sauvetage 